Abstract
The 2016 US Presidential elections may have presented the most prominent illustration of email and recordkeeping in public perception, but they offer only the most recent and public story of emails as records. This article offers an overview of the development of email as a government record in the USA, as well as the evolving archival perspectives on email and political accountability. Archivists have been contending with email for over 30 years, and from its earliest days in the US political usage, email has presented a complex array of recordkeeping and archival challenges, and we trace the changing archival perspectives and regulatory situations around email as a record in the USA over the past three decades. In this investigation, we explore questions about how and why officials create or destroy email, how email records are appraised, and whether or not preserved emails can be meaningfully accessed. In light of these questions, we argue that the archival tenet of accountability is tenuous at best in the face of the changing technological and political challenges presented by email as a record.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aftergood S (2018) Hundreds of CIA email accounts deemed permanent records. Secrecy News Blog, Federation of American Scientists, 3 May. https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2018/05/cia-email-permanent/. Accessed 28 Oct 2018
Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President (1989) Declaration of Gordon Riggle, 6 February
Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President (1993a) Opinion, 6 January. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (810 F. Supp. 335)
Armstrong v. Executive Office of the President (1993b) Opinion, 13 August. U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (1 F.3d 1274)
Baron J (2003) The PROFS decade: NARA, e-mail and the courts. In: Ambacher B (ed) Thirty years of electronic records. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, pp 105–138
Baron J, Payne N (2017) Dark archives and e-democracy: strategies for overcoming access barriers to the public record archives of the future. In: 2017 International conference for e-democracy and open government. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cedem.2017.27
Bennett B, Halper E (2015) What you need to know about Hillary Clinton’s emails. The Los Angeles times, 13 October. http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-prez-clinton-emails-q-and-a-html-htmlstory.html. Accessed 29 May 2018
Blanton T (2015) America classifies way too much information—and we are all less safe for it. The Washington Post, 31 July. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-united-states-is-not-safer-when-its-citizens-are-left-in-the-dark/2015/07/31/641b53fa-36e2-11e5-b673-1df005a0fb28_story.html. Accessed 20 May 2018
Burleigh N (2016) The George W. Bush White House ‘lost’ 22 million emails. Newsweek, 12 September. https://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/george-w-bush-white-house-lost-22-million-emails-497373.html. Accessed 2 Feb 2019
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (2007) Without a trace: the story behind the missing White House e-mails and violations of the presidential records act. Washington, DC. https://web.archive.org/web/20070502003342/http://www.citizensforethics.org:80/files/041207WithoutATraceFullReport.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018
CNN (2009) Millions of Bush administration e-mails recovered. 14 December. http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/14/white.house.emails/. Accessed 2 Feb 2019
Cocciolo A (2016) Email as cultural heritage resource: appraisal solutions from an art museum context. Rec Manag J 26:68–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-04-2015-0014
Cook T (1997) What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria 43:17–63
Cox R (2006) Ethics, accountability, and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet, London
Cox R, Wallace D (2002) Introduction. In: Cox R, Wallace D (eds) Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, Westport, pp 1–17
Dawsey J, Peterson A (2017) Hundreds of White House emails sent to third Kushner family account. Politico, 2 October. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/02/jared-kushner-email-account-white-house-243389. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
Eastwood T (1993) Reflections on the development of archives in Canada and Australia. In: McKemmish S, Upward F (eds) Archival documents: providing accountability through recordkeeping. Monash University, Melbourne, pp 27–39
Gerstein J (2014) Senate passes W.H. records bill. Politico under the Radar Blog, 11 Sept. https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2014/09/senate-passes-wh-records-bill-195309. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
Hamburger T (2007) Officials’ e-mails may be missing, White House says. Los Angeles Times, 12 April. Archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20070414175500/http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-emails12apr12,0,4800585.story?coll=la-home-headlines. Accessed 2 Feb 2019
Hurley C (2005) Recordkeeping and accountability. In: McKemmish S et al (eds) Archives: recordkeeping in Society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Stuart University, Wagga Wagga, pp 223–253
Hurley C (2006) Archivists and accountability. Arch Manuscr 34:82–111
Iacovino L (1993) Reflections on Eastwood’s concept of democratic accountability and continuity. Arch Manuscr 21:30–47
Iacovino L (2010) Archives as arsenals of accountability. In: Eastwood T, MacNeil H (eds) Currents of archival thinking. ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, pp 181–212
Linick S, McCullough C (2015) OIG Report, 17 July. https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-15-04-05.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2018
MacNeil H (2000) Trusting records: legal, historical, and diplomatic perspectives. Kluwer, Leiden
Murray K, Prom C (2018) The future of email archives: a report from the task force on technical approaches for email archives. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC. https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/08/CLIR-pub175.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
Pearce-Moses R (2005) A glossary of archival and records terminology, Society of American Archivists, Chicago, s.v. “Accountability,” https://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms/a/accountability. Accessed 29 May 2018
Pennock M (2006) Curating e-mails: a life-cycle approach to the management and preservation of e-mail messages. In: Ross S, Day M (eds) DCC digital curation manual. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resource/curation-manual/chapters/curating-e-mails. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
Pontevolpe G, Salza S (2009) Keeping and preserving email. InterPARES 3 General Study 5. http://interpares.org/ip3/display_file.cfm?doc=ip3_italy_gs05a_final_report.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2018
Prom C (2011) Preserving email. Digital preservation coalition, heslington. http://www.dpconline.org/component/docman/doc_download/739-dpct211-01.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2018. https://doi.org/10.7207/twr11-01
Public Citizen v. Carlin (1997) Opinion and order, 22 October. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (2 F.Supp.2d 1)
Public Citizen v. Carlin (1998) Memorandum opinion and order, 9 April. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (2 F.Supp.2d 18)
Public Citizen v. Carlin (1999) Opinion, 6 August. U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit (184 F.3d 900)
Ravanbakhsh A (2015) Capstone GRS published. NARA records express Blog, 16 September. https://records-express.blogs.archives.gov/2015/09/16/capstone-grs-published/. Accessed 29 May 2018
Rein L (2018) Clinton isn’t first senior government leader to use personal e-mail for official business, The Washington Post, 3 March. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clintons-experience-not-unique/2015/03/03/cf59747a-c1e5-11e4-9ec2-b418f57a4a99_story.html. Accessed 29 May 2018
Schmidt M (2015) Hillary Clinton used personal email account at State Department, possibly breaking rules. New York Times, New York
Sinn D, Syn SY, Kim S (2011) Personal records on the web: who’s in charge of archiving, Hotmail or archivists? Libr Inf Sci Res 33:320–330
Society of American Archivists (2011) Core values of archivists. https://www2.archivists.org/statements/saa-core-values-statement-and-code-of-ethics. Accessed 2 February 2019
Society of American Archivists (2015) Statement on use of non-government email accounts for the conduct of public business. Chicago, Illinois, 23 March. https://www2.archivists.org/statements/statement-on-use-of-non-government-email-accounts-for-the-conduct-of-public-business. Accessed 30 May 2018
Underwood W et al (2009) Advanced decision support for archival processing of presidential electronic records: final scientific and technical report (September 22, 2006-September 21, 2009). PERPOS TR ITTL/CSITD 09-05, Georgia Tech Research Institute. http://perpos.gtri.gatech.edu/publications/TR%2009-05-Final%20Report.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2018
U.S. Congress (2014) Presidential and federal records act amendments of 2014, 26 November (Public Law 113–187). https://www.congress.gov/113/plaws/publ187/PLAW-113publ187.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct.2018
U.S. Department of Defense. Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence (2002) Design criteria standard for electronic records management software applications, DoD 5015.2-STD, 19 June. http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/projects/rma/downloads/p50152s2.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2018
U.S. Executive Office of the President. Office of Management and Budget and National Archives and Records Administration (2012) Managing government records directive, 24 August. https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/m-12-18.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2019
U.S. Executive Office of the President. Office of the Press Secretary (2011) Presidential memorandum: managing government records, 28 November. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/28/presidential-memorandum-managing-government-records. Accessed 20 May 2018
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2001) Clinton administration’s management of Executive Office of the President’s e-mail system. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01446.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2019
U.S. Government Publishing Office (various dates) United States government policy and supporting positions (Plum Book). https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/plum-book. Accessed 21 May 2018
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (1995a) Electronic mail systems: final rule, 28 August (60 Fed. Reg.: 44633-44642)
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (1995b) General records schedule 20: Disposition of electronic records, 28 August (60 Fed. Reg.: 44643-44650)
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (2009) Pre-accessioning permanent electronic records, NARA Bulletin 2009-03, 30 July. https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/bulletins/2009/2009-03.html. Accessed 20 May 2018
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (2013) Guidance on a new approach to managing email records. Bulletin 2013-02, 29 August. https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/bulletins/2013/2013-02.html. Accessed 20 May 2018
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (2014) Markup version of the amendments to the Presidential and Federal records acts of 2014, Public Law 113–187. https://www.archives.gov/files/about/laws/p-l-113-187.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (2016) General Records Schedule 6.1: Email managed under a Capstone approach, Transmittal No. 26, September. https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/grs/grs06-1.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2019
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Archivist of the United States (1998) Letter from John Carlin to Arthur Money regarding baseline requirements for automated recordkeeping, 18 August. https://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/policy/automated-recordkeeping-requirements.html. Accessed 18 May 2018
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Office of the Chief Records Officer (2015a) White paper on the Capstone approach and Capstone GRS, April. https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/email-management/final-capstone-white-paper.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2019
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Office of the Chief Records Officer (2015b) Records management self-assessment 2014, November 6. https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/resources/self-assessment-2014.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2019
U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Office of the Chief Records Officer (2017) Federal agency records management: 2016 annual report. https://www.archives.gov/files/records-mgmt/resources/2016-federal-agency-records-management-annual-report.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018
U.S. National Security Council (1987) PROFS and A1 memorandum for NSC Staff from Grant S. Green, Jr., 5 March. PROFS/VAX fact sheet attached, undated
U.S. Senate. Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (2014) S. Rept. 113–218. 23 July. https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/113th-congress/senate-report/218. Accessed 19 April 2019
U.S. Senate. Select Intelligence Committee (2014) Letter from Diane Feinstein and Saxby Chambliss to Margaret Hawkins, 17 November. https://fas.org/irp/congress/2014_cr/feinstein-email.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2018
Wallace D (2001) Implausible deniability: the politics of documents in the Iran-Contra affair and its investigations. In: Wallace D, Cox R (eds) Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, Westport, pp 91–114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, J.A., Wallace, D.A. & Punzalan, R.L. Messages sent, and received? Changing perspectives and policies on US federal email as record and the limits of archival accountability. Arch Sci 19, 309–329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09318-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-019-09318-8