Skip to main content
Log in

Damage detection through nonparametric models using Kautz filters

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to present an approach to detect structural changes by using nonparametric models. The impulse response functions (IRFs) of mechanical systems in healthy conditions are identified through the sum of convolution expanded on an orthonormal basis. The Kautz filters with multiple poles optimized are implemented as an efficient orthonormal basis to identify nonparametric reference models. Identifying the IRFs of a smart beam with PZTs actuators/sensors coupled is used to illustrate the necessary procedures. The damages are simulated as a loss of bolts, nuts, and washers attached near a PZT sensor. A statistical procedure of a hypothesis test is also used to confirm the smart beam’s structural state. The experimental results achieved show that it is possible to detect the structural changes with statistical confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alves V, Cury A, Roitman N, Magluta C, Cremona C (2015) Novelty detection for SHM using raw acceleration measurements. Struct Control Health Monit 22(9):1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avci O, Abdeljaber O, Kiranyaz S, Hussein M, Gabbouj M, Inman DJ (2021) A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 147:107077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldelli DH, Mazzaro DH, Peña RSS (2001) Robust identification of lightly damped flexible structures by means of orthonormal bases. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 9(5):696–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. da Silva S, Paixão J, Rébillat M, Mechbal N (2020) Extrapolation of AR models using cubic splines for damage progression evaluation in composite structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X20963171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Oliveira MA, Monteiro AV, Vieira Filho J (2018) A new structural health monitoring strategy based on PZT sensors and convolutional neural network. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Entezami A, Shariatmadar H, Mariani S (2020) Early damage assessment in large-scale structures by innovative statistical pattern recognition methods based on time series modeling and novelty detection. Adv Eng Soft 150:102923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farrar CR, Lieven NA (2007) Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc 365:623–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrar CR, Worden K, Todd MD, Par G, Nichols J, Adams DE (2007) Nonlinear system identification for damage detection. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report: LA-14353-MS

  9. Fassois SD, Sakellariou JS (2007) Time-series methods for fault detection and identification in vibrating structures. Philos Trans R Soc 365:411–448

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fathi A, Esfandiari A, Fadavie M, Mojtahedi A (2020) Damage detection in an offshore platform using incomplete noisy FRF data by a novel Bayesian model updating method. Ocean Eng 217:108023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Filho JV, Baptista FG, Inman DJ (2011) Time-domain analysis of piezoelectric impedance-based structural health monitoring using a multilevel wavelet decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:1550–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heuberger PSC, den Hof PMJV, Wahlberg B (2005) Modelling and identification with rational orthogonal basis functions. ISBN-10: 185233956X. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. den Hof PMJV, Bokors PSC (1995) System identification with generalized orthonormal basis functions. Automatica 31(12):1821–1834

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kopsaftopoulos FP, Fassois SD (2011) Statistical time series methods for damage diagnosis in a scale aircraft skeleton structure-loosened bolts scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on damage assessment of structures (DAMAS). University of Oxford England. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/305/1/012056

  15. Ljung L (1978) System identification: theory for the user, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lynch JP (2004) Design of a wireless active sensing unit for localized structural health monitoring. J Struct Control Health Monit 12:405–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park G, Figueiredo EF, Farinholt KM, Farrar CR (2010) Time series analysis of piezoelectric active-sensing for SHM applications. In: Proceedings of 17th SPIE conference on smart structures and nondestructive evaluation, March 7-11, San Diego, CA, USA

  18. Scussel O, da Silva S (2016) Output-only identification of nonlinear systems via Volterra series. J Vib Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033458.041012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scussel O, da Silva S (2017) The harmonic probing method for output-only nonlinear mechanical systems. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39(9):3329–3341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0723-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. da Silva S (2011) Non-parametric identification of mechanical systems by Kautz filter with multiple poles. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(4):1103–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. da Silva S, Dias Junior M, Lopes Junior V (2009) Identification of mechanical systems through Kautz filter. J Vib Control 15:849–865

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. da Silva S, Dias Junior M, Lopes Junior V, Brennan MJ (2008) Structural damage detection by fuzzy clustering. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:1636–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spanos NA, Sakellariou JS, Fassois SD (2020) Vibration-response-only statistical time series structural health monitoring methods: a comprehensive assessment via a scale jacket structure. Struct Health Monit 19(3):736–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719862487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wahlberg B (1994) System identification using Kautz models. IEEE Trans Autom Control 39:1276–1282

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the valuable remarks given by the Editor and the ad-hoc reviewers for improving the readability of the paper.

Funding

The authors thank the financial support provided by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) Grant No. 2013/09008-4, and the Brazilian National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) Grant No. 306526/2019-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel da Silva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva, S., Hansen, C. Damage detection through nonparametric models using Kautz filters. Meccanica 56, 1177–1189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01319-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01319-1

Keywords

Navigation