Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 194, 15 April 2021, 116951
Water Research

Chlorination decreases acute toxicity of iodophenols through the formation of iodate and chlorinated aliphatic disinfection byproducts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.116951Get rights and content

Highlights

  • HOCl was reactive with 2-iodophenol, 4-iodophenol and 2,4,6-triiodophenol

  • Acute toxicity of iodophenols could be largely eliminated after chlorination

  • Iodophenols were transformed into chlorinated aliphatic DBPs, iodinated-THMs and iodate

  • The transformation products were verified with chemical standards

Abstract

Highly toxic iodinated phenolic by-products were frequently detected in the oxidative treatment and disinfection of iodine-containing water. Herein, it was found that three model iodinated phenolic disinfection byproducts (DBPs), 2-iodophenol, 4-iodophenol and 2,4,6-triiodophenol, were reactive with HOCl, and the reaction rate constants (at pH 7.0 and 25℃) were 1.86 ×102, 1.62 ×102 and 7.5 ×101 M−1s−1, respectively. When HOCl was in excess (HOCl/iodophenol = 40/1, [iodophenol]0 = 20 μM), acute toxicity of water sample containing iodophenols could be largely eliminated (> 85%), with the conversion of iodophenols into stable and non-toxic iodate (IO3) and iodinated and chlorinated aliphatic DBPs. Besides IO3, seven kinds of aromatic intermediate products including iodophenols, chloroiodophenols, iodoquinones, chloroiodoquinones, chloroquinones, chlorophenols, and coupling products were detected. C-I bond of iodophenols was cleaved in the reaction and the resulted aromatic products were further transformed into chlorinated aliphatic DBPs [trichloromethane (TCM), trichloroacetic acid (TCAA), dichloroacetic acid (DCAA), and chloral hydrate (CH)] (mg/L level) and iodinated trihalomethanes (μg/L level). HOCl was effective for converting iodophenols into IO3 and less toxic chlorinated aliphatic DBPs. Considering that chlorine was widely used as disinfectant, transformation and toxicity alteration of emerging DBPs during chlorination/booster chlorination warrant further investigations.

Introduction

Disinfection is always the last defense for controlling waterborne diseases. Although other methods such as ozone oxidation and ultraviolet irradiation were effective for water disinfection, chlorination was cheap and easy-to-use (Cantor 1994, McGuire 2006). More importantly, the residual chlorine existing in treated water would maintain disinfection effect during water distribution process. A main shortage of chlorine disinfection/pre-oxidation is the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs) (Dong et al. 2019, Liu et al. 2020a). HOCl is an electrophilic reagent and reactive with organics containing electron-rich moieties. As natural organic matter (NOM) ubiquitously existed in natural waters, formation of chlorinated DBPs raised public concerns due to their toxicity and potential health impacts (Allard et al. 2015, Ashbolt, 2004).

Accompanied with global warming and the rising of sea level, saline water intrusion may greatly impact quality of source water in coastal area (Ferguson and Gleeson 2012). Background halogen ions such as bromide and iodide would react with HOCl to generate active halogen species, which could further react with NOM with the formation of halogenated DBPs (, Criquet et al. 2012, Liu et al. 2018). Iodide exists in natural waters with concentration ranging from 0.4 µg/L to 100 µg/L (Plewa et al. 2008, Schwehr and Santschi 2003). In the oxidative treatment of iodide-containing water, iodide would be oxidized into active iodine (i.e. HOI and I2). The active iodine could further react with NOM and other dissolved organics with the formation of iodinated DBPs (Bichsel and von Gunten 1999, 2000, Criquet et al. 2012, Liu et al. 2021, Sayess et al. 2020, Ye et al. 2013). Recent study showed that odorous iodinated by-products (μg/L level) even formed in the coagulation of surface water in Yangtze River delta, China, as FeCl3 (coagulant) oxidized iodide into active iodine (HOI) and the HOI further reacted with NOM in raw water with the formation of iodinated aliphatic and phenolic by-products (Ding et al. 2019).

Phenolic groups and aromatic rings are the basic structure of NOM, and iodinated phenolic DBPs were more and more frequently detected during chlorination or chloramination of source water and wastewater (Gong et al. 2017, Liberatore et al. 2017, Liu et al. 2020b, Liu and Zhang 2014, Pan et al. 2016b, W. Parsons 1983, Yang and Zhang 2013, Yang et al. 2019). For example, 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrophenol (up to 3.9 ng/L) and 2,4,6-triiodophenol (up to 0.43 ng/L) were detected in tap water which used HOCl as disinfectant in Yangtze River delta in 2016 (Pan et al. 2016a). 4-Iodophenol (up to 0.1 nM) was detected in the chloramination of iodide-containing source water (Gong et al. 2017). Both in the chloramination of iodide-containing source water and in the chlorinated saline secondary sewage effluent, 2,4,6-triiodophenol was detected with up to 330.3 ng/L and 0.4 ng/L of concentration, respectively (Gong et al. 2017, Yang and Zhang 2013). Moreover, production of gas and oil through hydrofracturing raised concern about the pollution of source water with the subsurface injection of “produced water” containing halides. Enhanced formation of halogenated DBPs was observed in downstream drinking water treatment plants (Burgos et al. 2017, Harkness et al. 2015), and dozens of iodinated phenolic DBPs including 2-iodophenol, 4-iodophenol, 2,4,6-triiodophenol and iodomethylphenols were detected in chloraminated oil and gas wastewaters (Liberatore et al. 2017).

I-DBPs were more genotoxic and cytotoxic than their chlorinated and brominated analogues (Richardson et al. 2008), while iodinated phenolic DBPs were more toxic than iodinated aliphatic DBPs (Hu et al. 2018, Liu and Zhang 2014, Pan et al. 2016b). Cytotoxicity of 2,4,6-triiodophenol to human hepatoma cells HepG2 was 10.7 times higher than that of triiodomethane (TIM) (Hu et al. 2018). Developmental toxicity of iodinated phenolic DBPs to embryos of a polychaete P. dumerilii was 50 - 200 times higher than that of iodinated aliphatic DBPs (Pan et al. 2016b). Toxicity of 2,4,6-triiodophenol and 4-iodophenol to a marine alga was as much as 76.3 and 16.2 times higher than that of iodoacetic acid, respectively (Liu and Zhang 2014). Since the detection frequency of iodinated phenolic DBPs increased in tap water and wastewater, finding methods to eliminate their toxicity is important.

Previous studies reported the transformation of brominated and chlorinated phenolic DBPs during chlorination and the transformation of iodinated phenolic DBPs during chloramination (Gong et al. 2017, Hu et al. 2018, Jiang et al. 2020, Jiang et al. 2017, Nunez-Gaytan et al. 2010, Zhai and Zhang 2011). Chlorinated and brominated phenolic DBPs formed in the chlorination of source water and these phenolic DBPs acted as intermediate compounds to further react with HOCl to generate trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids (Jiang et al. 2020, Jiang et al. 2017, Nunez-Gaytan et al. 2010, Zhai and Zhang 2011). In order to control the formation of regulated DBPs, chloramine was used as disinfectant instead of HOCl. However, study reported that 2,4,6-triiodophenol was finally converted into iodinated aliphatic DBPs during chloramination treatment, and cytotoxicity of the water sample increased significantly after chloramination (Hu et al. 2018). In the chlorination of wastewater and source water, iodinated phenolic DBPs were often detected. So far, transformation of iodinated phenolic DBPs during chlorination including products, reaction pathways and the variation of toxicity had not been revealed. Exploring the underlying mechanism could provide useful information for optimizing chlorine disinfection and controlling its negative impacts. 2,4,6-Triiodophenol was one of the most frequently detected iodinated phenolic DBPs and 2-iodophenol and 4-iodophenol may experience electrophilic substitution by active iodine (HOI) to be converted into 2,4-diiodophenol and 2,4,6-triiodophenol. Meanwhile, 2-iodophenol and 4-iodophenol were also frequently detected iodinated phenolic DBPs (Gong et al. 2017, Liberatore et al. 2017). Herein, 2-iodophenol, 4-iodophenol and 2,4,6-triiodophenol were selected as model compounds to study their transformation mechanism in the reaction with HOCl in terms of reaction kinetics, transformation pathways, and variation of acute toxicity.

Section snippets

Chemicals

2-Iodophenol, 4-iodophenol, hydroxylamine hydrochloride, KI, KIO3, triiodomethane (TIM) and monoiodoacetic acid (MIAA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dichloroiodomethane (DCIM) and diiodochloromethane (DICM) were purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Canada). 2,4,6-Triiodophenol was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCI, Japan). NaClO (6% active chlorine), ascorbic acid and sodium sulfite were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China. Four mixed standard samples

Reaction kinetics

Reaction kinetics of HOCl with iodophenols were investigated under pseudo first order condition (HOCl was in excess, [HOCl] ≥ 10 [iodophenol]). The reaction obeyed first-order law in respect to HOCl and iodophenol (TEXT S3, Figure S1), and the reaction kinetic could be described as Equation 1.d[iodophenol]/dt=kapp[iodophenol]tot[HOCl]tot

Where [iodophenol]tot represented the total exposure of iodophenol, and [HOCl]tot represented the total exposure of HOCl. The calculated second order rate

Conclusion and implication

The second order rate constant of the reaction of chlorine with iodide and HOI was 3.39×108 and 1.75×101 M−1s−1 (at pH 7), respectively (Bichsel and von Gunten 1999). The second order rate constant of the reaction of HOI with phenol was 2.59×104 M−1s−1 (at pH 7) (Wang et al. 2020). These three rate constants indicated that iodide could be rapidly oxidized to HOI by HOCl and then HOI was oxidized to iodate or reacted with phenol to generate iodophenols. The rate constant of the reaction of

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Major Projects for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (Grant No. 2017ZX07201003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 51808163, 51908126), and State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) (No. QA201925).

References (47)

  • J. Liu et al.

    Ferrate(VI) pretreatment before disinfection: An effective approach to controlling unsaturated and aromatic halo-disinfection byproducts in chlorinated and chloraminated drinking waters

    Environ Int

    (2020)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Addition of lemon before boiling chlorinated tap water: A strategy to control halogenated disinfection byproducts

    Chemosphere

    (2021)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Comparative toxicity of new halophenolic DBPs in chlorinated saline wastewater effluents against a marine alga: halophenolic DBPs are generally more toxic than haloaliphatic ones

    Water Res

    (2014)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Formation of iodinated trihalomethanes during breakpoint chlorination of iodide-containing water

    J Hazard Mater

    (2018)
  • Y. Pan et al.

    Formation and occurrence of new polar iodinated disinfection byproducts in drinking water

    Chemosphere

    (2016)
  • Y. Pan et al.

    Identification, toxicity and control of iodinated disinfection byproducts in cooking with simulated chlor(am)inated tap water and iodized table salt

    Water Res

    (2016)
  • K.A. Schwehr et al.

    Sensitive determination of iodine species, including organo-iodine, for freshwater and seawater samples using high performance liquid chromatography and spectrophotometric detection

    Analytica Chimica Acta

    (2003)
  • S. Sun et al.

    Activation of ferrate by carbon nanotube for enhanced degradation of bromophenols: Kinetics, products, and involvement of Fe(V)/Fe(IV)

    Water Res

    (2019)
  • A. Taurog et al.

    Conversion of iodate to iodide in vivo and in vitro

    The Journal of biological chemistry

    (1966)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Rapid oxidation of iodide and hypoiodous acid with ferrate and no formation of iodoform and monoiodoacetic acid in the ferrate/I(-)/HA system

    Water Res

    (2018)
  • M. Yang et al.

    Application of (LC/)MS/MS precursor ion scan for evaluating the occurrence, formation and control of polar halogenated DBPs in disinfected waters: A review

    Water Res

    (2019)
  • T. Ye et al.

    Formation of iodinated disinfection by-products during oxidation of iodide-containing waters with chlorine dioxide

    Water Res

    (2013)
  • S. Allard et al.

    Mechanistic Study on the Formation of Cl-/Br-/I-Trihalomethanes during Chlorination/Chloramination Combined with a Theoretical Cytotoxicity Evaluation

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (20)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text