Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Re-storying Laws for the Anthropocene: Rights, Obligations and an Ethics of Encounter

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Anthropocene prompts renewed critical reflection on some of the central tenets of modern thought including narratives of ‘progress’, the privileging of the nation state, and the universalist rendering of the human. In this context it is striking that ‘rights’, a quintessentially modern mode of articulating normativity, are often presumed to have an enduring relevance in the contemporary moment, exemplified in renewed recourse to rights in their attribution to parts of the nonhuman world. Our intervention contemplates ways in which the apparent disorientations of the Anthropocene might allow for a generative reorientation of some of these presuppositions. We critically consider the institutional and discursive limitations of rights and the ambivalence of rights language, and argue that the monism that rights so often implies limits the capacity to foster generative encounters between Indigenous and non-Indigenous legal traditions. We develop a critical discourse of obligation, understood here to both precede and exceed the rights-duty correlate so central to modern law. An attentiveness to the priority of obligation, we argue, might allow us to foreground an ethics of encounter between traditions, to examine the limits of modernity’s legal and political imaginary, and to pursue a ‘radical re-storying’ of laws for the Anthropocene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Kathryn Yusoff self-describes as a Professor of Inhuman Geography: https://www.qmul.ac.uk/geog/staff/yusoffk.html.

References

  • Beck, Ulrich. 2007. The cosmopolitan condition: Why methodological nationalism fails. Theory Culture & Society 24 (7–8): 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, Kathleen, and Julia Dehm. 2020 (in press). International law and the humanities in the ‘Anthropocene’. In The Routledge handbook of international law and the humanities, ed. Shane Chalmers and Sundhya Pahuja. Oxon, New York: Routledge.

  • Black, C.F. 2011. The land is the source of the law: A dialogic encounter with indigenous jurisprudence. Oxon, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, C.F. 2017. A mosaic of indigenous legal thought: Legendary tales and other writings. Oxon, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, Peter (ed.). 2011. Exploring wild law: The philosophy of earth jurisprudence. Kent Town: Wakefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdon, Peter. 2016. Foucault and the politics of rights: Review essay. Adelaide Law Review 37 (523–535): 523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree, Noel. 2017. Anthropocene. In Oxford bibliographies in geography, ed. B. Warf. Oxford: Oxford University Press. At https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199874002/obo-9780199874002-0111.xml. Accessed 17 July 2020.

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2011. Climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35 (2): 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2014. Climate and capital: On conjoined histories. Critical Inquiry 41 (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2018. Planetary crises and the difficulty of being modern. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46(3): 259–282.

  • Chandler, David, and Julian Reid. 2020. Becoming indigenous: The ‘speculative turn’ in anthropology and the (re)colonisation of indigeneity. Postcolonial Studies DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2020.1745993. Accessed 18 August 2002

  • Christodoulidis, Emilos. 2018. Dogma or the deep rootedness of obligation. In Law, obligation, community, ed. Daniel Matthews and Scott Veitch, 3–17. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Nigel, and Kathryn Yusoff. 2017. Geosocial formations in the Anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2–3): 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Brian R., Lauren A. Rickards, and Ian Rutherfurd. 2015. Geographies of the Anthropocene. Geographical Research 53 (3): 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cover, Robert. 1983. Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review 97: 4–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, Cormac. 2002. Wild law: A manifesto for earth justice. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danowski, Déborah, and Eduardo Viveiros De Castro. 2017. The ends of the world. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Margaret. 2017. Law unlimited. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Heather, and Zoe Todd. 2017. On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16 (4): 761–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoughrey, Elizabeth. 2019. Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola, Phillippe. 2013. The ecology of others. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, Dwayne. 2009. Forts, curriculum and indigenous métissage: Imagining decolonization of Aboriginal-Canadian relations in educational contexts. First Nations Perspectives 2 (1): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, Dwayne. 2010. On what terms can we speak? Lecture at the University of Lethbridge. At www.vimeo.com/15264558. Accessed 18 August 2020.

  • Dorsett, Shaunnagh, and Shaun McVeigh. 2012. Conduct of laws: Native title, responsibility, and some limits of jurisdictional thinking. Melbourne University Law Review 36 (2): 470–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas, Costas. 2000. The end of human rights. London: Hart.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, Radha. 2018. What’s wrong with rights? Social movements, law and liberal imaginations. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esmeir, Samera. 2006. On making dehumanization possible. Modern Language Association 121 (5): 1544–1551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2014. The revolutionary past: Decolonizing law and human rights. Metodo: International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2(1): 117–133.

  • Fortun, Kim. 2014. From Latour to late industrialism. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4(1): 309–329.

  • Golder, Ben. 2014. Beyond redemption? Problematising the critique of human rights in contemporary international legal thought. London Review of International Law 2 (1): 77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golder, Ben. 2015. Foucault and the politics of rights. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks, ed. Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

  • Gray, John. 2011. The Immortalisation Commission: The strange quest to cheat death. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grear, Anna. 2015. Deconstructing anthropos: A critical legal reflection on ‘anthropocentric’ law and anthropocene ‘humanity’. Law and Critique 26 (3): 231–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grear, Anna. 2017. ‘Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene’: Re-encountering environmental law and its ‘subject’ with Haraway and new materialism. In Environmental law and governance for the Anthropocene, ed. Louis J Kotzé, 77–96. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grear, Anna. 2019. It’s wrong-headed to protect nature with human-style rights. At https://aeon.co/ideas/its-wrongheaded-to-protect-nature-with-human-style-rights. Accessed 17 July 2020.

  • Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 2014. ‘Jeux de ficelles avec les espèces compagnes: Rester avec le trouble’. In Les animaux: Deux ou trois choses que nous savons d’eux, ed. Vinciane Despret, and Raphael Larrère. Paris: Hermann. (Quote taken from earlier English language draft).

  • Henkin, Louis. 1990. The age of rights. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Hyo Yoon, and Sara Kendall. 2020. Legal materiality. In The Oxford handbook of law and humanities, ed. Simon Stern, Maksymilian Del Mar, and Bernadette Meyler, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Naomi. 2014. This changes everything: Capitalism vs The climate. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2009. The making of law: An ethnography of the Conseil D’Etat. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2010. An attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’. New Literary History 41 (3): 471–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2018a. Down to earth. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2018b. On a possible triangulation of some current political positions. Critical Inquiry 44 (2): 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Nathaniel. 1991. An interview with Edward Kamau Brathwaite. Hambone 9: 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, Nathaniel. 1995. An interview with Kamau Brathwaite. In The Art of Kamau Brathwaite, ed. Stewart Brown, 13–32. Wales: Seren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, Lynn. 1998. Symbiosis: A new look at evolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Daniel. 2019. From global to anthropocenic assemblages: Re-thinking territory, authority, rights in the new climatic regime. Modern Law Review 82 (4): 665–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Daniel. 2018. Obligations in the new climatic regime. Critical Legal Thinking Blog. 16 July. At https://criticallegalthinking.com/2018/07/16/obligations-in-the-new-climatic-regime/. Accessed 17 July 2020.

  • McGee, Kyle. 2014. Normativity of networks. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Kyle. 2015. Bruno Latour and the passage of law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, Kyle. 2018. Hybrid legalities. In Law, obligation, community, ed. Daniel Matthews and Scott Veitch, 163–182. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter, and Catherine Walsh. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Jason. 2015. Capitalism in the web of life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Kathleen D. 2015. Provincializing the Anthropocene. Seminar 673 (September): 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Timothy. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyn, Samuel. 2016. Rights vs. duties: Reclaiming civic balance. Boston Review, 16 May. At https://scholar.harvard.edu/smoyn/publications/rights-vs-duties-reclaiming-civic-balance. Accessed 17 July 2020.

  • O’Neill, Onora. 2016. Justice across boundaries: Whose obligations? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pottage, Alain. 2012. The materiality of what? Journal of Law and Society 39 (1): 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramose, Mogobe. 2011. Foreword. In The land is the source of the law: A dialogic encounter with indigenous jurisprudence, C.F. Black. Oxon, New York: Routledge.

  • Rawson, Ariel, and Becky Mansfield. 2018. Producing juridical knowledge: ‘Rights of nature’ or the naturalization of rights? Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1 (1–2): 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, Michael. 1995. The natural contract, trans. Elizabeth MacArthur. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Sloterdijk, Peter. 2015. The Anthropocene: A process-state at the edge of geohistory? In Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies, trans. Anna-Sophie Springer, ed. Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin, 327–340. London: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Zoe. 2015. Indigenizing the Anthropocene. In Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies, ed. Heather Davis and Etienne Turpin, 241–254. London: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, Thom, and Deborah Bird Rose. 2016. Lively ethography: Storying animist worlds. Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirksey, and Ursula Münster. 2016. Multispecies studies: Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venne, Sharon Helen. 1998. Our elders understand our rights: Evolving international law regarding indigenous peoples. Penticton, British Columbia: Theytus Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Vanessa. 2013. Indigenous place-thought & agency amongst human and non-humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!), Decolonization: Indigeneity. Education and Society 2 (1): 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Simone. 2005a. The need for roots. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Simone. 2005b. Human personality. In Simone Weil: An anthology, ed. Sian Miles, 69–98. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Simone. 2005c. The needs of the soul. In Simone Weil: An anthology, ed. Sian Miles, 105–140. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, Kathryn. 2013. Geologic life: Prehistory, climate, futures in the Anthropocene. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31 (5): 779–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, Kathryn. 2018. The Anthropocene and geographies of geopower. In Handbook on the geographies of power, ed. Mat Coleman and Jon Agnew. London: Edward Elgar

  • Yusoff, Kathryn. 2019. A billion black Anthropocenes or none. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. At https://manifold.umn.edu/projects/a-billion-black-anthropocenes-or-none. Accessed 20 July 2020.

  • Yusoff, Kathryn, and Mary Thomas. 2018. The Anthropocene. In The Edinburgh companion to animal studies, ed. Lynn Turner, Undine Sellbach, and Ron Broglio, 52–64. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Kathleen Birrell

  2. Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Daniel Matthews

Authors
  1. Kathleen Birrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Birrell.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birrell, K., Matthews, D. Re-storying Laws for the Anthropocene: Rights, Obligations and an Ethics of Encounter. Law Critique 31, 275–292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09274-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-020-09274-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation