Skip to main content
Log in

Research and Improvement on Active Compliance Control of Hydraulic Quadruped Robot

  • Robot and Applications
  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on active compliance control of hydraulic quadruped robot, especially the analysis of the inner-loop of the coupled system. Current researches on active compliance control regard the bandwidth of the inner loop of the system as infinite, while ignoring that the extra-load will cause the inner-loop response characteristics to deteriorate when the leg is in the stance phase. In this work, we first briefly introduced the structure of the robot, and its kinematics and dynamics are analyzed. Next, the robot’s active compliance control framework is established, and the inner-loop two-cylinder coupling system is analyzed in depth. It can be concluded that the existence of low frequency poles in the system is the main reason for the poor response characteristics. Then through the analysis of the state equation and transfer function matrix of the multi-input multi-output system, we show that the equivalent hydraulic spring stiffness (EHSS) is the main factor affecting the zero-pole distribution. Furthermore, we optimize the structure to increase the EHSS to improve the response characteristics of the system. Finally, the co-simulation platform and single-leg experiment bench are introduced. The simulation and experimental results show that the response speed of the inner-loop control is significantly improved after optimization, and the robot with active compliance control strategies can significantly reduce the impact of the foot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. D. Carlo, P. M. Wensing, and S. Kim, “Dynamic locomotion in the mit cheetah 3 through convex model-predictive control,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1–9, October 2018.

  2. B. Katz, J. D. Carlo, and S. Kim, “Mini Cheetah: A platform for pushing the limits of dynamic quadruped control,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 6295–6301, May 2019.

  3. C. Gehring, S. Coros, and R. Siegwart, “Control of dynamic gaits for a quadrupedal robot,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3287–3292, January 2013.

  4. C. Gehring, S. Coros, and M. Hutter, “Towards automatic discovery of agile gaits for quadrupedal robots,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4243–4248, June 2014.

  5. M. Raibert, K. Blankepoor, and G. Nelson, “Bigdog, the Rough-Terrain quadruped robot,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 10822–10825, July 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Michael, “Meet Boston dynamics’ LS3 — the latest robotic war machine,” Tedxuwollongong Talk, October 2012.

  7. C. Semini, N. G. Tsagarakis, and D. G. Caldwell, “Design of HyQ — A hydraulically and electrically actuated quadruped robot,” Sage Journals, vol. 225, no. 6, pp. 204–210, August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  8. X. Rong, Y. Li, J. Ruan, and B. Li, “Design and simulation for a hydraulic actuated quadruped robot,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1171–1177, April 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Y. Wang, F. Yan, and J. Chen, “A new adaptive time-delay control scheme for cable-driven manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 3469–3481, June 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Y. Wang, S. Li, and D. Wang, “Adaptive time-delay control for cable-driven manipulators with enhanced nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 2356–2367, 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Y. Wang, K. Zhu, and B. Chen, “Model-free continuous nonsingular fast terminal sliding mode control for cable-driven manipulators,” ISA Transactions, vol. 98, pp. 483–495, 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Q. Guo, Z. Zuo, and Z. Ding, “Parametric adaptive control of single-rod electrohydraulic system with block-strict-feedback model,” Automatica, vol. 113, pp. 108807, March 2020.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Q. Guo, J. Yin, and T. Yu, “Saturated adaptive control of an electrohydraulic actuator with parametric uncertainty and load disturbance,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 7930–7941, October 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Y. Wang, L. Gu, and Y. Xu, “Practical tracking control of robot manipulators with continuous fractional-order nonsingular terminal sliding mode,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 6194–6204, October 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Y. Wang, L. Liu, and D. Wang, “Time-delay control using a novel nonlinear adaptive law for accurate trajectory tracking of cable-driven robots,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 5234–5243, August 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Boaventura, C. Semini, and D. G. Caldwell, “Dynamic torque control of a hydraulic quadruped robot,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1889–1894, May 2012.

  17. L. Liu, S. Leonhardt, and B. J. E. Misgeld, “Experimental validation of a torque-controlled variable stiffness actuator tuned by gain scheduling,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2109–2120, October 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Chen, H. Ding, T. Fu, J. Li, and L. Shao, Design and Impedance Control of the Integrated Rotary Compliant Joint, Springer, 2017.

  19. E. Bayraktar, C. B. Yigit, and P. Boyraz, “Object manipulation with a variable-stiffness robotic mechanism using deep neural networks for visual semantics and load estimation,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 32, August 2019.

  20. C. Gehring, M. Hoepflinger, and R. Siegwart, “Practice makes perfect: An optimization-based approach to controlling Agile motions for a quadruped robot,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 34–43, March 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Gehring, Planning and Control for Agile Quadruped Robots, ETH Zurich, 2017.

  22. C. Semini, V. Barasuol, and T. Boaventura, “Towards versatile legged robots through active impedance control,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1003–1020, June 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Barasuol, J. Buchli, and C. Semini, “A reactive controller framework for quadrupedal locomotion on challenging terrain,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2554–2561, May 2013.

  24. G. Bledt, M. J. Powell, and B. Katz, “Mit cheetah 3: Design and control of a robust, dynamic quadruped robot,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2245–2252, October 2018.

  25. T. Boaventura, J. Buchli, and D. G. Caldwell, “Modelbased hydraulic impedance control for dynamic robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1324–1336, December 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. B. Cunha, C. Semini, and E. Guglielmino, “Gain scheduling control for the hydraulic actuation of the HYQ robot leg,” Proc. of the 20th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, pp. 523–530, 2009.

  27. B. Ugurlu, I. Havoutis, and C. Semini, “Dynamic trotwalking with the hydraulic quadruped robot — HyQ: Analytical trajectory generation and active compliance control,” Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6044–6051, November 2013.

  28. C. Semini, V. Barasuol, and J. Goldsmith, “Design of the hydraulically actuated, torque-controlled quadruped robot HyQ2Max,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 635–646, April 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. P. I. Corke, “A simple and systematic approach to assigning Denavit-Hartenberg parameters,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 590–594, June 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. N. Hogan, “Impedance control: An approach to manipulation,” Proc. of American Control Conference, pp. 304–313, June 1984.

  31. N. Hogan, “Impedance control — An approach to manipulation. I — Theory. II — Implementation. III — Applications,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 107, pp. 1–24, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. D. Surdilovic, “Contact stability issues in position based impedance control: theory and experiments,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1675–1680, April 1996.

  33. H. E. Merritt, Hydraulic Control Systems, Wiley, 1967.

  34. H. Geyer and H. M. Herr, “A muscle-reflex model that encodes principles of legged mechanics produces human walking dynamics and muscle activities,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 263–273, June 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingjun Yang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Recommended by Associate Editor Maolin Jin under the direction of Editor Kyoung Kwan Ahn.

Zhu Rui received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Taiyuan University of Technology, China, in 2017. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, China. His research interests include quadruped robot, electrohydraulic servo control and nonlinear control.

Yang Qingjun received his Ph.D., M.S. and B.S. degrees in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, China, in 1995, 1997 and 2003, respectively. He has been with the mechatronics engineering at Harbin Institute of Technology since 2003 and promoted to the rank of associate professor in 2006. His research interests include fluid control and flow field analysis, hydraulic and pneumatic components design, nonlinear control and adaptive control.

Song Jiaxing received her M.S. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, China, in 2019, and received her B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Taiyuan University of Technology, China, in 2017. She works in China Aerospace Science & Industry Nanjing Chenguang Group as an electrical engineer at present. Her research interests include servo valve driver by piezoelectric ceramic and hydraulic control system.

Yang Shangru received his B.S. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, China, in 2019. He is currently pursuing an M.S. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology. His research interests include electro-hydraulic control and microfluidic.

Liu Yudong received his M.S. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, China, in 2019, and received his B.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from Yanshan University, China, in 2017. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology. His research interests include hydraulic components and systems and electro-hydraulic control.

Mao Qi received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Taiyuan University of Technology, China, in 2018. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in mechatronics engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology, China. His research interests include heat and mass transfer and microfluidic technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, R., Yang, Q., Song, J. et al. Research and Improvement on Active Compliance Control of Hydraulic Quadruped Robot. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 19, 1931–1943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0221-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-020-0221-3

Keywords

Navigation