To read this content please select one of the options below:

Gendered assisted desistance: a decade from Corston

Una Mairead Barr (School of Education and Social Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK)

Safer Communities

ISSN: 1757-8043

Article publication date: 2 January 2018

Issue publication date: 20 March 2018

731

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of assisted desistance from the perspective of women involved in the criminal justice system. It focusses on two community projects set up in the aftermath of the 2007 Corston Report, Northshire Women’s Centres (WCs) and the Housing for Northshire project.

Design/methodology/approach

Through analysis of a year of observation in these settings and 23 narrative interviews with staff and service users, the paper notes the differences between risk-focussed and desistance-focussed justice for women.

Findings

Neither projects are a panacea; however, they offer an insight into desistance-focussed practice. The findings would suggest that the projects provide social justice as opposed to criminal justice, particularly because of their flexible approach and awareness of the relational elements involved in female desistance.

Originality/value

The in-depth, qualitative data provided challenges the “payment by results” rhetoric which demands positivist research that promotes an understanding of desistance as a binary outcome. Implications for policy are considered.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

All places, agencies and names have been given pseudonyms.

Citation

Barr, U.M. (2018), "Gendered assisted desistance: a decade from Corston", Safer Communities, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-05-2017-0019

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles