Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T15:31:12.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of flowering time response among recombinant inbred lines of WAB638-1/PRIMAVERA rice under reproductive stage drought stress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2021

Kehinde A. Adeboye Open the ORCID record for Kehinde A. Adeboye [Opens in a new window] ,
Olusegun A. Oduwaye ,
Isaac O. Daniel ,
Mamadou Fofana  and
Mande Semon
Kehinde A. Adeboye*
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Agricultural Development and Sustainable Environment (CEADESE), Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria Africa Rice Center, Ibadan, Nigeria
Olusegun A. Oduwaye
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Technology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
Isaac O. Daniel
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Technology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
Mamadou Fofana
Affiliation:
Africa Rice Center, Ibadan, Nigeria
Mande Semon
Affiliation:
Africa Rice Center, Ibadan, Nigeria
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: kaadeboye@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ninety-eight high-yielding recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of WAB638-1/PRIMAVERA rice were evaluated with the parents under reproductive stage drought stress. The study aimed at characterizing flowering time response under drought stress and consequently classifying the genetic resources for efficient use in breeding programmes. Two field trials were conducted during the 2016 and 2017 dry seasons using the randomized complete block design with two replications. In 2016, 12 RILs were evaluated with the parents for the rooting attributes under drought stress and well-watered treatments. Analysis of variance revealed a significant (P < 0.05) variation among the genotypes for the traits evaluated. Drought stress reduced most of the characters in this study, including grain yield. However, the inbred lines exhibited considerable tolerance to drought stress as indicated by yield-related stress indexes, including stress susceptibility and drought tolerance indexes. Delayed flowering (FD) was recorded in 75 genotypes (including WAB638-1), while 25 genotypes (including PRIMAVERA) had no delay under drought stress compared to the control. The genotypes were grouped into flowering delay (D) genotypes (FD > 1 d) and no delay (N) genotypes (FD < 1 d), which significantly differ (P ⩽ 0.05) for numbers of days to 50% flowering. The flowering delay genotypes may be suitable for intermittent drought, while genotypes with little or no delay may be selected for terminal drought conditions. There was a significant correlation (r > 0.5) between the root length and number of days to 50% flowering. The study indicated that root parameters, such as the root length, may contribute to the drought adaptation mechanisms of the RILs.

Keywords

adaptation mechanismsdrought resistance indexflowering delayroot attributesstress susceptibility indexupland rice
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinbile, CO, Abd El-Latif, KM, Abdullah, R and Yusoff, MS (2011) Rice production and water use efficiency for self-sufficiency in Malaysia: a review. Trends in Applied Sciences Research 6: 1127–1140.Google Scholar
Arif, MAR, Attaria, F, Shokat, S, Akram, S, Waheed, MQ, Arif, A and Börner, A (2020) Mapping of QTLs associated with yield and yield related traits in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) under irrigated and drought conditions. International Journal of Molecular Science 21: 2372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belder, P, Bouman, BAM, Spiertz, JHJ, Peng, S, Castañeda, AR and Visperas, RM (2005) Crop performance, nitrogen and water use in flooded and aerobic rice. Plant and Soil 273: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocco, R, Lorieux, M, Seck, PA, Futakuchi, K, Manneh, B, Baimey, H and Ndjiondjop, MN (2012) Agro-morphological characterization of a population of introgression lines derived from crosses between IR 64 (Oryza sativa; indica) and TOG 5681 (Oryza glaberrima) for drought tolerance. Plant Science 183: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouman, BAM and Tuong, TP (2001) Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agricultural Water Management 49: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, J, Impa, S, O'Toole, J, Jagadish, S and Price, A (2011) Influence of the soil physical environment on rice (Oryza sativa L.) response to drought stress and its implications for drought research. Field Crops Research 121: 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, P, Das, BS and Senb, SK (2015) Soil water potential and recoverable water stress in drought tolerant and susceptible rice varieties. Agricultural Water Management 152: 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gana, AS (2011) Screening and resistance of traditional and improved cultivars of rice to drought stress at Badeggi, Niger State, Nigeria. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2: 1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handmer, JY, Honda, ZW, Kundzewicz, N, Arnell, G, Benito, J, Hatfield, IF, Mohamed, P, Peduzzi, S, Wu, B, Sherstyukov, K, Takahashi, and Yan, Z (2012) Changes in impacts of climate extremes: human systems and ecosystems. In: Field, CB, Barros, V, Stocker, TF, Qin, D, Dokken, DJ, Ebi, KL, Mastrandrea, MD, Mach, KJ, Plattner, GK, Allen, SK, Tignor, M and Midgley, PM (eds.) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, A, Wehler, R, Grondin, A, Franke, R and Quintana, M (2016) Environmental and physiological effects on grouping of drought-tolerant and susceptible rice varieties related to rice (Oryza sativa) root hydraulics under drought. Annals of Botany 118: 711–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibrahim, FA (2014) Reproductive Stage Drought Screening of F3 Progenies from a Reciprocal Oryza sativa x Oryza sativa Cross. Master's Dissertation, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Jaleel, CA, Gopi, R, Sankar, B, Gomathinayagam, M and Panneerselvam, R (2008) Differential responses in water use efficiency in two varieties of Catharanthus roseus under drought stress. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331: 42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, DJ and Futakuchi, K (2019) Effect of moderate drought-stress on flowering time of interspecific hybrid progenies (Oryza sativa L. × Oryza glaberrima Steud.). Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 22: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazan, K and Lyons, R (2015) Link between flowering time and stress tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany 67: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kebede, A, Kang, MS and Bekele, E (2019) Chapter Five – Advances in mechanisms of drought tolerance in crops, with emphasis on barley. In: Sparks, DL (ed.) Advances in Agronomy, vol. 156. Cambridge: Academic Press, pp. 265–314.Google Scholar
Kumar, A, Dixit, A, Ram, T, Yadaw, RB, Mishra, KK and Mandal, NP (2014) Breeding high-yielding drought-tolerant rice: genetic variations and conventional and molecular approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany 65: 6265–6278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, R, Sarawgi, AK, Ramos, C, Amarante, AM, Ismail, AM and Wade, LJ (2006) Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Research 98: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafitte, HR, Ismail, A and Bennett, J (2004) Abiotic stress tolerance in rice for Asia: progress and the future. New Dimensions for a Diverse Planet. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 September.Google Scholar
Lipiec, J, Doussan, C, Nosalewicz, A and Kondracka, K (2013) Effect of drought and heat stresses on plant growth and yield: a review. International Agrophysics 27: 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mau, YS, Ndiwa, ASS, Oematan, SS and Markus, JER (2019) Drought tolerance indices for selection of drought tolerant, high yielding upland rice genotypes. Australian Journal of Crop Science 13: 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molden, D, Frenken, K, Barker, R, de Fraiture, C, Mati, B, Svendsen, M, Sadoff, CW and Finlayson, M (2007) Trends in water and agriculture development. In: Molden, D (ed.) Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. International Water Management Institute, London: Earthscan and Colombo, pp. 57–89.Google Scholar
Moldenhauer, K and Slaton, NA (2001) Rice growth and development. In: Slaton, NA (ed.), Rice Production Handbook. Miscellaneous Publication 192. Little Rock: Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, University of Arkansas, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
Nauraein, M, Mohammadi, SA, Ahrizad, S, Moghaddam, M and Sadeghzadeh, B (2013) Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in wheat recombinant inbred population. Annals of Biological Research 4: 113–122.Google Scholar
Ndjiondjop, MN, Manneh, B, Cissoko, M, Drame, NK, Kakai, RG, Bocco, R, Baimey, H and Wopereis, M (2010) Drought resistance in an interspecific backcross population of rice (Oryza spp.) derived from the cross WAB56–104 (O. sativa) × CG14 (O. glaberrima). Plant Science 179: 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, HT, Babu, RC and Blum, A (1997) Breeding for drought resistance in rice: physiology and molecular genetics considerations. Crop Science 37: 1426–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oikeh, SO, Nwilene, FE, Agunbiade, FA, Oladimeji, O, Ajayi, O, Mande, S, Tsunematsu, H and Samejima, H (2008) Growing upland rice: a production handbook. Africa Rice Center, Benin, p. 5.Google Scholar
Pantuwan, G, Fukai, S, Cooper, M, Rajatasereekul, S and O'Toole, JC (2002) Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes to drought under rainfed lowlands: part 2. Selection of drought resistant genotypes. Field Crops Research 73: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, A, Satish, VB, Nimai, MP, Mukund, V, Shukla, VD, Dwivedi, JL, Singh, BN, Singh, ON, Padmini, S, Ashutosh, MK, Robin, S, Chandrababu, R, Abhinav, J, Tilatoo, R, Hittalmani, S, Haefele, S, Piepho, HP and Kumar, A (2012) Drought yield index to select high yielding rice lines under different drought stress severities. Rice 5: 31. http://www.thericejournal.com/content/5/1/31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasheed, R, Wahid, A, Farooq, M, Hussain, I and Basra, SMA (2011) Role of proline and glycine betaine pre treatments in improving heat tolerance of sprouting sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) buds. Plant Growth Regulation 65: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riboni, M, Galbiati, M, Tonelli, C and Conti, L (2013) GIGANTEA enables drought escape response via abscisic acid-dependent activation of the florigens and suppressor of overexpression of constants. Plant Physiology 162: 1706–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saikumar, S, Varma, CMK, Saiharini, A, Kalmeshwer, GP, Nagendraa, K, Lavanyaa, K and Ayyappa, D (2016) Grain yield responses to varied level of moisture stress at reproductive stage in an interspecific population derived from Swarna/O. glaberrima introgression line Surapaneni. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 78: 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmalenbach, I, Zhang, L, Reymond, M and Jiménez-Gómez, JM (2014) The relationship between flowering time and growth responses to drought in the Arabidopsis Landsberg erecta× Antwerp-1 population. Frontiers in Plant Science 5: 609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SES (2014) Standard Evaluation System for Rice, 5th edn. Los Baños: International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Shavrukov, Y, Kurishbayev, A, Jatayev, S, Shvidchenko, V, Zotova, L, Koekemoer, F, de Groot, S, Soole, K and Langridge, P (2017) Early flowering as a drought escape mechanism in plants: how can it aid wheat production? Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 01950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, Y, Kukal, SS, Jat, ML and Sidhu, HS (2014) Improving water productivity of wheat-based cropping systems in South Asia for sustained productivity. Advances in Agronomy 127: 157–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, B, Reddy, KR, Redona, ED and Walker, T (2017) Screening of rice cultivars for morpho-physiological responses to early season soil moisture stress. Rice Science 24: 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, E and Østergaard, L (2009) Distinct and dynamic auxin activities during reproductive development. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 1: a001628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ukaoma, AA, Okocha, PI and Okechukwu, RI (2013) Heritability and character correlation among some rice genotypes for yield and yield components. Journal of Plant Breeding Genetics 01: 73–84.Google Scholar
Verulkar, SB, Mandal, NP, Dwivedi, JL, Singh, BN, Sinha, PK, Mahato, RN, Swain, P, Dongre, P, Payasi, D, Singh, ON, Bose, LK, Robin, S, Babu, RC, Senthil, S, Jain, A, Shashidhar, HE, Hittalmani, S, Vera Cruz, C, Paris, T, Hijmans, R, Raman, A, Haefele, S, Serraj, R, Atlin, G and Kumar, A (2010) Breeding resilient and productive rice genotypes adapted to drought–prone rainfed ecosystems of India. Field Crops Research 117: 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wopereis, MCS, Kropff, MJ, Maligaya, AR and Tuong, TP (1996) Drought-stress responses of two lowland rice cultivars to soil water status. Field Crops Research 46: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xangsayasane, P, Jongdee, B, Pantuwan, G, Fukai, S, Mitchell, JH, Inthapanya, P and Jothiyangkoon, D (2014) Genotypic performance under intermittent and terminal drought screening in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Research 156: 281–2292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, GH, Liu, HY, Mei, HW, Liu, GL, Yu, XQ, Li, MS, Wu, JH, Chen, L and Luo, LJ (2007) Screening for drought resistance of rice recombinant inbred populations in the field. Journal of Integrated Biology 49: 1508–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Adeboye et al. supplementary material

Table S1 and Figures S1-S3

Download Adeboye et al. supplementary material(File)
File 358.4 KB