Abstract
The belief that sexualization might be used as a source of power for women in Western societies is spreading (Anderson 2014; Erchull and Liss 2013). The present research aims at evaluating the interpersonal consequences for women endorsing this belief. In three experimental studies with Belgian and French participants (100 college men in Study 1; 135 men in Study 2; 203 women in Study 3), we examine how women who intentionally self-sexualize (i.e., endorse a sex-is-power belief; SIPB) are perceived on four facets of social judgment (i.e., agency, morality, competence, warmth). Furthermore, we compare the perception of women endorsing SIPB to the perception of those who enact body surveillance (BSV), a behavior commonly associated with passive self-objectification, and we explore the expected and actual objectifying behaviors these targets elicit. Results indicate that women engaged in BSV were negatively evaluated on the four facets of social judgment, were perceived as more likely to experience daily objectification, and were more objectified by men than women who do not. The same pattern of results emerges for women endorsing (vs. not) SIPB, except that their agency is acknowledged. We discuss the societal consequences of intentional self-sexualization, whether empowering or not.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abele, A. E., Hauke, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymkow, A., & Duan, Y. (2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: Agency with competence and assertiveness-communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810.
Allen, J., & Gervais, S. J. (2012). The drive to be sexy: Prejudice and core motivations in women’s self-sexualization. In D. W. Russell & C. A. Russell (Eds.), Psychology of prejudice: Interdisciplinary perspectives on contemporary issues (pp. 77–112). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Anderson, K. (2014). Modern misogyny: Anti-feminism in a post-feminist era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Attwood, F. (2009). Mainstreaming sex: The sexualization of western culture. New York: IB Tauris.
Aubrey, J. S., Gamble, H., & Hahn, R. (2017). Empowered sexual objects? The priming influence of self-sexualization on thoughts and beliefs related to gender, sex, and power. Western Journal of Communication, 81, 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1257822.
Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York and London: Routledge.
Bernard, P., Loughnan, S., Marchal, C., Godart, A., & Klein, O. (2015). The exonerating effect of sexual objectification: Sexual objectification decreases rapist blame in a stranger rape context. Sex Roles, 72, 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0482-0.
Bernard, P., Legrand, S., & Klein, O. (2018). From bodies to blame: Exposure to sexually objectifying media increases tolerance toward sexual harassment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000114.
Bernard, P., Hanoteau, F., Gervais, S., Servais, L., Bertolone, I., Deltenre, P., … Colin, C. (2019). Revealing clothing does not make the object: ERP evidences that cognitive objectification is driven by posture suggestiveness, not by revealing clothing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218775690.
Bernard, P., Cogoni, C., & Carnaghi, A. (2020). The sexualization–objectification link: Sexualization affects the way people see and feel toward others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419898187.
Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Perceptions of low agency and high sexual openness mediate the relationship between sexualization and sexual aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21644.
Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397.
Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744.
Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women's daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313727.
Bue, A. C. C., & Harrison, K. (2019). Empowerment sold separately: Two experiments examine the effects of ostensibly empowering beauty advertisements on women’s empowerment and self-objectification. Sex Roles, 81, 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01020-4.
Cahoon, D. D., & Edmonds, E. M. (1989). Male-female estimates of opposite-sex first impressions concerning females’ clothing styles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 280–281. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334607.
Calogero, R. M. (2013). Objects don’t object evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612452574.
Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S. E., & Thompson, J. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. American Psychological Association.
Calogero, R. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2019). Widening understandings of women’s sexual desire: A social–ecological lens. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 1693–1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1351-z.
Calogero, R. M., Tylka, T. L., Donnelly, L. C., McGetrick, A., & Leger, A. M. (2017). Trappings of femininity: A test of the “beauty as currency” hypothesis in shaping college women’s gender activism. Body Image, 21, 66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.02.008.
Carrier, A., Louvet, E., Chauvin, B., & Rohmer, O. (2014). The primacy of agency over competence in status perception. Social Psychology, 45, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000176.
Choi, D., & DeLong, M. (2019). Defining female self-sexualization for the twenty-first century. Sexuality & Culture, 1, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09617-3.
Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21497.
Currie D, H., Kelly D, M., & Pomerantz S. (2009). “Girl power”: Girls reinventing girlhood, New York: Peter Lang.
De Wilde, M., Casini, A., Wollast, R., & Demoulin, S. (2019). Sex is power belief and women’s mental health: The mediating roles of self-objectification and sexual subjectivity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2643.
De Wilde, M., Casini, A., Bernard, P., Wollast, R., Klein, O., & Demoulin, S. (2020). Preregistered direct replication of “Objects don’t object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women’s social activism.” Psychological Science, 31, 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619896273.
Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2005). Psychological empowerment and subjective wellbeing. In D. Narayan (Ed.), Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 125–140). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Donaghue, N., Kurz, T., & Whitehead, K. (2011). Spinning the pole: A discursive analysis of the websites of recreational pole dancing studios. Feminism & Psychology, 21, 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353511424367.
Duits, L., & van Zoonen, L. (2007). Who's afraid of female agency? A rejoinder to Gill. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807075820.
Dworkin, A. (2000). Against the male flood: Censorship, pornography, and equality. In D. Cornell (Ed.), Feminism: Feminism and pornography (pp. 19–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the Sex is Power Scale. Gender Issues, 30, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-013-9114-6.
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2014). The object of one’s desire: How perceived sexual empowerment through objectification is related to sexual outcomes. Sexuality & Culture, 18, 773–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9216-z.
Farris, C., Treat, T. A., Viken, R. J., & McFall, R. M. (2008). Sexual coercion and the misperception of sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.03.002.
Fetterolf, J. C., & Rudman, L. A. (2017). Exposure to sexual economics theory promotes a hostile view of heterosexual relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316669697.
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.
Folberg, A. M., Kercher, K., & Ryan, C. S. (2019). The hidden role of dominance in career interests: A bifactor analysis of agentic and communal goal orientations. Sex Roles, 1, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01104-1.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.
Freund, A. M., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2014). Aging and social perception: So far, more similarities than differences. Psychology and Aging, 29, 451–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037555.
Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and “fat talk”: Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023516209973.
Gay, R. K., & Castano, E. (2010). My body or my mind: The impact of state and trait objectification on women’s cognitive resources. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.
Gervais, S. J., Sáez, G., Riemer, A. R., & Klein, O. (2019). The social interaction model of objectification: A process model of goal-based objectifying exchanges between men and women. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 248–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12339.
Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism & Psychology, 18, 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507084950.
Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2013). As if postfeminism had come true: The turn to agency in cultural studies of ‘sexualization’. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, agency, and coercion (pp. 240–258). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295613_14.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491.
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., … Castro, Y. R. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713.
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low-and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00238.x.
Goldenberg, J. L., Cox, C. R., Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (2002). Understanding human ambivalence about sex: The effects of stripping sex of meaning. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552155.
Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J., & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726.
Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. F. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025883.
Gruenfeld, D. H., Inesi, M. E., Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111.
Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008.
Heflick, N. A., Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558312.
Heldman, C., & Wade, L. (2010). Hook-up culture: Setting a new research agenda. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 7, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-010-0024-z.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Infanger, M., Rudman, L. A., & Sczesny, S. (2016). Sex as a source of power? Backlash against self-sexualizing women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558312.
Jellison, J. M., & Green, J. (1981). A target-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 643–649. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.40.4.643.
Kant, I. 1991. (First published in 1797). The metaphysics of morals. (translated by M. Gregor) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.
Klein, O., Allen, J., Bernard, P., & Gervais, S. J. (2014). Angry naked ladies: Can stereotyping and sexual objectification be used to transform social systems? In D. Sindic, M. Barreto, & R. Costa-Lopes (Eds.), The intersection between power and identity: Perspectives from the social sciences (pp. 71–93). London: Psychology Press.
Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x.
Lamb, S. (2010). Feminist ideals for a healthy female adolescent sexuality: A critique. Sex Roles, 62, 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9698-1.
Lamb, S., & Peterson, Z. D. (2012). Adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: Two feminists explore the concept. Sex Roles, 66, 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9995-3.
Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234.
Leotti, L. A., Iyengar, S. S., & Ochsner, K. N. (2010). Born to choose: The origins and value of the need for control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001.
Lerum, K., & Dworkin, S. L. (2009). “Bad girls rule”: An interdisciplinary feminist commentary on the report of the APA task force on the Sexualization of girls. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903079542.
Lindner, D., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2017). The development and psychometric evaluation of the Self-objectification Beliefs and Behaviors Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41, 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843176921.
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.755.
Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313485718.
MacKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.
Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2012). Social considerations related to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment: A response to Lamb and Peterson. Sex Roles, 66, 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0079-1.
Murray, S., & Ouellette, L. (Eds.). (2008). Reality TV: Remaking television culture. New York: NYU Press.
Nussbaum, M. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x.
Orehek, E., & Weaverling, C. G. (2017). On the nature of objectification: Implications of considering people as means to goals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617691138.
Pacilli, M. G., Pagliaro, S., Loughnan, S., Gramazio, S., Spaccatini, F., & Baldry, A. C. (2017). Sexualization reduces helping intentions towards female victims of intimate partner violence through mediation of moral patiency. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12169.
Papadaki, L. (2010). What is objectification? Journal of Moral Philosophy, 7, 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/174046809X12544019606067.
Peterson, Z. (2010). What is sexual empowerment? A multidimensional and process-oriented approach to adolescent girls’ sexual empowerment. Sex Roles, 62, 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9725-2.
Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.
Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x.
Roberts, T. A., & Waters, P. L. (2012). The gendered body project: Motivational components of objectification theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 323–334). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0018.
Sáez, G., Riemer, A. R., Brock, R. L., & Gervais, S. J. (2019). Objectification in heterosexual romantic relationships: Examining relationship satisfaction of female objectification recipients and male objectifying perpetrators. Sex Roles, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0990-9.
Smith, J. K., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Kelly, C. M., Adragna, K., & Baines, K. (2018). The relationship between sexualized appearance and perceptions of women’s competence and electability. Sex Roles, 79, 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0898-4.
Strelan, P., & Pagoudis, S. (2018). Birds of a feather flock together: The interpersonal process of objectification within intimate heterosexual relationships. Sex Roles, 79, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0851-y.
Teixeira, C. P., Spears, R., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2019). Is Martin Luther king or Malcom X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups’ reactions to low-status groups’ collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118, 919–944. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000195.
Tolman, D. L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66, 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0122-x.
Vaes, J., & Muratore, M. (2013). Defensive dehumanization in the medical practice: A cross sectional study from a health care worker's perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12008.
Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.824.
Williams, S. (1993). Feminist legal epistemologies. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 8, 63–105. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38FW1S.
Wojciszke, B. (1997). Parallels between competence-versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199705)27:3<245::AID-EJSP819>3.0.CO;2-H.
Wollast, R., Puvia, E., Bernard, P., Tevichapong, P., & Klein, O. (2018). How sexual objectification generates dehumanization in western and eastern cultures. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 77, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000209.
Wookey, M. L., Graves, N. A., & Butler, J. C. (2009). Effects of a sexy appearance on perceived competence of women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 116–118. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.1.116-118.
Yzerbyt, V., Provost, V., & Corneille, O. (2005). Not competent but warm... really? Compensatory stereotypes in the French-speaking world. Group Processes & Intergroup, 8, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205053944
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Kervyn, N., & Judd, C. M. (2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1110–1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318602.
Zurbriggen, E. L., & Roberts, T. A. (2013). The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements
We thank Olivier Klein, Andrea Carnaghi and Vincent Yzerbyt for their helpful comments on the manuscript and Nathalie Lefèvre (of the Statistical Methodology and Computing Service) for her advice on statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Statement
The authors confirm that the research was conducted ethically, the results are reported honestly, the submitted work is original and not (self-)plagiarized, and the authorship reflects individuals’ contributions.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Data are available at: https://osf.io/ugxsq/?view_only=5524d82e772b436384966c1d0315410a
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 277 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Wilde, M., Carrier, A., Casini, A. et al. The Drawback of Sexual Empowerment: Perceiving Women as Emancipated but Still as Sexual Objects. Sex Roles 84, 626–643 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01192-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01192-4