Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automatic handover execution technique using machine learning algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrating LTE sub-6 GHz and millimeter wave (mmWave) bands brings great benefit in increasing communication bandwidth, reliability, and better coverage of future smart intelligent network and its applications. However, finding the right mmWave remote radio units (RRUs) is challenging due to coverage blindness of directional beams. Further, the mmWave network depends on edge cloud deployment for satisfying low latency requirement of future smart applications. Along with, reducing energy consumption for handover execution is important due to the battery constraint of IoT (Internet of Things) device. Thus, it is important to reduce the signaling overhead of the handover process. First, this paper presents an efficient handover mechanism between LTE and mmWave; second present automatic handover execution mechanism between LTE and mmWave using a machine learning algorithm. Third presented improved XGBoost classification algorithm for predicting handover success rate using channel information collected through sampling window. Lastly, showed combining machine learning prediction model with standard handover execution model reduces signaling overhead and improves the handover success rate. The experiment is conducted by varying IoT device the result achieved shows XGBoost-based handover execution model achieves much superior performance than existing KNN-based handover execution algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nishimoto H, Kawahara Y, Asami T (2010) Prototype implementation of ambient RF energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. In: Proc. IEEE sensors, Nov. 2010, pp 1282–1287

  2. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poczter SL, Jankovic LM (2013) The google car: driving toward a better future? J Bus Case Stud 10(1):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hobert L, Festag A, Llatser I, Altomare L, Visintainer F, Kovacs A (2015) Enhancements of v2x communication in support of cooperative autonomous driving. IEEE Commun Mag 53(12):64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S, Xu H, Liu D, Hu B, Wang H (2014) A vision of IoT: applications, challenges, and opportunities with china perspective. IEEE Internet Things J 1(4):349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Minerva R, Biru A, Rotondi D (2015) Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT). IEEE Internet Initiat (Torino, Italy)

  7. Cisco (2017) Cisco Visual Networking Index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016–2021, White Paper

  8. Iwamura M (2015) NGMN view on 5G architecture. In: IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring)

  9. Boccardi F, Heath RW, Lozano A, Marzetta TL, Popovski P (2014) Five disruptive technology directions for 5G. IEEE Commun Mag 52(2):74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Polese M, Jana R, Kounev V, Zhang K, Deb S, Zorzi M (2019) Exploiting spatial correlation for improved prediction in 5G cellular networks. In: Information theory and applications workshop (ITA)

  11. Rangan S, Rappaport TS, Erkip E (2014) Millimeter-wave cellular wireless networks: potentials and challenges. Proc IEEE 102(3):366–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chinchali S, Hu P, Chu T, Sharma M, Bansal M, Misra R, Pavone M, Sachin K (2018) Cellular network traffic scheduling with deep reinforcement learning. In: National conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI)

  13. Li R, Zhao Z, Zhou X, Ding G, Chen Y, Wang Z, Zhang H (2017) Intelligent 5G: when cellular networks meet artificial intelligence. IEEE Wirel Commun 24(5):175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. He Y, Yu FR, Zhao N, Yin H, Yao H, Qiu RC (2016) Big data analytics in mobile cellular networks. IEEE Access 4:1985–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubler S, Robert J, Derigent W, Voisin A, Le Traon Y (2016) A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications. Expert Syst Appl 65:398–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk M, Akram M, Hussain S, Imran MA (2019) Novel QoS-aware proactive spectrum access techniques for cognitive radio using machine learning. IEEE Access 7:70811–70827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu A, Guo S, Liu B, Ma M, Yao J, Su X (2019) Adaptive Multiservice Heterogeneous Network Selection Scheme in Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Internet Things J 6(4):6862–6875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Q, Han T, Ansari N (2019) Energy-efficient on-demand resource provisioning in cloud radio access networks. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw

  19. Roy A, Borkar VS, Chaporkar P, Karandikar A (2019) Low complexity online radio access technology selection algorithm in LTE-WiFi HetNet. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput

  20. Ali J, Ahmad R, Maqsood T, Rodrigues J, Haq N, Sarwar S, Iqbal T (2018) Madani S (2018) Network selection in heterogeneous access networks simultaneously satisfying user profile and QoS. Int J Commun Syst 31:e3730. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen J, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang E (2018) QoE-Aware intelligent vertical handoff scheme over heterogeneous wireless access networks. IEEE Access 6:38285–38293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang G, Yu H (2018) Network selection algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks based on service characteristics and user preferences. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1264-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yan L et al (2019) Machine learning-based handovers for sub-6 GHz and mmWave integrated vehicular networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 18(10):4873–4885. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2019.2930193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma B, Guo W, Zhang J (2020) A survey of online data-driven proactive 5G network optimisation using machine learning. IEEE Access 8:35606–35637. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baccelli F, Blaszczyszyn B (2009) Stochastic geometry and wireless networks, vol I—theory. NoW Publishers

  26. 3GPP (2011) Evolved universal terrestrial radio access; LTE Positioning Protocol, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, TS 36.355

  27. 3GPP (2016) Evolved universal terrestrial radio access; radio resource control, 3rd Generation Partnership Project, TS 36.331

  28. Sun S, MacCartney GR, Rappaport TS (2016) Millimeter-wave distance-dependent large-scale propagation measurements and path loss models for outdoor and indoor 5G systems

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nishatbanu Nayakwadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nayakwadi, N., Fatima, R. Automatic handover execution technique using machine learning algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 13, 1431–1439 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00627-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-021-00627-9

Keywords

Navigation