Abstract
Edge detection of the sources of potential field anomaly is an important step in the interpretation of subsurface source geometries. The conventional methods based on calculation of horizontal or vertical derivatives identify the edges or center of sources by minima, maxima, or zero values in the transformed data. We present a wavelet source edge detector method (WSED) using wavelet multiresolution analysis to identify potential field sources boundaries. The two-dimensional wavelet decomposition is an effective method to understand the frequency components of the signal in different directions. We use a 2D-discrete wavelet transform using Haar wavelets in resolving lateral edges for source edge detection. We test the method on synthetic magnetic anomalies due to sources of complex geometries generated using prismatic sources. We investigated the robustness of the method on the magnetic data of the Bishop model and found the results useful in resolving the edges. We applied the method to gravity data of the north Delhi fold belt, India, to identify boundaries of different geological formations. Our results indicate distinct properties of the source edges in the wavelet domain, which is for the first time reported for the interpretation of the potential field anomalies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data are restricted as per government policy.
Code Availability
Custom codes developed (algorithm provided in the manuscript).
References
Arısoy, M. O., & Dikmen, U. (2015). Edge enhancement of magnetic data using fractional-order-derivative filters. Geophysics, 80(1), J7–J17.
Blakely, R. J., & Simpson, R. W. (1986). Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies. Geophysics, 51, 1494–1498.
Butler, P. G., Jr., Wanamaker, A. D., Scourse, J. D., Richardson, C. A., & Reynolds, D. J. (2013). Variability of marine climate on the North Icelandic Shelf in a 1357-year proxy archive based on growth increments in the bivalve Arctica islandica. Paleogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology., 373, 141–151.
Chamoli, A., Bansal, A. R., & Dimri, V. P. (2007). Wavelet and rescaled range approach for the Hurst coefficient for short and long time series. Computer and Geosciences., 33, 83–93.
Chamoli, A., Swaroopa Rani, V., Srivastava, K., Srinagesh, D., & Dimri, V. P. (2010). Wavelet analysis of the seismograms for Tsunami warning. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics., 17, 569–574.
Cooper, G. R. J. (2009). Balancing images of potential-field data. Geophysics, 74(3), L17–L20.
Cooper, G. R. J., & Cowan, D. R. (2006). Enhancing potential field data using filters based on the local phase. Computers and Geosciences., 32, 1585–1591.
Cordell, L., & Grauch, V.J.S.: Mapping basement magnetization zones from aeromagnetic data in the San Juan basin, New Mexico. In: The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps (ed. W.J. Hinze), pp.181–197. Society of Exploration Geophysicists (1985)
Cornish, C. R., Bretherton, C. R., & Percival, D. B. (2006). Maximal overlap wavelet statistical analysis with application to atmospheric turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorology., 119, 339–374.
Dwivedi, D., Chamoli, A., & Pandey, A. K. (2019). Crustal structure and lateral variations in Moho beneath the North Delhifold belt, NW India: Insight from gravity data modeling and inversion. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors., 297, 106317.
Evjen, H. M. (1936). The place of the vertical gradient in gravitational interpretations. Geophysics, 1, 127–136.
Fairhead, J. D., Salem, A., Cascone, L., Hammill, M., Masterton, S., & Samson, E. (2011). New developments of the magnetic tilt-depth method to improve structural mapping of sedimentary basins. Geophysical Prospecting, 59, 1072–1086.
Farge, M. (1992). Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 24, 395–457.
Ferreira, F. J., de Souza, J., de Bongiolo, B. E. S. A., & de Castro, L. G. (2013). Enhancement of the total horizontal gradient of magnetic anomalies using the tilt angle. Geophysics, 78(3), J33–J41.
Gerovska, D., Araúzo-Bravo, M., Whaler, K., Stavrev, P., & Reid, A. (2010). Three-dimensional interpretation of magnetic and gravity anomalies using the finite-difference similarity transform. Geophysics, 75(4), L79–L90.
Hidalgo-Gato, M. C., & Barbosa, V. C. F. (2015). Edge detection of potential-field sources using scale-space monogenic signal: Fundamental principles. Geophysics, 80(5), J27–J36.
Hsu, S., Sibuet, J. C., & Shyu, C. (1996). High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique. Geophysics, 61(2), 373–386.
Leblanc, G. E., & Morris, W. A. (2001). Denoising of aeromagnetic data via the wavelet transform. Geophysics, 66(6), 1793–1804.
Li, X. (2016). Terracing gravity and magnetic data using edge-preserving smoothing filters. Geophysics, 81(2), G41–G47.
Malamud, B. D., & Turcotte, D. L. (2001). Wavelet analyses of Mars polar topography. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 17497–17504.
Mallat, S. G. (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(7), 674–693.
Mallat, S. G., & Zhong, S. (1992). Characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(7), 710–732.
Mandal, A., Mohanty, W. K., Sharma, S. P., Biswas, A., Sen, J., & Bhatt, A. K. (2015). Geophysical signatures of uranium mineralization and its subsurface validation at Beldih, Purulia District, West Bengal, India: A case study. Geophysical Prospecting, 63(3), 713–726.
Miller, H. G., & Singh, V. (1994). Potential field tilt—a new concept for location of potential field sources. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 32, 213–217.
Nabighian, M. N. (1972). The analytical signal of a two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation. Geophysics, 37(3), 507–517.
Nabighian, M. N. (1984). Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations. Geophysics, 49(6), 780–786.
Percival, D., & Walden, A. (2000). Wavelet methods for time series analysis (Cambridge series in statistical and probabilistic mathematics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pesquet, J. C., Krim, H., & Carfantan, H. (1996). Time invariant orthonormal wavelet representations. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 44(8), 1964–1970.
Roest, W. R., Verhoef, J., & Pilkington, M. (1992). Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal. Geophysics, 57(1), 116–125.
Salem, A., Masterton, S., Campbell, S., Fairhead, J. D., Dickinson, J., & Murphy, C. (2013). Interpretation of tensor gravity data using an adaptive tilt angle method. Geophysical Prospecting., 61, 1065–1076.
Salem, A., Williams, S., Fairhead, D., Smith, R., & Ravat, D. (2008). Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives. Geophysics, 73(1), L1–L10.
Santos, D. F., Silva, J. B. C., Barbosa, V. C. F., & Braga, L. F. S. (2012). Deep-pass -An aeromagnetic data filter to enhance deep features in marginal basins. Geophysics, 77(3), J15–J22.
Sinha-Roy, S. (1984). Precambrian crustal interactions in Rajasthan, NW India. Indian Journal of Earth Sciences CEISM, 20, 84–91.
Sinha-Roy, S. (1988). Proterozoic Wilson cycle in Rajasthan. Memoir Geological Society of India, 7, 95–108.
Sun, Y., Yang, W., Zeng, X., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Edge enhancement of potential field data using spectral moments. Geophysics, 81(1), G1–G11.
Telesca, L., Lovallo, M., Chamoli, A., Dimri, V. P., & Srivastava, K. (2013). Fisher–Shannon analysis of seismograms of tsunamigenic and non-tsunamigenic earthquakes. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392(16), 3424–3429.
Torrence, C., & Compo, G. P. (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79, 61–78.
Verduzco, B., Fairhead, J. D., Green, C. M., & Mackenzie, C. (2004). New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping. The Leading Edge, 23, 116–119.
Walnut, D. F. (2002). An introduction to wavelet analysis. New York: Springer.
Wijns, C., Perez, C., & Kowalczyk, P. (2005). Theta map: Edge detection in magnetic data. Geophysics, 70(4), L39–L43.
Williams, S., Fairhead, J. D., & Flanagan, G.: Realistic models of basement topography for depth to magnetic basement testing. In 72nd SEG annual meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, Expanded Abstracts. pp 814–817 (2002)
Yao, Y., Huang, D., Yu, X., & Chai, B. (2016). Edge interpretation of potential field data with the normalized enhanced analytic signal. Acta Geodetica et Geophysica, 51, 125–136.
Zhang, X., Yu, P., Tang, R., Xiang, Y., & Zhao, C. (2014). Edge enhancement of potential field data using an enhanced tilt angle. Exploration Geophysics, 46, 276–283.
Acknowledgements
DD acknowledges the financial grant of the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India. The efforts of AC were supported by the DST FIST grant [SR/FST/ES11-018] and Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India project grant [File no. EMR/2016/002910]. We appreciate the comments of two anonymous reviewers that significantly improved this manuscript.
Funding
Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), India (for DD), DST FIST [SR/FST/ES11-018] and Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India project-EMR/2016/002910.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1: Multiresolution Analysis Using DWT
Appendix 1: Multiresolution Analysis Using DWT
The DWT uses multiresolution analysis to represent a signal in terms of its spatial frequency components (Mallat 1989). It represents a signal using approximation \(({\mathbf{V}}_{j} )\) and detail \(({\mathbf{W}}_{j} )\) spaces with different levels of resolution.
A sequence \(\{ V_{j} \}_{{j \in {\mathbf{z}}}}\) of the closed subspaces of Hilbert space \({\mathbf{L}}^{2} ({\mathbf{R}})\) is a multiresolution approximation if the following properties exist (Mallat 1989):
-
1.
\(\forall (j,n)\, \in {\mathbf{Z}}^{2} \;\,f(t) \in \,V_{j} \; \leftrightarrow \;f(t - 2^{j} n)\, \in \;V_{j}\)
-
2.
\(\forall j\, \in \,{\mathbf{Z}}\;\;f(t)\; \in \,V_{j} \; \leftrightarrow \,f(t/2)\; \in \,V_{j + 1}\)
-
3.
\(\forall j\, \in \,{\mathbf{Z}}\;\;V_{j + 1} \, \in \,V_{j}\)
-
4.
\(\lim_{j \to + \infty } \;V_{j} = \cap_{j \in z} V_{j} = \{ 0\}\)
-
5.
\(\lim_{j \to - \infty } \;V_{j} = \cup_{j \in z} V_{j} = {\mathbf{L}}^{2} ({\mathbf{R}})\)
-
6.
There exist \(\phi (t)\, \in \,V_{0}\) such that \(\phi (t - n)_{n \in z}\) is an orthonormal basis of \(\,V_{0}\)
For each integer j, the functions are an orthonormal basis for each \(V_{j}\). The wavelet spaces \(W_{j}\) are introduced from the orthogonal complements of \(V_{j}\) in \(V_{j - 1} \;(V_{j - 1} = V_{j} \oplus \,W_{j} ,\,\forall j \in \;{\mathbf{z}}).\) One can construct wavelet \(\psi\) such that the dilated and translated family is an orthogonal basis of \({\mathbf{L}}^{2} ({\mathbf{R}})\).
In 2D wavelet transform, the scaling and wavelet function are two variable functions, denoted as \(\phi (x,y)\) and \(\psi (x,y)\).
The scaled and wavelet basis functions expressions are given as (Mallat 1989):
where \(\left( {x,y} \right) \in \,{\mathbf{R}}^{2}\) and \(\left( {p,q} \right) \in \,{\mathbf{Z}}^{2}\). There is one scaling function and three wavelet functions for each level. If the wavelet function is separable, then these functions can be rewritten as:
The wavelet family \(\{ \psi_{j,p,q}^{H} ,\,\,\psi_{j,p,q}^{V} ,\,\,\psi_{j,p,q}^{D} \}_{{p,q\, \in \,{\mathbf{Z}}^{2} }} \,\) is an orthonormal basis of \({\mathbf{W}}_{j}^{2}\) and \(\{ \psi_{j,p,q}^{H} ,\,\,\psi_{j,p,q}^{V} ,\,\,\psi_{j,p,q}^{D} \}_{{(j,p,q)\, \in \,{\mathbf{Z}}^{3} }} \,\) is an orthonormal basis of \({\mathbf{L}}^{2} ({\mathbf{R}}^{2} )\).
The wavelet approximation coefficients for the function \(f(x,y)\) of size \(M \times L\) can be given as (Mallat 1989):
where \(j_{0}\) is the scale of the coefficients.
The horizontal (\(W_{\psi }^{H}\)), vertical (\(W_{\psi }^{V}\)) and diagonal (\(W_{\psi }^{D}\)) wavelet detail coefficients can be written as (Mallat 1989):
This is the general form of the 2D discrete wavelet transform.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dwivedi, D., Chamoli, A. Source Edge Detection of Potential Field Data Using Wavelet Decomposition. Pure Appl. Geophys. 178, 919–938 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02675-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02675-5