Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:56:38.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sounding Riddims: King Tubby’s dub in the context of soundscape composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2017

Nimalan Yoganathan  and
Owen Chapman
Nimalan Yoganathan*
Affiliation:
MA candidate, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Owen Chapman*
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Studies, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
*
Emails: nimalan.yoganathan@gmail.com; owen.chapman@concordia.ca
Emails: nimalan.yoganathan@gmail.com; owen.chapman@concordia.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A significant body of academic literature and music journalism has explored the historical trajectory of Jamaican dub music and its innovative use of audio recording technology. The present article seeks to demonstrate the similarities between the studio compositional methods of Jamaican dub innovator King Tubby and those of Canadian soundscape composers Barry Truax and Hildegard Westerkamp. Rather than attempting to identify aesthetic and stylistic similarities between Tubby’s dub music and soundscape composition, this article presents a comparative analysis of dub in relation to soundscape composition focusing on artistic articulations of contextual meaning and acoustic communication. Specifically, this work argues that Tubby’s compositional approach directly addresses the following conceptual themes common in soundscape composition: 1) referential composition and the invocation of past listening associations through sonic abstraction, 2) timbral play as a means of linking sound processing to acoustic communication, and 3) the evocation of real-world motion cues by way of ecologically informed sound-processing effects. Exploring the conceptual similarities between Tubby’s work and the established academic-affiliated genre of soundscape composition provides a new perspective on his work as reflecting a multifaceted musical approach that warrants further scholarly study.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 23 , Special Issue 1: Context-based Composition , April 2018 , pp. 91 - 100
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, J. C. 2009. Natural Audiotopias: The Construction of Sonic Space in Dub Reggae. MA thesis, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Barrow, S. and Dalton, P. 1997. Reggae: The Rough Guide. London: Rough Guides.Google Scholar
Bradley, L. 2000. This is Reggae Music: The Story of Jamaica’s Music. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1983. Guide des objets sonores: Pierre Schaeffer et la recherche musicale. Paris: INA/Buchet/Chastel.Google Scholar
Chude-Sokei, L. 1997. Dr. Satan’s Echo Chamber: Reggae, Technology and the Diaspora Process. Institute of Caribbean Studies, Reggae Studies Unit, University of the West Indies, Mona.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, D. 2008. From Ghetto Laboratory to the Technosphere: The Influence of Jamaican Studio Techniques on Popular Music. Journal on the Art of Record Production 3 (1). www.academia.edu/750536/From_Ghetto_Laboratory_to_the_Technosphere_The_influence_of_Jamaican_Studio_Techniques_on_popular_Music (accessed 23 November 2017).Google Scholar
Katz, D. 2014. Dubbing is a Must: A Beginner’s Guide to Jamaica’s Most Influential Genre. Factmag. www.factmag.com/2014/04/16/dubbing-is-a-must-a-beginners-guide-to-jamaicas-most-influential-genre/ (accessed 20 November 2017).Google Scholar
Keller, D. and Truax, B. 1998. Ecologically-based Granular Synthesis. Proceedings of the 1998 International Computer Music Conference. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Lane, C. 2001. A Musical Revolution. Natty Dread: Le Magazine du Reggae 19(1). http://djgreedyg.proboards.com/thread/8793 (accessed 23 November 2017).Google Scholar
Manning, E. and Massumi, B. 2014. Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, P. and Marshall, W. 2006. The Riddim Method: Aesthetics, Practice, and Ownership in Jamaican Dancehall. Popular Music 25(3): 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCartney, A. 1999. Sounding Places: Situated Conversations through the Soundscape Work of Hildegard Westerkamp. PhD diss., York University.Google Scholar
McCartney, A. 2000. Soundscape Composition and the Subversion of Electroacoustic Norms. eContact! 3(4). http://econtact.ca/3_4/SoundscapeComposition.htm Google Scholar
Natal, B. 2009. Dub Echoes. London: Soul Jazz Films.Google Scholar
Partridge, C. H. 2010. Dub in Babylon: Understanding the Evolution and Significance of Dub Reggae in Jamaica and Britain from King Tubby to Post-Punk. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. 1998. Generation Ecstasy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Soundshapes. Organised Sound 2(2): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. 2014. Remixology: Tracing the Dub Diaspora. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Toop, D. 2004. Replicant: On Dub. In C. Cox and D. Warner (eds.) Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. Edinburgh: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 1992. Composing with Time-shifted Environmental Sound. Leonardo Music Journal 2(1): 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 1994. Discovering Inner Complexity: Time-shifting and Transposition with a Real-time Granulation Technique. Computer Music Journal 18(2): 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 1996. Soundscape, Acoustic Communication and Environmental Sound Composition. Contemporary Music Review 15(1): 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 1999. Handbook of Acoustic Ecology. CD-ROM. Vancouver: Cambridge Street Publishing.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2001. Acoustic Communication. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Truax, B. 2002. Genres and Techniques of Soundscape Composition as Developed at SimonFraser University. Organised Sound 7(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 2013. Interacting with Inner and Outer Sonic Complexity: From Microsound to Soundscape Composition. eContact! 16(3). http://econtact.ca/16_3/truax_soniccomplexity.html Google Scholar
Veal, M. E. 2007. Dub: Soundscapes and Shattered Songs in Jamaican Reggae. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Westerkamp, H. 1996. Liner notes to Transformations . Montreal: Empreintes Digitales, IMED 963-CD.Google Scholar
Westerkamp, H. 2002. Linking Soundscape Composition and Acoustic Ecology. Organised Sound 7(1): 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerkamp, H. 2008. Personal email communication, 6 April.Google Scholar
Williams, S. 2012. Tubby’s Dub Style: The Live Art of Record Production. In S. Zagorski-Thomas and S. Frith (eds.) The Art of Record Production: An Introductory Reader for a New Academic Field. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Williams, S. 2013. Stockhausen Meets King Tubby’s: The Transformation of the Stepped Filter into a Musical Instrument. In F. Weium and T. Boon (eds.) Material Culture and Electronic Sound. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.Google Scholar