Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:05:16.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dorothea or Jane? The Dilemmas of Early Feminist Criticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2018

Martha Vicinus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have never forgotten a comment made by a friend at the first feminist meeting, held in Bloomington Indiana, in the spring of 1969: “Nothing travels faster than an idea whose time has come.” We were amazed and thrilled to discover how much we had in common with other women, and how the women's movement in its early stages gave us permission to express in public a variety of extreme emotions. All of us at that meeting were young, untenured faculty and graduate students, and suddenly—or at least so it seemed—we could speak out against authority. And sometimes authority listened. We quickly turned to writing, our natural medium, for we realized that our academic work had an immediate resonance with our political ambitions. How rare and special this moment was for those of us who worked on the literature of dead authors!

Type
Looking Backward
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , Spring 2019 , pp. 155 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Brontë, Charlotte. Jane Eyre (1847). Edited by Smith, Margaret. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. Middlemarch (1871). Edited by Carroll, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Selected Chronological Bibliography of Feminist Publications on Victorian Literature, 1970–1987

Millett, Kate. Sexual Politics. New York: Doubleday, 1970.Google Scholar
Colby, Vineta. A Singular Anomaly: Women Novelists of the Nineteenth Century. New York: New York University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Vicinus, Martha, ed. Suffer and Be Still: Women in the Victorian Age. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972. Includes Kate Millett, “The Debate over Women: Ruskin vs. Mill” and Jane Stedman, “From Dame to Women: W. S. Gilbert and Theatrical Transvestism.”Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. “The Temptations of a Motherless Woman.” In On Lies, Secrets, and Silence: Selected Prose, 1966–1978. New York: Norton, 1979. Originally given as a talk in 1972; published in Ms. in 1973.Google Scholar
Beer, Patricia. Reader, I Married Him: A Study of the Women Characters of Jane Austen, Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell and George Eliot. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1974.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. “Dinah Mulock Craik and the Tactics of Sentiment: A Case Study of Victorian Female Authorship.” Feminist Studies 2 (1975): 5–23.Google Scholar
Peters, Margot. Unquiet Soul: A Biography of Charlotte Brontë. New York: Doubleday, 1975.Google Scholar
Redinger, Ruby. George Eliot: The Emergent Self. New York: Knopf, 1975.Google Scholar
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. The Female Imagination. New York: Knopf, 1975.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Cora, ed. Salt and Bitter and Good: Three Centuries of English and American Women Poets. New York: Paddington, 1975.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Nina. “The Power of Hunger: Demonism and Maggie Tulliver.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 30 (September 1975): 150–71.Google Scholar
Gubar, Susan. “The Genesis of Hunger, According to Shirley.” Feminist Studies 3 (Summer 1976): 5–21.Google Scholar
Moers, Ellen. Literary Women. New York: Doubleday, 1976.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra. “Plain Jane's Progress.” Signs 2 (Summer 1977): 779–804.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sally. “Sentiment and Suffering: Women's Recreational Reading in the 1860s.” Victorian Studies 21 (Fall 1977): 29–45.Google Scholar
Vicinus, Martha, ed. A Widening Sphere: Changing Roles of Victorian Women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977. Includes Sally Mitchell, “The Forgotten Women of the Period: Penny Weekly Family Magazines of the 1840s and 1850s.”Google Scholar
Jacobus, Mary, ed. Women Writing and Writing about Women. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1979. Includes her “The Buried Letter: Feminism and Romanticism in Villette,” Cora Kaplan's “The Indefinite Disclosed: Christina Rossetti and Emily Dickinson,” and Gillian Beer's “Beyond Determinism: George Eliot and Virginia Woolf.”Google Scholar
Gilbert, Sandra M. and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret. Women Writers and Poetic Identity: Dorothy Wordsworth, Emily Brontë, and Emily Dickinson. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sally. The Fallen Angel: Chastity, Class, and Women's Reading, 1835–1880. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Vicinus, Martha. “‘Helpless and Unfriended’: Nineteenth-Century Domestic Melodrama.” New Literary History 13 (Fall 1981): 127–43.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Nina. Women and the Demon: The Life of a Victorian Myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. “Three Women's Texts and a Critique of Imperialism.” Critical Inquiry, 12 no. 1 (Autumn 1985): 243–61.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. The Industrial Reformation of English Fiction: Social Discourse and Narrative Form, 1832–1867. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fictions: A Political History of the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar