Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of harvesting intensity on tree taxonomic diversity, structural diversity, population structure, and stability in a West African mangrove forest

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wetlands Ecology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the impacts of wood harvesting intensity on the diversity and structure of ecosystems such as mangroves is essential for defining actions for their sustainable management. We compared tree taxonomic diversity, structural diversity and dominance patterns, density, growth characteristics, size class distribution-SCD and stand stability in West African mangroves subject to low vs. high wood harvesting intensity. Data on tree species identity, total height, diameter (dbh), and conditions (logged, topped or pruned) were collected from ten mangrove sites per harvesting intensity. We found seven species of which two true mangroves species (Rhizophora racemosa and Avicennia germinans) that were dominant across all sites. As expected, there were significantly 3–4, 3–7, and 2–4 times more logged, topped and pruned trees respectively in high-harvesting sites than in low-harvesting sites. Taxonomic diversity was less affected than structural diversity (dbh and height-based diversity metrics). Tree density was significantly 1.3–5 times higher in low-harvesting sites than in high-harvesting sites for the whole stand and each of the dominant species. Total regeneration density was also low in high-harvesting sites. However, regeneration density was relatively higher in high-harvesting sites for R. racemosa contrary to A. germinans. Trees were also significantly smaller and shorter in high-harvesting sites. The SCD indicated inverse J-shaped distributions, irrespective of the harvesting intensity and showed that tree harvesting targeted mostly dbh classes 10–30 cm. The density of this class was 2.6–6.2 times lower in high-harvesting sites. This study provides important information on impacts of wood harvesting in a marginally studied mangroves’ area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

source of energy c, a mangrove site proected by the Zangbéto as local measure to mangrove conservation d, branches of mangroves harvested for fish trap “Acadja” e

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

References

  • Adanguidi J, Padonou EA, Zannou A, Houngbo SB, Saliou IO, Agbahoungba S (2020) Fuelwood consumption and supply strategies in mangrove forests-Insights from RAMSAR sites in Benin. For Policy Econ 116:102192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajonina GN, Ago EE, Amoussou G, Mibog ED, Akambi ID, Dossa E (2014) Carbon Budget as a Tool for Assessing Mangrove Forests Degradation in the Western, Coastal Wetlands Complex Ramsar Site 1017 of Southern Benin, West Africa. In S. Diop, J.-P. Barusseau, & C. Descamps (Eds), The Land/Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone of West and Central Africa. Springer International Publishing. pp. 139–149

  • Alongi DM (2002) Present state and future of the world’ s mangrove forests. Environ Conserv 29(3):331–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asuk SA, Offiong EE, Ifebueme NM, Akpaso EO (2018) Species composition and diversity of mangrove swamp forest in southern Nigeria. Int J Avian Wildl Biol 3(2):166–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Abino AC, Castillo JAA, Lee YJ (2014) Assessment of species diversity, biomass and carbon sequestration potential of a natural mangrove stand in Samar, the Philippines. For sci technol 10(1):2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botha J, Witkowski E, Shackleton C (2002) A comparison of anthropogenic and elephant disturbance on Acacia xanthophloea (fever tree) populations in the Lowveld, South Africa. Koedoe 45:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cintron G, Schaeffer-Novelli SY (1984) Methods for studying mangrove structure. In: Snedaker SC, Snedaker JG (eds) The mangrove ecosystem: research methods. United National Educational, Scientific and cultural organization, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dănescu A, Albrecht AT, Bauhus J (2016) Structural diversity promotes productivity of mixed, uneven-aged forests in southwestern Germany. Oecologia 182(2):319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke NC (2001) Gap creation and regenerative processes driving diversity and structure of mangrove systems. Wetl Ecol Manag 9:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMICoV (2011). Enquête Modulaire Intégrée sur les Conditions de Vie des ménages 2e Edition. In Book Enquête Modulaire Intégrée sur les Conditions de Vie des ménages 2ème Edition. Cotonou, Benin: ‘Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Économique (INSAE).

  • FAO (2007) The world’s mangroves 1980–2005. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. FAO Forestry Paper 153

  • FAO (2020) Stratégie nationale et plan d’actions de gestion durable des écosystèmes de mangroves du Bénin. Cotonou, FAO report

    Google Scholar 

  • Fini A, Frangi P, Faoro M, Piatti R, Amoroso G, Ferrini F (2015) Effects of different pruning methods on an urban tree species: a four-year-experiment scaling down from the whole tree to the chloroplasts. Urban For Urban Green 14(3):664–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folega F, Rakotondrasoa MA, Wala K, Woegan YA, Kanda M, Pereki H, Polo-Akpisso A, Batawila K, Akpagana K (2017) Écologie et dynamique spatio-temporelle des mangroves au Togo. [VertigO] Rev Electron Sci Environ 17(3):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaoue OG, Yessoufou K (2019) Strong seedling recruitment does not limit mangrove vulnerability to harvest. Environ Res Lett 14(6):064019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm CV, Witkowski E (2012) Characterising wide spatial variation in population size structure of a keystone African savanna tree. For Ecol Manag 263:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihia MC (2014) Impact of human physical disturbance on mangrove forest structure at the Gazi Bay, Kenya. Egerton J Sci Technol 14:31–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs JM, Wang J, Blanco-Correa M (2001) Mapping disturbances in a mangrove forest using multi-date Landsat TM imagery. Environ Manag 27(5):763–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. J Stat Softw 82(13):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Portillo J, Lewis RR, Saenger P, Rovai A, Koedam N, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Agraz-Hernández C, Rivera-Monroy VH (2017) Mangrove forest restoration and rehabilitation. In: Mangrove Ecosystems A (ed) Rivera-Monroy VH, Shing Yip Lee EK, Robert R Twilley. Global Biogeographic Perspective. Springer, Cham, pp 301–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins AR, Shackleton CM (2017) Abundance, population structure and harvesting selection of two palm species (Hyphaene coriacea and Phoenix reclinata) in Zitundo area, southern Mozambique. For Ecol Manag 398:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Arthur R (1969) Species packing, and what competition minimizes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 64(4):1369–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensah S, Salako VK, Assogbadjo AE, Glèlè Kakaï R (2018) Differential responses of taxonomic, structural, and functional diversity to local-scale environmental variation in Afromontane forests in South Africa. Trop Conserv Sci 11:1940082918762372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngole-Jeme VM, Fonge BA, Tabot PT, Mumbang C (2016) Impact of logging activities in a tropical mangrove on ecosystem diversity and sediment heavy metal concentrations. J Coast Conserv 20(3):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong JE, Gong WK (2013) Structure, Function and Management of Mangrove Ecosystems. ISME Mangrove Educational Book Series No. 2. International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems (ISME), Okinawa, Japan, and International Tropical Timber.

  • Orekan V, Plagbeto H, Edea E, Sossou M (2019) Évolution actuelle des écosystèmes de mangrove dans le littoral béninois. Conférence OSFACO:Des images satellites pour la gestion durable des territoires en Afrique, March 2019, Cotonou, Bénin. hal-02189536.

  • Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Online). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajkaran A, Adams JB (2010) The implications of harvesting on the population structure and sediment characteristics of the mangroves at Mngazana Estuary, Eastern Cape. South Africa Wetlands Ecol Manag 18(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakotomahazo C, Ravaoarinorotsihoarana LA, Randrianandrasaziky D, Glass L, Gough C, Todinanahary GGB, Gardner CJ (2019) Participatory planning of a community-based payments for ecosystem services initiative in Madagascar’s mangroves. Ocean Coast Manag 175:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Santiago LS, Ma L, Lin G-J, Lian J-Y, Cao H-L et al (2013) Forest dynamics of a subtropical monsoon forest in Dinghushan, China: recruitment, mortality and the pace of community change. J Trop Ecol 29:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spalding M (2010) World atlas of mangroves. Routledge

  • Teka O, Houessou LG, Djossa BA, Bachmann Y, Oumorou M, Sinsin B (2019) Mangroves in Benin, West Africa: threats, uses and conservation opportunities. Environ Dev Sustain 21(3):1153–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teka O, Vogt J (2010) Social perception of natural risks by local residents in developing countries—The example of the coastal area of Benin. The Soc Sci J 47(1):215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson PB (1986) The botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 215

    Google Scholar 

  • Traoré L, Sop TK, Dayamba SD, Traoré S, Hahn K, Thiombiano A (2013) Do protected areas really work to conserve species? A case study of three vulnerable woody species in the Sudanian zone of Burkina Faso. Environ Dev Sustain 15(3):663–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2007) Mangroves of Western and Central Africa. UNEP Regional Seas Programme /UNEP-WCMC. http://www.unepwcmc.org/resources/publications/

  • Venter SM, Witkowski ETF (2010) Baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) density, size-class distribution and population trends between four land-use types in northern Venda, South Africa. For Ecol Manag 259(3):294–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vovides AG, Bashan Y, López-Portillo JA, Guevara R (2011) Nitrogen fixation in preserved, reforested, naturally regenerated and impaired mangroves as an indicator of functional restoration in mangroves in an arid region of Mexico. Restor Ecol 19:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters BB, Rönnbäck P, Kovacs JM, Crona B, Hussain SA, Badola R, Primavera JH, Barbier E, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2008) Ethnobiology, socio-economics and management of mangrove forests: A review. Aquat Bot 89:220–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters BB (2005a) Patterns of local wood use and cutting of Philippine mangrove forests. Econ Bot 59(1):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters BB (2005b) Ecological effects of small-scale cutting of Philippine mangrove forests. For Ecol Manag 206(1–3):331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Fu H, Lee SY, Fan H, Wang M (2020) Can Strict Protection Stop the Decline of Mangrove Ecosystems in China? From Rapid Destruction to Rampant Degradation. Forests 11(1):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells S, Samoilys M, Makoloweka S, Kalombo H (2010) Lessons learnt from a collaborative management programme in coastal Tanzania. Ocean Coast Manag 53(4):161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand K, Ward D, Thulke H-H, Jeltsch F (2000) From snapshot information to long-term population dynamics of Acacias by a simulation model. Plant Ecol 150:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhila H, Mahmood H, Rozainah MZ (2014) Biodiversity and biomass of a natural and degraded mangrove forest of Peninsular Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 71(11):4629–4635

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the International Foundation for Science–IFS (Grant No I-1-6068-1 attributed to ZMS) and the International Tropical Timber Organization–ITTO (Fellowships No 094/17A attributed to SKV). We also acknowledge the financial support from the Fond National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technologie–FNRSIT through the project PGD-Mangroves (Agreement No. 003/MESRS/FNRSIT/AC/SSE/SAI/SA). ZMS doctoral studies were supported through the RUFORUM Nurturing Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZMS and SKV conceived the work with advices from GKR. ZMS collected the data. ZMS and SKV processed the data and performed the statistical analyses. ZMS drafted the manuscript with contribution of SKV and MS. GKR supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kolawolé Valère Salako.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zanvo, M.S., Salako, K.V., Gnanglè, C. et al. Impacts of harvesting intensity on tree taxonomic diversity, structural diversity, population structure, and stability in a West African mangrove forest. Wetlands Ecol Manage 29, 433–450 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09793-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-021-09793-w

Keywords

Navigation