Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing the carbon and water footprints of Brazilian green coconut

  • REGIONAL TOPICS FROM LATIN AMERICA
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The assessment of the carbon and water footprints of agricultural products is important for fruit producers because it enables improvements in environmental management along the production chain as well as the opening of new markets. This study analyses the carbon and water footprints of green coconut produced in seven farms located at the main producing States in Brazil (Ceará, Alagoas, Sergipe and Bahia), investigating opportunities for reducing these footprints.

Methods

The carbon footprint was calculated based on ISO 14067 and the water footprint, on ISO 14046. Primary data were collected from orchards with dwarf coconut trees, located in the states of Ceará (CE1, CE2, CE3 and CE4 farms), Alagoas (AL farm), Sergipe (SE farm) and Bahia (BA farm). The impact categories considered and their assessment models were as follows: (i) for the carbon footprint, climate change impact was assessed (ILCD midpoint); (ii) for the water footprint, water scarcity (AWARE), human toxicity, cancer, non-cancer, and freshwater ecotoxicity and marine and freshwater eutrophication (ILCD midpoint) were assessed. Sensitivity analysis was performed for variations in emissions from land use change (LUC) and water scarcity characterization factors. Uncertainty analysis was applied to identify best performing farms and their practices.

Results and discussion

The farms that resulted in lower footprints (AL and CE4) caused less carbon losses in LUC and used less nitrogen fertilizers and irrigation water. LUC emissions answered for one third of coconut carbon footprint when orchards were installed in areas with Caatinga vegetation. However, if coconut orchards replaced annual crops, carbon footprint may reduce up to 61%. Regarding water scarcity, in the case of applying monthly AWARE factors, the impact increased as much as 95% in relation to impacts calculated using annual factors. The use of regionalized annual or monthly AWARE factors increased impact up to 97% in relation to when annual and monthly AWARE were used.

Conclusions

The analysis of alternatives for footprint reduction showed that both footprints can be reduced in all regions with changes in orchard lifespan, irrigation and fertilization. Increasing the useful life of the orchard results in a reduction of up to 38% in footprints, adjusting irrigation, up to 49%, and the amount of fertilizer, up to 70% of the carbon footprint and up to 82% of water footprint profile. Regionalized factors were more accurate for identifying critical watersheds for coconut production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrade EP, Nunes ABA, Alves KF, Ugaya CML, Alencar MC, Santos TL, Barros VS, Pastor AV, Figueirêdo MCB (2019) Water scarcity in Brazil: part 1 - regionalization of the AWARE model characterization factors. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragão WM, Ramos SRR, Alves MCS (2016) Coconut plantations. In: Fontes HR, Ferreira JMS (ed) The culture of the coconut tree. https://www.spo.cnptia.embrapa.br. Accessed 25 Apr 2018.

  • Basset-Mens C, Vannière H, Grasselly D, Heitz H, Braun A, Payen S, Koch P, Biard Y (2016) Environmental impacts of imported and locally grown fruits for the French market: a cradle-to-farm-gate LCA study. Fruits 71(2):93–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) (2018) Municipal agricultural production in 2016. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, IBGE

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) (2020) Municipal agricultural production in 2019. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, IBGE

  • Boulay AM, Bare J, Benini L, Berger M, Lathuillière MJ, Manzardo A, Margni M, Motoshita M, Núñez M, Pastor AV, Ridoutt B, Oki T, Worbe S, Pfister S (2018) The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints: assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining (AWARE). Int J Life Cycle Assess 23:368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro JM, Dias AF, Barros VS, Giongo V, Matsuura MISF, Figueirêdo MCB (2019) Carbon and water footprints of Brazilian mango produced in the semiarid region. Int J Life Cycle Assess 24(4):735–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltro L, Karaski TU (2019) Environmental indicators of banana production in Brazil: Cavendish and Prata varieties. J Cleaner Prod 207:363–378

  • Donke ACG, Novaes RML, Pazianotto RAA et al (2020) Integrating regionalized Brazilian land use change datasets into the ecoinvent database: new data, premises and uncertainties have large effects in the results. Int J Life Cycle Assess 25:1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01763-3

  • EPD (Environmental Product Declaration) (2019) Fruits and Nuts: Product Category (UN CPC 013). Available at www.environdec.com

  • Faist EM, Reinhard J, Zah R (2009) Sustainability quick check for biofuels: background report, Dübendorf

  • Figueirêdo MCB, Potting J, Serrano LAL, Bezerra MA, Barros VS, Gondim RS, Nemecek T (2016) Environmental assessment of tropical perennial crops: the case of the Brazilian cashew. J Clean Prod 112:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueirêdo MCB, Inke de Boer JM, Kroeze C, Barros VS, Sousa JÁ, Aragão FAZ, Gondim RS, Potting J (2014) Reducing the impact of irrigated crops on freshwater availability: the case of Brazilian yellow melons. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueirêdo MCB, Kroeze C, Potting J, Barros VS, Aragão FAZ, Gondim RS, Santos TL, Imke de Boer JM (2013) The carbon footprint of exported Brazilian yellow melon. J Clean Prod 47:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2019) Quantity of coconut production by continent 2016. http://www.fao.org/statistics/databases/en/. Accessed 15 Aug 2019

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N (2007) ecoinvent: overview and methodology. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudice AL, Mbohwa C, Clasadonte MT, Ingrao C (2013) Environmental assessment of the citrus fruit production in Sicily using LCA. Ital J Food Sci 25:202–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Schryver A, Oele M (2013) Simapro 7: introduction to LCA. PRé Consultants.

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2013) ISO 14067: greenhouse gases – carbon footprint of products – requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014) ISO 14046: environmental management–water footprint – principles, requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change (2007): synthesis report: contributions of working group I, II and III to the fourth Assessment Report. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_sppdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2017

  • Knudsen MT, Almeida GF, Langer V, Abreu LS, Halberg N (2011) Environmental assessment of organic juice imported to Denmark: a case study on oranges (Citrus sinensis) from Brazil. Org Agric 1:167–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar KSN, Maheswarappa HP (2019) Carbon sequestration potential of coconut based cropping systems underintegrated nutrient management practices. J Plant Crops 47(2):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Marras S, Masia S, Duce P, Spano D, Sirca C (2015) Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard. Agric For Meteorol 214–215:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins CR, Jesus LA Jr (2014) Production and commercialization of coconut in Brazil and international trade: 2014 panorama. Embrapa Coastal Trays, Aracaju

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI) [Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation] (2010) Brazilian Inventory of Anthropogenic Emissions by Sources and Removals by Sinks of Greenhouse Gases not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol. MCTI, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Industry, Foreign Trade and Services (MDIC) (2018) Brazilian trade balance: States. http://www.mdic.gov.br/comercio-/estatisticas-de-comercio-exterior/balanca-comercial-brasileira-unidades-da-federacao. Accessed 13 July 2018

  • Miranda FR, Gomes ARM (2006) Coqueiro-Anão irrigation management. Embrapa Tropical Agribusiness Technical Circular 25:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda FR, Rocha ABS, Guimarães VB, Silva ES, Lima GCM, Santos MMS (2019) Water use efficiency in dwarf coconut irrigation. Irrig 24(1):109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mordini M, Nemecek T, Gaillard G (2009) Carbon & Water Footprint of oranges and strawberries. Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Zurich, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacional Institute for Colonization and Agrarian Reform (INCRA) (2020) Classification of Rural Properties. http://www.incra.gov.br/pt/credito/66-atuacao/234-classificacao-dos-imoveis-rurais.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2020

  • National Mango Board (NMB) (2010) Sustainability assessment: baseline assessment findings & recommendations. https://www.mango.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Sustainability_Exec_Summary_Eng.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2019

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J (2012) Methods of assessment of direct field emissions for LCIs of agricultural production systems, Zurich

  • Nemecek T, Schnetzer J, Reinhard J (2016) Updated and harmonized greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21(9):1361–1378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novaes RML, Pazianotto RAA, Brandão M, Alves BJR, May A, Folegatti-Matsuura MIS (2017) Estimating 20-year land-use change and derived CO2 emissions associated with crops, pasture and forestry in Brazil and each of its 27 states. Glob Change Biol 23:3716–3728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira JM, Ugaya CML (2019) Freshwater eutrophication. In: Ugaya CML, Almeida Neto JA, Figueirêdo MCB. Recommendation of life cycle impact models for use in the Brazilian context. Available in http://acv.ibict.br

  • Passos EEM (2016) Climate requirements for coconut trees. In: Fontes HR, Ferreira JMS. The culture of the coconut tree. https://www.spo.cnptia.embrapa.br. Accessed 24 Apr 2018

  • Ribal J, Estruch V, Clemente G, Fenollosa ML, Sanjuán N (2019) Assessing variability in carbon footprint throughout the food supply chain: a case study of Valencian oranges. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Roibás L, Elbehri A, Hospido A (2015) Evaluating the sustainability of Ecuadorian bananas: carbon footprint, water usage and wealth distribution along the supply chain. Sustain Prod Consump 2:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampaio APC, Silva AKP, Barros VS, Amorim JRA, Miranda FR, Figueirêdo MCB (2018) Water footprint of green coconut water in the main producing regions of the Northeast. Latin Am Rev Life Cycle Assess (LALCA) 1:128–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos TL, Nunes ABA, Giongo V, Barros VS, Figueirêdo MCB (2018) Cleaner fruit production with green manure: the case of Brazilian melons. J Clean Prod 181:260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JJ, Dias TJ, Rolim HO, Lima LR, Júnior EBP (2014) Aerial biomass and estimated organic carbon in Coconut Agrosystem (Cocus nucifera, L.) irrigated green dwarf. Rev Green 9(1):01–07

  • Sobral LF (2016) Coconut manure. In: Fontes HR, Ferreira JMS (eds) The culture of the coconut tree. https://www.spo.cnptia.embrapa.br. Accessed 24 Apr 2018

  • Tassielli G, Notarnicola B, Renzulli PA, Arcese G (2018) Environmental life cycle assessment of fresh and processed sweet cherries in southern Italy. J Clean Prod 171:184–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-Rowe I, Torres-García JR, Cáceres AL, Larrea-Gallegos G, Quispe I, Kahhat R (2017) Assessing the magnitude of potential environmental impacts related to water and toxicity in the Peruvian hyper-arid coast: a case study for the cultivation of grapes for Pisco production. Sci Total Environ 601–602:532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinyes E, Asin L, Alegre S, Muñoz P, Boschmonart J, Gasol CM (2017) Life cycle assessment of apple and peach production, distribution and consumption in mediterranean fruit sector. J Clean Prod 149:313–320

Download references

Funding

Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal Do Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, 60020-181, Brazil

    Ana Paula C. Sampaio & Anne Karolyne P. Silva

  2. Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros, Aracaju, Sergipe, 49040-090, Brazil

    Júlio R. A. de Amorim & Antônio D. Santiago

  3. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60511-110, Brazil

    Fábio R. de Miranda

  4. Universidade Estadual Do Ceará (UECE), Fortaleza, Ceará, 60741-000, Brazil

    Viviane S. Barros

  5. Universidade Estadual Ceará (UFC), Fortaleza, Ceará, 60020-181, Brazil

    Marta Celina L. Sales

  6. Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, 60511-110, Brazil

    Maria Cléa B. de Figueirêdo

Authors
  1. Ana Paula C. Sampaio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anne Karolyne P. Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Júlio R. A. de Amorim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antônio D. Santiago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fábio R. de Miranda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Viviane S. Barros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marta Celina L. Sales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Maria Cléa B. de Figueirêdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cléa B. de Figueirêdo.

Additional information

Communicated by Stephan Pfister.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 224 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sampaio, A.P.C., Silva, A.K.P., de Amorim, J.R.A. et al. Reducing the carbon and water footprints of Brazilian green coconut . Int J Life Cycle Assess 26, 707–723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01871-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01871-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation