Abstract
This paper presents results from a survey of Romanian education researchers on their experience of research uptake and transfer to policy makers and practitioners. A range of variables are analysed in order to understand the factors they perceived to influence the use of educational research. The researchers’ context was analysed, including factors such as conceptions of the academic role, funding, type of research and collaboration in research. An adaptation of the research utilisation scale (Knott and Wildavsky in Knowl Creat Diffus Util 1(4):537–578, 1980; Cherney et al. in Int J Educ Res 56:23–34, 2012) survey was administered to a sample of 115 academics from 17 public universities in Romania, representing 31% of the total number of academics in schools of education. The quantitative data were complemented with qualitative data derived from in depth interviews with 14 university managers from the main research-intensive universities. The results indicate that researchers’ context is a determinant key of research mobilisation in practice. Despite the importance given to this aspect by the researchers, the lack of institutional coherent strategies to enhance the research transfer and use could represent constraints and challenges that are often faced when academics engage in research aimed at influencing policy and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adedoyin, O. O. (2015). Barriers inhibiting utilization of educational research findings within the school system: Views of botswana junior secondary school teacher. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 2(1), 1–9.
Amo, C. (2007). Conceptualizing research impact: The case of education research. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 22(1), 75.
Anwaruddin, S. M. (2016). Language teachers’ responses to educational research: Addressing the ‘crisis’ of representation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(3), 314–328.
Belkhodja, O., Amara, N., Landry, R., & Ouimet, M. (2007). The extent and organizational determinants of research utilization in Canadian health services organizations. Science Communication, 28(3), 377–417.
Bell, M, Cordingley, P, Isham, C, & Davis, R. (2010). Report of professional practitioner use of research review: Practitioner engagement in and/or with research. Available at: http://www.curee.co.uk/files/publication/[site-timestamp]/Practitioner%20Use%20of%20Research%20Review%20-%20FINAL%2011_02_11.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2016.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Biesta, G. (2010). Why “what works” still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491–503.
Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-based policy making: Insights from policy minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York: Routledge.
Brown, C., Daly, A., & Liou, Y. H. (2016). Improving trust, improving schools: Findings from a social network analysis of 43 primary schools in England. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(1), 69–91.
Brown, C., & Zhang, D. (2017). How can school leaders establish evidence-informed schools: An analysis of the effectiveness of potential school policy levers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership., 45(3), 382–401.
Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.
Cain, T. (2016). Research utilisation and the struggle for the teacher’s soul: A narrative review. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252912.
Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Borehamb, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners? The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34.
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. P. (2016). Research-practice partnerships in education outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.
Coburn, C., & Talbert, J. (2006). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112, 469–495.
Cooper, A., Levin, b, & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 159–171.
Cornelissen, F., Daly, A. J., Liou, Y. H., Van Swet, J., Beijaard, D., & Bergen, T. C. (2015). Leveraging the relationship: Knowledge processes in school–university research networks of master’s programmes. Research Papers in Education, 30(3), 366–392.
Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2011). Network determinants of knowledge utilization preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication, 33(4), 448–471.
Cummings, G. G., Estabrooks, C. A., Midodzi, W. K., Wallin, L., & Hayduk, L. (2007). Influence of organizational characteristics and context on research utilization. Nursing Research, 56(4), 24–39.
Curaj, A. A. (2015). Stairway to excellence country report: Romania. Bucuresti: UEFISCDI. Available at: http://uefiscdi.gov.ro/Upload/cec07eff-0631-4133-8052-04a553ae0d07.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2016.
Day, C., & Sammons, P. (2013). Successful leadership: A review of the international literature. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
Edwards, A., Sebba, J., & Rickinson, M. (2007). Working with users: Some implications for educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 647–661.
Gelderblom, G., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Ehren, M. (2016). Data-based decision making for instructional improvement in primary education. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 1–14.
Heinsch, M., Gray, M., & Sharland, E. (2015). Re-conceptualising the link between research and practice in social work: A literature review on knowledge utilization. International Journal of Social Welfare, 25(1), 33–45.
Hess, F. M. (2008). When research matters: How scholarship influences education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Honerød, M. (2012). Educational research and useful knowledge: Production, dissemination, reception, implementation. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 56–61.
Ion, G., & Castro, D. (2016). Transitions in the manifestations of the research culture of Spanish Universities. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208153.
Ion, G., & Iucu, R. (2014). Professionals’ perceptions about the use of research in educational practice. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(4), 334–347.
Ion, G., Stîngu, M., & Marin, E. (2018). How can researchers facilitate the utilisation of research by policy-makers and practitioners in education? Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452965.
Joel, R., Malin, J., Brown, C., & Trubceac, A. (2018). Going for broke: A multiple-case study of brokerage in education. AERA Open, 4(2), 1–14.
Kearney, M. L., & Lincoln, D. (2014). Researchers and policy-makers: A stakeholder alliance. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1291–1292.
Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, What is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), 537–578.
Kwiek, M. (2015). Academic generations and academic work: Patterns of attitudes, behaviours, and research productivity of Polish academics after 1989. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1354–1376.
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Climbing the ladder of research utilization—Evidence from social science research. Science Communication, 22(4), 396–422.
Lester, J. P. (1993). The utilization of policy analysis by state agency officials. Science Communication, 14(3), 267–290.
Levin, B. (2011). Mobilising research knowledge in education. London Review of Education, 9(1), 15–26.
Levin, B. (2013). To know is not enough: Research knowledge and its use. Review of Education, 1(1), 2–31.
Levin, B., & Edelstein, H. (2010). Research, policy and practice in education. Education Canada, 50(2), 29–30.
Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac-counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.
Lubienski, C., Scott, J., & DeBray, E. (2014). The politics of research production, promotion, and utilization in educational policy. Educational Policy, 28(2), 131–144.
Meijers, J. M., Janssen, M. A. P., Cummings, G. G., Wallin, L., Estabrooksc, A., & Halfens, R. Y. G. (2006). Assessing the relationships between contextual factors and research utilization in nursing: Systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(5), 622–635.
Metcalfe, A. S., & Fenwick, T. (2009). Knowledge for whose society? Knowledge production, higher education, and federal policy in Canada. Higher Education, 57(2), 209–225.
Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197.
Qvortrup, L. (2016). Capacity building: Data- and research-informed development of schools and teaching practices in Denmark and Norway. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1253675.
Rickinson, M. (2003). Reviewing research evidence in environmental education: Some methodological reflections and challenges. Environmental Education Research, 9(2), 257–271.
Sá, C. M., Li, S. X., & Faubert, B. (2011). Faculties of education and institutional strategies for knowledge mobilization: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 61(5), 501–512.
Singer, F. M. (2013). Cercetarea ştiinţifică românească în educaţie: încotro? Romanian research in education: Where to? Revista de Politica Stiintei si Scientometrie—Serie Noua, 2(4), 286–302.
Temple, P. (2003). Educational research and policymaking: Findings from some transitional countries. London Review of Education, 1(3), 217–228.
van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenked, W. (2018). Barriers and conditions for teachers’ utilisation of academic knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 50–63.
Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2010). The gap between educational research and practice: Views of teachers, school leaders, intermediaries and researchers. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 299–316.
Vîiu, G. A., & Miroiu, A. (2013). Evaluarea cercetării universitare din România. Abordări metodologice alternative. Revista de Politica Stiintei si Scientometrie—Serie Noua, 2(2), 89–107.
Vlăsceanu, L., & Hâncean, M. G. (2015). Policy incentives and research productivity in the romanian higher education. An institutional approach. In A. Curaj, et al. (Eds.), The European higher education area (pp. 185–203). Berlin: Springer.
Wieser, C. (2016). Teaching and personal educational knowledge—Conceptual considerations for research on knowledge transformation. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1253673.
Zgaga, P. (2014). The role of higher education centres in research and policy: A case from a European periphery. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1393–1400.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS—UEFISCDI Project Number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-1605.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ion, G., Marin, E. & Proteasa, C. How does the context of research influence the use of educational research in policy-making and practice?. Educ Res Policy Prac 18, 119–139 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9236-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9236-4