Skip to main content
Log in

Liberalism and great upheaval: What did classical liberals do in the Tsarist Russia?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

“You want a great upheaval, we want a great Russia”

Peter Stolypin, Prime Minister of Russia

Address to the Second Duma, May 10, 1907

Abstract

Efficient constitutional change depends on ability of bargaining parties to overcome such inherent problems of political change as commitment and credibility (Galiani et al. in J Econ Behav Organ 103:17–38, 2014; Congleton in Perfecting parliament: constitutional reform, liberalism, and the rise of western democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011; Boettke and Coyne in J Inst Econ 5(1):1–23, 2009). This paper studies how constitutional bargaining leads to a negative sum-game in a transitional illiberal environment. We use a historical example of the Russian constitutional monarchy (1905–1917) to demonstrate that an exchange-based constitutional change within the king-council model leads to an inefficient outcome when bargaining parties fail to trade political authority for policy results. The historical example of the Russian constitutional monarchy shows how both radicalization of the liberal parliamentary majority and pseudo-constitutionalism of Nicholas II undermined efficiency of the legislative assembly. We also find that nationality-based politics undermined the constitutional bargaining by radicalizing both the liberal movement and the tsar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Immanuel Kant’s 1793 essay “On the Relationship of Theory to Practice in Political Right (Against Hobbes)” and Von Humboldt’s 1851 Limits of State Action (written in 1790s) are examples of a broad range of German liberalism. Von Humboldt (1851) provided the Lockean narrative of liberty to present a critique of Kant and argued that a main role of the state was to promote liberty, human development, and happiness (Congleton 2011: 458–459).

  2. See Franko ([1903] 1986), Lenin (1903).

  3. Pipes (1974: 305–309) argues that Russia became a de-facto police state after the Decree of August 14, 1881 that instituted martial law and expanded authority of the Ministry of Interior.

  4. The Western Provinces consisted of nine provinces stretching from the south-west of present-day Ukraine to the north-east of present-day Belarus and included such cities as Kyiv, Minsk, Vilnius, Kaunas, Belostok, Grodno, and Brest-Litovsk.

  5. Article 87 of the Fundamental Laws was similar to Article 63 of the 1848 Constitution of Germany. Scholars of the Russian history debate whether the tsar had a constitutional right to prorogue the Duma or not (see Ascher 1992, 1988; Pipes 1990). On the one hand, the Fundamental Laws guaranteed independence of the legislative assembly. On the other hand, Nicholas II did not take an oath to the Fundamental Laws and thus the monarch’s power remained superior to the constitution.

  6. The Provisional Government that was formed in March 1917 established a legislative assembly. After the October Revolution of 1917 the Bolsheviks took the control of the Russian government. Nonetheless, the Bolsheviks took part in the parliamentary elections. After losing the majority to the Socialist Revolutionaries, Lenin dissolved the assembly in January 1918.

  7. The Duma replaced the so-called Bulygin Duma, a powerless consultative assembly based on the principle of representation, established by the Decree of February 18, 1905 and chaired by Alexander Bulygin (1851–1919), the Minister of Interior (Pipes 1990: 29–34).

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York City: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, A. (1988). The revolution of 1905: Russia in disarray. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, A. (1992). The revolution of 1905: Authority restored. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. (1945). Land tenure in the Austrian monarchy before 1848. Agricultural History, 19(2), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P., & Coyne, C. (2009). The problem of credible commitment in reconstruction. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. (2011). Perfecting parliament: Constitutional reform, liberalism, and the rise of western democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conquest, R. (1986). Harvest of sorrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahomanov, M. ([1878] 1937a). Address to Hromada. In The selected works of Mykhaylo Drahomanov (Vol. 1). Prague: Pavlo Bogatsky. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.ditext.com/drahomanov/selected/hromada-u.html.

  • Drahomanov, M. ([1880] 1937b). Little Russian internationalism. In The selected works of Mykhaylo Drahomanov (Vol. 1). Prague: Pavlo Bogatsky. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.ditext.com/drahomanov/selected/internationalism.html.

  • Franko, I. ([1903] 1986). What is progress? In J. P. Kyryljuk (Eds.), The selected works of Ivan Franko (Vol. 44–47). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka Press. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.ukrcenter.com/Лiтepaтypa/Iвaн/Фpaнкo/25125/Щo-тaкe-пocтyп.

  • Franko, I. (1904). History of socialist movement. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.i-franko.name/uk/Publicistics/1904/HistSocialist.html.

  • Galiani, S., Torrens, G., & Yanguas, M. L. (2014). The political Coase theorem: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective: A book of essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1965). Agrarian policies and industrialization of Russia, 1861–1917. In H. Habakkuk, M. Postan, & J. Clapman (Eds.), Cambridge economic history of Europe (Vol. 2, Part 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Himka, J.-P. (1982). Young radicals and independent statehood: The idea of a Ukrainian nation-state, 1890–1895. Slavic Review, 41(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, G. (1968). The breakdown of the Tsarist autocracy. In R. Pipes (Ed.), Revolutionary Russia (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistyakivsky, B. ([1899] 1996). Society and individual. In The selected works of Bogdan Kistyakivsky. Kyiv: Abris Press.

  • Korros, A. (2004). The Kadet party and the elusive ideal of internal democracy. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 5(1), 136–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawchenko, B. (1985). Social change and national consciousness in twentieth-century Ukraine. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. (1903). The position of the bund in the party. Iskra, 51. Retrieved October 22, from https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1903/oct/22a.htm.

  • Markevich, A., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2018). The economics effects of the abolition of serfdom: Evidence from the Russian empire. American Economic Review, 108(4–5), 1074–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, D. (1979). Marxism after Marx. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D., & Weingast, B. (1989). Constitution and commitment: The evolution of institutional governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pares, B. (1933). Fedor Rodichev. The Slavonic and East European Review, 12(34), 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrov, F. (1994). Crowning the edifice: The Zemstvo, local self-government, and the constitutional movement, 1864–1881. In B. Eklof, J. Bushnell, & L. Zakharova (Eds.), Russia’s great reforms, 1885–1881 (pp. 197–213). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, R. (1974). Russia under the old regime. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, R. (1990). The Russian revolution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, R. (1994). Did the Russian revolution have to happen? The American Scholar, 63(2), 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podemska-Mikluch, M. (2015). Elections vs political competition: The case of the Polish–Lithuanian commonwealth. The Review of Austrian Economics, 28(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and material well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, R. (2017). Overtaken by the night, one Russian’s journey through peace, war, revolution, and terror. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudnytsky, I. (1967). Review of Beiträge zur Geschichte und Kultur der Ukraine: Ausgewählte deutsche Schriften des revolutionären Demokraten, 1882–1915. In I. Franko, E. Winter, P. Kirchner, O. I. Bilec’kyj, & I. I. Bass (Eds.), Slavic review (Vol. 26(1), pp. 141–147). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

  • Schumpeter, J. (1954). History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielvogel, J. J. (2014). Western civilization (9th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subtelny, O. (2009). The history of Ukraine (4th ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomenko, M. (1996). Liberal idea in Ukraine. In O. Dergachov (Ed.), Ukrainian statehood in the twentieth century: Historical and political analysis (pp. 71–81). Kyiv: Political Thought.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mises, L. (1902). Die Entwicklung des Gutsherrlich-Bäuerlichen Verhältnisses in Galizien, 1772–1848. Series: Wiener Staatswissenschaftliche Studien. Vienna: Franz Deuticke.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Schmoller, G. (1875). Über einige Grundfragen des Rechts und der Volkswirtschaft. Ein offenes Sendschreiben an Herrn Professor Dr. Heinrich von Treitschke. Jena: Mauke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ([1906] 1995). Russian revolutions (P. Baehr, Ed., G. Wells, Trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Weeks, T. (1994). Defining us and them: Poles and Russians in the “Western provinces”, 1863–1914. Slavic Review, 53(1), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenkovsky, A. (1986). Stolypin: Russia’s last great reformer. Princeton, NJ: Kingston Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Roger Congleton and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonid Krasnozhon.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krasnozhon, L., Bunyk, M. Liberalism and great upheaval: What did classical liberals do in the Tsarist Russia?. Const Polit Econ 30, 96–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-019-09273-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-019-09273-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation