Abstract
As the number of non-native species introductions continues to increase, the need for tools to predict potential invaders is a central focus in invasion ecology. Trait-based models are a popular method used to predict non-native species success; however, they have many challenges to overcome and often fail to address the role of propagule pressure in failed invasions. Due to a lack of data, many studies cannot incorporate failed invasions into their models examining the success of invaders. Here, we analyzed the relationship between the functional traits of non-native species, both successful and failed, and native species in the Laurentian Great Lakes over three time periods between 1870 and 2010. We only examined failed invasions where there was an environmental match and sufficient propagule pressure for establishment as determined through records of authorized stocking, allowing us to directly test the contribution of traits to invasion success. We evaluated whether nearest neighbor functional distance (NNFD), mean functional distance (MFD), lake, time, and functional traits predicted invasion success and impact using logistic regression models. Our results indicate that species with functional traits associated with r-selected life-history strategies were more likely to establish and predators were more likely to have high impact. While smaller NNFD and MFD values predicted establishment success, higher MFD values predicted high impact. This study examined the role of functional traits in invasion success and demonstrated the importance that a change in community context contributes to regulating invasion success.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data may be available from authors upon request.
References
Azzurro E, Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Maynou F, Simberloff D, Rodríguez-Pérez A, Solé RV (2014) External morphology explains the success of biological invasions. Ecol Lett 17:1455–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12351
Azzurro E, Maynou F, Belmaker J, Golani D, Crooks JA (2016) Lag times in Lessepsian fish invasion. Biol Invasions 18:2761–2772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1184-4
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. R package version 1.1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bernes MD, Coverdale TC (2013) An invasive species facilitates the recovery of salt marsh ecosystems on Cape Cod. Ecology 94:1937–1943. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-2150.1
Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P (2015) The influence of numbers on invasion success. Mol Ecol 24:1942–1953. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13075
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023
Brown EH Jr (1972) Population biology of Alewives, Alosa pseudoharengus, in Lake Michigan, 1949–1970. J Fish Res Board Canada 29:477–500. https://doi.org/10.1139/f72-084
Cadotte MW, Campbell SE, Li S, Sodhi DS, Mandrak NE (2018) Preadaptation and naturalization of nonnative species: Darwin’s two fundamental insights into species invasion. Annu Rev Plant Biol 69:661–684. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040339
Caley P, Groves RH, Barker R (2008) Estimating invasion success of introduced plants. Divers Distrib 14:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00440.x
Campbell SE, Mandrak NE (2017) Dissecting spatiotemporal patterns of functional diversity through the lens of Darwin’s naturalization conundrum. Ecol Evol 7:3861–3869. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2933
Campbell SE, Mandrak NE (2019) Temporal dynamics of taxonomic homogenization in the fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Divers Distrib 25:1870–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12986
Catford JA, Smith AL, Wragg PD, Clark AT, Kosmala M, Cavender-Bares J, Reich PB, Tilman D (2019) Traits linked with species invasiveness and community invasibility vary with time, stage, and indicator of invasion in a long-term grassland experiment. Ecol Lett 22:593–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13220
Claramunt RM, Madenjian CP, Clapp DF (2013) Pacific salmonines in the Great Lakes Basin. In: Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Leonard NJ (eds) Great Lakes policy and management, 2nd edn. Michigan State University Press, Michigan, pp 609–650
Colautti RI, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-3735-y
Coker GA, Portt CB, Minns CK (2001) Morphological and ecological characteristics of Canadian freshwater fishes. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2554
Cornwell WK, Ackerly DD (2009) Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California. Ecol Monogr 79:109–126. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1134.1
Crawford SS (2001) Salmonine introductions to the Laurentian Great Lakes: an historical review and evaluation of ecological effects, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 132. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, p 205
Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion1. Écoscience 12:316–329. https://doi.org/10.2980/i1195-6860-12-3-316.1
Cucherousset J, Olden JD (2011) Ecological impacts of nonnative freshwater fishes. Fisheries 36:215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2011.574578
D’Antonio CM, Kark S (2002) Impacts and extent of biotic invasions in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 17:P202–P204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02454-0
Dextrase A, Mandrak NE (2006) Impacts of invasive alien species on freshwater fauna at risk in Canada. Biol Invasions 8:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-0232-2
Díaz S, Lavorel S, de Bello F, Quétier F, Grigulis K, Robson M (2007) Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20684–20689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704716104
Díaz S, Purvis A, Cornelissen JHC, Mace GM, Donoghue MJ, Ewers RM, Jordano P, Pearse WD (2013) Functional traits, the phylogeny of function, and ecosystem service vulnerability. Ecol Evol 3:2958–2975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.601
Divíšek J, Chytry M, Beckage B, Gotelli NJ, Lososová Z, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Molofsky J (2018) Similarity of introduced plant species to native ones facilitates naturalization, but differences enhance invasion success. Nat Commun 9:4631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06995-4
Duarte CM, Alcaraz M (1989) To produce many small or few large eggs: a size-independent reproductive tactic of fish. Oecologia 80:401–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379043
Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London
Essl F, Mang T, Moser D (2012) Ancient and recent alien species in temperate forests: steady state and time lags. Biol Invasions 14:1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0156-y
Gallien L, Carboni M (2017) The community ecology of invasive species: where are we and what’s next? Ecography 40:335–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02446
Gallien L, Zurell D, Zimmermann NE (2018) Frequency and intensity of facilitation reveal opposing patterns along a stress gradient. Ecol Evol 8:2171–2181. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3855
Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–871. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823
Gozlan RE, Britton JR, Cowx I, Copp GH (2010) Current knowledge on non-native freshwater fish introductions. J Fish Biol 76:751–786. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02566.x
Helfman GS (2007) Fish conservation. Island Press, Washington
Howeth JG, Gantz CA, Angermeier PL, Frimpong EA, Hoff MH, Keller RP, Mandrak NE, Marchetti MP, Olden JD, Romagosa CM, Lodge DM (2016) Predicting invasiveness of species in trade: climate match, trophic guild and fecundity influence establishment and impact of non-native freshwater fishes. Divers Distrib 22:148–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12391
Jelks HL, Walsh SJ, Burkhead NM, Contreras-Balderas S, Diaz-Pardo E, Hendrickson DA, Lyons J, Mandrak NE, McCormick F, Nelson JS, Platania SP, Porter BA, Renaud CB, Schmitter-Soto JJ, Taylor EB, Warren ML Jr (2008) Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33:372–407. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446-33.8.372
Jiang L, Tan J, Pu Z (2010) An experimental test of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis. Am Nat 175:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1086/650720
Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02101-2
Kolar CS, Lodge DM (2002) Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298:1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1075753
Kowarik I (1995) Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. In: Pyšek K, Prach M, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions – general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam
Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1
Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B (2014) FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. R package version, vol 1, pp 0–12
Larkin DJ (2012) Lengths and correlates of lag phases in upper-Midwest plant invasions. Biol Invasions 14:827–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0119-3
Laureto LMO, Cianciaruso MV, Samia DSM (2015) Functional diversity: an overview of its history and applicability. Nat Conserv 13:112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.11.001
Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00657.x
Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.004
Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2013) Invasion ecology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0689:BICEGC]2.0.CO;2
Mandrak NE (1989) Potential invasion of the Great Lakes by fish species associated with climatic warming. J Great Lakes Res 15:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0380-1330(89)71484-2
Mandrak NE, Cudmore B (2010) The fall of native fishes and the rise of non-native fishes in the Great Lakes basin. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 13:255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2010.507150
Mandrak NE, Cudmore B (2013) Fish species at risk and non-native fishes in the Great Lakes basin: Past, present, and future. In: Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Leonard NJ (eds) Great Lakes policy and management, 2nd edn. Michigan State University Press, Michigan, pp 167–202
Marx HE, Giblin DE, Dunwiddie PW, Tank DC (2016) Deconstructing Darwin’s naturalization conundrum in the San Juan Islands using community phylogenetics and functional traits. Divers Distrib 22:318–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12401
Miller RR, Williams JD, Williams JE (1989) Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14:22–38. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1989)014<0022:EONAFD>2.0.CO;2
Moyle PB, Light T (1996) Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology 77:1666–1670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265770
Moyle PB, Marchetti MP (2006) Predicting invasion success: freshwater fishes in California as a model. Bioscience 56:515–524. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[515:PISFFI]2.0.CO;2)56[515:PISFFI]2.0.CO;2
Norkko J, Reed DC, Timmermann K, Norkko A, Gustafsson BG, Bondsdorff E, Slomp CP, Carstensen J, Conley DJ (2012) A welcome can of worms? Hypoxia mitigation by an invasive species. Global Change Biol 18:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02513.x
Ordonez A (2014) Functional and phylogenetic similarity of alien plants to co-occurring natives. Ecology 95:1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1002.1
Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2003) Indirect effects of host-specific biological control agents. Trends Ecol Evol 18:456–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00188-5
Petchey OL, Gaston KJ (2006) Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett 9:741–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00924.x
Podani J (1999) Extending Gower’s general coefficient of similarity to ordinal characters. Taxon 48:331–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224438
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Ricciardi A (2001) Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meldown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2513–2525. https://doi.org/10.1139/f01-178
Ricciardi A, Atkinson SK (2004) Distinctiveness magnifies the impact of biological invaders in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol Lett 7:781–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00642.x
Rodriguez LF (2006) Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol Invasions 8:927–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5103-3
Roth BM, Mandrak NE, Hrabik T, Sass GG, Peters J (2013) Fishes and decapod crustaceans of the Great Lakes basin. In: Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Leonard NJ (eds) Great Lakes policy and management, 2nd edn. Michigan State University Press, Michigan, pp 105–257
Ruesink JL (2005) Global analysis of factors affecting the outcome of freshwater fish introductions. Conserv Biol 19:1883–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00267.x-i1
Salo P, Korpimäki E, Banks PB, Nordström M, Dickman CR (2007) Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1237–1243. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0444
Seabloom EW, Williams JW, Slayback D, Stoms DM, Viers JH, Dobson AP (2006) Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled plant species in California. Ecol Appl 16:1338–1350. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1338:HIPIAI]2.0.CO;
Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120304
Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010086329619
Smith SH (1972) Factors of ecological succession in oligotrophic fish communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes. J Fish Res Board Can 29:717–730. https://doi.org.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/https://doi.org/10.1139/f72-117
Snyder RJ, Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, MacNeill DB (2014) Updated invasion risk assessment for Ponto-Caspian fishes to the Great Lakes. J Great Lakes Res 40:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2014.03.009
Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2005) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5841–5845. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0508073103
Thorpe JE, Miles MS, Keay DS (1984) Developmental rate, fecundity and egg size in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Aquaculture 43:289–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(84)90030-9
Thuiller W, Gallien L, Boulangeat I, De Bello F, Münkemüller T, Roquet C, Lavergne S (2010) Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Divers Distrib 16:461–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00645.x
Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/371065a0
Vermeij GJ (1996) An agenda for invasion biology. Biol Conserv 78:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(96)00013-4
Violle C, Thuiller W, Mouquet N, Munoz F, Kraft NJB, Cadotte MW, Livingstone SW, Mouillot D (2017) Functional rarity: the ecology of outliers. Trends Ecol Evol 32:356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.002
Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2005) Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86:3212–3218. https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0427
Wehrly K, Wang L, Infante D, Joseph C, Cooper A, Stanfield L, Rutherford ES (2013) Landscape change and its influences on aquatic habitats and fisheries in the Great Lakes basin. In: Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Leonard NJ (eds) Great Lakes policy and management, 2nd edn. Michigan State University Press, Michigan, pp 81–103
Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313420
Williamson M (2006) Explaining and predicting the success of invading species at different stages of invasion. Biol Invasions 8:1561–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-005-5849-7
Zenni RD, Nuñez MA (2013) The elephant in the room: the role of failed invasions in understanding invasion biology. Oikos 122:801–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00254.x
Zielinski DP, Freiburger C (in press) Advances in fish passage in the Great Lakes basin. J Great Lakes Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2020.03.008
Acknowledgements
We thank Robert Green, Kevin Loftus, and Christopher Wilson of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry for providing stocking data. Anjali Bapat, UTSC, conducted the climate match analyses. Funding was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant to NEM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, S.E., Mandrak, N.E. Context dependence in community composition of functional traits mediates freshwater fish invasion success in the Laurentian Great Lakes over time. Biol Invasions 23, 1949–1963 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02483-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02483-x