Abstract
With regards to the model of the homo oeconomicus this paper argues that incentives for performing liturgies in classical Athens were based on profit-oriented calculation rather than desire to gain support for public offices. In classical Athens democratic measures diminished the power of single-person offices which led to a decrease in the desire to hold such offices by the aristocracy. Simultaneously, recourse to altruistic incentives is incompatible with the costs of liturgies and the effort some members of Athens society made in order to perform them. Careful examination of past research on liturgical spending in classical Athens and an analysis of coeval conditions show the validity of economic instruments that lead to a rational-actor perspective on public spending under the incentive of financial gain rather than non-monetary profit.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a detailed analysis of market economics see Mankiw and Taylor (2010).
See Kirsch (2004), 170–175.
For a detailed examination of the direct democracy of Athens using a political economy perspective see Tridimas (2011).
For detailed information cf. Herodotus (2003) VII. 138–144.
For an economic perspective on Athenian trade policies see Woolmer (2016).
Cf. FGrH 328 F33 Atthis; (Wilson 2011, 40).
References
Amemiya, T. (2007). Economy and economics of ancient Greece. London: Routledge.
Bleicken, J. (1995). Die athenische Demokratie. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Bücher, K. (1906). Die entstehung der volkswirtschaft. Tübingen: Laupp.
Christ, M. R. (2006). The bad citizen in classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christ, M. (2008). The bad citizen in classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press.
Csapo, E. (2004). The context of ancient drama. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Demosthenes (2003). Speeches Victor Bers, (Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Eich, A. (2006). Die politische Ökonomie des antiken Griechenland (6.–3. Jahrhundert vor Christus). Cologne: Böhlau.
Finley, M. I. (1973). The ancient economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gabrielsen, V. (1994). Financing the Athenian fleet. Public taxation and social relations. London: John Hopkins University Press.
Green, J. R. (2007). Let’s hear it for the fat man. In C. Miller (Ed.), Origins of theatre in ancient Greece (pp. 96–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, G. (1998). Reciprocity, altruism and prisoners dilemma. In C. Gill (Ed.), Reciprocity in ancient Greece (pp. 199–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herodotus (2003). The Histories (A. de Sélincourt, Trans.) London: Penguin Books.
Kaiser, B. A. (2007). The Athenian trierarchy: Mechanism design for the private provision of public goods. The Journal of Economic History, 67(2), 445–480.
Kirsch, G. (2004). Neue politische ökonomie. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
Lysias (2004). Reden (I. Huber, Trans.). Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.
Lyttkens, C. H. (1997). A rational-actor perspective on the origin of liturgies in ancient Greece. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 153, 462–484.
Mankiw, G., & Taylor, M. (2010). Economics. Andover: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Meyer, E. (1895). Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung des Altertums: Ein Vortrag, gehalten auf der dritten Versammlung Deutscher Historiker in Frankfurt a. M. am 20. April 1985. Jena. Fischer.
Pomeroy, S. B. (1999). Ancient Greece. A political, social and cultural history. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, D. M. (2013). Sport, democracy and war in classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pritchett, W. K. (1991). The Greek state at war 5. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Raaflaub, K. A. (1998). The transformation of Athens in the 5th century. In D. Boedeker & K. A. Raaflaub (Eds.), Democracy, empire, and the arts in fifth-century Athens (pp. 17–43). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raaflaub, K. A. (2007). The Breakthrough of Demokratia in Mid-Fifth-Century Athens. In K. A. Raaflaub, J. Ober, & R. W. Wallace (Eds.), Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece (pp. 105–164). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Thukydides (1991). Geschichte des Peloponnesischen Krieges (P. Landmann, Trans.). Munich: Dt. Taschenbuch.
Tridimas, G. (2011). A political economy perspective of direct democracy in ancient Athens. Constitutional Political Economy, 22, 58–82.
Tridimas, G. (2013). Homo oeconomicus in ancient Athens: Silver bonanza and the choice to build a navy. Homo Oeconomicus, 30(4), 435–458.
Wagner-Hasel, B. (2011). Die Arbeit des Gelehrten. Der Nationalökonom Karl Bücher (pp. 1847–1930). Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
Wilson, P. (2000). The Athenian institution of the khoregia: The chorus, the city and the stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, P. (2011). The glue of democracy—Tragedy, structure and finance. In D. M. Carter (Ed.), Why Athens?—Reappraisal of tragic politics (pp. 19–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woolmer, M. (2016). Forging links between regions. In E. M. Harris, D. M. Lewis, & M. Woolmer (Eds.), The ancient Greek economy—Markets, households and city–states (pp. 149–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper. Special thanks hereby to Roland Oetjen, who introduced us to New Institutional Economics and supported us throughout our research. Responsibility for any errors remaining is ours alone.
Glossary
Glossary
- Archon:
-
One of the nine highest offices in archaic Athens
- Areopagus:
-
Aristocratic council. Oversaw laws and magistrates
- Arete:
-
Moral virtue
- Basileus:
-
High priest of ancient Athens
- Choregia:
-
Theatrical liturgy that enables the carrier to train and finance a chorus for a festival
- Cleisthenes’ reforms:
-
Reorganization of the Athenian political structure in democratic fashion in order to break up existing power-bases in the society
- Club good:
-
Good bound by excludability, not rivalness
- Common property resource:
-
Good bound by rivalness, not excludability
- Council of Five Hundred:
-
Executive power in classical Athens
- Delian League:
-
Association of Greek city states 478–404, members numbering between 150 and 330 with purpose to uphold the hegemony in the Mediterranean
- Demos:
-
Citizens of a polis
- Eisphora:
-
War tax that was introduced in times of need. Poll tax implemented on the richest citizens
- Ekklesia:
-
Assembly of Athens, carrying out legislative powers
- Free riding:
-
Act of gaining utility of a good without paying for it
- Heliaia:
-
Supreme court of ancient Athens
- Lamian War:
-
War that led to Athens final defeat against Macedonia in 322
- Liturgy:
-
Appropriation of goods by the richest members of a society as alternative to poll tax
- Metic:
-
Foreigner currently or permanently residing in Athens
- Pentecontaetia:
-
Fifty years between Persian Wars and Peloponnesian War
- Polemarch:
-
Commander in chief
- Polis:
-
Greek city state
- Private good:
-
Good bound by both, excludability and rivalness
- Public good:
-
Good bound by neither excludability, nor rivalness
- Solon’s reforms:
-
Reorganization of the Athenian polis in order to overcome disparity. Allocation of citizens in four classes according to emblements. Political rights varied between the classes
- Thesmothetai:
-
Six junior archons. Mainly organizational character for trials
- Trierarchy:
-
Liturgy that enables the carrier to finance and command a warship for a year
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Günther, J., Hahn, F. Choregia and trierarchy as profit-oriented entrepreneurships. Const Polit Econ 30, 177–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-019-09276-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-019-09276-4