Abstract
This study explores patterns of development in cognitive, as well as social and emotional skills for children in the first year of school in Russia. The data analyzed are drawn from the International Performance Indicators in Primary Schools project. This is a large-scale assessment project involving 2741 children from two Russian regions. A k-means cluster analysis identifies four groups of children according to their cognitive and non-cognitive profiles, assessed at the beginning of the school year. Additional analyses explored how levels of children’s skill in each cluster differed by gender, phonological awareness and receptive vocabulary, maternal education, number of books in the home, parent involvement in home learning activities, and attendance at kindergarten in the year prior to school. The clusters proved to be stable across the end of the school year when a follow-up assessment was completed. The distinctive developmental characteristics of children from different clusters might be used to inform teachers in the first year of school about how they can adapt their teaching approaches to address the distinctive learning needs of different groups of children to reduce educational inequalities through primary school.
Résumé
Cette étude explore des modèles de développement des habiletés cognitives, sociales et émotionnelles d’enfants en première année d’école en Russie. Les données analysées sont tirées du projet sur les indicateurs internationaux de performance dans les écoles primaires (International Performance Indicators in Primary Schools, iPIPS). Il s’agit d’un projet d’évaluation à grande échelle impliquant 2741 enfants de deux régions russes. Une analyse de groupe par k moyennes identifie quatre groupes d’enfants selon leurs profils cognitif et non cognitif, évalué en début d’année scolaire. Des analyses additionnelles explorent comment les niveaux d’habileté des enfants de chaque groupe différent selon le sexe, la conscience phonologique et le vocabulaire réceptif, l’éducation maternelle, le nombre de livres à la maison, la participation des parents à des activités d’apprentissage à la maison ainsi que la fréquentation de la maternelle l’année précédant l’école. Ces regroupements se sont avérés stables jusqu’à la fin de l’année scolaire, alors qu’une évaluation de suivi a été effectuée. Les caractéristiques développementales distinctives des enfants des différents groupes pourraient servir à informer les enseignants de la première année d’école sur la façon dont ils peuvent adapter leurs approches pédagogiques pour répondre aux besoins distinctifs d’apprentissage des différents groupes d’enfants et réduire les inégalités en matière d’éducation au cours de l’école primaire.
Resumen
Esta investigación explora los patrones de desarrollo en habilidades cognitivas, sociales y emocionales en niños de primer año de Primaria en Rusia. La información analizada se obtuvo del proyecto Indicadores de Desempeño Internacional en Escuelas de Primaria (iPIPS, por sus siglas en inglés). Este proyecto de evaluación a gran escala incluía 2.741 niños de dos regiones de Rusia. Un análisis de cluster de K-medias identificó cuatro grupos de niños con base en sus perfiles cognitivos y no cognitivos, evaluados al comenzar el año escolar. Análisis adicionales exploraron diferencias en los niveles de habilidad de los niños en cada grupo respecto al género, conocimiento fonológico y asimilación de vocabulario, educación materna, cantidad de libros en sus hogares, participación de los padres en actividades de aprendizaje en casa, y asistencia a kindergarten durante el año escolar precedente. Una evaluación de seguimiento posterior mostró que dichos grupos se mantuvieron estables durante todo el año. Los rasgos distintivos del desarrollo de los niños en diferentes grupos podrían ser utilizados por los maestros de primer año escolar para adaptar sus métodos de enseñanza, atendiendo así a las diversas necesidades de aprendizaje de diferentes grupos de niños con el fin de reducir desigualdades educativas durante la educación primaria.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The latest version can be downloaded here: https://rg.ru/2013/11/25/doshk-standart-dok.html.
Can be downloaded here (in Russian): http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/portret-russia.pdf.
Details are available upon request.
References
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: Its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801–814.
Archer, E., Scherman, V., Coe, R., & Howie, S. J. (2010). Finding the best fit: The adaptation and translation of the Performance Indicators for Primary Schools (PIPS) for the South African context. Perspectives in Education, 28(1), 77–88.
Bäuerlein, K., Faust, G., Franz, U., Jost, M., & Schneider, W. (2010). Fähigkeitsindikatoren Primarschule (FIPS)—Erprobung und Weiterentwicklung einer internationalen computerbasierten Schulanfangsdiagnose (Performance Indicators for Primary Schools (PIPS)—testing and development of an international computerized instrument for the beginning of school). In M. Hasselhorn & W. Schneider (Eds.), Frühprognose schulischer Kompetenzen, Tests und Trends (Vol. 9, pp. 85–108). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972–1059.
Brun, I. V., Ivanova, A., Kardanova, E., & Orel, E. (2016). Noncognitive development of first graders and their cognitive performance. NRU Higher School of Economics. Series Psychology, WP BRP 57/PSY/2016. Moscow, Russian Federation: Higher School of Economics, National Research University.
Christenson, S. L., Rounds, T., & Gorney, D. (1992). Family factors and student achievement: An avenue to increase students’ success. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 178–206.
Coneus, K., Laucht, M., & Reus, K. (2012). The role of parental investments for cognitive and noncognitive skill formation—Evidence for the first 11 years of life. Economics and Human Biology, 10, 189–209.
Davies, S., Janus, M., Duku, E., & Gaskin, A. (2016). Using the early development instrument to examine cognitive and non-cognitive school readiness and elementary student achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 35, 63–75.
Department for Education. (2014). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage. Setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five, London: Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.foundationyears.org.uk.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.
Federal Agency of Statistics. (2012). Social and demographic portrait of Russia, on the results of Census-2010. Moscow, Russian Federation. Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/portret-russia.pdf.
Federal Law No. 273. (2012). About education in the Russian Federation from 29.12.2012 (ed. 03.07.2016); purview 5, point 5; purview 67, points 4 and 5. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_lang=en&p_isn=93529.
Federal Law No. 273. (2012). About education in the Russian Federation from 29.12.2012 (ed. 03.07.2016), purview 3, point 7. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/natlex4.detail?p_lang=en&p_isn=93529.
Garcia, E. (2014). The need to address noncognitive skills in the education policy agenda. EPI briefing paper, Briefing paper # 386. Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Gutman, L., & Schoon, I. (2013). The impact of non-cognitive skills on outcomes for young people, Literature Review, Education Endowment Foundation. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Hindman, A. H., Skibbe, L. E., Miller, A., & Zimmerman, M. (2010). Ecological contexts and early learning: Contributions of child, family, and classroom factors during head start, to literacy and mathematics growth through first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 235–250.
Jain, A. K. (2010). Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(8), 651–666.
Kardanova, E., Ivanova, A., Merrell, C., Hawker, D., Tymms, P. (2014), The role of the IPIPS assessment in providing high quality value added information on school and system effectiveness within and between countries (No. WP BRP 20/EDU/2014. Series EDU “Education”). Moscow: NRU Higher School of Economics.
Kautz, T., Heckman, J. J., Diris, R., Ter Weel, B., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success (No. w20749). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Linacre, J. M. (2011). A user’s guide to Winsteps. Program manual 3.71.0. Retrieved from http://www.winsteps.com/a/winsteps.pdf
Loeb, S., Bridges, M., Bassok, D., Fuller, B., & Rumbergerd, R. (2007). How much is too much? The influence of preschool centers on children’s social and cognitive development. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), 52–66.
Lubotsky, D., & Kaestner, R. (2016). Do ‘Skills Beget Skills’? Evidence on the effect of kindergarten entrance age on the evolution of cognitive and noncognitive skill gaps in childhood. Economics of Education Review, 53, 194–206.
Matthews, J. S., Ponitz, C. C., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Early gender differences in self-regulation and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 689–704.
Melhuish, E. C., Phan, M. B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggart, B. (2008). Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 95–114.
OECD. (2015). Skills for social progress: The power of social and emotional skills, OECD Skills Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pomerantz, E., Moorman, E., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: more is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 373–410.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322–338.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of educational research, 75(3), 417–453.
Tamis-LeMonda, C., Luo, R., McFadden, K., Bandel, E., & Vallotton, C. (2017, online). Early home learning environment predicts children’s 5th grade academic skills. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2017.1345634.
Tymms, P. (1999). Baseline assessment and monitoring in primary schools: Achievements, attitudes and value-added indicators. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Henderson, B. (1997). The first year at school: A quantitative investigation of the attainment and progress of pupils. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 101–118.
Tymms, P., Merrell, C., & Wildy, H. (2014). The progress of pupils in their first school year across classes and educational systems. British Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 365–380.
Vidmar, M., & Tymms, P. (2009). Performance indicators in primary schools: On-entry baseline assessment and follow-up material (PIPS-BA). Ljubljana: Pedagoskega Instituta.
Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. N. (1979). Best test design. Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press.
Acknowledgements
Support from the Basic Research Program of the National Research University Higher School of Economics is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Non-cognitive skills items rated by teachers on the PSED questionnaire
Item | Description | Lower score (1) | Upper score (5) |
---|---|---|---|
Adjusting to the school environment | |||
Comfort | Extent to which a child is comfortable with his/her separation from his/her main caregiver; his/her ability to cope with transitions between locations and activities; and generally how settled he/she is during the day | Getting upset in the morning on separation from carer. Feels concerned during the day. It is difficult for a child to cope with the change in activities and locations within the school | Never upset in the morning on the separation with the carer. Very comfortable, feels at ease during activities. Has no difficulties coping with the changes in activities and locations within the school |
Independence | Dependency on adults or other children for guidance and support, as well as the extent to which a child needs help with dressing and going to the bathroom | Needs support of the teacher and other children for most of the time. Generally needs help with clothing and personal activities (coat, toilet, etc.) | Independent. Asks for help only when something unusual is required. Can put on coat and fasten it, go to the toilet, etc.) |
Personal development | |||
Confidence | Child’s willingness to talk and ability to join group activities | Very hesitant. Does not join in group activities and rarely talk to others | Very confident. Willingly participate in group activities within the school |
Concentration (teacher-directed activities) | Child’s concentration on tasks directed from the teacher. Is the child able to maintain concentration and remain undisturbed in the presence of competing activities? | Finds it very difficult to concentrate. Very rarely concentrates on one thing and very easily distracted | Able to focus attention, even when something disturbs. There were examples of concentration for a long period (e.g., for 15 min) |
Concentration (self-directed activities) | Child’s concentration on activities chosen by the child rather than those determined by the teacher | Finds it very difficult to concentrate. Very rarely concentrates on one thing and very easily distracted | Able to focus attention, even when something disturbs. There were examples of concentration for a long period (e.g., for 15 min) |
Actions | Child’s impulsivity and actions. Does he/she act without consideration for him/herself or others? Does he/she demonstrate appropriate behavior and interact well with others? | Acts impulsively without taking into consideration consequences for him/herself and others. Demonstrates inappropriate behavior in all situations. Unable to cope with changes in routine | Almost always takes into consideration consequences for him/herself and others before acting. Unless strongly provoked, demonstrates appropriate behavior with others without being prompted to do so. Copes well with changes in routine |
Social development | |||
Relationship with peers | Child’s ability to communicate, make friends, and notice the feelings of others | Communicates quite easily with other children and makes friends. Considers feelings of other people, when they are very obvious | Communicates very easily with other children and willingly makes friends. Is aware of other people feelings and responds to their needs. Sensitive |
Relationship with adults | Child’s ability to approach and communicate with adults and to interact appropriately and confidently | Finds it very difficult to communicate with adults. Does not approach adults or interact with them. Demonstrates inappropriate behavior with adults | Confident approaching adults when necessary. Demonstrates appropriate behavior while interacting with adults. Speaks natural and easily understood |
Rules | Extent to which the child obeys rules or instructions and restrains from distracting peers | Takes no notice of rules. Distracts other children and interrupts activities | Always obeys rules. Never distracts others |
Cultural awareness | Extent to which the child understands that others may have a different way of life that should be respected | Shows an awareness of the routines in his/hers home (you can see it through the role-play “home-comer”) | Demonstrates understanding and respect to the way of life of others. Recognizes that other children and adults should pay respect to the life of the others |
Communication | Child is able to communicate fluently and coherently, listen to the views of others, respond appropriately, and take turns in conversation? | Communicates using single words, gestures, and facial expressions | Speaks fluently and coherently. Speech is generally, but not always, grammatically correct. Listens attentively to others views and responds appropriately taking turns in the conversation |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orel, E., Brun, I., Kardanova, E. et al. Developmental Patterns of Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills of Russian First-Graders. IJEC 50, 297–314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-018-0226-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-018-0226-8