Skip to main content
Log in

Public Sector Reform in Italian Higher Education: The Governance Transformation of the Universities — A Comparison Among Perceptions of Rectors and Department Chairs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Higher Education Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New public management (NPM) has dominated the reforms in the higher education sector and the academic discussion on how universities should be governed since the 1980s. Besides, the introduction of accountability and efficiency measures in the form of performance measurement and pay-for-performance scheme, a key debated aspect of NPM is the strengthening of the role of boards and the introduction of a more firm-like governance structure. Much work is still needed to evaluate the implementation of NPM reforms in the university domain, particularly with respect to the internal governance changes. Besides formal rules, perceptions of key actors on their institutional environment play a major role in investigating university governance. This article uses a unique dataset on Italian universities to illustrate the internal governance patterns that emerged after the 2010 reform and critically analyses the differences in the perceptions of rectors and department chairs providing insights for both academic and policymakers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NPM:

New public management

AS:

Academic Senate

ATS:

Administrative-technical staff

GD:

General Director

AB:

Administrative Board

UR:

University Researchers

R :

Rector

DC:

Department chair

POE:

Punti Organico Equivalenti

References

  • Aarrevaara, T. (2010) ‘Academic freedom in a changing academic world’, European Review 18(S1): S55–S69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C., Mas-Colell, A. and Sapir, A. (2010) ‘The governance and performance of universities: Evidence from Europe and the US’, Economic Policy 25(61): 7–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Tavares, O. and Santos, C. (2013) ‘Higher education reform in Portugal: A historical and comparative perspective of the new legal framework for public universities’, Higher Education Policy 26(1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2010) Corporations in Evolving Diversity: Cognition, Governance, and Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2004) ‘The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back’, New Directions for Higher Education 127(1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (1998) ‘Justifying the evaluative state: New public management ideals in higher education’, Journal of Public Affairs Education 4(2): 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B. and Musselin, C. (2011) ‘New public management, network governance and the university as a changing professional organization’, in T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.). The Ashgate Research Companion To New Public Management, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. and Merrien, F.X. (eds.) (1999) Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities?: A Comparative View, London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. and Bull, D. (2010) ‘The financial route to education reform’, Italian Politics 26: 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. and Regini, M. (2013) ‘Governance reforms and organizational dilemmas in European universities’, Comparative Education Review 58(1): 73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. and Regini, M. (2015) Come Cambia la Governance: Università Italiane ed Europee a Confronto, Rome: Fondazione CRUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G., Regini, M. and Turri, M. (2016) Changing Governance in Universities. Italian Higher Education in Comparative Perspective, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. and Turri, M. (2017) ‘Same governance template but different agencies’, Higher Education Policy 30(2): 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho T. and Diogo S. (2018) ‘Exploring the relationship between institutional and professional autonomy: A comparative study between Portugal and Finland’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 40(1): 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, T. and Videira, P. (2019) ‘Losing autonomy? Restructuring higher education institutions governance and relations between teaching and non-teaching staff’, Studies in Higher Education 44(4): 762–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (1983) The Higher Education System, Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective, Berkley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S. (2012) What are Universities for? London: Penguin Books UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Molin, M., Turri, M. and Agasisti, T. (2017) ‘New public management reforms in the Italian universities: Managerial tools, accountability mechanisms or simply compliance?’, International Journal of Public Administration 40(3): 256–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, H.F., Enders, J. and Leisyte, L. (2007) ‘Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university’, Public Administration 85(1): 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Favero, M. (2003) ‘Faculty–administrator relationships as integral to high performing governance systems: New frameworks for study’, American Behavioral Scientist 46(7): 902–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Favero, M. and Bray, N.J. (2010) ‘Herding cats and big dogs: Tensions in the faculty–administrator relationship’, in L.W. Perna (ed.). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 477–541.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Donina, D., Meoli, M. and Paleari, S. (2015) ‘Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance’, Higher Education Policy 28(2): 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donina, D. and Paleari, S. (2018) ‘New public management: Global reform script or conceptual stretching? Analysis of university governance structures in the Napoleonic administrative tradition’, Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., de Boer, H.F. and Weyer, E. (2013) ‘Regulatory autonomy and performance: The reform of higher education re-visited’, Higher Education 65(1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facchini, C., Fia, M. and Sacconi, L. (2018) ‘La governance universitaria in Italia, tra mutamento legislativo e adattamento istituzionale. Teoria ed evidenze’, Politiche Sociali, Social Policies 2018(3): 363–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C. and Andresani, G. (2008) ‘The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective’, Higher Education 56(3): 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fia, M. and Sacconi, L. (2013) ‘L’Università nella prospettiva della responsabilità sociale: un modello di Governance Multistakeholder’, in A. Cassone, L. Sacconi (eds.). Autonomia e responsabilità sociale dell’università. Governance e Accountability, Milano: Giuffrè Editore, pp. 63–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fia, M. and Verde, M. (2013) ‘La Riforma della Governance Universitaria in Italia e il Sistema Anglosassone: paradigmi interpretativi a confronto’, in A. Cassone, L. Sacconi (eds.). Autonomia e responsabilità sociale dell’università. Governance e Accountability, Milano: Giuffrè Editore, pp. 13–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fia, M., Verde, M., Sacconi, L. and Cassone, A. (2016) ‘Il governo dell’università dopo la legge n. 240/2010, le criticità. Statuti e codici etici, il quadro aggiornato’, in Chiara Mio (a cura di), La rendicontazione sociale negli atenei italiani valori, modelli, misurazioni, Milan: Franco Angeli Editore, pp. 62–86.

  • Frey, B. (2016) ‘Withering Academia’, Analyse and Kritik 32(2): 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, B. (2011) The Fall of the Faculty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J. and Hart, O.D. (1986) ‘The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration’, The Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 691–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1999) Higher education as an associative good. Yale Law and Economics Working Paper no. 231.

  • Hart, O. and Moore, J. (1990) ‘Property rights and the nature of the firm’, Journal of Political Economy 98(6): 1119–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2002) ‘Emerging concepts of academic leadership and their implications for intra-institutional roles and relationships in higher education’, European Journal of Education 37(1): 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, W.Z. and Weber, L.E. (2001) Governance in Higher Education: The University in a State of Flux, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, G.E. (2004) ‘How academic ships actually navigate’, in R.G. Ehrenberg (ed.). Governing Academia: Who is in Charge at the Modern University?, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 165–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. and Ott, M. (2013) ‘Faculty perceptions of organizational politics’, The Review of Higher Education 36(2): 145–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti, L. and Tavoletti, E. (2006) ‘Governance shifts in higher education: A cross-national comparison’, European Educational Research Journal 5(1): 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumino, R., Gambardella, D. and Grimaldi, E. (2017) ‘The evaluation turn in the higher education system: Lessons from Italy’, Journal of Educational Administration and History 49(2): 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, A., Veiga, A. and Amaral, A. (2018) ‘The changing role of external stakeholders: From imaginary friends to effective actors or non-interfering friends’, Studies in Higher Education 43(4): 737–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masten, S.E. (2006) ‘Authority and commitment: Why universities, like legislatures, are not organized as firms’, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 15(3): 649–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J.Z. (2017) The Tyrrany of Metrics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2013) ‘Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university’, Higher Education 65(1): 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2012) The evaluative state, institutional autonomy and re-engineering higher education in Western Europe: The prince and his pleasure, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M. (2010) ‘Governance by numbers. Does it really work in research?’, Analyse & Kritik 32(2): 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. and Ferlie, E. (eds.) (2009) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.W. and White, T.H. (1992) ‘Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views or different models of organization?’, Research in Higher Education 33(2): 177–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011) Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regini, M. (2015) ‘Changing governance of European universities: A study on the effects of reforms’, Scuola Democratica 6(1): 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostan, M. and Vaira, M. (2011) ‘Faltering effects of market-oriented reforms on Italian higher education’, in P.N. Teixeira and D.D. Dill (eds.). Public Vices, Private Virtues? Issues in Higher Education vol 2, Rotterdam: SensePublishers, pp. 327–343.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sacconi, L. (1999) ‘Codes of ethics as contractarian constraint on the abuse of authority within hierarchies: A perspective from the theory of the firm’, Journal of Business Ethics 21(2–3): 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viesti, G. (2016) Università in declino Un’indagine sugli Atenei da Nord a Sud, Rome: Donzelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1975) Market and Hierarchies, New York, NY: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magali Fia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the Authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Facchini, C., Fia, M. Public Sector Reform in Italian Higher Education: The Governance Transformation of the Universities — A Comparison Among Perceptions of Rectors and Department Chairs. High Educ Policy 34, 560–581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00152-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-019-00152-2

Keywords

Navigation