Skip to main content
Log in

Why Do Haul Truck Fatal Accidents Keep Occurring?

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Powered haulage continues to be a large safety concern for the mining industry, accounting for approximately 50% of the mining fatal accidents every year. Among these fatal accidents, haul-truck-related accidents are the most common, with 6 of 28 and 6 of 27 fatal accidents occurring in 2017 and 2018, respectively. To better understand why these accidents continue to occur and what can be done to prevent them, researchers reviewed the 91 haul-truck-related fatal accidents that occurred in the USA from 2005 to 2018 and performed bow-tie analyses using the final reports published by the Mine Safety and Health Administration. The analyses explore the context of the accidents with a focus on the initiating event, event outcome, hazards present, and possible preventative and mitigative controls. Overall, the vast majority of the accidents resulted in a haul truck colliding with the environment, and the majority of these events were initiated by loss of situational awareness or loss of control. The majority of the hazards were related to design and organizational controls. The results of this study suggest a need to investigate operator decision-making and organizational controls and to focus on improving design and operation controls such as mine design and operational procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term accident is used here and throughout the paper to describe an unexpected event with a negative or unwanted outcome that caused harm

References

  1. Mine Safety and Health Administration (2018) Quarterly Training Calls and Stakeholder Meetings. 30 April 2018. https://www.msha.gov/sites/default/files/Training_Education/april-2018-stakeholder-call-4-30-18-11 am.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2019.

  2. PR Newswire (2015) “Global mining truck market 2015-2019 - growth of mining truck rental business with caterpillar, Hitachi Construction Machinery & Komatsu Dominating,” 7 October 2015. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-mining-truck-market-2015-2019---growth-ofmining-truck-rental-business-with-caterpillar-hitachi-construction-machinery--komatsu-dominating-300158568.html

  3. Mine Safety and Health Administration (2018) Fatality Reports. Department of Labor, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  4. Randolph RF, Boldt CMK (1996) Safety analysis of surface haulage accidents. Proc. of 27th Annual Institute on Mining Health, Safety and Research, Blacksburg, pp 29–38

  5. Turin F, Wiehagen W, Jaspal J, Mayton A (2001) Haulage truck dump site safety: An examination of reported injuries. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA, IC 9454. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet1018.html

  6. Santos BR, Porter WL, Mayton AG (2010) An Analysis of Injuries to Haul Truck Operators in the U.S. Mining Industry. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet SAGE 54(21):1870–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Porter WL (2016) Haul trucks can kill! Coal Zoom. http://www.coalzoom.com/article.cfm?articleid=8832. Accessed 12 September 2019

  8. Wharry M (2019) Powered haulage-effective technological safeguards proximity detection and seat belts. In: Proceedings of the New Mexico Mine Health and Safety Conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico

  9. Kecojevic V, Radomsky M (2004) The causes and control of loader- and truck-related fatalities in surface mining operations. Inj Control Saf Promot 11(4):239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reardon L, Heberger J, Dempsey P (2014) Analysis of Fatalities During Maintenance and Repair Operations in the U.S. Mining Sector. IIE Trans Occup 2(1):27–38

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hulme A, Stanton N, Waterson WGP, Salmon P (2019) What do applications of systems thinking accident analysis methods tell us about accident causation? A systematic review of applications between 1990 and 2018. Saf Sci 117:164–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Drury C, Brill M (1993) Human factors in consumer product accident investigation. Hum Factors 23(5):329–342

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reason J (2000) Human error: Models and management. Br Med J 320:768–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drury C, Porter W, Dempsey P (2012) Patterns in mining haul truck accidents. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181312561420

  15. Waterson P, Robertson M, Cooke NML, Stanton RE, Stanton N (2015) Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety. Ergonomics 58(4):565–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang M, Kecojevic V, Komljenovic D (2014) Investigation of haul truck-related fatal accidents in surface mining using fault tree analysis. Saf Sci 65:106–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cockshott J (2005) Probability Bow-Ties: A Transparent Risk Management Tool. Process Saf Environ 83(4):307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Scyoc K, Hughes G (2009) Rail ruminations for process safety improvement. J Loss Prev Process 22:689–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Ruijter A, Guldenmund F (2016) The bowtie method: A review. Saf Sci 88:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burgess-Limerick R (2016) Bowtie analysis of mining fatalities to identify priority control technologies. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Contract #: 200-2015-M-62391), Pittsburgh, PA

  21. Earth Moving Equipment Safety Round Table (2019) PR-5A: Vehicle Interaction Systems (Version 2). Earth Moving Equipment Safety Round Table (EMESRT), Pinjarra Hills

    Google Scholar 

  22. International Council on Mining and Metals (2015) Health and Safety Critical Control Management Good Practice Guide. International Council on Mining and Metals, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mine Safety and Health Administration (2019) Mine Data Retrieval System. https://www.msha.gov/mine-data-retrieval-system. Accessed 12 September 2019.

  24. Erlingsson C, Brysiewicz P (2017) A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. Afr J Emerg Med 7:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Australian Coal Association Research Program (2019) Riskgate. Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre at the University of Queensland. http://www.riskgate.org/. Accessed 1 February 2019.

  26. McWilliams L, Lenart P, Lancaster J, Zeiner J (2012) National Survey of the Mining Population. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA. IC 9528. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet633.html

  27. Li W, Harris D (2006) Pilot Error and Its Relationship with Higher Organizational Levels: HFACS Analysis of 523 Accidents. Aviat Space Environ Med 77(10):1056–1061

    Google Scholar 

  28. Honn K, Hinson J, Whitney P, Van Dongen H (2019) Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation. Accid Anal Prev 126:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wise J, Heaton K, Patrician P (2019) Fatigue in Long-Haul Truck Drivers: A Concept Analysis. Work# HealthSaf 67(2):68–77

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keyes J (2019) Vehicle interaction considerations for mining. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Contract #: 75D30119P04748), Pittsburgh, PA

  31. Marcus JH, Rosekind MR (2017) Fatigue in transportation: NTSB investigations and safety recommendations. Inj Prev 23(4):232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rasmussen J (1997) Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modeling Problem. Saf Sci 27(2/3):182–213

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bellanca designed and directed the project. Bellanca, Ryan, and Orr performed the qualitative analysis with methodological support from Burgess-Limerick. Bellanca primarily wrote the manuscript and created the figures, tables, and graphs with input from Ryan, Orr, and Burgess-Limerick. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennica L. Bellanca.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mention of company names or products does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellanca, J.L., Ryan, M.E., Orr, T.J. et al. Why Do Haul Truck Fatal Accidents Keep Occurring?. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 38, 1019–1029 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00410-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-021-00410-1

Keywords

Navigation