Skip to main content
Log in

Design of tendon mechanism for soft wearable robotic hand and its fuzzy control using electromyogram sensor

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes a wearable robotic hand using an improved tendon mechanism enhanced compared to the existing link one with heavy and hard-to-ware. The enhanced wearable robot hand is controlled using the electromyogram (EMG) sensor. In previous tendon mechanism of wearable robotic hand, it only implemented the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon. Therefore, the fingertip is flexed much more, which means that the radius of curvature is large, so the motion of gripping an object became unstable. Prototype of the first proposed tendon-driven wearable robotic hand is implemented to both FDP and flexor digitorum superficialis tendon, so that the middle phalanx can flex with the distal phalanx. This leads the motion of gripping objects become stable. However, it is difficult to move the distal phalanx and middle phalanx together to grab the object completely. The second improved tendon mechanism of wearable robotic hand is implemented to only FDP, but it sets different friction force to each guide; thus, it can grip the object completely. The EMG sensor is used to detect the motion of the finger, and the fuzzy controller is used to control the finger of the wearable robotic hand according to the amount of muscle used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig.10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heo PW (2012) Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(5):807–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim S, Laschi C, Trimmer B (2013) Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends Biotechnol 31(5):287–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asbeck AT, Rossi De, Galiana I, Ding I, Walsh CJ (2014) Stronger, smarter, softer: next-generation wearable robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 21(4):22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jo IS (2017) Design and control of a wearable and force-controllable hand exoskeleton system. Mechatronics 41:90–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Troncossi M, Mazzotti C, Foumashi MM, Zannoli D, Parenti-Castelli V (2012) Design and manufacturing of a hand-and-wrist exoskeleton prototype for the rehabilitation of post-stroke patients. In: Quaderni del DIEM–GMA. Atti della Sesta Giornata di Studio Ettore Funaioli, pp111–120

  6. Chang WH, Kim YH (2013) Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Stroke 15(3):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yun SS (2017) Exo-Glove PM: An easily customizable modularized pneumatic assistive glove. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2(3):1725–1732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Polygerinos P (2015) Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robot Autonom Syst 73:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yap HK, Lim JH, Nasrallah F, Yeow CH (2017) Design and preliminary feasibility study of a soft robotic glove for hand function assistance in stroke survivors. Front Neurosci 11:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yap HK, Lim JH, Goh JCH, Yeow CH (2016) Design of a soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation of stroke patients with clenched fist deformity using inflatable plastic actuators. J Med Dev 10(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sasaki D, Noritsugu T, Takaiwa M, Yamamoto H (2004) Wearable power assist device for hand grasping using pneumatic artificial rubber muscle. In: 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN 2004, pp 655–660

  12. Maeder-York P, Clites T, Boggs E, Neff R, Polygerinos P, Holland D, Stirling L, Galloway K, Wee C, Walsh C (2014) Biologically inspired soft robot for thumb rehabilitation. J Med Dev 8(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  13. Polygerinos P, Galloway KC, Savage E, Herman M, Donnell KO, Walsh CJ (2015) Soft robotic glove for hand rehabilitation and task specific training. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp 2913–2919

  14. Yap HK, Lim JH, Nasrallah F, Goh JC, Yeow RC (2015) A soft exoskeleton for hand assistive and rehabilitation application using pneumatic actuators with variable stiffness. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 4967–4972

  15. Koo IW (2013) Development of hand exoskeleton using pneumatic artificial muscle combined with linkage. J Kor Soc Precis Eng 30(11):1217–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang BB (2016) Development of a polymer-based tendon-driven wearable robotic hand. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp 3750–3755

  17. Majidi C (2014) Soft robotics: a perspective—current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot 1(1):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kadar A, Thoreson AR, Reisdorf RL, Amadio PC, Moran SL, Zhao C (2017) Turkey model for flexor tendon research: in vitro comparison of human, canine, turkey, and chicken tendons. J Surg Res 216:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heo P, Gu GM, Lee SJ, Rhee KH, Kim J (2012) Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(5):807–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu KS, Gonzalez RC, Lee CS (1987) Robotics : control, sensing, vision, and intelligence. Int J Electr Eng Educ 24:1

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu SN, Lee HD, Lee SH, Kim WS, Han JS, Han CS (2012) Design of an under-actuated exoskeleton system for walking assist while load carrying. Adv Robot 26(5–6):561–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ju Z, Liu H (2013) Human hand motion analysis with multisensory information. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 1:456–466

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fleischer C, Hommel G (2008) A human- exoskeleton interface utilizing electromyography. IEEE Trans Robot 24(4):872–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aguirre-Ollinger G, Colgate JE, Peshkin MA, Goswami A (2007) Active-impedance control of a lower-limb assistive exoskeleton. In: IEEE 10th international conference on rehabilitation robotics, 2007, ICORR 2007, pp 188–195

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a 2-year Research Grant of Pusan National University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Cheol Lee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, JG., Lee, M.C. Design of tendon mechanism for soft wearable robotic hand and its fuzzy control using electromyogram sensor. Intel Serv Robotics 14, 119–128 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-020-00347-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-020-00347-2

Keywords

Navigation