Skip to main content
Log in

Examining Reactive and Proactive Aggression through Narrative Text Processing

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined attention allocation in adolescents during processing of social situations, by employing an on-line narrative comprehension methodology and a contradiction paradigm. Adolescents with different, self-rated, levels of reactive and proactive aggression and verbal ability read short stories presenting situations that varied with respect to their consistency with any pre-existing hostile schemas and text-based expectations. Results indicated that, regardless of text content, adolescents with higher reactive and combined aggression levels tended to read texts faster than adolescents with low and average aggression levels. While hostile protagonists’ reactions were generally read faster than mild protagonists’ reactions, adolescents of lower verbal ability and an average risk for aggression read sentences describing hostile protagonists’ reactions at a slower pace compared to mild protagonists’ descriptions. The expected text contradiction effect was not demonstrated. The implications of these findings with respect to the development of effective text-based interventions, aiming in slowing down processing and altering erroneous beliefs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T., & Rescorla, L. (2013). Achenbach system of empirically based assessment (pp. 31–39). Springer New York.

  • Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arsenio, W. F., Adams, E., & Gold, J. (2009). Social information processing, moral reasoning and emotion attributions: Relations with adolescents’ reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 80(6), 1739–1755.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A. (2001). Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence. Social Development, 10(1), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, C. A., & Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: Associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 713–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9(1), 3–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20(1), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis.

  • Coleman, J. M., & Kardash, C. A. M. (1999). Encoding and retrieval of ambiguous and unambiguous information by aggressive and nonaggressive elementary boys. Child Study Journal, 29(2), 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combs, D. R., Penn, D. L., Wicher, M., & Waldheter, E. (2007). The ambiguous intentions hostility questionnaire (AIHQ): A new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 12(2), 128–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, D. R., Penn, D. L., Michael, C. O., Basso, M. R., Wiedeman, R., Siebenmorgan, M., ... & Chapman, D. (2009). Perceptions of hostility by persons with and without persecutory delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14(1), 30–52.

  • Cook, A. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social-information processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(l), 74–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information processing deficits in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993–1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). Overt and relational forms of reactive aggression in adolescents: Relations with temperamental reactivity and self-regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (1989). The discoursive production of male/female dualism in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 15, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pascalis, V., Arwari, B., D’Antuono, L., & Cacace, I. (2009). Impulsivity and semantic/emotional processing: An examination of the N400 wave. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(1), 85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diakidoy, I. N., Mouskounti, T., & Ioannides, C. (2011). Comprehension and learning from refutation and expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(1), 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diakidoy, I. N., Mouskounti, T., Fella, A., & Ioannides, C. (2016). Comprehension processes and outcomes with refutation and expository texts and their contribution to learning. Learning and Instruction, 41, 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (1991). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression. In D. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201–218). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A. (2006). Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of aggressive behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 18(3), 791–814.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Crick, N. R. (1990). Social information processing bases of aggressive behavior in children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(l), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Godwin, J., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2013). Social-information-processing patterns mediate the impact of preventive intervention on adolescent antisocial behavior. Psychological Science, 24, 456–465.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. A., Lansford, J. E., Sorbring, E., Skinner, A. T., et al. (2015). Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(30), 9310–9315.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 349–371.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fanti, K. A. (2018). Understanding heterogeneity in conduct disorder: A review of psychophysiological studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews., 91, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanti, K. A., Frick, P. J., & Georgiou, S. (2009). Linking callous-unemotional traits to instrumental and non instrumental forms of aggression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, G. E., & Werner, J. G. (1996). The use of the computer to support cognitive-behavioral interventions for students with behavioral disorders. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 7(3–4), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrig, R. J. (1988). Text comprehension. In R. J. Sternberg & E. E. Smith (Eds.), The psychology of human thought (pp. 242–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, K. A., & Cougle, J. R. (2013). Effects of interpretation training on hostile attribution bias and reactivity to interpersonal insult. Behavior Therapy, 44(3), 479–488.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrenkohl, T. I., McMorris, B. J., Catalano, R. F., Abbott, R. D., Hemphill, S. A., & Toumbourou, J. W. (2007). Risk factors for violence and relational aggression in adolescence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(4), 386–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horsley, T. A., De Castro, B. O., & Van der Schoot, M. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Eye-tracking assessment of social information processing in aggressive behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(5), 587–599.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laue, C., Griffey, M., Lin, P.I., Wallace, K., Van der Schoot, M., Horn, P., Pedapati, E. & Barzman, D. (2018). Eye gaze patterns associated with aggressive tendencies in adolescence. Psychiatric Quarterly, 1-10.

  • Linder, J. R., Werner, N. E., & Kelsey, A. L. (2010). Automatic and controlled social information processing and relational aggression in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 778–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Lenhart, L. (1995). Cognitive behavioral therapy of aggressive children: Effects of schemas. In H. P. J. G. van Bilsen, P. C. Kendall, & J. H. Slavenburg (Eds.), Behavioral approaches for children and adolescents: Challenges for the next century (pp. 145–166). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz, J., Elosua, P., Hambleton, R. K., & International Test Commission. (2013). International test commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus (version 6)[computer software]. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modelling, 14(4), 535–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polman, H., de Castro, B. O., Koops, W., van Boxtel, H. W., & Merk, W. W. (2007). A meta-analysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 522–535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Liu, J. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 32(2), 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., & Raven, J. C., Court, JH (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales.

  • Roussos, A., Francis, K., Zoubou, V., Kiprianos, S., Prokopiou, A., & Richardson, C. (2001). The standardization of Achenbach's youth self-report in Greece in a national sample of high school students. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 10(1), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Kaukiainen, A. (2004). “Female aggression” revisited: Variable- and person-centered approaches to studying gender differences in different types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 30(2), 158–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. The handbook of social psychology, 2, 391–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., & Waterman, M. (2003). Processing bias for aggression words in forensic and nonforensic samples. Cognition and Emotion, 17(5), 681–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanoudis, G., & Pahiti, J. (2012). Adaptation and standardization of language ability tests in Greek-Cypriot population. (unpublished master’s thesis). University of Cyprus.

  • Tremblay, P. F., & Belchevski, M. (2004). Did the instigator intend to provoke? A key moderator in the relation between trait aggression and aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Goozen, S. H. M., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Matthys, W., & van Engeland, H. (2002). Preference for aggressive and sexual stimuli in children with disruptive behavior disorder and normal controls. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 247–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (2007). The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D., Gordon, R. D., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2007). Tracking the evil eye: Trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 650–666.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(2), 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingrove, J., & Bond, A. J. (2005). Correlation between trait hostility and faster reading times for sentences describing angry reactions to ambiguous situation. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 463–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yaros, A., Lochman, J. E., Rosenbaum, J., & Jimenez-Camargo, L. A. (2014). Real-time hostile attribution measurement and aggression in children. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 409–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelli, A., Huesmann, L. R., & Cervone, D. (1995). Social inference and individual differences in aggression: Evidence for spontaneous judgments of hostility. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thalia Mouskounti.

Ethics declarations

The study reported was funded in part by a University of Cyprus Research Activity Fund to the third author.

The APA ethical standards were followed in the conduct of the study.

Conflict of Interest

The University of Cyprus has no interests that could possibly be interpreted as influencing the design and/or the results of the study.

Informed Consent

All participants signed an informed consent form prior to data collection and were debriefed upon completion of the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mouskounti, T., Fanti, K.A. & Diakidoy, IA.N. Examining Reactive and Proactive Aggression through Narrative Text Processing. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 43, 43–57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09845-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09845-0

Keywords

Navigation