Skip to main content
Log in

Strategyproof mechanisms for 2-facility location games with minimax envy

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a fairness-based model for 2-facility location games on the real line where the social objective is to minimize the maximum envy over all agents. All the agents seek to minimize their personal costs, and the envy between any two of them is the difference in their personal costs. We consider two cases of personal costs, called min-dist cost and sum-dist cost. We are interested in pursuing strategyproof mechanisms for 2-facility location games in both cases. For the min-dist personal cost, we first show that a lower bound of the additive approximation for any deterministic strategyproof mechanism is 1/4, then devise a deterministic group strategyproof mechanism with additive approximation of 1/2 and two randomized strategyproof mechanisms with additive approximation of 1/4. For the sum-dist personal cost, we devise a group strategyproof deterministic mechanism which is also optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alon N, Shapira A, Sudakov B (2009) Additive approximation for edge-deletion problems. Ann Math 170(1):371–411

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Alon N, Feldman M, Procaccia AD, Tennenholtz M (2010) Strategyproof approximation of the minimax on networks. Math Oper Res 35(3):513–526. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1100.0457

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasiadis E, Deligkas A (2018) Heterogeneous facility location games. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 623–631

  • Cai Q, Filos-Ratsikas A, Tang P (2016) Facility location with minimax envy. In: Proceedings of the 25th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 137–143

  • Cheng Y, Wu W, Zhang G (2013) Strategyproof approximation mechanisms for an obnoxious facility game on networks. Theor Comput Sci 497:154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2011.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Hu X, Jia X, Li M, Tang Z, Wang C (2018) Mechanism design for two-opposite-facility location games with penalties on distance. In: Proceedings of the 11th international symposium, pp 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99660-8

  • Clarke E (1971) Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choices 11:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding Y, Liu W, Chen X, Fang Q, Nong Q (2020) Facility location game with envy ratio. Comput Ind Eng 148:106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106710

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Duan L, Li B, Li M, Xu X (2019) Heterogenious two-facility location games with minimum distance requirement. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 1461–1469

  • Feigenbaum I, Sethuraman J (2015) Strategyproof mechanisms for one-dimensional hybrid and obnoxious facility location models. In: Workshop on incentive and trust in e-communities at the 29th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 8–13

  • Fong K, Li M, Lu P, Todo T, Yokoo T (2018) Facility lcation games with fractional preferences. In: Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 1039–1046

  • Fotakis D, Tzamos C (2014) On the power of deterministic mechanisms for facility location games. ACM Trans Econ Comput 2(4), Article 15

  • Groves T (1973) Incentive in teams. Econometrica 41(4):617–631

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Lu P, Yao Y, Zhang J (2020) Strategyproof mechanism for two heterogeneous facilities with constant approximation ratio. In: Proceedings of the 29th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp 238–245. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/34

  • Lipton R, Markakis E, Mossel E, Saberi A (2004) On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM conference on electronic commerce, pp 125–131

  • Lu P, Wang Y, Zhou Y (2009) Tighter bounds for facility games. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on internet and network economics, pp 137–148

  • Lu P, Sun X, Wang Y, Zhu Z (2010) Asymptotically optimal strategy-proof mechanisms for two-facility games. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce, 315–324

  • Mei L, Li M, Ye D, Zhang G (2019) Facility location games with distinct desires. Discrete Appl Math 264:148–160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1980) On strategy-proofness and single peakedness. Public Choice 35(4):437–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Rothe J (2013) How to decrease the degree of envy in allocations of indivisible goods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on algorithmic decision theory, pp 271–284

  • Nisan N, Ronen A (2001) Algorithmic mechanism design. Games Econ Behav 35:166–196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Procaccia AD, Tennenholtz M (2009) Approximate mechanism design without money. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on electronic commerce, pp 177–186

  • Schummer J, Vohra R (2007) Mechanism design without money. In: Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos É, Vazirani V (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 243–266

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Serafino P, Ventre C (2016) Heterogeneous facility location without money. Theor Comput Sci 636:27–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16:8–37

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, Ono T, Todo T, Yokoo M (2018) Facility location with variable and dynamic populations. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 336–344

  • Yuan H, Wang K, Fong K, Zhang Y, Li M (2016) Facility location games with optional preference. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second european conference on artificialintelligence, pp 1520–1527

  • Zhang Q, Li M (2014) Strategyproof mechanism design for facility location games with weighted agents on a line. J Comb Optim 28(4):756–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-013-9598-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zou S, Li M (2015) Facility location games with dual preference. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp 615–623

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11971447, 11871442), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2019MA052) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (201964006, 201861001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenjing Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Algorithmic Aspects in Information and Management (AAIM 2020), Z. Zhang et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12290, Springer, 260–272.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Fang, Q., Liu, W. et al. Strategyproof mechanisms for 2-facility location games with minimax envy. J Comb Optim 43, 1628–1644 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-021-00711-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-021-00711-7

Keywords

Navigation