Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Research on the NPD coordination, knowledge transfer process and innovation performance of interfirm projects in China

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chinese high-tech firms urgently depend on interfirm coordination to improve new product development (NPD) innovation. While there is an increasing research interest in investigating the performance effect of supply chain coordination in Western countries, little attention has been paid to whether and how NPD coordination influences innovation performance in China. By incorporating the knowledge-based view of the firm and a dyadic perspective of knowledge transfer, this study explores the relationship between NPD coordination and innovation success, as well as the mediating roles of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding. We test the hypotheses using data collected from 131 Chinese interfirm NPD projects. The results reveal that NPD coordination is positively associated with innovation performance. As expected, as NPD coordination increases, interfirm projects can benefit from a higher level of knowledge sharing and a lower level of knowledge hiding among stakeholders. Moreover, the positive performance effect of NPD coordination is partially mediated by knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding, highlighting the need to manage counterproductive knowledge transfer in collaborative supply chain innovation. Finally, theoretical implications, managerial suggestions, and future research directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J., & Overton, T. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14: 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, P. 2004. Shedding light on knowledge management. Hr Magazine, 49(5): 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3): 421–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions, Klein KJ, Kozlowski, SWJ (eds). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA; 349–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Eckstein, D. 2014. The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility: A knowledge-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 147: 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogilović, S., Černe, M., & Škerlavaj, M. 2017. Hiding behind a mask? Cultural intelligence, knowledge hiding, and individual and team creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5): 710–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, M., & Cleven, N. J. 2011. Innovation culture, collaboration with external partners and NPD performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(4): 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler, L., & Hemmert, M. 2015. The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new product development collaborations: Evidence from Korea. Technovation, 45: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. 2005. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5): 720–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. 2011. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3): 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., Sohal, A. S., & Prajogo, D. I. 2013. Supply chain operational risk mitigation: a collaborative approach. International Journal of Production Research, 51(7): 2186–2199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. J., Hsiao, Y. C., & Chu, M. A. 2014. Transfer mechanisms and knowledge transfer: The cooperative competency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(12): 2531–2541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., & Zweig, D. 2015. How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3): 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. 2012. Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1): 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas, J. M., Julkunen, S., & Gabrielsson, M. 2015. Power symmetry and the development of trust in interdependent relationships: The mediating role of goal congruence. Industrial Marketing Management, 48: 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N. T., & Dimov, D. 2011. A closer look at cross-functional collaboration and product innovativeness: Contingency effects of structural and relational context. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(5): 680–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca, L.M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2007. Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., & Wei, J. C. 2007. Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6): 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, P., Eskerod, P., Dalcher, D., & Sandhawalia, B. 2010. The dynamics of collaboration in multipartner projects. Project Management Journal, 41(4): 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z., Ng, F., & Li, J. 2014. A parallel multiple mediator model of knowledge sharing in architectural design project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1): 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. 2002. Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S. & Sproull, L. 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Science, 46(12): 1554–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., & Zhao, X. 2010. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach. Journal of Operations Management, 28(1): 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, P. S., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. 2018. Knowledge hiding and team creativity: The contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2): 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadi, S., & D’Ambra, J. 2012. Coopetitive relationships in cross-functional software development teams: How to model and measure?. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(5): 1096–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 1996a. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. 1996b. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4): 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1): 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haus-Reve, S., Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2019. Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 48(6): 1476–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirunyawipada, T., Beyerlein, M., & Blankson, C. 2010. Cross-functional integration as a knowledge transformation mechanism: Implications for new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4): 650–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, P., Doll, W. J., Nahm, A. Y., & Li, X. 2004. Knowledge sharing in integrated product development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(2): 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D., & Anderson, E. 2003. Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Science, 49(12): 1684–1701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, J. K., & Varkkey, B. 2018. Are you a cistern or a channel? Exploring factors triggering knowledge-hiding behavior at the workplace: Evidence from the Indian R&D professionals. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4): 824–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Roldán, J. L., Ariza-Montes, J. A., & Leal-Millán, A. 2014. From potential absorptive capacity to innovation outcomes in project teams: The conditional mediating role of the realized absorptive capacity in a relational learning context. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6): 894–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Zheng, Y., & Wang, C. L. 2016. Inter-firm collaboration in new product development in Chinese pharmaceutical companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1): 165–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, S. H., Hu, D. C., & Ding, L. W. 2017. Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan’s networking communication industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 191: 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, R. J., Che, R. H., & Ting, C. Y. 2012. Turning knowledge management into innovation in the high-tech industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(1): 42–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Wang, Y., & Kung, L. 2015. Influences of cross-functional collaboration and knowledge creation on technology commercialization: Evidence from high-tech industries. Industrial Marketing Management, 49: 128–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. 2015. Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: The role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack, A., Verganti, R., & Iansiti, M. 2001. Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Science, 47(1): 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCurtain, S., Flood, P. C., Ramamoorthy, N., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. 2010. The top management team, reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3): 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1): 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Yannopoulos, P. 2014. Customer and supplier involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical innovation capability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2): 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. A., & Shah, R. 2009. In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27: 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert, R.K., Caeldries, F., Lievens, A., & Wauters, E. 2000. Communication flows in international product innovation teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(5): 360–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, C., & Im, S. 2010. Spurring cross-functional integration for higher new product performance: A group effectiveness perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4): 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Wilemon, D. 2000. Software development and new product development: Potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2), 211–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, D. X., Heim, G. R., & Mallick, D. N. 2014. Collaborative product development: The effect of project complexity on the use of information technology tools and new product development practices. Production and Operations Management, 23(8): 1421–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. 2017. From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1): 53–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popaitoon, S., & Siengthai, S. 2014. The moderating effect of human resource management practices on the relationship between knowledge absorptive capacity and project performance in project-oriented companies. International Journal of Project Management, 32(6): 908–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradabwong, J., Braziotis, C., Tannock, J. D., & Pawar, K. S. 2017. Business process management and supply chain collaboration: effects on performance and competitiveness. Supply Chain Management, 22(2): 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. 2004. Spss and sas procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 36(4): 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomo, S., Weise, J., & Gemünden, H. G. 2007. NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of product innovation management, 24(4): 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaddar, S., Nargundkar, S., & Daley, M. 2006. Inter-organizational information sharing: The role of supply network configuration and partner goal congruence. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2): 744–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleimer, S. C., & Faems, D. 2016. Connecting interfirm and intrafirm collaboration in NPD projects: Does innovation context matter?. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(2): 154–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, Y. J., Dinwoodie, J., & Kwak, D. W. 2014. The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link?. Supply Chain Management, 19(5): 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A. & Bontis, N. 2016. Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: Antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6): 1199–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. 2001. Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somech, A. 2006. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32(1): 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suprapto, M., Bakker, H. L., & Mooi, H. G. 2015. Relational factors in owner-contractor collaboration: The mediating role of teamworking. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6): 1347–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. 2003. Openness among Chinese in conflict: Effects of direct discussion and warmth on integrative decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(9): 1878–1897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. H., & Hsu, T. T. 2014. Cross-functional collaboration, competitive intensity, knowledge integration mechanisms, and new product performance: A mediated moderation model. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2): 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. 2015. Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: The benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1): 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Aben, M. 2001. Making the most of your company’s knowledge: A strategic framework. Long Range Planning, 34(4): 421–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., Song, M., & Stringfellow, A. 2003. Antecedents and consequences of goal incongruity on new product development in five countries: A marketing view. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(3): 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, T., & Dooley, K. J. 2013. Communication intensity, goal congruence, and uncertainty in buyer–supplier new product development. Journal of Operations Management, 31(7): 523–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. 2003. Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2): 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, E. N. 2018. Leveraging supply chain collaboration in pursuing radical innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 10(3): 350–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., & Min, M. 2019. The negative consequences of knowledge hiding in NPD project teams: The roles of project work attributes. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2): 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., & Li, A. 2019. Investigating the effects of reward interdependence and nonfinancial incentives on NPD collaboration in diverse project teams. Project Management Journal, 50(6): 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work described in this article is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No.71902107), the Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province (Project No. 19DGLJ11) and the National Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Project No. ZR2017BG008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Empirical research on the effects of NPD coordination on innovation outcomes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Min, M. Research on the NPD coordination, knowledge transfer process and innovation performance of interfirm projects in China. Asia Pac J Manag 39, 1161–1186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09755-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09755-z

Keywords

Navigation