Skip to main content
Log in

Science in Indigenous homelands: addressing power and justice in sustainability science from/with/in the Penobscot River

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sustainability science offers an alternative space for research that challenges colonial histories of western science, especially in its orientation to interdisciplinarity and for addressing complex problems through equitable knowledge co-production processes. However, the justice-oriented commitments within sustainability science remain underdeveloped, in particular for centering indigenous research methods (IRM) and promoting decolonization of academic institutions. In this paper, we draw from more than 10 years of experience across three cases of conducting sustainability science in Indigenous homelands. The cases focus on (1) adaptive responses to the Emerald Ash Borer insect which threatens black ash basketmaking cultures and economies; (2) efforts to link science with decision making to protect public health and reduce shellfish bed closures; and (3) collaborative research to support dam removal and river restoration. We identify tensions in science as a discourse, including how sustainability science is uniquely shaped by practices of naming and social constructions of time. We then describe how we engage these tensions through four main commitments to critical praxis, or tailored practices that respond to emergent problems and systems of power. These commitments include centering Wabanaki diplomacy and IRMs, redesigning all stages of research for inclusivity and dialogue, attending to multiple temporalities, and supporting Wabanaki and Indigenous students as leaders and researchers. To conclude, we reflect on how these practices may be adapted to other contexts, histories, and sustainability-related issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Maine, black ash is commonly referred to as brown ash.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

McGreavy and Ranco share the first authorship and request that references to this paper acknowledge this in citation practices (e.g. McGreavy, Ranco et al.). We are grateful to the co-authors for their contributions to the projects, writing, and dialogues over many years of effort and the many participants and collaborators in this ongoing work. We thank Gregg Walker for his early feedback and encouragement on the FoD advisory board.

Funding

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grants (EPS-0904155, IIA-1330691, and IIA-1539071) to the Senator George J. Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions at the University of Maine in collaboration with the University of New Hampshire and the University of Rhode Island.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bridie McGreavy or Darren Ranco.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handled by Christopher M. Raymond, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki Department of Landscape Architecture, Finland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGreavy, B., Ranco, D., Daigle, J. et al. Science in Indigenous homelands: addressing power and justice in sustainability science from/with/in the Penobscot River. Sustain Sci 16, 937–947 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00904-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00904-3

Keywords

Navigation