The opposition [that Albert Einstein] felt to all types of regimentation made his education at the Munich gymnasium increasingly irksome and contentious. The mechanical learning there, he complained, ‘seemed very much akin to the methods of the Prussian army, where a mechanical discipline was achieved by repeated execution of meaningless orders…’ He once asked C.P. Snow, the British writer and scientist, whether he was familiar with the German word Zwang. Snow allowed that he was; it meant constraint, compulsion, obligation, coercion. Why? In his Munich school, Einstein answered, he had made his first strike against Zwang, and it had helped define him ever since. (Isaacson 2007).
Abstract
Is science culturally determined? If so, in what aspects and how? Using evidence from three studies of German and Israeli science, this paper shows that the contexts of scientific discovery in those countries are highly distinct. Respondents from each study embraced a universalist position by holding the belief that ‘science is science,’ suggesting that they share similar understandings about the context of scientific justification. However, respondents also agreed that the deep cultural codes of hierarchy (in Germany) and symmetry (in Israel) constitute the actual contexts of scientific discovery on utterly different trajectories. Specifically, they claimed that deep cultural codes determine the organization of labs; that they set the ground rules for the relations between senior and junior scientists; that they determine concrete research practices; and that they even constitute intellectual styles. By adding ‘national culture’ as an important factor in science studies, this paper suggests that it is the task of science and technology studies to employ broader approaches of cultural analysis. Such approaches would bring to light national particularities in socialization towards the universal Temple of Science; they also would facilitate greater appreciation for the multiple cultural ways of doing science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The author is aware of Galtung's antisemitism and was partly involved in 'outing' him. See https://www.haaretz.com/1.5218261.
Very few Israeli scientists train in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or the Netherlands and Switzerland. England is a minor exception, but the figures are incomparable with the numbers doing graduate studies or postdocs in the US.
The number of Arab or Palestinian Israeli citizens working as scientists in academia is negligible. In this context, therefore, the conflation between Israeliness and Jewishness reflects reality.
While respondents used 'hierarchy' to explain German practices, the use of 'symmetry' was rare. Respondents rather spoke of equality and informality. I chose the theoretical concept of 'symmetry' as Reuvan Kahane (1974) used it in his theory of informal education.
Author, authority, and authoritarianism reflect a pre-ordained source—God, or professor-doktor. Those below have to obey.
References
Abbott, Alison. 2017. The Secret to Germany’s Scientific Excellence. Nature 549 (7670): 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/549018a.
Alexander, Jeffrey. 2003. The Meaning of Social Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2008. Clifford Geertz and the Strong Program: The Human Sciences and Cultural Sociology. Cultural Sociology 2 (2): 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975508091030.
Becher, T., and P.R. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.
Belfer, Israel. 2013. Review: ‘Einstein’s Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion. H-net, H-Judaic. https://networks.h-net.org/node/28655/reviews/31027/belfer-gimbel-einsteins-jewish-science-physics-intersection-politics.
Ben-David, Joseph. 1971. The Scientist’s Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ben-David, Joseph, and Awraham Zloczower. 1962. Universities and Academic Systems in Modern Societies. European Journal of Sociology 3 (01): 45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003975600000527.
Borry, Pascal, Angus Clarke, and Kris Dierickx. 2008. Carrier Screening: Look before You Leap: Carrier Screening for Type 1 Gaucher Disease: Difficult Questions. European Journal of Human Genetics 16 (2): 139–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201960.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1975. The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason. Social Science Information/Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales 14 (6): 19–47.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000a. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000b. Making the Economic Habitus: Algerian Workers Revisited. Ethnography 1 (1): 17–41.
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bucchi, Massimiano. 2004. Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science. London: Routledge.
Child, G., and A. Keiser. 1997. Organization and Managerial Roles in British and West-German Companies: An Examination of the Culture-free Thesis. In Comparative Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, ed. Malcolm Warner, 20–40. London: Routledge.
Christin, Angèle. 2018. Counting Clicks: Quantification and Variation in Web Journalism in the United States and France. American Journal of Sociology 123 (5): 1382–1415. https://doi.org/10.1086/696137.
Clark, William. 2006. Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Cramer, Rahel. 2015. German Ordnung: A Semantic and Ethnopragmatic Analysis of a Core Cultural Value. International Journal of Language and Culture 2 (2): 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.2.2.06cra.
Dumais, Susan A. 2002. Cultural Capital, Gender, and School Success: The Role of Habitus. Sociology of Education 75 (1): 44–68.
Dumont, Louis. 1986. Are Cultures Living Beings? German Identity in Interaction. Man 21 (4): 587–604.
Duschinsky, Robbie, and Sue Lampitt. 2012. Managing the Tensions of Essentialism: Purity and Impurity. Sociology 46 (6): 1194–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512437896.
Dwyer, Sean, Hani Mesak, and Maxwell Hsu. 2005. An Exploratory Examination of the Influence of National Culture on Cross-National Product Diffusion. Journal of International Marketing 13 (2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.13.2.1.64859.
Eisenstadt, S.N. 2001. The Challenge of Multiple Modernities. In New Horizons in Sociological Theory and Research, ed. Luigi Tomasi, 99–126. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 1985. The Transformation of Israeli Society: An Essay in Interpretation. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Elias, Norbert. 1996. The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fuchs, Stephan. 2001. Against Essentialism: A Theory of Culture and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Galtung, J. 1981. Structure, Culture, and Intellectual Style: An Essay Comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic Approaches. Social Science Information 20 (6): 817–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901848102000601.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
Gimbel, Steven. 2012. Einstein’s Jewish Science: Physics at the Intersection of Politics and Religion. Maryland: John’s Hopkins University Press.
Girsh, Yaron. 2014. The (late?) Modern Family: The Family’s Significance for Adolescents in Germany and Israel. Journal of Adolescence 37 (6): 863–870.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Guetzkow, Joshua, Michèle Lamont, and Grégoire Mallard. 2004. What Is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? American Sociological Review 69 (2): 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240406900203.
Hall, Edward T., and Mildred Reed Hall. 1987. Hidden Differences: Doing Business with the Japanese. New York: Anchor.
Harding, Sandra. 2005. Culture and Science. In Science, Technology, and Society: An Encyclopedia, ed. Sal P. Restivo, 77–79. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hazareesingh, Sudhir. 2015. How the French Think: An Affectionate Portrait of an Intellectual People. New York: Basic Books.
Heilman, Samuel C. 2001. People of the Book: Drama, Fellowship and Religion. New York: Routledge.
Heilman, Samuel C. 2017. Synagogue Life: A Study in Symbolic Interaction. Oxon: Routledge.
Hellyer, Marcus. 2005. Catholic Physics: Jesuit Natural Philosophy in Early Modern Germany. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hufner, Klaus. 2004. Germany. In Doctoral Studies and Qualifications in Europe and the United States: Status and Prospects, ed. Jan Sadlek, 51–62. Bucharest: UNESCO.
Isaacson, Walter. 2007. Einstein: His Life and Universe. London: Simon and Schuster.
Jamison, Andrew. 1987. National Styles of Science and Technology: A Comparative Model. Sociological Inquiry 57 (2): 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1987.tb01039.x.
Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2): 119–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
Kahane, Reuven. 1975. The Committed: Preliminary Reflections on the Impact of the Kibbutz Socialization Pattern on Adolescents. The British Journal of Sociology 26 (3): 343–353.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1992. Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Science and Culture. New York: Routledge.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Kuipers, G. 2013. The Rise and Decline of National Habitus: Dutch Cycling Culture and the Shaping of National Similarity. European Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431012437482.
Kumar, Krishan. 2001. Sociology and the Englishness of English Social Theory. Sociological Theory 19 (1): 41–64.
Kuzmics, Helmut, and Roland Axtmann. 2007. Authority, State and National Character: The Civilizing Process in Austria and England, 1700–1900. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
Lamont, Michèle. 2010. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1949. Les Structures Elémentaires de la Parenté. Paris: Mouton.
Levine, Donald N. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lomsky-Feder, Edna. 2004. The Memorial Ceremony in Israeli Schools: Between the State and Civil Society. British Journal of Sociology of Education 25 (3): 291–305.
Long, Scott John, and Mary Frank Fox. 1995. Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 45–71.
Marcuse, Herbert. 2008. A Study on Authority. London: Verso.
Marx, Karl. 1972. In The Karl Marx Library, vol. 1, ed. K.Saul Padover, 245–246. New York: McGraw Hill.
Mennell, Stephen. 2007. The American Civilizing Process. Cambridge: Polity.
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, John W. 1988. Society Without Culture: A Ninteenth-Centuray Legacy. In Rethinking the Nineteenth Century, ed. Francisco Ramirez, 193–201. New York: Greenwood.
Miettinen, Reijo. 2006. The Sources of Novelty: A Cultural and Systemic View of Distributed Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management 15 (2): 173–181.
Mintz, Alex, and Carly Wayne. 2016. The Polythink Syndrome and Elite Group Decision-Making. Political Psychology 37: 3–21.
Mouzelis, Nicos. 2007. Habitus and Reflexivity: Restructuring Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. Sociological Research Online 12 (6): 9.
Nakata, C., and K. Sivakumar. 2001. Instituting the Marketing Concept in a Multinational Setting: The Role of National Culture. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (3): 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/03079459994623.
Ortner, Sherry B. 1973. On Key Symbols. American Anthropologist 75 (5): 1338–1346.
Pace, David. 1986. Claude Levi-Strauss: The Bearer of Ashes. London: Ark.
Paulle, Bowen, Bart van Heerikhuizen, and Mustafa Emirbayer. 2012. Elias and Bourdieu. Journal of Classical Sociology 12 (1): 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795x11433708.
Pfotenhauer, Sebastian, and Sheila Jasanoff. 2017. Panacea or Diagnosis? Imaginaries of Innovation and the ‘MIT Model’ in Three Political Cultures. Social Studies of Science 47 (6): 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717706110.
Pickel, Andreas. 2004. Homo Nationis: The Psycho-social Infrastructure of the Nation-state Order. Global Society 18 (4): 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360082042000272445.
Prpic, Katarina. 2002. Gender and Productivity Differentials in Science. Scientometrics 55 (1): 27–58.
Rapaille, Clotaire. 2006. The Culture Code: An Ingenious Way to Understand Why People Around the World Live and Buy as They Do. New York: Broadway.
Rees-Caldwell, Kelly, and Ashly H. Pinnington. 2013. National Culture Differences in Project Management: Comparing British and Arab Project Managers’ Perceptions of Different Planning Areas. International Journal of Project Management 31 (2): 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.04.003.
Schwartz, Norbert. 1998. Warmer and More Social: Recent Developments in Cognitive Social Psychology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 239–264.
Senor, Dan, and Saul Singer. 2009. Start-up Nation: The Story of Israel’s Economic Miracle. New York and Boston: A Council on Foreign Relations Book.
Shore, Barry, and Benjamin J. Cross. 2005. Exploring the Role of National Culture in the Management of Large-scale International Science Projects. International Journal of Project Management 23 (1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.009.
Sismondo, Sergio. 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Smith, Edwin. 2003. Ethos, Habitus and Situation for Learning: An Ecology. British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (4): 463–470.
Snow, C.P. 1963. The Two Cultures: And a Second Look. New York: Mentor.
Solomon, Gavriel. 1993. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swidler, Ann. 1986. Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273.
Trow, Martin. 2006. “Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modern Societies Since WWII.” In International Handbook of Higher Education, edited by James J. F. Forest and Philip G. Altbach, 243–280. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_13.
Turner, R.Steven. 1980. The Prussian Universities and the Concept of Research. Internationales Archiv Für Sozialgeschichte Der Deutschen Literatur (IASL) 5 (1): 68–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/iasl.1980.5.1.68.
Vinitzky-Seroussi, Vered. 2002. Commemorating a Difficult Past: Yitzhak Rabin’s Memorials. American Sociological Review 67 (1): 30–51.
Vinitzky-Seroussi, Vered, and Chana Teeger. 2007. Controlling for Consensus: Commemorating Apartheid in South Africa. Symbolic Interaction 30 (1): 57–78.
Wacquant, Loic J.D. 1989. For a Socio-analysis of Intellectuals: On Homo Academicus (an Interview with Pierre Bourdieu). Berkeley Journal of Sociology: A Critical Review 34: 1–29.
Walker, Connor. 1994. Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Weber, Max. 1946. “Politics as a Vocation.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by H H Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 77–128. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max. 1973. Max Weber on Universities. Translated by Edward Shils. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Whitley, Richard, Bernward Joerges, and Helga Nowotny. 2003. Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Fordrecht: Kluwer.
Yair, Gad. 2009. Pierre Bourdieu: The Last Musketeer of the French Revolution. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Yair, Gad. 2015. The Germans: Cultural Trauma and the Israeli Habitus. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 3 (2): 254–279. https://doi.org/10.1057/ajcs.2015.2.
Yair, Gad, and Noa Apeloig. 2006. Israel and the Exile of Intellectual Caliber: Local Position and the Absence of Sociological Theory. Sociology 40 (1): 51–69.
Yair, Gad, Yaron Girsh, Samira Alayan, Henning Heus, and Or Elad. 2014. WE DON’T NEED ANOTHER HERO: Heroes and Role Models in Germany and Israel. Comparative Education Review 58 (2): 269–295.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to Avigail Weil, Elias Kuhley, and Jason Weiss for sharing data from their studies. Elad Schustack advised on statistical issues. Keith Goldstein assisted in organizing data and read drafts of this paper. Nir Rotem and Liron Shani provided significant inputs too.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yair, G. Hierarchy versus symmetry in German and Israeli science. Am J Cult Sociol 8, 214–245 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00069-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-019-00069-8