Elsevier

European Journal of Soil Biology

Volume 103, March–April 2021, 103295
European Journal of Soil Biology

Seasonal dynamics of soil nutrients and microbial activity due to colonization by bracken ferns (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn) in a pine forest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103295Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Brackens induced sinks of soil nutrient, though with a marked seasonality.

  • Brackens increased soil nutrient pools in winter during its senescence.

  • Bracken effect on nutrients did not depend on bracken area, density or height.

  • Brackens enhanced soil microbial respiration independently of seasons.

Abstract

Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) is an aggressive colonizer of disturbed and other successional habitats in temperate forests. However, little is known about how bracken colonization modifies soil microbial activity and nutrient cycling. We questioned whether bracken presence alters soil nutrient pools and soil microbial respiration throughout a growing season and whether this effect depends on the size of the bracken patch. To answer these questions, we sampled the soil in bracken patches of different sizes (large, medium and small) and in the surrounding pine forest (paired sampling design) in summer, autumn, winter and spring. We analyzed the samples to determine nutrient contents (C, N and P) and soil microbial respiration. Patch size did not influence soil microbial activity or nutrient pools. Bracken acted as nutrient sink for N pools through the growing season and as source or sink for C and P pools depending on season. Moreover, the effect on nutrient pools did not depend on bracken characteristics (area, density or height). Bracken presence enhanced soil microbial respiration proportionally to patch area. The control that bracken exerts over nutrient pools may determine the successful (or otherwise) establishment of other plant species. This contributes to making bracken a successful colonizer as no particular population threshold (area, density) has to be reached before nutrients becomes limiting to other plant species.

Introduction

Bracken (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn) is a common aggressive ruderal in European forests, but little is known on how this species influences soil microbial activity and nutrient pools during its growth cycle. Bracken is one of the most widely dispersed and common plant species worldwide [1,2]. Several of its characteristics contribute to bracken being a successful colonizer. First, the rhizome system stores nutrients and carbohydrates, enabling fast rapid recovery of the plant after disturbance such as fire or harvesting. Second, the high productivity of bracken yields a massive frond canopy, resulting in litter accumulation, water interception and limiting access to light by other plant species. Third, the plant releases several toxic chemicals [[3], [4], [5], [6]], and fourth the bracken reallocates nutrients to the rhizome that will be used to trigger growth in spring [7]. These traits make it difficult for other plant species to become established once bracken colonizes the soil [7]. Bracken has been widely studied as a modifier of plant succession because it can even suppress colonization by trees [7]. Further, research has also focused on bracken because it produces a carcinogenic agent (ptaquiloside) that can affect livestock [8]. In addition, variation in soil nutrient pools has been attributed to uptake and storage as bracken is a very efficient nutrient recycler, sequestering nutrients even after senescence [3,6,9]. However, although there are important contributions studying how the presence of bracken modifies soil microbial respiration and nutrient pools in soils where the plants are established [[10], [11], [12]]; little is known about how the influence of bracken varies between seasons and with the size of bracken patches.

The main aim of the present study was to determine whether bracken affects the nutrient pools and soil microbial respiration in soils where it is present. However, due to the particular growth habits of bracken, it is difficult to compare the effects on soil biochemical parameters in colonized and uncolonized (control) areas, because the bracken forms dense, uniform patches [7]. However, bracken stands may occur in patches due to habitat variability, competition, or even to the effects of bracken on itself [7]. Size of the patches has been related with its age and with the number of clones they comprise [13,14]. In this way, and according to the home-field advantage hypothesis [15] microorganisms should be more adapted to decompose bracken litter more efficiently in larger patches. However, this should largely depend on how fast patches grow. Thus, it could be expected that the influence of bracken being larger in the inner than at the edge of the patches would increase with patch size.

These defined patches of different sizes can be considered habitat-islands (Fig. 1). Habitat-islands play an important role in the study of ecology and evolution, and their particular characteristics (small isolated areas and defined boundaries with surrounding ecosystems) make them suitable sites for scientific research [16]. Habitat-island systems have been studied as oceanic islands per se [17,18] and even as “isolated patches” of communities different from the surrounding communities [19].

We questioned whether the presence of bracken effectively modifies basal soil microbial respiration and nutrient dynamics and whether the particular traits governing growth cycle of brackens, i.e. reallocation of nutrients from the frond to the rhizome in autumn and winter during senescence [20,21], alter the nutrient pools and soil microbial respiration of soil colonized by the bracken. We should expect higher levels of nutrients in autumn, winter and even spring, as a result of decomposition of dead fronds and also because nutrients are provided by the rhizome during the initial stages of growth of fronds [21]. Moreover, if bracken behaves as an invasive species, we would expect increased nutrient contents, especially of nitrogen, underneath the plants, relative to bracken free areas, as it has been shown that bracken, as other invasive plant species, enhance nitrogen pools [[10], [11], [12],22]. However, for brackens this effect is strongly modulated according to pH [12]. Secondly, we also questioned whether the effects of bracken on soil nutrient pools and basal soil microbial respiration depend on the size of the bracken patch. It is known that habitat-island size (hereafter bracken patch) is associated with ecosystem properties and function, as litter mass loss, nutrient content and microbial biomass and activity [17,19]. We, therefore, hypothesized that the effects of bracken on soil nutrient pools and basal soil microbial respiration will increase with patch size and even with bracken density and height.

Section snippets

The study area and sampling procedure

The study site, (12.33 Ha), is located in Ribadavia, NW Spain (42°18′44″ N, 8°05′45″ W, at 165 m above sea level). The climate is temperate Mediterranean with a mean annual precipitation of 800 mm (range 759–818 mm) and mean annual temperature of 14.5 °C (range 4.4–36.3 °C). The dominant tree in the site is pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.), and the sparse understorey is composed of gorse (Ulex europaeus L.), broom (Chamaespartium tridentatum L.) and bell heather (Erica cinerea L.), with young

Results

Patch size did not differ between summer (33.23 ± 6.01 m2) and spring (33.51 ± 6.05 m2, F1,17 = 2.85, P = 0.11), indicating that colonization of bracken in this area occurs very slowly. Bracken density did not depend on patch size (F2,17 = 1.54, P = 0.24), although it was lower in spring (6.04 ± 0.36 fronds m−2) than in summer (10.01 ± 0.68 fronds m−2, F1,17 = 28.51, P=0.0001), indicating that the patches had not yet reached their previous density. The same occurred with bracken height, which

Discussion

The study findings showed that the bracken seasonally affected soil nutrient pools but not soil microbial respiration. Height and density of bracken decreased and increased the DON and DOC contents in summer and spring respectively. We also found that patch size only affected the DOC and phosphate contents as well as soil microbial respiration, with the lowest values always associated with the medium-sized patches. Contrary to our hypothesis (i.e. high availability of nutrients in autumn,

Conclusions

Bracken ferns act as nutrient sinks, only releasing nutrients in winter; this effect was independent of patch size, density or height of brackens. More importantly, since patch size it is related with its age [10,11] this data suggests that bracken does not need to reach any population threshold (area, density) before limiting other plant species. Bracken colonization significantly enhanced soil microbial respiration.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AGL2017-86813-R) and the Xunta de Galicia (ED431B 2019/38).

References (56)

  • P. Engel et al.

    Microbial degradation and impact of Bracken toxin ptaquiloside on microbial communities in soil

    Chemosphere

    (2007)
  • C.N. Page

    The taxonomy and phytogeography of bracken – a review

    Bot. J. Linn. Soc.

    (1976)
  • J.L. Harper

    Population Biology of Plants

    (1977)
  • A.H. Dolling et al.

    Seasonal variation in phytotoxicity of bracken (Pteridium aquilinum L. Kuhn)

    J. Chem. Ecol.

    (1994)
  • B.R. Werkman et al.

    Responses of bracken and heather to increased temperature and nitrogen addition, alone and in competition

    Basic Appl. Ecol.

    (2001)
  • R.H. Marrs et al.

    Biological flora of the British isles: Pteridium aquilinum (L.) kuhn,

    J. Ecol.

    (2006)
  • J. Vetter

    A biological hazard of our age: bracken fern [Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn]—a review

    Acta Vet. Hung.

    (2009)
  • R.H. Marrs et al.

    Control of bracken and the restoration of heathland. IV. Effects of bracken control and heathland restoration treatments on nutrient distribution and soil chemistry

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (1992)
  • R.J. Mitchell et al.

    A study of the restoration of heathland on successional sites: changes in vegetation and soil chemical properties

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (1999)
  • T.H. DeLuca et al.

    Bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum L. kuhn) promotes an open nitrogen cycle in heathland soils

    Plant Soil

    (2013)
  • C. Bardon et al.

    Control of soil N cycle processes by Pteridium aquilinum and Erica cinerea in heathlands along a pH gradient

    Ecosphere

    (2018)
  • E. Oinonen

    The correlation between the size of Finnish bracken (Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn.) clones and certain periods of site history

    Acta For. Fenn.

    (1967)
  • E. Oinonen

    Sporal regeneration in bracken Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn in Finland in the light of the dimensions and age of its clones

    Acta For. Fenn.

    (1967)
  • D.A. Wardle et al.

    The influence of island area on ecosystem properties

    Science

    (1997)
  • T. Fukami et al.

    Above- and below-ground impacts of introduced predators in seabird-dominated island ecosystems

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2006)
  • D.A. Wardle et al.

    Island biology and ecosystem functioning in epiphytic soil communities

    Science

    (2003)
  • A.S. Watt

    The differentiation and fate of the bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) frond and their relation to the age-structure of the shoot and frond population

    New Phytol.

    (1967)
  • A.S. Watt

    The ecological status of bracken

    Bot. J. Linn. Soc.

    (1976)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Different fates and retention of deposited NH<inf>4</inf><sup>+</sup> and NO<inf>3</inf><sup>−</sup> in an alpine grassland in northwest China: A <sup>15</sup>N tracer study

      2022, Environmental and Experimental Botany
      Citation Excerpt :

      This condition is consistent with related studies (Gebauer et al., 2001; Friedrich et al., 2011), suggesting that the litter layer may be a temporary N sink, which buffers the direct effects of deposited N on plants. Soil is another important sink for deposited N (Wang et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2017b; Ning et al., 2015), and soil microorganisms are important control factors for N turnover and retention (Manuel et al., 2021; Ashraf et al., 2020). N recovery in the 0–5 cm soil was higher than that in the 5–10 cm soil at all sampling times (Table 1, Fig. 5).

    View full text