Skip to main content
Log in

Suggestion pattern on online social networks: between intensity, effectiveness and user’s satisfaction

  • Original article
  • Published:
The Visual Computer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forms of influence are widely applied in social networks in order to encourage users to take actions that are favourable to these technologies providers. In our prior work, we proposed a set of influence patterns that are applied in social networks (suggestion pattern, reminder pattern, reward pattern, interaction pattern and social influence pattern) which influence users progressively over time in order to shape their behaviours and to persuade them to stay as long as possible. Nevertheless, the guidance or recommendations for applying these patterns for developers have not yet been defined. This research will focus on the first suggestion pattern and describes an experiment designed to examine whether excessive/intense application of suggestions (which may adversely affect user time) is also more effective and more satisfying from a user perspective. We used two video sharing applications (YouTube and YouTube Focus); the first contains excessive/intense suggestions against the second that contains limited suggestions. Our finding shows that limited suggestions are more effective than excessive/intense suggestions and are as satisfactory as excessive/intense suggestions. We believe that these results will promote favourable outcomes when applying the suggestion pattern, (1) for users: by helping them understand the nature of influence techniques and to empower them to be proactive in creating an environment that is more favourable for them, and that helps them to achieve their goals without getting distracted; (2) for designers: by providing them with insights on the optimal and effective method of using patterns of influence notably, suggestion pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert, W., Tullis, T.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Newnes, Oxford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altman, D.G.: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastien, C., Scapin, D.L.: Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of human–computer interfaces. RT-0156, INRIA. pp. 79 (1993)

  4. Bedjaoui, M., Elouali, N., Benslimane, S.: User time spent between persuasiveness and usability of social networking mobile applications: patterns of influence. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 2: HUCAPP, pp. 35–44 (2020)

  5. Bedjaoui, M., Elouali, N., Benslimane, S.M.: User time spent between persuasiveness and usability of social networking mobile applications: a case study of Facebook and YouTube. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, pp. 15–24 (2018)

  6. Branch, C.C.: Perceptions of the Ethics of Persuasive Technology. Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology (2019). Accessed from https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses/10258

  7. Caruso, J.B., Salaway, G.: The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2007. Retrieved December 8, 2007 (2007)

  8. Chan, T.K., Cheung, C.M., Lee, Z.W., Neben, T.: Transition from urge to excessive use of social networking sites: the moderating role of self-control and accessibility. In: PACIS, p. 196 (2015)

  9. Cialdini, R.B.: The Psychology of Persuasion. Quill William Morrow, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20(1), 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. da Silva, J.V., Pereira, R., Buchdid, S.B., Duarte, E.F., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: SAwD-socially aware design: an organizational semiotics-based case tool to support early design activities. In: International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations, pp. 59–69. Springer (2016)

  12. Davis, J.W., Bobick, A.: Virtual PAT: a virtual personal aerobics trainer. In: Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces, pp. 13–18. Citeseer (1998)

  13. Elo, S., Kyngäs, H.: The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62(1), 107–115 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elouali, N.: Time well spent with multimodal mobile interactions. J. Multimodal User Interfaces 13(4), 395–404 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fogg, B., Eckles, D.: The behavior chain for online participation: how successful web services structure persuasion. In: International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 199–209. Springer (2007)

  16. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002(December), 2 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holsti, O.R.: Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley (content analysis), Reading (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iosub, D., Andrei, A.G., Iacob, A.: Patterns of social influence in social networking sites—a design perspective. Best practices and economic performance inmanagement and marketing, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Press, pp.197–203 (2009). ISBN 978-973-703-519-6

  20. Iso, W.: 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). The international organization for standardization 45(9) (1998)

  21. Kampik, T., Nieves, J.C., Lindgren, H.: Coercion and deception in persuasive technologies. In: 20th International Trust Workshop (co-located with AAMAS/IJCAI/ECAI/ICML 2018), Stockholm, Sweden, 14 July, 2018, pp. 38–49. CEUR-WS (2018)

  22. Kuss, D.J., Griffiths, M.D.: Online social networking and addiction-a review of the psychological literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 8(9), 3528–3552 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 33(1), 159–174 (1977)

  24. Némery, A., Brangier, E.: Set of guidelines for persuasive interfaces: organization and validation of the criteria. J. Usabil. Stud. 9(3), 110 (2014)

  25. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Oduor, M., Alahäivälä, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Persuasive software design patterns for social influence. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 18(7), 1689–1704 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Towards deeper understanding of persuasion in software and information systems. In: First international conference on advances in computer-human interaction, pp. 200–205. IEEE (2008)

  28. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 24(1), 28 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Razali, N.M., Wah, Y.B.: Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson–Darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Anal. 2(1), 21–33 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Regina, J., Ejinden, V., Lemmens, J., Valkenburg, P.: The social media disorder scale: validity and psychometric properties. Comput. Human Behav. 61, 478–487 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R.L.: Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis, vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4), 591–611 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., Diakopoulos, N.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, Bengaluru (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shotton, M.A.: The costs and benefits of ‘computer addiction’. Behav. Inform. Technol. 10(3), 219–230 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stemler, S.: An overview of content analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 7(1), 17 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Taype, G.E.E., Calani, M.C.B.: Extending persuasive system design frameworks: an exploratory study. In: International Conference on Information Technology & Systems, pp. 35–45. Springer (2020)

  37. Thadani, D., Cheung, C.: Exploring the role of online social network dependency in habit formation. In: ICIS 2011 Proceedings 34. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/34 (2011)

  38. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T.: Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs. Health Sci. 15(3), 398–405 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J.: Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J. Adolesc. Health 48(2), 121–127 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. van Delden, R., de Vries, R.A., Heylen, D.K.: Questioning our attitudes and feelings towards persuasive technology. In: International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 3–15. Springer (2019)

  41. Wansink, B., Painter, J.E., North, J.: Bottomless bowls: why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obesity Res. 13(1), 93–100 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Weiksner, G.M., Fogg, B., Liu, X.: Six patterns for persuasion in online social networks. In: International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 151–163. Springer (2008)

  43. Wimmer, R.D., Dominick, J.R.: Mass Media Research. Cengage Learning, Boston (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yahya, Y., Rahim, N.Z.A., Ibrahim, R., Azmi, N.F., Sjarif, N.N.A., Sarkan, H.M.: Between habit and addiction: an overview of preliminary finding on social networking sites usage among teenagers. In: Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Computer and Technology Applications, pp. 112–116 (2019)

  45. Yang, S.C., Tung, C.-J.: Comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Comput. Human Behav. 23(1), 79–96 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Yates, D., Moore, M.D., McCabe, G.: The Practice of Statistics. WH Freeman, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Algerian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research and the Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development (DG-RSDT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Bedjaoui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

We acknowledge the Algerian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, as well as the Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development (DG-RSDT) for funding our PhD project. We are grateful to all of our participants for volunteering their time.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedjaoui, M., Elouali, N., Benslimane, S.M. et al. Suggestion pattern on online social networks: between intensity, effectiveness and user’s satisfaction. Vis Comput 38, 1331–1343 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02084-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02084-8

Keywords

Navigation