Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T08:44:03.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A sound track to ecological crisis: tracing guitars all the way back to the tree

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2019

Chris Gibson
Chris Gibson*
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Cultural Environmental Research, School of Geography and Sustainable Communities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia E-mail: cgibson@uow.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analyses of music and environment are proliferating, yet new conceptions are needed to make sense of growing ecological crisis in the Anthropocene. From an empirical project tracing guitars all the way back to the tree, I argue for deeper conceptual and empirical integration of music into the material and visceral processes that constitute ecological crisis itself. Musicians are not only inspired by environmental concerns for compositional or activist purposes. They are entangled in environmental crisis through material and embodied relations with ecosystems, especially via the musical instruments we depend upon. I foreground three ‘more-than-musical’ themes to make sense of unfurling forces: materiality, corporeality and volatility. Musical instruments are gateway objects that invite contemplation of material and corporal relations. Such relations bind together musicians and non-human others. Material and corporeal relations with increasingly threatened upstream forests, and endangered tree species, are being confronted and reconfigured. In the context of ecological crisis, guitars do much more than make pleasing acoustic sounds. Via guitars we co-generate, with non-human others, a sound track of crisis both melancholy and hopeful.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 183 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abood, S., Lee, J.S.H., Burivalova, Z., Garcia-Ulloa, J. and Koh, L.P. 2015. ‘Relative contributions of the logging, fiber, oil palm, and mining industries to forest loss in Indonesia’, Conservation Letters, 8, pp. 58–67Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., and Stacey, J. (eds) (2001) Thinking Through the Skin (London, Routledge)Google Scholar
Allen, A.S. 2011. ‘Colloquy: Ecomusicology’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 64, pp. 391–424Google Scholar
Allen, A.S. 2012. ‘“Fatto di Fiemme”: Stradivari and the musical trees of the Paneveggio’, in Invaluable Trees: Cultures of Nature, 1660–1830, ed. Cook, E.H. and Pacini, G. (Oxford, Voltaire Foundation), pp. 301–15Google Scholar
Bendrups, D., and Weston, D. 2015. ‘Open air music festivals and the environment: a framework for understanding ecological engagement’, The World of Music, 4, pp. 61–71Google Scholar
Bendrups, D., Barney, K., and Grant, C. 2013. ‘An introduction to sustainability and ethnomusicology in the Australasian context’, Musicology Australia, 35, pp. 153–8Google Scholar
Bennett, B. 2016. ‘The sound of trees: wood selection in guitars and other chordophones’, Economic Botany, 70, pp. 49–63Google Scholar
Bennett, J. 2004. ‘The force of things: steps toward an ecology of matter’, Political Theory, 32, pp. 347–72Google Scholar
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Bisschop, L. 2012. ‘Out of the woods: the illegal trade in tropical timber and a European trade hub’, Global Crime, 13, pp. 191–212Google Scholar
Callon, M., and Muniesa, F. 2005. ‘Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices’, Organization Studies, 26, pp. 1229–50Google Scholar
Carr, C., and Gibson, C. 2016. Geographies of making: rethinking materials and skills for volatile futures, Progress in Human Geography, 40, pp. 297–315Google Scholar
Castree, N. 2004. ‘The geographical lives of commodities: Problems of analysis and critique’, Social & Cultural Geography, 5, pp. 21–35Google Scholar
Castree, N. 2017. ‘Unfree radicals: geoscientists, the Anthropocene and Left politics’, Antipode, 49, pp. 52–74Google Scholar
Castree, N., et al. 2014. ‘Changing the intellectual climate’, Nature Climate Change, 4, pp. 763–8Google Scholar
Clark, N., Saldanha, A., and Yusoff, K. (eds.) 2017. Capitalism and the Earth (New York, Punctum)Google Scholar
Coehlo, V.A. 2003. Picking through cultures: a guitarist's music history. In The Cambridge Companion to the Guitar, ed. Coehlo, V. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–12Google Scholar
Cook, I. 2004. ‘Follow the thing: Papaya’, Antipode, 36, pp. 642–64Google Scholar
Corn, A. 1999. ‘The didjeridu as a site of economic contestation in Arnhem Land’, Centre for Studies in Australian Music Newsletter, 10, pp. 1–4Google Scholar
Corn, A. 2003. ‘Outside the hollow log: the didjeridu, globalisation and socio-economic contestation in Arnhem Land’, Rural Society, 13, pp. 244–57Google Scholar
Currier, N. 2014. ‘Classical music in the Anthropocene’, Ecomusicology Newsletter, 3, pp. 8–51Google Scholar
Dawe, K. 2010. The New Guitarscape in Critical Theory, Cultural Practice and Musical Performance (Abingdon, Routledge)Google Scholar
Dudley, K.M. 2014. Guitar Makers: The Endurance of Artisanal Values in North America (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Duff, C., and Sumartojo, S. 2017. ‘Assemblages of creativity: material practices in the creative economy’, Organization, 24, pp. 418–32Google Scholar
Duffy, M., Waitt, G., Gorman-Murray, A. and Gibson, C. 2011. ‘Bodily rhythms: corporeal capacities to engage with festival spaces’, Emotion, Space and Society, 4, pp. 17–24Google Scholar
Ellis, E.C., Antill, E.C., and Kreft, H. 2012. ‘All is not loss: plant biodiversity in the Anthropocene’, PLoS ONE, 7, e30535Google Scholar
Gibson, C., and Warren, A. 2016. ‘Resource-sensitive global production networks: reconfigured geographies of timber and acoustic guitar manufacturing’, Economic Geography, 92, pp. 430–54Google Scholar
Gibson, C., and Warren, A. 2018. ‘Unintentional path dependence: Australian guitar manufacturing, bunya pine and legacies of forestry decisions and resource stewardship’, Australian Geographer. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2017.1336967Google Scholar
Corporation, Gibson Guitar. 2011. ‘Gibson Guitar Corp. responds to federal raid’, press release. http://www2.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/News/en-us/gibson-08252011Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J.-K., and Roelvink, G. 2010. ‘An economic ethics for the Anthropocene’, Antipode, 41, pp. 320–46Google Scholar
Gill, C. 2011. ‘Log jam’, Guitar Aficionado, September, pp. 64–8Google Scholar
Gordon, A. 2016. ‘Rural cultural resourcefulness: how community music enterprises sustain cultural vitality’, Journal of Rural Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.001Google Scholar
Gore, T., and Gilet, G. 2011. Contemporary Acoustic Guitar Design and Build (2 Vols) (Terrey Hills)Google Scholar
Grunfeld, F. 1969. The Art and Times of the Guitar (London, Macmillan)Google Scholar
Guy, N. 2009. ‘Flowing down Taiwan's Tamsui River: towards an ecomusicology of the environmental imagination’, Ethnomusicology, 53, p. 218Google Scholar
Hawkins, G. 2009. ‘The politics of bottled water’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2, pp. 183–95Google Scholar
Hawkins, H., and Kanngieser, A. 2017. ‘Artful climate change communication: overcoming abstractions, insensibilities, and distances’, WIREs Climate Change. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wcc.472/fullGoogle Scholar
Head, L. 2016. Hope and Grief in the Anthropocene: re-conceptualising human-nature relations (Abingdon, Routledge)Google Scholar
Head, L., Atchison, J., and Phillips, C. 2015. ‘The distinctive capacities of plants: re-thinking difference via invasive species’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 40, pp. 399–413Google Scholar
Hoad, C. 2012. ‘“Scream bloody gore”: the abject body and posthuman possibilities in death metal’, Neo, 5, pp. 1–14Google Scholar
Ingold, T. 2017. Five questions of skill. Cultural Geographies. s://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017702514Google Scholar
Iverson, L.R., et al. 2008. Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. Forest Ecology & Management, 254, pp. 390–406Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. et al. 2012. ‘International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations’, Nature, 486, pp. 109–12Google Scholar
Maalsen, S. 2013. ‘The life history of sound’, PhD thesis (University of Sydney)Google Scholar
Martinez-Reyes, J. 2015. ‘Mahogany intertwined: environmateriality between Mexico, Fiji, and the Gibson Les Paul’, Journal of Material Culture, 20, pp. 313–29Google Scholar
Trades, Music. 2015. The Music Industry Census (Englewood, NJ, Music Trades)Google Scholar
Neuenfeldt, K. (ed.) 1997. The Didjeridu: From Arnhem Land to Internet (Sydney, John Libby/Perfect Beat)Google Scholar
Oliver, P. 1988. ‘Musico-ethnological approaches to musical instruments’, Popular Music, 7, pp. 216–18.Google Scholar
Pedelty, M. 2012. Ecomusicology: Rock, Folk, and the Environment (Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press)Google Scholar
Pollens, S. 2003. ‘Antonio Stradivari and baroque guitar making’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Guitar, ed. Coehlo, V. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 207–28Google Scholar
Probyn, E. 1992. ‘Theorizing through the body’, in Women Making Meaning, ed. Rakow, L.F. (London, Routledge), pp. 83–99Google Scholar
Revill, G. 2016. ‘How is space made in sound? Spatial mediation, critical phenomenology and the political agency of sound’, Progress in Human Geography, 40, pp. 240–56Google Scholar
Rose, D.B., van Dooren, T., et al. 2012. ‘Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities’, Environmental Humanities, 1, pp. 1–5Google Scholar
Ryan, R. 2014. ‘Toward a new, musical paradigm of place: the Port River Symphonic of Chester Schultz’, Environmental Humanities, 4, pp. 41–67Google Scholar
Ryan, R. 2015. ‘“Didjeri-dus” and “Didjeri-don'ts”: confronting sustainability issues’, The Journal of Music Research Online, 6. http://www.jmro.org.au/index.php/mca2/article/view/121/44Google Scholar
Schippers, H., and Bendrups, D. 2015. ‘Ethnomusicology, ecology and sustainable music cultures’, The World of Music, 4, pp. 9–19Google Scholar
Schippers, H., and Grant, C. 2016. Sustainable Futures for Music Cultures: An Ecological Perspective (Oxford, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Shaw, R., and Szego, P. 2013. Inventing the American Guitar (Hal Leonard)Google Scholar
Shelley, W.R. 2012. ‘Setting the tone: the Lacey Act's attempt to combat the international trade of illegally obtained plant and wildlife and its effect on musical instrument manufacturing’, Environmental Law, 42, pp. 549–57Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. 2011. ‘The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship’, Ambio, 40, pp. 739–61Google Scholar
Thrift, N. 2002. ‘The future of geography’, Geoforum, 33, pp. 291–8Google Scholar
Titon, J.T. 2009. ‘Music and sustainability: an ecological viewpoint’, The World of Music, 51, pp. 119–38Google Scholar
Troutman, J. 2016. Kı̄kā Kila: How the Hawaiian Steel Guitar Changed the Sound of Modern Music (Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press)Google Scholar
Truanquada, J., and King, J. 2012. The ‘Ukulele: A History (Honolulu, HI, University of Hawai'i Press)Google Scholar
van Dooren, T. 2016. ‘The Unwelcome Crows: hospitality in the anthropocene’, Angelaki, 21, pp. 193–212Google Scholar
Waksman, S. 2001. Instruments of Desire (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Watkins, H. 2007. ‘The pastoral after environmentalism: nature and culture in Stephen Albert's Symphony: RiverRun’, Current Musicology, 84, pp. 7–24Google Scholar