Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characteristics and differences of lifelong learning policy implementation for the elderly in Thailand

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Educational Research for Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined the process of policy implementation of lifelong learning for the elderly in Thailand, covering four main regions within the country. The study empirically compared inputs, processes, outputs, and outcomes of policy implementation in the north, south, northeast, and central regions of Thailand and captured the rigor of policy implementation. Using qualitative research methodology, the study showed that each region had established a networking model among stakeholders differently, with distinct actors as focal points in promoting the policy. North and south were the two regions where the elderly were most active and had contributed substantially in terms of inputs. They had also steered the process of policy implementation through close collaboration with sub-district administrative offices and the establishment of their respective associations for the elderly. The other two regions depended on support from the central government and regional branch of the office of non-formal and informal education. The sharp contrast between the regions led to the conclusion that the direction and pro-activeness in promoting lifelong learning policy for the elderly people in Thailand yielded different policy outputs and outcomes; that policy outputs and outcomes remained at the discretion of key actors within each locality; and that policy output and outcome were also not completely dependent on the top-down direction provided by the national government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourn, D. (2001). Global perspectives in lifelong learning. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 6(3), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, B. (2008). Adult learning in groups. Glasgow: Bell and Bain Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhirathiti, N. (2014). Lifelong learning policy for the elderly people: A comparative experience between Japan and Thailand. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(6), 770–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Brussels: European Commission.

  • European Commission. (2007). The key competences for lifelong learning—A European framework. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Belgium.

  • Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development. (2009). Report of the elderly situation. Bangkok: TGRD.

  • Fuwa, K. (2009). Is the expansion of higher education in Japan for young students only or for all? A critical analysis from a lifelong learning perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28(4), 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (2004). Learning for life: The foundations for lifelong learning. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, N. (2010). Public administration and public affairs (11th ed.). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Security Commission. (2003). Human security now. New York: United Nations.

  • Jakobi, A. P. (2009). International organizations and lifelong learning: From global agendas to policy diffusion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2008). Democracy, lifelong learning and the learning society: Active citizenship in a late modern age (1st ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, P. (2008). Education reform for Japan for lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(5), 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K., & Li, Z. (2008). The changing role of schools in Asian societies: Schools for the knowledge society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longworth, N. (2003). Lifelong learning in action: Transforming education in the 21st century. Virginia: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (Thailand). (2009). Rationale and ideas for implementation of ONIE: ONIE Handbook. Bangkok: ONIE.

  • Ministry of Education (Thailand). (2012). Lifelong Learning Policy. http://www.moe.go.th/moe/th/news/detail.php?NewsID=28439&Key=hotnews. Retrieved on 15 January 2016.

  • MEXT. (2008). Basic plan for the promotion of education. Tokyo: MEXT.

  • MEXT. (2014). Summary of lifelong learning policy. Tokyo: MEXT.

  • Nyyssold, K., & Hämäläinen, K. (2001). Lifelong learning in Finland: The extent to which vocational education and training policy is nurturing lifelong learning in Finland. Helsinki: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Thessaloniki (Greece), Finnish National Board of General Education.

  • Ogden, A. C. (2010). A brief overview of lifelong learning in Japan. The Language Teacher, 34(6), 5–13.

  • Okumoto, K. (2008). Lifelong learning in England and Japan: Three translations. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 38(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradab, R. (2013). Community organizations council: New politics and challenges to local elite groups. Bangkok: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenson, K. (2011). Adult learning and education. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen, T., & Nyhan, B. (2006). Promoting lifelong learning for older workers: An international overview. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • TGRI. (2015). Situation of the Thai Elderly 2015. Bangkok: Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute.

  • UNESCO. (1996). Learning: The treasure within—Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning (1st ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

    Nopraenue S. Dhirathiti

  2. Faculty of Political Science and Public Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Pojjana Pichitpatja

Authors
  1. Nopraenue S. Dhirathiti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pojjana Pichitpatja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nopraenue S. Dhirathiti.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund under the Project on Trends and Development of Lifelong Learning Policy for Elderly People in Thailand (Grant RDG5740036).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhirathiti, N.S., Pichitpatja, P. Characteristics and differences of lifelong learning policy implementation for the elderly in Thailand. Educ Res Policy Prac 17, 53–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-017-9219-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-017-9219-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation