Time to update our suggestibility scales
Introduction
The Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility Form A (HGSHS:A, Shor & Orne, 1962) has, for almost 60 years, been used as the initial (and still often the only) test when recruiting participants for hypnosis experiments. It has been translated into a number of languages; the latest norms for its use in the United Kingdom were published in 2020 (Oakley et al., 2020). The scale has had an enormous impact on what researchers in the field and participants in hypnosis experiments think that hypnosis is. Despite its ongoing popularity, HGSHS:A has been criticized (e.g., Woody, 1997). Also Acunzo and Terhune (Acunzo & Terhune, Preprint) discuss several of its shortcomings, along with those of other, similar contemporary measures of hypnotic suggestibility: e.g., having binary scoring and single-trial sampling (see also Kirsch et al., 2011).
My comment is two-fold. I will mainly focus on the problems with how the HGSHS:A instructs participants to respond to suggestions along with the kinds of suggestions it includes. Oakley, Walsh, Mehta, Halligan, and Deeley (2021) propose some changes to HGSHS:A; however, at the end of this comment I will point out why these changes do not fix the problems.
Section snippets
Non-hypnotic suggestibility
By the end of the 19th Century, researchers (e.g., Binet, 1900) had started becoming interested in suggestibility more generally: i.e., without connection to hypnosis. That interest has continued and grown. Gheorghiu et al. (1989) are typical in concluding that the phenomenon of suggestibility finds applications across many areas, including medicine (e.g., via the placebo effect), education, psychotherapy, and marketing.
Unfortunately, too few devices are available to measure waking
Defining core terms
“Suggestion” has been defined in many ways (for a review, see Gheorghiu, 1989). The following three definitions give an idea of what is meant while revealing why further clarification is sorely needed. McDougall (1908, p. 100) defines “suggestion” as “…a process of communication resulting in the acceptance with conviction of the communicated proposition in the absence of logically adequate grounds for its acceptance”. Sidis (1898) defines “suggestion” as an intrusive idea1
The evolution of HGSHS:A
Development of the currently available scales such as HGSHS:A began in the late 1950s when Andre Weitzenhoffer and Ernst Hilgard developed metrics for hypnotic susceptibility. Their research culminated in the development of three scales in particular, known as the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B (SHSS:A, SHSS:B, Weitzenhoffer & Hilgard, 1959) and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSS:C, Weitzenhoffer & Hilgard, 1962). These scales were largely based on
Problems with HGSHS:A
The first problem with HGSHS:A is that the instructions for responding to suggestions are quite ambiguous. In the beginning of the induction, participants are asked to test how it feels to respond to suggestions when not hypnotized (pp. 4–5):
As you know, thinking of a movement and making a movement are closely related. Soon after you think of your head falling forward you will experience a tendency to make the movement.
Several suggestions of the head falling forward are given so that
Conclusion
What has happened to suggestibility closely resembles what has happened to many other constructs in the history of science: the more researchers learn about them, the more complicated they turn out to be. Consider how the construct of memory has come to be understood as a complex cluster of memory systems, some of them working independently of each other (e.g., Bower, 2000).
I have taken up many concerns that I have regarding the Harvard scale in its current form. While noting similar concerns,
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. I wish to thank Joel Parthemore and Oskar MacGregor for commenting on the manuscript.
References (49)
- et al.
Cerebral activation of during hypnotically induced and imagined pain
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
Suggested visual hallucinations in and out of hypnosis
Consciousness and Cognition
(2009) - et al.
Suggested visual hallucination without hypnosis enhances activity in visual areas of the brain
Consciousnes and Cognition
(2012) - Acunzo, D. J., & Terhune, D. B. (Preprint). A critical review of standardized measures of hypnotic suggestibility....
- et al.
Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions
Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences
(2019) La Suggestibilité
(1900)A brief history of memory research
Understanding reports of nonvolition
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
(1986)- et al.
The experience of hypnotic suggestions
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
(1988) - et al.
An experimental analysis of the Chevreul Pendulum Illusion
The Journal of General Psychology
(1976)
Is suggestibility?
Primary and secondary suggestibility: An experimental and statistical study
Journal of Experimental Psychology
The depth of hypnosis
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
The development of research on suggestibility: Critical considerations
Hypnotic susceptibility
Suggestibility and suggestions as related to hypnosis
Hypnotic susceptibility scales under attack: An examination of Weitzenhoffer’s criticisms
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
A tailored SHSS:C, permitting user modification for special purposes
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Hypnosis and Suggestibility: An Experimental Approach
Hypnotic phenomena and altered states of consciousness: A multilevel framework of description and explanation
Contemporary Hypnosis
Seeing blue as red: A hypnotic suggestion can alter visual awareness of colors
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
Synaesthesia-type associations and perceptual changes induced by hypnotic suggestion
Scientific Reports
Cited by (6)
The importance of highlighting the role of the self in hypnotherapy and hypnosis
2024, Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeDirect verbal suggestibility: A response to “Time to update our suggestibility scales” (Kallio, 2021)
2021, Consciousness and CognitionEditing reality in the brain
2022, Neuroscience of ConsciousnessMultisensory Integration Dominates Hypnotisability and Expectations in the Rubber Hand Illusion
2022, Frontiers in Human NeuroscienceEffects of False Statements on Visual Perception Hinge on Social Suggestibility
2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance