Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:54:42.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reparative Justice for Climate Refugees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2019

Abstract

This paper sketches an account of reparative justice for climate refugees, focusing on total land loss due to sea-level rise. I begin by outlining the harm of this loss in terms of self-determination and cultural heritage. I then consider, first, who is owed these reparations? Second, who should pay such reparations? Third, in what form should the reparations be paid? I end with thoughts on the project of reparative justice more generally, arguing that such obligations do not depend upon a perfect account of how reparations might be fulfilled; we simply have an obligation to shoot the arrow as close to the target as we can.

Type
Winner of the 2018 Philosophy prize essay competition
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 NASA (2017) Sea Level, available at: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/

2 IPCC. (2013) ‘Fifth Assessment Report: A Physical Science Basis’, (retrieved May 11th, 2018) available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/

3 This paper assumes that climate change is manmade. That is, the warming of the planet is caused by the emission of greenhouse gases and burning of fossil fuels. For more information on the unequivocal evidence for this assumption please see the NASA climate report (2015), IPCC (2013; 2014; 2015).

4 Kelman, I. and West, J. (2009) ‘Climate Change and Small Island Developing States: A Review’, Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 116Google Scholar

5 Souter, J. (2013) ‘Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice’, Political Studies, Vol. 62, No. 2. 326342Google Scholar

6 UN General Assembly, Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 28 July 1951, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, p. 137, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3be01b964.html [accessed 14 June 2018]

7 Shacknove, A. (1985) ‘Who is a RefugeeEthics, Vol. 95, No. 2, 274284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Some disagree with specifying refugees due to ‘types’ of displacement. See in particular Zetter (2007) in which he argues that creating typologies of refugees leads to differential treatment. Whilst I agree that in a current political climate in which not all refugees have their basic, minimal rights respected, we may not want to encourage a prioritisation of some refugees over others. However, from the perspective of reparations, it may be that causes of displacement can generate additional duties. Zetter, R. (2007) ‘More Labels, Fewer Refugees: Remaking the Refugee Label in an Era of Globalization’, Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, 172-192CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Nine, C. (2012) Global Justice and Territory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Moore, M (2015), A Political Theory of Territory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Vincent, A. (1987) Theories of The State, Blackwell: Oxford, 19Google Scholar

12 Held, D. (1983) States and Societies, New York University Press: New York, 3Google Scholar

13 T. Hobbes, Leviathan, Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1946), 232

14 Kolers, A. (2015) ‘Floating Provisos and Sinking Islands’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 29, No. 4, 333343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Bell, D. (2004) ‘Environmental Refugees: What Rights? Which Duties?Res Publica, Vol. 10, 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Deshalit, A., (2011) ‘Climate Change Refugees, Compensation and Rectification’, The Monist, Vol. 94, No. 3, 315Google Scholar

17 Goodin, R. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable, University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 60Google Scholar

18 Ögalen, J. (2015) ‘Underwater Self-determination: Sea-Level Rise and Deterritorialized, Small Island States’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, Vol. 17, No. 2, 233Google Scholar.

19 Nine, C. (2012) Global Justice and Territory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Government of Tuvalu (2015) ‘Intended Nationally Determined Contributions: Communicated to the UNFCC on November 27 2015’, available at: http://www4.unfccc.int/ndcregistry/PublishedDocuments/Tuvalu%20First/TUVALU%20INDC. pdf

21 Thompson, J. (2002) Taking Responsibility for the Past: Reparations and Historic Injustice, Wiley: London, 42Google Scholar

22 Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York Books: New York, 49Google Scholar

23 C. Ogletree (2002) ‘Repairing the Past: New Efforts in in the Reparations Debate in America’, Harvard Civil-Rights Civil-Liberties, Law Review, Vol. 38, 279

24 M. McKeown (2015) ‘Collective Responsibility for the Future’, University College Dublin

25 Brooks, T. (2004) Atonement and Forgiveness: A New Model for Black Reparations, University of California Press: Berkeley, 666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 C. Ogletree (2002), 311

27 I. Young (2011) Responsibility for Justice, 105–106; (quoted in McKeown, 2015)

28 Thompson, J. (2002) Taking Responsibility for the Past: Reparations and Historic Injustice, Wiley: London, 41Google Scholar

29 Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books: New YorkGoogle Scholar, Chapter 7

30 J. Thompson (2002), Taking Responsibility for the Past: Reparations and Historic Injustice, 43

31 Souter, J. (2013) ‘Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice’, Political Studies, Vol. 62, No. 2, 326-342CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 316

32 Gibney, M. (2004) The Ethics and Politics of Asylum, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Parfit, D. (1987) Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press: Oxford, 363Google Scholar

34 For a convincing solution to the non-identity problem, see Gardner, M. (2015) ‘A Harm-Based Solution to the Non-Identity Problem’, Ergo, Vol. 2, No. 17, 427444Google Scholar

35 Kolers, A. (2015) ‘Floating Provisos and Sinking Islands’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 29, No. 4, 333343CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 337; Nine, C (2012) Global Justice and Territory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 T. Coates, (2014) ‘The Case for Reparations’ The Atlantic, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/

37 J. Drydyk, P. Penz & P. Bose (2011) Displacement by Development: Ethics, Rights and Responsibilities, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 210

38 J. Souter (2013) ‘Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice’, 330

39 Ibid.

40 Miller, D. (2007) National Responsibility and Global Justice, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 P. Penz (1997) ‘The Ethics of Development Induced Displacement’, Refuge, Vol. 16, No. 3, 38

42 J. Souter (2013), ‘Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice’, 330

43 S. Gardiner (2006) ‘A Perfect Moral Storm: Climate Change, Intergenerational Ethics and the Problem of Moral Corruption’, Environmental Values, Vol. 15, 398

44 For the sake of brevity, this paper will not consider the APP in full as, in being focused on ability, it does not satisfy the question of who is responsible for climate change. For further discussion on the APP, please see Caney, S. (2010) ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 13, No. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

45 Baatz, C. (2013) ‘Responsibility for the Past? Some Thoughts on Compensating Those Vulnerable to Climate Change in Developing Countries’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

46 Caney, S. (2005) ‘Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change’, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, 753)Google Scholar

47 Eckersley, R. (2015) ‘The common but differentiated responsibilities of states to assist and receive ‘climate refugees’, European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 14, No. 4, 481500CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 497

48 Muller, B. et al. (2009) ‘Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate change’, Climate Policy, Vol. 9, 593611CrossRefGoogle Scholar. 594

49 Caney, S. (2010) ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol. 13, No. 1, 203228CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 207

50 Doty, R. (2011) ‘Bare Life: Border Crossing Deaths and Spaces of Moral Alibi, Environment and Planning: Society and Space, Vol. 29, No. 4, 599612Google Scholar.

51 C. Nine (2012) Global Justice and Territory, 162

52 Baatz, C. (2013) ‘Responsibility for the Past? Some Thoughts on Compensating Those Vulnerable to Climate Change in Developing Countries’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

53 Ibid.

54 Page, E. (2008) ‘Distributing the Burdens of Climate Change’, Environmental Politics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 556575CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 565

55 Gosseries, A. (2004) ‘Historical Emissions and Free-Riding’, Ethical Perspectives, Vol. 11, 3660CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 42

56 S. Caney (2010) ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’, 209

57 Stilz, A. (2011) ‘Collective Responsibility and the State’, Journal of Political Philosophy Vol. 1, No. 2 19, 2, 190-208CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 190

58 Baatz, C. (2013) ‘Responsibility for the Past? Some Thoughts on Compensating Those Vulnerable to Climate Change in Developing Countries’, Ethics, Policy and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1, 94-110CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 108

59 Walker, M. Urban (2006) ‘Restorative Justice and Reparations’, Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 37, No. 3, 377-395CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 379

60 Ibid, 382

61 Ibid, 383

62 A. de Shalit (2011) ‘Climate Change Refugees, Compensation and Rectification’, 328

63 De Shalit, A. (2011) ‘Climate Change Refugees, Compensation and Rectification’, The Monist, Vol. 94, No. 3, 311Google Scholar

64 Case D1/2018, High Court of the Commonwealth of Australia; Commonwealth of Australia v. Mr A Griffiths (deceased) and Lorraine Jones on behalf of the Ngaliwurru and Nungali Peoples http://www.hcourt.gov.au/cases/case_d1-2018

65 See, for example, the displacement solutions generated for small island states and the Tuvalu HLD initiative: http://displacementsolutions.org/ds-initiatives/climate-change-and-displacement-initiative/tuvalu-climate-displacement

66 J. Souter (2013) ‘Asylum as Reparations for Past Injustice’, 327

67 Miller, D., (2015), ‘Justice in ImmigrationEuropean Journal of Political Theory, Vol 14, No 4, 402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68 Ibid, 402

69 Eckersley, R. (2015) ‘The common but differentiated responsibilities of states to assist and receive ‘climate refugees’, European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 14, No. 4, 481500CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 481

70 Ibid, 481

71 Byravan, S. & Rajan, T. (2010) ‘The Ethical Implications of Sea-Level Rise Due to Climate Change’, Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 3, 239-260CrossRefGoogle Scholar. 244

72 Marino, E. (2015) Fierce Climate, Sacred Ground, University of Alaska Press: Fairbanks, 81Google Scholar

74 A. de Shalit (2011) ‘Climate Change Refugees, Compensation and Rectification’, 328

75 McAdam, J. (2016) ‘The High Price of Resettlement: the proposed environmental relocation of Nauru to Australia’, Australian Geographer, Vol. 48, No. 1, 8Google Scholar

76 Written Statement of Nauru 1991, pars. 20, 74; quoted in J. McAdam (2016), 10

77 C. Nine (2012) Global Justice and Territory, 163

78 Government of Tuvalu (2015) ‘Intended Nationally Determined Contributions: Communicated to the UNFCC on November 27 2015’, available at: http://www4.unfccc.int/ndcregistry/PublishedDocuments/Tuvalu%20First/TUVALU%20INDC.pdf