Abstract
This study is motivated by the estimation of many crop yield densities, each with a small number of observations. These densities tend to resemble one another if they are spatially proximate. To gain flexibility and improve efficiency, we propose kernel-based estimators refined by empirical likelihood probability weights derived under spatially smoothed moment conditions. We construct spatially smoothed moments based on spline functions, which are robust to outliers and readily customizable. We use these methods to estimate the corn yield distributions of Iowa counties and to predict the premiums of crop insurance programs. Monte Carlo simulations and an empirical application demonstrate the good performance and usefulness of the proposed methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramson IS (1982) On bandwidth variation in kernel estimates—a square root law. Ann Stat 10:1217–1223
Baltagi BH, Li J (2014) Further evidence on the spatio-temporal model of house prices in the United States. J Appl Econom 29:515–522
Baltagi BH, Bresson G, Etienne J-M (2015) Hedonic housing prices in Paris: an unbalanced spatial lag pseudo-panel model with nested random effects. J Appl Econom 30:509–528
Banerjee S, Gelfand AE, Knight JR, Sirmans CF (2004) Spatial modeling of house prices using normalized distance-weighted sums of stationary processes. J Bus Econ Stat 22:206–213
Bickel PJ, Fan J (1996) Some problems on the estimation of unimodal densities. Stat Sin 6:23–45
Brady RR (2011) Measuring the diffusion of housing prices across space and over time. J Appl Econom 26:213–231
Cai Z (2001) Weighted Nadaraya–Watson regression estimation. Stat Prob Lett 51:307–318
Carbon M, Tran LT, Wu B (1997) Kernel density estimation for random fields. Stat Prob Lett 36:115–125
Chen SX (1997) Empirical likelihood-based kernel density estimation. Austral J Stat 39:47–56
Cheng M-Y, Gasser T, Hall P (1999) Nonparametric density estimation under unimodality and monotonicity constraints. J Comput Graph Stat 8:1–21
Claassen R, Just RE (2011) Heterogeneity and distributional form of farm-level yields. Am J Agric Econ 93:144–160
Conley TG, Topa G (2002) Socio-economic distance and spatial patterns in unemployment. J Appl Econom 17:303–327
Crespo Cuaresma J, Feldkircher M (2013) Spatial filtering, model uncertainty and the speed of income convergence in Europe. J Appl Econom 28:720–741
Eloyan A, Ghosh SK (2011) Smooth density estimation with moment constraints using mixture distributions. J Nonparam Stat 23:513–531
Gao J, Lu Z, Tjøstheim D (2006) Estimation in semiparametric spatial regression. Ann Stat 34:1395–1435
Goodwin BK, Ker AP (1998) Nonparametric estimation of crop yield distributions: implications for rating group-risk crop insurance contracts. Am J Agric Econ 80:139–153
Hall P (1990) On the bias of variable bandwidth curve estimators. Biometrika 77:529–535
Hall P, Huang L-S (2002) Unimodal density estimation using kernel methods. Stat Sin 12:965–990
Hall P, Kang K-H (2005) Unimodal kernel density estimation by data sharpening. Stat Sini 15:73–98
Hall P, Marron J (1988) Variable window width kernel estimates of probability densities. Probab Theory Relat Fields 80:37–49
Hall P, Presnell B (1999) Density estimation under constraints. J Comput Graph Stat 8:259–277
Hall P, Hu TC, Marron JS (1995) Improved variable window kernel estimates of probability densities. Ann Stat 23:1–10
Hallin M, Lu Z, Tran LT (2004a) Kernel density estimation for spatial processes: the L1 theory. J Multivar Anal 88:61–75
Hallin M, Lu Z, Tran LT (2001) Density estimation for spatial linear processes. Bernoulli, pp 657–668
Hallin M, Lu Z, Tran LT (2004b) Local linear spatial regression. Ann Stat 32:2469–2500
Harri A, Coble KH, Ker AP, Goodwin BJ (2011) Relaxing heteroscedasticity assumptions in area-yield crop insurance rating. Am J Agric Econ 93:707–717
Iversen ES Jr (2001) Spatially disaggregated real estate indices. J Bus Econ Stat 19:341–357
Jones M (1990) Variable kernel density estimates and variable kernel density estimates. Austral J Stat 32:361–371
Jones MC, Signorini DF (1997) A comparison of higher-order bias kernel density estimators. J Am Stat Assoc 92:1063–1073
Ker AP, Tolhurst TN, Liu Y (2016) Bayesian estimation of possibly similar yield densities: implications for rating crop insurance contracts. Am J Agric Econ 98:360–382
Lee Y, Choi H, Park B, Yu K (2004) Local likelihood density estimation on random fields. Stat Probab Lett 68:347–357
Li Q, Racine JS (2007) Nonparametric econometrics: theory and practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Lin Z, Li D, Gao J (2009) Local linear M-estimation in non-parametric spatial regression. J Time Ser Anal 30:286–314
Lu Z, Chen X (2004) Spatial Kernel Regression Estimation: Weak Consistency. Statistics & probability letters 68:125–136
Majumdar A, Munneke HJ, Gelfand AE, Banerjee S, Sirmans CF (2006) Gradients in spatial response surfaces with application to urban land values. J Bus Econ Stat 24:77–90
Müller UU, Schick A, Wefelmeyer W (2005) Weighted Residual-Based Density Estimators for Nonlinear Autoregressive Models, Statist. Sinica 15:177–195
Owen AB (1988) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional. Biometrika 75:237–249
Owen AB (1990) Empirical likelihood ratio confidence regions. Ann Stat 18:90–120
Owen AB (2001) Empirical likelihood. Chapman and Hall, London
Ozaki VA, Silva RS (2009) Bayesian ratemaking procedure of crop insurance contracts with skewed distribution. J Appl Statist 36:443–452
Ozaki VA, Goodwin BK, Shirota R (2008) Parametric and nonparametric statistical modelling of crop yield: implications for pricing crop insurance contracts. Appl Econ 40:1151–1164
Park E, Brorsen BW, Harri A (2019) Using Bayesian Kriging for spatial smoothing in crop insurance rating. Am J Agric Econ 101:330–351
Phillips PCB (2001) Descriptive econometrics for non-stationary time series with empirical illustrations. J Appl Econom 16:389–413
Qin G, Tsao M (2005) Empirical likelihood based inference for the derivative of the nonparametric regression function. Bernoulli 11:715–735
Racine J, Ker A (2006) Rating crop insurance policies with efficient nonparametric estimators that admit mixed data types. J Agric Resour Econ 31:27–39
Robinson PM (2011) Asymptotic theory for nonparametric regression with spatial data. J Econom 165:5–19
Schick A, Wefelmeyer W (2009) Improved density estimators for invertible linear processes. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38:3123–3147
Silverman BW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London
Tack JB, Holt MT (2015) The influence of weather extremes on the spatial correlation of corn yields. Clim Change, pp 1–11
Terrell GR, Scott DW (1992) Variable kernel density estimation. Ann Stat 20:1236–1265
Tran LT (1990) Kernel density estimation on random fields. J Multivar Anal 34:37–53
Wand M, Jones M (1995) Kernel smoothing. Chapman and Hall, London
Woodard J (2016) Determining optimal data aggregation: an application of out-of-sample mixture models. In: Agricultural and applied economics association annual meeting in Boston. MA, July, Boston
Zhang B (1997) Quantile Processes in the Presence of Auxiliary Information. Ann Inst Stat Math 49:35–55
Zhang B (1998) A note on kernel density estimation with auxiliary information. Commun Stat-Theory Methods 27:1–11
Zhang YY (2017) A density-ratio model of crop yield distributions. Am J Agric Econ 99:1327–1343
Zhang J, Liu A (2003) Local polynomial fitting based on empirical likelihood. Bernoulli 9:579–605
Acknowledgements
Kuangyu Wen’s research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST: 2019WKYXQN058.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, K., Wu, X. & Leatham, D.J. Spatially Smoothed Kernel Densities with Application to Crop Yield Distributions. JABES 26, 349–366 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00442-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-021-00442-6