Skip to main content
Log in

How Funding of Non-profit Social Organizations Affects the Number of Volunteers

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, significant changes have occurred to how charities and non-profit organizations are funded. However, only limited research has considered how the new financial landscape affects the work being carried out by these organizations. This article presents a quantitative analysis of the relationship between financing and the number of volunteers. The data material consists of panel data on revenue streams to nationwide, social, non-profit organizations in Denmark. The analysis reveals a strong, positive relationship between both value-driven general revenues and the organizations’ equity in relation to the number of volunteers. Conversely, targeted and means-driven investments do not have any significant correlation with the number of volunteers. Overall, the findings point to the fact that more volunteers can be attracted through forms of financing that strengthen the stability and organizational capacity of an organization as well as its ability to independently organize the work to be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Fixed prices have been used at the 2017 level.

References

  • Abraham, K. G., & Mackie, C. (2004). Beyond the market: Designing nonmarket accounts for the United States. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, M., & Harris, M. (2017). The “hollowing out” of smaller third sector organisations? Voluntary Sector Review, 8(3), 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, P. (2016). The history of third sector service delivery in the UK. In J. Rees & D. Mullins (Eds.), The third sector delivering public services. Bristol: Bristol University, Press Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, J., Hede, A., & Andersen, J. G. (2017). Tilliden til samfundets bærebjælker [Confidence in the pillars of society]. Copenhagen: Tryg Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L. L. (2019). Hybride civilsamfundsorganisationer under forandring: Neoliberale praksisser, marked og civile rettigheder [Hybrid civil society organizations under change: Neoliberal practices, market and civil rights]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 21(4), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baines, S., Hardill, I., & Wilson, R. (2011). Introduction: Remixing the economy of welfare? Social Policy and Society, 10(3), 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (2001). Time-series-cross-section data: What have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 100(4), 67–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (1991). Managing contracted services in the nonprofit agency. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Body, A. (2015). Weathering the storm: Understanding the voluntary sector through a fields theory analysis: Early findings of a case study of preventative children’s services in Kent. Working paper presented at Voluntary Sector and Volunteering Research Conference, NCVO, Leeds.

  • Boje, T. P. (2017). Civilsamfund, medborgerskab og deltagelse [Civil society, citizenship and participation] [Civil society, citizenship and participation]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, T. (2017). Journeys and destinations: using longitudinal analysis to explore how third sector organisational governance helps to navigate sustainable futures. Voluntary sector review., 8(1), 3–24. ([Online]).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, C., & Osborne, S. P. (2008). Strategic positioning in UK charities that provides services. Public Money & Management, 28(5), 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, D., Geyne-Rahme, F., & Mohan, J. (2013). Variations between organisations and localities in government funding of third-sector activity: Evidence from the national survey of third-sector organisations in England. Urban Studies, 50(5), 959–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espersen, H. H., Andersen, L. L., Olsen, L., Tortzen, A. (2018). Understøttelse og udvikling af det frivillige sociale arbejde [Support and development of voluntary social work]. Copenhagen: VIVE – The Danish Center for Social Science Research.

  • Fridberg, t, & Henriksen, L. S. . (2014). Udvikling i frivilligt socialt arbejde [Development in voluntary social work]. Copenhagen: SFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. T. (2002). The effect of government funding on nonprofit administrative efficiency: An empirical test. Cambridge: Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbjerg, K. A. (1991). Managing grants and contracts: The case of four nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, L. S., & Bundesen, P. (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 605–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, L. S., Koch-Nielsen, I., & Rosdahl, D. (2008). Formal and informal volunteering in a Nordic context: The case of Denmark. Journal of Civil Society, 4(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibsen, B. (1997). Fordærver pengene foreningerne? [Does money corrupt associations?]. Politica, 29(1), 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishkanian, A., & Szreter, S. (2012). The big society debate: A new agenda for social welfare? London: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J., Mohan, J., Brookes, N., & Yoon, Y. (2018). The English voluntary sector: How volunteering and policy climate perceptions matter. Journal of Social Policy, 47(4), 759–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1994). Voluntary agencies and the contract culture. Social Service Review, 68(1), 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lie, M., & Baines, S. (2007). Making sense of organizational change: Voices of older volunteers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(3), 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorentzen, H., & Henriksen, L. S. (2014). The invention and institutionalization of volunteer centers: A comparative analysis of Norway and Denmark. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L. (2013). Voluntary sector in transition: Hard times or new opportunities? Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L., & Murray, U. (2017). Civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web? London: Trebtham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L., & Murray, U. (2017B). Dangerous liaisons and spaces for resistance. In civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web? London: Trebtham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., et al. (2015). Social finance Does ‘investment’ add value? In Nicholls (Ed.), Social finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, U. (2017). Voluntary organizations and criminal justice: A misguided turn. In L. Milbourne & U. Murray (Eds.), Civil society organizations in turbulent times: A gilded web? London: Trebtham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., et al. (2015). Social Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., & Emerson, J., et al. (2015). Social finance: Capitalizing social impact. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social finance (pp. 1–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pharoah, C. (2012). Finding the big society. In A: Ishkanian & S. Szreter, see above.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (2010). Putting the civil society sector on the economic map of the world. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(2), 167–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salway, M. (2017). Social investment as a new charity finance tool: Using both head and heart. Centre for Charity Effectiveness, Cass Business School: University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflexive practioner: How practitioner think in action. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivesind, K. H. (ed.). (2016). Mot en ny skandinavisk velferdsmodell? [Toward a new Scandinavia welfare model?] Institut for samfundsforskning, rapport 2016 01.

  • Skalts, V., & Nørgaard, M. (1981). Mødrehjælpens epoke [The era of Mothers’ Aid]. Copenhagen: Forlaget Rhodos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R. (2018). The future of nonprofit human services. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(4), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2018). Handbook on non-profit institutions in the system of national account. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D., et al. (2015). Financing social innovation. In Nicholls (Ed.), Social finance (pp. 96–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, J., Moore, M., & Oppeinhemer, M. (2018). Challenges to the recruitment and retention of volunteers in traditional nonprofit organizations: A case study of Australian meals on wheels. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(16), 1361–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, D. (2014). The ideological context. NCIA Inquiry into the Future of Voluntary Services.

  • Wijkström, F. (2011). Charity speak and business talk: The on-going (re)hybridization of civil. The transformation of the popular movement tradition. Nomos: In Nordic civil society at a cross-roads.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijkström, F., & Zimmer, A. (2011). Introduction: Nordic civil societies beyond. The transformation of the popular movement tradition. Nomos: In Nordic civil society at a cross-roads.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Roskilde University and the Obelsk Family Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mads Roke Clausen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 3 .

Table 3 Influence from internal factors and different revenue streams and investment rationalities on the number of volunteers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clausen, M.R. How Funding of Non-profit Social Organizations Affects the Number of Volunteers. Voluntas 33, 362–373 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00321-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00321-1

Keywords

Navigation