Abstract
This article critically examines the role of political leadership in shaping and sustaining institutional reforms. While leadership has recently attracted a great deal of attention from other social scientists, law and development scholars have only begun to seriously consider the influence of leaders on institutions and development outcomes. The article explores the new mantra that “leadership matters” as cause for both careful optimism and renewed attention to some deeper anxieties about the future directions of law and development. On one side, emerging models of leadership provide important insights about how to change dysfunctional institutions and how to sustain those changes over the long run. A number of major studies published in the last few years have made some version of the claim that successful reforms inevitably require the dedicated leadership of one or more prominent individuals, positing good leaders as a necessary condition for institutional transitions. But the argument that good leadership itself determines good institutions also risks reproducing one of the most obstinate dilemmas in modern social theory: the contest between “structure” and “agency” as causal explanations of social change. If the new mantra that “leadership matters” represents a shift in focus away from the structure of law and politics and towards the influence of individual agents’ choices, actions, talents and beliefs, there is good reason to be sceptical about whether simply privileging agency over structure—or the inverse—has any greater chance of success than the many failed attempts to do just that in other fields of knowledge over the past several decades. Instead, the present moment could be a valuable opportunity to assess whether alternative and more integrative approaches to the longstanding structure-agency impasse in development law and policy are possible.
References
Acemoglu, D., and M.O. Jackson, History, Expectations, and Leadership in the Evolution of Social Norms, 82 The Review of Economic Studies, no. 2 (2014).10.3386/w17066Search in Google Scholar
Ahlquist, J., and M. Levi, Leadership: What It Means, What It Does, and What We Want to Know about It, 14 Annual Review of Political Science (2011).10.1146/annurev-polisci-042409-152654Search in Google Scholar
Ahlquist, J. and M. Levi, In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013).10.23943/princeton/9780691158563.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Alchian, A.A., and H. Demsetz, Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, 62 The American Economic Review, no. 5 (1972).10.1017/CBO9780511817410.015Search in Google Scholar
Aligică, P.D., Institutional Diversity and Political Economy: The Ostroms and Beyond (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199843909.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Alston, L.J., Beyond Institutions: Beliefs and Leadership, 77 The Journal of Economic History, no. 2 (2017).10.1017/S0022050717000523Search in Google Scholar
Alston, L.J., M.A. Melo, B. Mueller, and C. Pereira, Brazil in Transition: Beliefs, Leadership, and Institutional Change (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016).10.23943/princeton/9780691162911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Archer, M.S., Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action, 33 The British Journal of Sociology, no. 4 (1982).10.2307/589357Search in Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J., Social Choice and Individual Values (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951).Search in Google Scholar
Bennister, M., New Approaches to Political Leadership, 4 Politics and Governance, no. 2 (2016).10.17645/pag.v4i2.683Search in Google Scholar
Bennister M., B. Worthy, and P. t’Hart, The Leadership Capital Index: A New Perspective on Political Leadership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).10.1093/oso/9780198783848.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bernstein, H., Modernization Theory and the Sociological Study of Development, 7 The Journal of Development Studies, no. 2 (2007).10.1080/00220387108421356Search in Google Scholar
Besley, T., J.G. Montalvo, and M. Reynal-Querol, Do Educated Leaders Matter?, 121 The Economic Journal, no. 554 (2011).10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02448.xSearch in Google Scholar
Besley, T., T. Persson, and M. Reynal-Querol, Resilient Leaders and Institutional Reform: Theory and Evidence, 83 Economica, no. 332 (2016).10.1111/ecca.12208Search in Google Scholar
Bidner, C., and P. Francois, The Emergence of Political Accountability, 128 The Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 3 (2013).10.1093/qje/qjt014Search in Google Scholar
Bubb, R., The Evolution of Property Rights: State Law or Informal Norms?, 56 Journal of Law and Economics, no. 3 (2013).10.1086/673208Search in Google Scholar
Bulman, D.J., Incentivized Development in China: Leaders, Governance, and Growth in China’s Counties (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).10.1017/CBO9781316694497Search in Google Scholar
Coase, R.H., The Nature of the Firm, 4 Economica, no. 16 (1937).10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.xSearch in Google Scholar
Davis, K., and M. Trebilcock, The Relationship between Law and Development: Optimists versus Skeptics, 56 American Journal of Comparative Law, no. 4 (2008).10.5131/ajcl.2007.0031Search in Google Scholar
Delacroix, J., and C. Ragin, Modernizing Institutions, Mobilization, and Third World Development: A Cross-National Study, 84 American Journal of Sociology, no. 1 (1978).10.1086/226743Search in Google Scholar
Devarajan, S., and S. Khemani, If Politics Is the Problem, How Can External Actors Be Part of the Solution? (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016).10.1596/1813-9450-7761Search in Google Scholar
Elgie, R., Studying Political Leadership: Foundations and Contending Accounts (New York: Springer, 2016).10.1007/978-1-137-34708-4Search in Google Scholar
Ensminger, J., and J. Knight, Changing Social Norms: Common Property, Bridewealth, and Clan Exogamy, 38 Current Anthropology, no. 1 (1997).10.1086/204579Search in Google Scholar
Faustino, J., and D. Booth, Development Entrepreneurship: How Donors and Leaders Can Foster Institutional Change, Working Politically in Practice Series: Case Study No. 2 (2014).Search in Google Scholar
Fine, B., “Neither Washington nor Post-Washington Consensus: Challenging Development Policy in the Twenty-First Century”, in B. Fine, C. Lapavitsas, and J. Pincus (eds.), Development Policy in the Twenty-First Century (London: Routledge, 2001).Search in Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, D., Evolution and Chaos in Property Right Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access, 115 Yale Legal Journal (2005).10.2307/20455644Search in Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, D., and A. McWilliam, Bright-Line Fever: Simple Legal Rules and Complex Property Customs among the Fataluku of East Timor, 47 Law and Society Review, no. 2 (2013).10.1111/lasr.12014Search in Google Scholar
Garikipati, S., and W. Olsen, The Role of Agency in Development Planning and the Development Process: Introduction to the Special Issue on Agency and Development, 30 International Development Planning Review, no. 4 (2008).10.3828/idpr.30.4.1Search in Google Scholar
Garud, R., C. Hardy, and S. Maguire, Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency: An Introduction to the Special Issue, 28 Organization Studies, no. 7 (2007).10.1177/0170840607078958Search in Google Scholar
Giddens, A., Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4Search in Google Scholar
Hall, P.A., and R.C.R. Taylor, Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms, 44 Political Studies, no. 5 (1996).10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hay, C., and D. Wincott, Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism, 46 Political Studies, no. 5 (1998).10.1111/1467-9248.00177Search in Google Scholar
Hayo, B., and F. Neumeier, Political Leaders’ Socioeconomic Background and Fiscal Performance in Germany, 34 European Journal of Political Economy (2014).10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.01.009Search in Google Scholar
Helms, L., “Institutional Analysis”, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653881.013.010Search in Google Scholar
Hermalin, B.E., “Leadership and Corporate Culture”, in Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).10.1515/9781400845354-013Search in Google Scholar
Higgott, R., From Modernization Theory to Public Policy: Continuity and Change in Political Science of Political Development, 15 Studies in Comparative International Development, no. 4 (1980).10.1007/BF02686446Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, G., The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism (London: Routledge, 2004).10.4324/9780203300350Search in Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B., Moral Hazard in Teams, 13 The Bell Journal of Economics, no. 2 (1982).10.2307/3003457Search in Google Scholar
Huntington, S.P., The Change to Change: Modernization, Development, and Politics, 3 Comparative Politics, no. 3 (1971).10.2307/421470Search in Google Scholar
Jones, B.F., and B.A. Olken, Do Leaders Matter? National Leadership and Growth since World War II, 120 The Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 3 (2005).10.1093/qje/120.3.835Search in Google Scholar
Komai, M., M. Stegeman, and B.E. Hermalin, Leadership and Information, 97 The American Economic Review, no. 3 (2007).10.1257/aer.97.3.944Search in Google Scholar
Lawrence, T., R. Suddaby, and B. Leca, Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization, 20 Journal of Management Inquiry, no. 1 (2010).10.1177/1056492610387222Search in Google Scholar
Leftwich, A., Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State, 31 Journal of Development Studies, no. 3 (1995).10.1080/00220389508422370Search in Google Scholar
Leftwich, A., Bringing Agency Back, 6 Politics and Human Agency in Building Institutions and States. Synthesis and Overview Report of Phase One of the Leaders, Elites and Coalitions Research Programme, Research Paper (2009).Search in Google Scholar
Leftwich, A., Beyond Institutions: Rethinking the Role of Leaders, Elites and Coalitions in the Institutional Formation of Developmental States and Strategies, 37 Forum for Development Studies, no. 1 (2010).10.1080/08039410903558327Search in Google Scholar
Levi, M., Why We Need a New Theory of Government, 4 Perspectives on Politics, no. 1 (2006).10.1017/S1537592706060038Search in Google Scholar
Levi, M., and B. Epperly, “Principled Principals in the Founding Moments of the Rule of Law”, in Global Perspectives on the Rule of Law (2010).Search in Google Scholar
López, E., and W. Leighton, Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers: The Economic Engine of Political Change (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012).10.1515/9780804783965Search in Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., and R. Snyder, Rethinking Agency and Structure in the Study of Regime Change, 34 Studies in Comparative International Development, no. 2 (1999).10.1007/BF02687620Search in Google Scholar
Manzo, K., Modernist Discourse and the Crisis of Development Theory, 26 Studies in Comparative International Development, no. 2 (1991).10.1007/BF02717866Search in Google Scholar
Marsh, D., and G. Stoker, Theory and Methods in Political Science (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).10.1007/978-0-230-36664-0Search in Google Scholar
McClelland, D., The Achieving Society (New York: The Free Press, 1961).10.1037/14359-000Search in Google Scholar
Mehta, P.B., and M. Walton, Ideas, Interests and the Politics of Development Change in India: Capitalism, Inclusion and the State, ESID Working Paper No. 36 (2014).10.2139/ssrn.2503367Search in Google Scholar
Naudé, W., “Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: Theory, Evidence and Policy”, Bruce Currie-Alder, Ravi Kanbur, David M. Malone, and Rohinton Medhora (ed.), International Development: Ideas, Experience, and Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Search in Google Scholar
North, D.C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).10.1017/CBO9780511808678Search in Google Scholar
North, D.C., Understanding the Process of Economic Change (Princeton: Princeton Academic Press, 2005).10.1515/9781400829484Search in Google Scholar
Önis, Z., and F. Senses, Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus, 36 Development and Change, no. 2 (2005).10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00411.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., An Agenda for the Study of Institutions, 48 Public Choice, no. 1 (1986).10.1007/BF00239556Search in Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005).Search in Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems, 100 American Economic Review (2010).10.1257/aer.100.3.641Search in Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, 39 Policy Studies Journal, no. 1 (2011).10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.xSearch in Google Scholar
Peet, R., and E. Hartwick, Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives (New York: Guilford Publications, 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Persson, A., and M. Sjöstedt, Responsive and Responsible Leaders: A Matter of Political Will?, 10 Perspectives on Politics, no. 3 (2012).10.1017/S1537592712001648Search in Google Scholar
Portes, A., Modernity and Development: A Critique, 8 Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID), no. 3 (1973).10.1007/BF02800432Search in Google Scholar
Prado, M., and M. Trebilcock, Path Dependence, Development, and the Dynamics of Institutional Reform, 59 University of Toronto Law Journal, no. 3 (2009).10.3138/utlj.59.3.341Search in Google Scholar
Prado, M.M., and A.C. Da Matta Chasin, How Innovative Was the Poupatempo Experience in Brazil? Institutional Bypass as a New Form of Institutional Change, 5 Brazilian Political Science Review, no. 1 (2011).Search in Google Scholar
Putzel, L., A.B. Kelly, P.O. Cerutti, and Y. Artati, Formalization as Development in Land and Natural Resource Policy, Society and Natural Resources (2015).10.1080/08941920.2015.1014608Search in Google Scholar
Riker, W.H., The Art of Political Manipulation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986).Search in Google Scholar
Riker, W.H., The Strategy of Rhetoric: Campaigning for the Ratification of the Constitution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996).Search in Google Scholar
Ritchie, H.A., Unwrapping Institutional Change in Fragile Settings: Women Entrepreneurs Driving Institutional Pathways in Afghanistan, 83 World Development (2016).10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.007Search in Google Scholar
Rixen, T., and L.A. Viola, Putting Path Dependence in Its Place: Toward a Taxonomy of Institutional Change, 27 Journal of Theoretical Politics, no. 2 (2015).10.1177/0951629814531667Search in Google Scholar
Rodrik, D., When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations, 28 Journal of Economic Perspectives, no. 1 (2014).Search in Google Scholar
Roland, G., Understanding Institutional Change: Fast Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions, 38 Studies in Comparative International Development, no. 4 (2004).10.1007/BF02686330Search in Google Scholar
Rostow, W.W., The Stages of Economic Growth, 12 The Economic History Review, no. 1 (1959).10.1017/CBO9780511625824Search in Google Scholar
Rotberg, R., The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017).10.1515/9781400884995Search in Google Scholar
Samuels, R.J., Machiavelli’s Children: Leaders and Their Legacies in Italy and Japan (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003).Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A., Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse, 11 Political Science, no. 1 (2008).10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, V.A., Speaking of Change: Why Discourse Is Key to the Dynamics of Policy Transformation, 5 Critical Policy Studies, no. 2 (2011).10.1080/19460171.2011.576520Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, N., Architects of Political Change: Constitutional Quandaries and Social Choice Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).10.1017/CBO9780511606892Search in Google Scholar
Simon, H.A., Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1982).Search in Google Scholar
Simon, H.A., Bounded Rationality in Social Science: Today and Tomorrow, 1 Mind & Society, no. 1 (2000).10.1007/BF02512227Search in Google Scholar
Smith, T., The Underdevelopment of Development Literature: The Case of Dependency Theory, 31 World Politics, no. 2 (1979).10.2307/j.ctt7zv88r.4Search in Google Scholar
Stubbs, R., What Ever Happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate, 22 The Pacific Review, no. 1 (2009).10.1080/09512740802650971Search in Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M.J., Between Universalism and Relativism: Reflections on the Evolution of Law and Development Studies, 66 University of Toronto Law Journal, no. 3 (2016).10.3138/UTLJ.3622Search in Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M.J., and M.M. Prado, What Makes Poor Countries Poor?: Institutional Determinants of Development (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011).10.4337/9780857938879Search in Google Scholar
Trubek, D.M., Law and Development: Forty Years after Scholars in Self-Estrangement, 66 University of Toronto Law Journal, no. 3 (2016).10.3138/UTLJ.3671Search in Google Scholar
Trubek, D.M., and M. Galanter, Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States, 1974 Wisconsin Law Review (1974).Search in Google Scholar
Upham, F.K., The Paradoxical Roles of Property Rights in Growth and Development, 8 Law and Development Review, no. 2 (2015).10.1515/ldr-2015-0024Search in Google Scholar
The World Bank, Putting Leadership at the Center of Development: The Collaborative Leadership for Development Approach (Washington: The World Bank Group, 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Wrenn, M.V., Agency and Neoliberalism, 39 Cambridge Journal of Economics, no. 5 (2014).10.1093/cje/beu047Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Law and Development Review
