Skip to main content
Log in

Intraspecific variation of reproductive traits between migratory and resident populations of the rice plant skipper Parnara guttata guttata

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much empirical data obtained across taxa is necessary to evaluate how variation in migratory costs and benefits can play a role in shaping the phenotypic and genetic patterns of reproductive investment between populations. Reproductive resources are allocated to both the size and number of eggs, and females may vary their allocation to each of these traits in response to increased movement capacity. In central regions of Japan, the rice plant skipper Parnara guttata guttata migrates in a southwesterly direction every year during late summer and early autumn (‘migratory’ population), but this migration is not observed in populations in southern or parts of western Japan (‘resident’ population). If migratory costs and benefits vary between these populations, they may cause their reproductive strategies to differ. Moreover, migration combined with a shift of reproductive allocation that evolved in one generation may influence the flight ability and patterns of reproductive allocation in the other generation in which migration has not evolved. In this study, a common-garden experiment was conducted to compare reproductive traits (egg size and number of eggs), flight ability and body size between these populations under two daylength regimes, at which different forms of adult P. g. guttata emerge. Under both daylength regimes the female adults of migratory populations had greater flight ability and tended to lay a greater number of eggs, which were on average smaller than the eggs laid by resident population females. A population-level difference in reaction norm elevation for flight ability and number of eggs was detected, but no interactions between population and daylength. The effects of the energetic cost of flight, adaptive constraints (e.g., genetic correlations and trade-offs), and the optimal strategy may explain the difference between populations of this species in the patterns of reproductive allocation to egg size and number of eggs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

adapted from Hiura 1980). White and gray circles show sampling sites for migratory and resident populations, respectively. The flight direction is shown by arrows. Solid small circles without arrows indicate there are no records of flight direction

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acolas M-L, Roussel J-M, Baglinière J-L (2008) Linking migratory patterns and diet to reproductive traits in female brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) by means of stable isotope analysis on ova. Ecol Freshw Fish 17:382–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster P, Bradshaw WE, Ruegg K, Holzapfel CM (2001) Geographic variation and the evolution of reproductive allocation in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Evolution 55:439–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braby MF (1994) The significance of egg size variation in butterflies in relation to host plant quality. Oikos 71:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun DC, Patterson DA, Reynolds JD (2014) Maternal and environmental influences on egg size and juvenile life-history traits in Pacific salmon. Ecol Evol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess SC, Bode M, Marshall DJ (2013) Costs of dispersal alter optimal offspring size in patchy habitats: combining theory and data for a marine invertebrate. Funct Ecol 27:757–765

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SP, Marler M, Winchell R, Dingle H (2003) Evolution of cryptic flight morph and life history differences during host race radiation in the soapberry bug, Jadera haematoloma Herrich-Schaeffer (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 96:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher BE, Njal R, Ronald JB, Justin DC, John BI, Fredric JJ, Jacqueline DL (2017) Phenotypic plasticity of nest timing in a post-glacial landscape: how do reptiles adapt to seasonal time constraints? Ecology 98:512–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD (1980) Effects of leaf age and plant life history patterns on herbivory. Nature 284:545–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossin GT, Hinch SG, Farrell AP, Higgs DA, Lotto AG, Oakes JD, Healey MC (2004) Energetics and morphology of sockeye salmon: effects of upriver migratory distance and elevation. J Fish Biol 65:788–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H (1996) Migration: the biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Elkin CM, Reid ML (2005) Low energy reserves and energy allocation decisions affect reproduction by Mountain Pine Beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae. Funct Ecol 19:102–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1990) Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet Res Camb 56:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka T, Tsukiyama H, Chiba H (1997) Japanese butterflies and their relatives in the world I. Shuppan Geijutsusha Co Ltd, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs M, Dyck HV (2010) Butterfly flight activity affects reproductive performance and longevity relative to landscape structure. Oecologia 163:341–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs M, Breuker CJ, Vandyck H (2010) Flight during oviposition reduces maternal egg provisioning and influences offspring development in Pararge aegeria (L.). Physiol Entomol 35:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson KL, McLeod HD (2009) Evaluating the reproductive cost of migration for females in a partially migrating pond-breeding amphibian. J Zool 279:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn A, Gatehouse AG (1993) The migration syndrome in the african armyworm moth, Spodoptera exempta: allocation of resources to flight and reproduction. Physiol Entomol 18:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn A, Gatehouse AG, Woodrow KP (1989) Trade-off between flight and reproduction in the African armyworm moth, Spodoptera exempta. Physiol Entomol 14:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Saastamoinen M, Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Healey MC (2001) Patterns of gametic investment by female stream- and ocean-type chinook salmon. J Fish Biol 58:1545–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiura I (1973) Butterflies migrating over sea. Sôju Shobô, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiura I (1980) Records of migration in the rice-plant skipper Parnara guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Shizenshi-Kenkyû 1:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Iguchi K, Yamaguchi M (1994) Adaptive significance of inter- and intrapopulational egg size variation in ayu Plecoglossus altivelis (Osmerida). Copeia 1994:184–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M (2000) Migration of butterflies. In: Ohsaki N (ed) Natural history of butterflies. Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo, pp 55–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Hidaka T (1979) Seasonal polymorphism of the adult rice-plant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and its control. Appl Entomol Zool 14:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Meteorological Agency (2020) Search for past weather data. https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php. Accessed May 2020

  • Jinks JL, Connolly V (1975) Determination of the environmental sensitivity of selection lines by the selection environment. Heredity 34:401–406

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson B, Jonsson N (2006) Life-history effects of migratory costs in anadromous brown trout. J Fish Biol 69:860–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidokoro T (1992a) Life cycle of rice-plant skipper, Parnara gutata guttata. Plant Pro 46:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidokoro T (1992b) Occurrence of rice-plant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in North Japan and possibility of immigration from south Japan. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 36:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Hendry AP, Quinn TP (2001) Migratory costs and the evolution of egg size and number in introduced and indigenous salmon populations. Evolution 55:1656–1667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama A, Rusuwa B, Yuma M (2003) Interpopulational egg-size variation of a landlocked Rhinogobius goby related to the risk of larval starvation. Environ Biol Fish 67:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura M (1992) Life tables of the migrant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata Bremer et Grey (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in the northern peripheral area of its distribution. Appl Entomol Zool 27: 331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishiro K, Fujisaki K, Nakasuji F (1994) Comparison of female reproductive effort and male mating success between macropterous and brachypterous forms of the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Appl Entomol Zool 29:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita K (1973) An observation on migrant of Parnara guttata Bremer et Grey (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in Japan. Jap J Ecol 23:251–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F (1982) Seasonal changes in native host plants of a migrant skipper, Parnara guttata Bremer et Grey (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Appl Entomol Zool 17:146–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F (1987) Egg size of skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in relation to their host specificity and to leaf toughness of host plants. Ecol Res 2:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Kimura M, Nishida R (1986) Seasonal changes of oviposition-grass preference in a migrant skipper Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Appl Entomol Zool 21:171–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F (1988) Migration of butterflies and its evolutionary adaptation. Spec Bull Lep Soc Jap 6:211–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Ishii M, Hiura I, Honda H (1981) Population dynamics of the migrant skipper butterfly Parnara guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) I. Survival rates of overwintering larvae. Physiol Ecol Japan 18:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Honda H (1979) Simple method for mass-rearing of the rice skipper, Parnara guttata guttata Bremer et Grey (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 23:118–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Ishii M (1988) Butterfly migration: a mystery of migration of Parnara guttata guttata. Tôju Shobô, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Ishii M (1983) A migrating butterfly: mystery of Parnara guttata guttata. Nat Study 29:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Kimura M (1984) Seasonal polymorphism of egg size in a migrant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Kontyû 52:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakasuji F, Nakano A (1990) Flight activity and oviposition characteristics of the seasonal form of a migrant skipper, Parnara-guttata-guttata (Lepidoptera, Hesperiidae). Res Popul Ecol 32:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity. In: Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DI (eds) Evolutionary ecology concept and case studies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 58–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin MA, Burchsted JCA (1992) The cost of migration insects. Annu Rev Entomol 37:533–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Räsänen K, Laurila A, Merilä J (2005) Maternal investment in egg size: environment- and population-specific effects on offspring performance. Oecologia 142:546–553

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1997) Evolutionary quantitative genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (1991) Wing dimorphisms and the evolution of migratory polymorphisms among the Insecta. Am Zool 31:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen M (2007) Mobility and lifetime fecundity in new versus old populations of the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oecologia 153:569–578

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2018) User’s manual of JMP ver. 14. Cary, NC, USA. https://www.jmp.com/en_us/support/technical-support-services.html. Accessed May 2020

  • Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1995) Gene regulation, quantitative genetics and the evolution of reaction norms. Evol Ecol 9:154–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriber JM, Slanski JF (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu Rev Entomol 26:183–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Seko T, Nakasuji F (2004) Effect of egg size variation on survival rate, development and fecundity of offspring in a migrant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Appl Entomol Zool 39:171–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Seko T, Miyatake T, Fujioka S, Nakasuji F (2006) Genetic and environmental sources of egg size, fecundity and body size in the migrant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Popul Ecol 48:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Seko T, Nakasuji F (2006) Adaptive significance of egg size plasticity in response to temperature in the migrant skipper, Parnara guttata guttata (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Popul Ecol 48:159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibly RM, Calow P (1985) Classification of habitats by selection pressures: a synthesis of life-cycle and r/K theory. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 75–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Solbreck C (1986) Wing and flight muscle polymorphism in a lygaeid bug, Horvathiolus gibbicollis: determinants and life history consequences. Ecol Entomol 11:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Springate DA, Scarcelli N, Rowntree J, Kover PX (2011) Correlated response in plasticity to selection for early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Evol Biol 24:2280–2288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns GD (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamada K, Iwata K (2007) Intra-specific variations of egg size, clutch size and larval survival relatedto maternal size in amphidromous Rhinogobius goby. Environ Biol Fishes 73:379–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga T, Kobayashi H, Ueki K (1989) Geographical variation of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beav. in Japan. J Japan Grassl Sci 35:164–171

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk AJ, Pulido F, Helm B, Coppack T, Delingat J, Dingle H, Hedenström A, van der Jeugd H, Marchetti C, Nilsson A, Pérez-Tris J (2006) A framework for the study of genetic variation in migratory behavior. J Ornithol 147:221–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505–522

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zera AJ, Denno RF (1997) Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Annu Rev Ent 42:207–230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Dr. F. Nakasuji (Akaiwa City) for providing information, comments, and suggestions on a draft of the manuscript. I also thank Dr. O. Watanabe (Shinshu University) and K. Shikata (Iida City Museum) for collecting P. g. guttata in Nagano Prefecture. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.S. conceived, designed, and executed this study and wrote the manuscript. No other person is entitled to authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomokazu Seko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seko, T. Intraspecific variation of reproductive traits between migratory and resident populations of the rice plant skipper Parnara guttata guttata. Evol Ecol 35, 183–199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-021-10106-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-021-10106-z

Keywords

Navigation