Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Concept of Modern Slavery: Definition, Critique, and the Human Rights Frame

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern slavery is a major topic of concern in international law and global governance, in civil society, and in academic debates. Yet, what does modern slavery mean, and can its highly different forms be covered in a single concept? This paper discusses these questions in three steps: First, it develops common definitions of modern slavery. Second, it discusses critical rejections of these definitions. The two camps that adhere to the definitions of modern slavery, and that reject them, respectively, face certain limits. In a third step, the paper takes up with the limits and the strengths of both. It suggests that the limits of definitions of modern slavery can be overcome by critical approaches; and that the limits of critical approaches can be overcome by definitions of modern slavery. The key is their integration into a human rights frame. Ultimately, the paper proposes an approach to modern slavery that neither relies on a binary distinction between slavery and non-slavery, nor does it strive for the abolishment of the concept of modern slavery. Rather, the paper calls for a normatively and contextually embedded approach within the human rights frame.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a discussion of the differences and similarities between former and contemporary forms of slavery, see Quirk 2006. One major difference is the legal status of slavery. The concept of modern slavery as opposed to historical forms of slavery can refer to both illegal and legal forms of slavery, thus becoming more dynamic and ambiguous (Crane 2013, p. 50). The paper refers to the concept of modern slavery to cover this heterogeneity.

  2. Further documents are dedicated to parallel or sub-forms of modern slavery. One prominent issue area covers child trafficking and the worst forms of child labor. Another issue area is forced labor, defined in the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Convention no. 29 (1930) and no. 105 (1957). The Bellagio-Harvard Guidelines recognize forced labor as slavery only when “the control over a person tantamount to possession” (§ 8) is exercised. The same differentiation applies to other practices and institutions similar to slavery. In order to not get lost with the numerous parallel forms and sub-forms of slavery, this chapter focuses only on some of the key documents that more generally deal with (modern) slavery.

  3. Interestingly enough, the focus on the movement of people mirrors the focus on slave trade in former abolition movements (Skinner 2009, 35; Lawrance 2010, 64, also cf. Wong 2011).

  4. Cf. Research Network on the Legal Parameters of Slavery 2012, §3; Bales 2013, p. 283 f.; Choi-Fitzpatrick 2017; Cockayne et al. 2016.

  5. Similarly Bales 2013, p. 284; Choi-Fitzpatrick 2012, p. 16; Craig et al. 2007, p. 12; Weissbrodt and Anti-Slavery International 2002, p. 7; Herzfeld 2002, p. 50; Moravcsik 1998, p. 174.

  6. I do not address the question, whether all forms of prostitution are a subordination of women, or whether sex workers need to be empowered in order to secure their working and living conditions, as it is being discussed extensively elsewhere (Kempadoo et al. 2012; Weitzer 2011; Quirk 2007; Ehrenreich and Hochschild 2004; Raymond and Hughes 2001).

  7. These conditions include certain ways of perception and perception biases (Sikkink 2017, p. 160ff.), public attention being a limited resource, and limited funding opportunities more generally.

  8. I borrow this idea from Spivak’s strategic essentialism that she describes to be misunderstood when it neglects its own time limit, financial situation, context, dependence, and historicity (Spivak et al. 1993).

  9. Also see Choi-Fitzpatrick 2017 for a nuanced discussion of how profiteers from slavery rationalize slavery.

References

  • Agustín LM (2007) Sex at the margins: Migration, labour markets and the rescue industry. London, New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akurang-Parry KO (2010) Transformations in the feminization of unfree domestic labor: A study of Abaawa or prepubescent female servitude in modern Ghana. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 28–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque C de (2010) Chronicle of an announced birth: The coming into life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights – the missing piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 32(1): 144–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allain J (ed) (2013) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau C (2008) Rethinking trafficking in women: Politics out of security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bales K (2005) New slavery: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales K (2013) Slavery in its contemporary manifestations. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales K and Robbins PT (2001) ‘No one shall be held in slavery or servitude’: A critical analysis of international slavery agreements and concepts of slavery. Human Rights Review 2(2): 18–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos S, Kothari U and Phillips N (2013) Dynamics of unfree labour in the contemporary global economy. The Journal of Development Studies 49(8): 1037–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beare ME (1999) Illegal migration: Personal tragedies, social problems, or national security threats? In: Williams P (ed.) Illegal immigration and commercial sex: The new slave trade. London, Portland: Frank Cass, pp. 11–41.

  • Bernstein E and Schaffner L (eds) (2004) Regulating sex: Sexual freedom and the politics of intimacy. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhukuth A (2005) Child Labour and Debt Bondage: A Case Study of Brick Kiln Workers in Southeast India. Journal of Asian and African Studies 40(4): 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brace L (2004) The politics of property: Labour, freedom and belonging. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass T (2013) Debating Capitalist Dynamics and Unfree Labour: A Missing Link? The Journal of Development Studies 50(4): 570–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breman J (2010) Neo-bondage: A fieldwork-based account. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysk A (2011) Sex as slavery? Understanding private wrongs. Human Rights Review 12(3): 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brysk A (2012) Rethinking trafficking: Human rights and private wrongs. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) (2012a) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2012b) Introduction: Rethinking trafficking. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2012) Rethinking trafficking: Contemporary slavery. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi-Fitzpatrick A (2017) What slaveholders think: How contemporary perpetrators rationalize what they do. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang JA (2015) Giving as governance? Philanthrocapitalism and modern-day slavery abolitionism. UCLA Law Review 62: 1516–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockayne J, Grono N and Panaccione K (2016) Slavery and the limits of international criminal justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice 14(2): 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig G, Gaus A, Wilkinson M, et al. (2007) Contemporary slavery in the UK: Overwiew and key issues. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

  • Crane A (2013) Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Academy of Management Review 38(1): 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen H (2013) Contemporary international legal norms on slavery. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta MN and Bales K (2013) Slavery in Europe: Part 1: Estimating the dark figure. Human Rights Quarterly 35(4): 817–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff N and Wolf KD (2013) Business and human rights: How corporate norm violators become norm entrepreneurs. In: Risse T, Ropp SC and Sikkink K (eds) The persistent power of human rights: From commitment to compliance. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–238.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich B and Hochschild AR (eds) (2004) Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Metropolitan Books/Holt.

  • Eide A, Krause C and Rosas A (eds) (1995) Economic, social and cultural rights: A textbook. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engerman SL (2000) Slavery at different times and places. The American Historical Review 105(2): 480–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercelawn A and Nauman M (2004) Unfree labor in South Asia: Debt bondage at brick kilns in Pakistan. Economic and Political Weekly 39(22): 2235–2242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa L (2010) Humanity without feathers. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1(1): 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold S, Trautrims A and Trodd Z (2015) Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 20(5): 485–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhart ME (ed) (2016) Human rights: Politics and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene SE (2009) Modern Trokosi and the 1807 abolition in Ghana: Connecting past and present. The William and Mary Quarterly 66(4): 959–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R (2016) Defining modern slavery out of existence: who benefits? Open Democracy (03. February 2016) (accessed 19 November 2018).

  • Hall S (1992) The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In: Hall S and Grieben B (eds) Formations of modernity: Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 185–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway JC (2008) The human rights quagmire of ‘human trafficking’. Virginia Journal of International Law 49(1): 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes DF (2014) The celebritization of human trafficking. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 653(1): 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert L (2012) The sexual politics of U.S. inter/national security. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 86–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld B (2002) Slavery and gender: Women’s double exploitation. Gender and Development 10(1): 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey R (2013) Seeking to understand the definition of slavery. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 220–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur R (2004) Erotic justice: Postcolonialism, law, sexuality. London: GlassHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck ME and Sikkink K (1998) Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempadoo K (2012) Introduction: From moral panic to global justice: Changing perspectives on trafficking. In: Kempadoo K, Sanghera J and Pattanaik B (eds) Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: New perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempadoo K (2015) The modern-day white (wo)man’s burden: Trends in anti-trafficking and anti-slavery campaigns. Journal of Human Trafficking 1(1): 8–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempadoo K, Sanghera J and Pattanaik B (eds) (2012) Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered: New perspectives on migration, sex work, and human rights. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff I and Miers S (1977) African ‘slavery’ as an institution of marginality. In: Miers S and Kopytoff I (eds) Slavery in Africa: Historical and anthropological perspectives. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 3–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krennerich M (2013) Soziale Menschenrechte: Zwischen Recht und Politik. Schwalbach/Ts.: Wochenschau-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman T (2018a) Hidden in plain sight: A cross-national analysis of modern slavery prevalence. Rights Lab Working Paper, University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman T (2018b) Out of the shadows: Trans-disciplinary research on modern slavery. Peace Human Rights Governance 2(2): 143–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrance BN (2010) From child labor ‘problem’ to human trafficking ‘crisis’: Child advocacy and anti-trafficking legislation in Ghana. International Labor and Working-Class History 78(1): 63–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist J (2013) Beyond anti-anti-trafficking. Dialectical Anthropology 37(2): 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lively A (2000) Masks: Blackness, race, and the imagination. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lott TL (1998) Early Enlightenment conceptions of the rights of slaves. In: Lott TL (ed.) Subjugation and bondage: Critical essays on slavery and social philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 99–129.

  • Mende J (2016) A human right to culture and identity? The ambivalence of group rights. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mende J and Drubel J (2019) Business Responsibility for Modern Slavery: At the Junction (forthcoming).

  • Miers S (2000) Contemporary forms of slavery. Canadian Journal of African Studies 34(3): 714–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers S (2003) Slavery: A question of definition. Slavery & Abolition 24(2): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik J (1998) Slavery and the ties that do not bind. In: Lott TL (ed.) Subjugation and bondage: Critical essays on slavery and social philosophy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 171–186.

  • O’Connell Davidson J (2006) Will the real sex slave please stand up? Feminist Review (83): 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson J (2008) Trafficking, modern slavery and the human security agenda. Human Security Journal 6: 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson J (2010) New slavery, old binaries: Human trafficking and the borders of ‘freedom’. Global Networks. A Journal of Transnational Affairs 10(2): 244–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson J (2012) Absolving the state: The trafficking-slavery metaphor. Global Dialogue 14(2): 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson J (2014) The making of modern slavery: Whose interests are served by the new abolitionism? British Academy Review 24: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson J (2015) Modern slavery: The margins of freedom. Basingstoke u.a.: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson O (1982) Slavery and social death: A comparative study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson MJ (1992) Whalers, cetologists, environmentalists, and the international management of whaling. International Organization 46(01): 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J (2006) The anti-slavery project: Linking the historical and contemporary. Human Rights Quarterly 28(3): 565–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J (2007) Trafficked into slavery. Journal of Human Rights 6(2): 181–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J (2012) Uncomfortable silences: Contemporary slavery and the ‘lessons’ of history. In: Brysk A and Choi-Fitzpatrick A (eds) From human trafficking to human rights: Reframing contemporary slavery. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J (2013) Defining slavery in all its forms: Historical inquiry as contemporary instruction. In: Allain J (ed.) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond JG and Hughes D (2001) Sex trafficking of women in the United States: International and domestic trends. Amherst: Coalition Against Trafficking in Women.

  • Research Network on the Legal Parameters of Slavery (2012) Bellagio-Harvard Guidelines on the Legal Parameters of Slavery. Available at: http://www.law.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/FileStore/Filetoupload,651854, en.pdf (accessed 2 April 2017).

  • Ruf UP (1999) Ending slavery: Hierarchy, dependency, and gender in Central Mauritania. Bielefeld: Transcript.

  • Sikkink K (2017) Evidence for hope: Making human rights work in the 21st century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner EB (2009) The fight to end global slavery. World Policy Journal 26(2): 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HM (2011) Sex trafficking: Trends, challenges, and the limitations of international law. Human Rights Review 12(3): 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak GC, Danius S and Jonsson S (1993) An Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Boundary 20(2): 24–50.

  • Steinfeld RJ (2001) Coercion, contract, and free labor in the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton A (1994) Slavery in Brazil: A link in the chain of modernisation. The case of Amazonia. London: Anti-Slavery International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbrodt D and Anti-Slavery International (2002) Abolishing slavery and its contemporary forms. New York, Geneva: United Nations Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer R (2007) The Social construction of sex trafficking: Ideology and institutionalization of a moral crusade. Politics & Society 35(3): 447–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer R (2011) Legalizing prostitution: From illicit cice to lawful business. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong WH (2011) Is trafficking slavery? Anti-Slavery International in the twenty-first century. Human Rights Review 12(3): 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janne Mende.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mende, J. The Concept of Modern Slavery: Definition, Critique, and the Human Rights Frame. Hum Rights Rev 20, 229–248 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0538-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-018-0538-y

Keywords

Navigation