Technical note
FeatherFlame: An Arduino-Based Thermocouple Datalogging System to Record Wildland Fire Flame Temperatures in Agris

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2021.01.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Rangeland scientists have long relied on thermocouples for measuring temperature, especially in agris—in the field, under the extreme conditions of wildland fire. But the electronics required to sense and record thermocouple data remain expensive to both purchase and protect from exposure to heat and flames. Open-source, do-it-yourself (DIY) electronics platforms such as Arduino are increasingly popular among ecologists, and have been shown to perform as well as proprietary commercial systems when recording thermocouple data. The FeatherFlame system is a reliable, low-cost solution to sampling wildland fire, ranging from US$240–490 for 1–6 thermocouple sensors, including all fire protection equipment. The low cost and multi-sensor capacity facilitates spatial replication, which allows fire ecologists to measure and report meaningful data on rate of spread and calculate fire intensity.

Introduction

Rangeland scientists and managers have used thermocouples for decades (Fons, 1946, Vaartaja, 1949). Thermocouples, which are capable of operating at very high temperatures, facilitate the detection of temperature changes by placing wires of two different metals into contact; as the contact point that connects the wires absorbs or dissipates energy, differences in the electrical signals produced along each wire change in a manner that scales with temperature (e.g., the Seebeck effect). However, their utility in the field has historically been restricted by limitations in datalogger technology. The development of transistors improved power demands and mobility (Kenworthy, 1963). Magnetic tape storage allowed thermocouple data to be recorded at 2 s intervals (Engle et al., 1989), while electronic memory allowed a single datalogger to record data from multiple sensors simultaneously (Jacoby et al., 1992). But protecting expensive electronics from the heat and flame of wildland fire is itself costly: fire-proof boxes for Campbell Scientific dataloggers cost as much as US$500 (Butler, Jimenez, Forthofer, Shannon, Sopko, 2010, Jacoby, Ansley, Trevino, 1992).

Unfortunately the time-temperature data provided by thermocouple dataloggers are often misused. Flame temperature has been conflated with intensity for at least 60 years (e.g., Davies, Boyd, Bates, Hulet, 2015, Ryan, Williams, 2011, Whittaker, 1961). A majority of studies incorrectly associate the duration of heating above a certain threshold with physical or biological responses (McGranahan, 2020), despite the rate and magnitude of energy flux being the appropriate measurements (Bova, Dickinson, 2005, Dickinson, Johnson, 2004). Both the concept of the “heat dose” and the organismal response threshold have been harshly criticized (Pingree, Kobziar, 2019, Smith, Cowan, Fitzgerald, 2016). As such, a more appropriate application of thermocouple data is actually to use the timestamps to measure the movement of fire through the landscape (e.g., Davies et al., 2009). Unlike temperature, rate of spread is predicted by fire behavior models and can be used to calculate fire intensity in lieu of measuring it directly (Byram, 1959, Rothermel, 1972). However, deploying a sufficient number of thermocouples to sample rate of spread through heterogeneous wildland fuels is prohibitively expensive for many researchers given the high cost of purchasing and protecting multi-sensor dataloggers.

Many agricultural scientists seeking low-cost solutions to expensive electronic instrumentation and environmental sensors have discovered the open-source, do-it-yourself (DIY) Arduino platform (e.g., Barnard, Findley, Csavina, 2014, Greenspan, Morris, Warburton, Edwards, Duffy, Pike, Schwarzkopf, Alford, 2016, McGranahan, Geaumont, Spiess, 2018, Shipley, Kapoor, Dreelin, Winkler, 2017). Several published comparisons demonstrate that Arduino microprocessors are comparable in performance to commercial dataloggers. The computational accuracy of Arduino microprocessors are satisfactory for use in psychological and neurophysiology experiments (D’Ausilio, 2012), and Arduino systems have been used to monitor temperature via K-type thermocouples (Arnold et al., 2015). These Arduino-based K-type thermocouple dataloggers perform comparably to proprietary, commercial systems, such as the Campbell Scientific CR1000 (McGranahan and Poling, 2020). Here I describe the design, assembly, and research advantages of a compact and mobile solution for recording time-temperature data from thermocouples in agris—in the field, during wildland fires. This paper covers each step in the use of the DIY FeatherFlame system: How to construct it, program it, and protect it from heat and flame, and how to process, analyze, and interpret data using open-source software.

Section snippets

Hardware

The FeatherFlame system employs the open-source Feather series of Arduino-based microcontrollers and accessories from Adafruit Industries (adafruit.com, Brooklyn, NY, USA). At its core is the Feather M0 Adalogger, driven by the ATSAMD21G18 ARM Cortex M0 microprocessor. The Adalogger board includes a μSD slot for removable data storage and is powered by a rechargeable 3.7V lithium polymer battery, which make it compact and portable.

Reading thermocouple data with Arduino-based microcontrollers is

Conclusion

The open-source, DIY FeatherFlame thermocouple datalogging system is a low-cost alternative to proprietary commercial systems for measuring wildland fire behavior. The low cost and multi-input capacity of the microprocessor facilitates high replication at multiple spatial scales, and the compact design of the unit permits reliable in agris measurement of wildland fire by making it easy to protect the electronics from heat and flame. Fixed spacing and time-stamped data from thermocouples allow

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The North Dakota State Agricultural Experiment Station and USDA-NIFA Hatch project number ND02393 supported this work. NDSU Wildland Fire crew members Jonathan Spiess, Brittany Poling, and Micayla Lakey helped with initial tests of the FeatherFlame system; Megan Zopfi and Jasmine Cutter assisted with field implementations. I appreciate Kathryn Yurkonis letting my team sample UND’s Oakville Prairie.

References (31)

  • M.R. Pingree et al.

    The myth of the biological threshold: A review of biological responses to soil heating associated with wildland fire

    Forest Ecology and Management

    (2019)
  • F. Arnold et al.

    Method for collecting thermocouple data via secured shell over a wireless local area network in real time

    Review of Scientific Instruments

    (2015)
  • H.R. Barnard et al.

    PARduino: A simple and inexpensive device for logging photosynthetically active radiation

    Tree Physiology

    (2014)
  • A.S. Bova et al.

    Linking surface-fire behavior, stem heating, and tissue necrosis

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research

    (2005)
  • B.W. Butler et al.

    A portable system for characterizing wildland fire behavior

  • G. Byram

    Combustion of forest fuels

    Forest fire: control and use

    (1959)
  • A. D’Ausilio

    Arduino: A low-cost multipurpose lab equipment

    Behavior Research Methods

    (2012)
  • G.M. Davies et al.

    Rate of spread of fires in Callunavulgaris -dominated moorlands

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    (2009)
  • K.W. Davies et al.

    Winter grazing can reduce wildfire size, intensity and behaviour in a shrub-grassland

    International Journal of Wildland Fire

    (2015)
  • M.B. Dickinson et al.

    Temperature-dependent rate models of vascular cambium cell mortality

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research

    (2004)
  • J. Dorrough et al.

    From plant neighbourhood to landscape scales: How grazing modifies native and exotic plant species richness in grassland

    Plant Ecology

    (2007)
  • D. Engle et al.

    A technique for quantifying fire behavior in grassland fire ecology studies

    The Southwestern Naturalist

    (1989)
  • W.L. Fons

    Analysis of fire spread in light forest fuels

    Journal of Agricultural Research

    (1946)
  • S.E. Greenspan et al.

    Low-cost fluctuating-temperature chamber for experimental ecology

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution

    (2016)
  • P.W. Jacoby et al.

    An improved method for measuring temperatures during range fires

    Journal of Range Management

    (1992)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Applications of low-cost environmental monitoring systems for fine-scale abiotic measurements in forest ecology

      2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For applications in forest ecology this advantage is substantial, as characterizing the high environmental variability that occurs in three dimensions requires a multitude of sensors. For applications in fire and urban ecology, there is also an elevated risk of sensor destruction from heat damage or vandalism (McGranahan 2021), further highlighting the importance of low cost abiotic monitoring systems. Although the open-source sensors and dataloggers we tested provided comparable results and cost savings relative to commercially available sensors, two primary disadvantages are the additional technical expertise and time required to construct and operate them, and the lower battery life.

    1

    Currently at: Livestock and Range Research Laboratory US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service 243 Fort Keogh Road Miles City, MT 59301, ORCiD: 0000-0002-3763-7641.

    View full text