Abstract
Proficiency testing on calibration by comparison of platinum resistance thermometers (PRTs) among several calibration laboratories in Korea was conducted. The challenges faced in organizing this proficiency testing were the required wide temperature range (from − 196 °C to 650 °C) and the large number of participants (43). Maintaining the stability of the test items was key to achieving the goal of proficiency testing because the uncertainty of the reference value should be considerably smaller than the uncertainty of the participants’ calibration. For the proficiency testing, four PRTs that meet the criteria specified in the International Temperature Scale of 1990 were used as test items and were circulated among the four groups into which the participants had been divided. The PRTs were calibrated at fixed points between the triple point of argon (− 189.3442 °C) and the freezing point of aluminum (660.323 °C) before and after circulation to the participants, and the PRTs where checked for stability at the mid-point of the circulation. It was possible to maintain the expanded uncertainty of the reference value to less than 18 mK, for which the instability of the test items was a dominant factor. It was found that among the 322 calibration points, 35 calibration points (11%) resulted in normalized error (|En|) > 1. The number of participants who had at least one calibration point with |En|> 1 was 15 (35%).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ISO/IEC 17025, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. (International Standard Organization, Geneva, 2017).
ISO/IEC 17043, Conformity Assessment – General Requirement for Proficiency Testing. (International Standard Organization, Geneva, 2010).
S. Bruce, G.F. Strouse, Int. J. Thermophys. 30, 351 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0436-7
CIPM MRA-D-04, Calibration and measurement capabilities in the context of the CIPM MRA (International Bureau of Weights and Measures, 2017). https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/CIPM-MRA/CIPM-MRA-D-04.pdf. Accessed 9 Februrary 2021.
N.M. Ali, H. Othman, M.-K. Ho et al., Metrologia 54, 03001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/54/1A/03001
B. Constantin, Metrologia 56, 03003 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/56/1A/03003
E.K. Ejigu, S. Hicham, S. Agbesinyale, J. Bado, Metrologia 57, 03008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/03008
H. Preston-Thomas, Metrologia 27, 3 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/27/1/002
JCGM 100:2008, Evaluation of measurement data: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. (Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008). https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2021.
I. Yang, K.S. Suherlan, Y.-G. Gam, Y.-G. Kim, Meas. Sci. Technol. 26, 035104 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/3/035104
Funding
This work was supported by the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science under the project ‘Establishment of National Physical Measurement Standards and Improvement of Calibration/Measurement Capability’ (grant number 19011040).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, I., Lee, Y.H. Large-Group Proficiency Testing on Calibration of Platinum Resistance Thermometers from − 196 °C to 650 °C. Int J Thermophys 42, 59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-021-02817-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-021-02817-w