The seven lives of Airbnb. The role of accommodation types
Introduction
The global pandemic has posed a serious threat to the global economy, the tourism and hospitality sector in general (Sharma & Nicolau, 2020), and to paid peer-to-peer accommodation types specifically (Dolnicar & Zare, 2020). Peer-to-peer models have grown exponentially in recent years (Ert et al., 2016; Gutiérrez et al., 2017; Viglia, 2020), mainly due to rapid technological developments (see Buhalis et al., 2019). Over time, paid peer-to-peer models like Airbnb have threatened traditional hotels by stealing market shares, proposing new ways to access services and focussing on unique experience, social/physical interactions and lower prices (Tussyadiah and Pesonen, 2016, Tussyadiah and Pesonen, 2018). In line with this, a growing body of literature has recently discussed the differences between paid peer-to-peer versus traditional models (i.e., Heo, 2016; Osman et al., 2019), along with the elements that travellers look for when choosing one model over another (Hajibaba & Dolnicar, 2017). Additionally, some systematic reviews on the state of current research (see Dolnicar, 2019; Prayag & Ozanne, 2018; Sainaghi, 2020; Sainaghi & Baggio, 2020) show substitution effects between these two realms.
Traditional models (e.g., hotels) are characterized by strong institutional settings (Osman et al., 2019), while in the case of paid peer-to-peer accommodation there is a lower social/physical distance and higher trust between guests and hosts (Ert & Fleischer, 2019; Pera et al., 2019). Hence, traditionally, travellers who choose a paid peer-to-peer model seek meaningful social/physical interactions with locals, unique experiences and lower prices (Tussyadiah & Pesonen, 2016). As argued by Dolnicar (2019, pp. 248–249), ‘a unique feature of paid online peer-to-peer accommodation is the wide range of different kinds of spaces being offered’ and ‘sometimes the human relationship rather than a house is… the primary shared asset’. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has explored empirically different types of paid peer-to-peer options, such as shared rooms, private rooms and entire homes (Tussyadiah, 2016). In particular, the author found that the pursuit of social benefits is associated more with the choice of shared flat than full flat. Nevertheless, as anticipated, the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the status quo of the sector, imposing new dynamics regarding the structures of accommodations, on the one hand, and the choices, needs, necessities and uses of travellers, on the other (Gössling et al., 2020). Consistently, Dolnicar and Zare (2020) have recently proposed that COVID-19 will disrupt the paid peer-to-peer accommodation type, and recent data show that paid peer-to-peer services have witnessed a dramatic drop in business volumes during the lockdown (Glusac, 2020). Moreover, given the economic crisis and the continued social/physical distancing applied in many countries around the world, these business models will likely continue to suffer for many months. Brian Chesky, Airbnb's chief executive, declared: ‘Airbnb's business has been hit hard, with revenue this year forecasted to be less than half of what we earned in 2019’. Nonetheless, Airbnb will now be listed in the stock market this year, which shows that its future is far from over (Driebusch et al., 2020).
In this paper, we propose and hypothesize that the paid peer-to-peer accommodation type is not dead but that there will be a change in bookings in favour of full flats rather than shared flats. In other terms, the pandemic reduces tourists' expectations and the search for the social/physical interaction typical of peer-to-peer models (Osman et al., 2019; Pera et al., 2019) and hotel main receptions and common spaces, such as bars or lounges. Along these lines, the pandemic favours types of accommodations that guarantee physical distance, such as full flats. Accordingly, we also hypothesize - and find evidence for it - that the increased choice for full flats is driven by the need for physical distance.
Physical distancing asks for fast changes in the social habits of citizens (Pfattheicher et al., 2020), so the physical aspect can be seen as the driving social habits change due to the pandemic. We use the composed term “social/physical” throughout the paper to reflect the physical part of social interactions (vs. social/technology-mediated interactions). In the past, social and physical interactions have been regarded mainly as synonymous/interchangeable, with the second being the main vehicle for the first (conviviality is a clear example). In the digital age (as exemplified by travellers' blogs or online communities), we feel it important to specify what we refer to.
The scientific community has found and communicated that COVID-19 can occur in specific settings, particularly indoor, where infected person(s) spend long periods of time with others (World Health Organization; https://www.who.int). A lingering question for the International health authorities and policy makers has therefore become “how to reduce virus spread while limiting also the negative socio-economic impact”. Physical distancing, that is minimizing one's contacts with others, has been proposed as one of the useful measures. Depending on the specific geographical context and on the timing, physical distancing has been induced through mandatory regulations (such as lockdown) and/or encouraged as voluntary practice by calling upon each citizen self-responsibility.
Measures such as physical distancing ask for fast changes in core social habits of citizens (Pfattheicher et al., 2020). Minimizing contacts between people may lead to benefits that are both egoistic in nature (namely, protecting oneself) and altruistic or social (as protecting others). At the same time, they entail personal costs. The presence of physical distance, indeed, inhibits also social/physical interaction. Given these arguments, we portray that need for physical distance is a key factor driving changes in each one's behaviour, including tourists' consumption patterns.
Methodologically, the paper proposes, in line with previous studies (Pera et al., 2019; Tassiello et al., 2018), three experiments to test the choice of the type of accommodation (full flat, shared flat, and hotel) across two different scenarios (non-pandemic versus pandemic one).
We test how these choices are mediated by the need for physical distance. We also actively manipulate physical distance to see whether a change in the level of this variable is able to influence accommodation choice. As far as we know, it is the first time that a tourism paper proposes a manipulation of a mediator in experimental designs (see Jacoby & Sassenberg, 2011). Using a manipulation of a mediator is important because it allows assessing whether it is possible to actively affect a process that induces certain behaviours (e.g., the choice of an accommodation). The empirical research finds that: a) controlling for price levels, full flats gained popularity during the pandemic crisis compared to hotels and shared flats; b) one person's need for physical distance represents the underlying mechanism behind the enhanced choice for full flats on Airbnb during the pandemic; c) the need for physical distance contributes to explaining the relationship between the pandemic situation and the accommodation type chosen, such that the ability of guaranteeing physical distance increases the preference for shared rooms and hotels.
The paper provides two clear implications for theory. First, the paper contributes to the literature on paid peer-to-peer accommodation types (e.g., Dolnicar, 2020; Dolnicar & Talebi, 2020; Ert & Fleischer, 2020; Guttentag et al., 2018), suggesting that this model is not dead but rather will undergo a major change. Specifically, the paper adds to the literature on social/physical distance in the accommodation realm (Osman et al., 2019; Pera et al., 2019), highlighting that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, travellers will increasingly choose the full flat model. Second, drawing from spatial distance theory (Williams & Bargh, 2008), this paper has proposed – and found evidence for – the need for physical distance (Pfattheicher et al., 2020) as an important underlying mechanism. We expect that the need for physical distance will affect travellers and influence their decisions and behaviours in the coming months and years, due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
From a managerial perspective, the study encourages to: a) list entire homes instead of splitting them into different listings; and b) put emphasis on, and include in communication, all the measures and practices to increase physical distance between strangers such as differentiated pathways. Overall, the paper sheds light on the emotional and behavioural responses of tourists to the changes imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Section snippets
Theoretical background
The sharing economy has attracted growing interest among scholars and practitioners in the last two decades and seems to receive even more attention recently (Dolnicar, 2020). Having revolutionized habits, relationships and business models, this rising phenomenon led researchers from different fields to pose new research questions (Eckhardt et al., 2019). It also permeated the boundaries of the tourism and hospitality sectors (Ert et al., 2016; Fang et al., 2016), crafting new ways for
Hypotheses development
A traveller chooses a shared flat when she/he wants to save money and enjoy a shared experience with another individual as a means of experiencing social/physical interactions (Liberman et al., 2007; Liu & Mattila, 2017; Yannopoulou et al., 2013). This is in line with the essence of the peer-to-peer accommodation type. However, the COVID-19 pandemic led to both normative (lockdown and mandatory social/physical distancing) and social constraints (less inclination towards social/physical
Overview of the studies and conceptual model
Based on the aforementioned literature, Fig. 1 presents our conceptual model.
The research employs three complementary laboratory experiments. This methodological approach is getting more popularity in tourism and hospitality (Fang et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2020). Study 1 investigates whether the presence of the pandemic (or not) influences the type of accommodation chosen, namely a private room in a shared flat [shared flat] vs. in a hotel [hotel] vs. a full flat [full flat], controlling for
Method
The purpose of Study 1 is to examine travellers' accommodation choice (shared flat in Airbnb vs. hotel vs. full flat in Airbnb) in two different scenarios, namely pandemic situation or not. Hence, the aim of this study is to test H1. Study 1 is a laboratory study run in October 2020 in a large European university, with a sample of participants from different nationalities. We specifically required prior booking experience as a screening question. This stratified sample includes students and
Study 2
Study 1 established the preference of tourists for full flats on peer-to-peer platforms (Airbnb) over hotels and shared flats during a pandemic situation. Study 2 investigates whether the personal need for physical distance is the mechanism behind the relationship between a pandemic scenario (or not) and the choice of one of the three accommodation types. This new study tests whether travellers' need for physical distance mediates this relationship, and whether these results change based on the
Study 3
Study 2 has provided laboratory evidence of a relationship between the scenario (non-pandemic and pandemic), the personal need for physical distance, and the choice of the three accommodation types. Study 3 actively manipulates physical distance (i.e., manipulation of a mediator in experimental designs – see Jacoby & Sassenberg, 2011), to investigate whether it affects the strength of the relationship between the pandemic situation and the accommodation choice.
Discussion and conclusions
This article hypothesizes and finds that - controlling for price - during the pandemic tourists are more inclined to book full flats compared to traditional hotel rooms and shared flats in Airbnb. Furthermore, the paper finds that need for physical distance (Pfattheicher et al., 2020) plays a key role in lessening the concerns to book a hotel room or a shared flat, as can be seen by the manipulated mediation in Study 3.
The results provide two main theoretical implications. First, the paper
Declaration of competing interest
None.
References (61)
- et al.
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
The Lancet.
(2020) - et al.
Predicting information seeking regarding hurricane evacuation in the destination
Tourism Management
(2016) A review of research into paid online peer-to-peer accommodation: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research curated collection on peer-to-peer accommodation
Annals of Tourism Research
(2019)- et al.
Does hosting on Airbnb offer hosts vacation-like benefits? Proposing a reconceptualization of peer-to-peer accommodation
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management
(2020) - et al.
The evolution of trust in Airbnb: A case of home rental
Annals of Tourism Research
(2019) - et al.
Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb
Tourism Management
(2016) - et al.
Effect of sharing economy on tourism industry employment
Annals of Tourism Research
(2016) - et al.
Physical attractiveness of service employees and customer engagement in tourism industry
Annals of Tourism Research
(2020) - et al.
Impacts of Covid-19 on peer-to-peer accommodation platforms: Host perceptions and responses
International Journal of Hospitality Management
(2020) - et al.
Fundamental motives: How evolutionary needs influence consumer behavior
Journal of Consumer Psychology
(2013)
The eruption of Airbnb in tourist cities: Comparing spatial patterns of hotels and peer-to-peer accommodation in Barcelona
Tourism Management
Airbnb in European cities: Business as usual or true sharing economy?
Journal of Cleaner Production
Substitutable by peer-to-peer accommodation networks
Annals of Tourism Research
Is home sharing driving up rents? Evidence from Airbnb in Boston
Journal of Housing Economics
Consumer responses to scarcity appeals in online booking
Annals of Tourism Research
Sharing for profit: A new business model?
Annals of Tourism Research
Airbnb: Online targeted advertising, sense of power, and consumer decisions
International Journal of Hospitality Management
When empathy prevents negative reviewing behavior
Annals of Tourism Research
How handwriting reduces negative online ratings
Annals of Tourism Research
Factors of satisfaction and intention to use peer-to-peer accommodation
International Journal of Hospitality Management
A review of experiments in tourism and hospitality
Annals of Tourism Research
Comparing customer perceptions of hotel and peer-to-peer accommodation advantages and disadvantages
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Travelers' health risk perceptions and protective behavior: A psychological approach
Journal of Travel Research
Tourist encounters
Tourist Studies
The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Sharing economy and peer-to-peer accommodation – A perspective paper
Tourism Review.
COVID19 and Airbnb – Disrupting the disruptor
Annals of Tourism Research.
Cited by (90)
Has COVID-19 changed the factors explaining the occupancy of Airbnb accommodation? Madrid as a case study
2024, Journal of Destination Marketing and ManagementConsumer hypocrisy and researcher myopia: A scrutiny of the intention-behaviour gap in sustainable tourism
2024, Annals of Tourism ResearchHow to react to a shock? Effects of Airbnb hosts’ choices and market segmentation at the time of Covid-19
2023, Information and ManagementExamining urban polarization in five Spanish historic cities through online datasets and onsite perceptions
2023, Habitat InternationalNegative signals on Peer-to-Peer platforms: The impact of cancellations on host performance across different property types
2023, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementCapital investments and firm characteristics: The moderating role of economic policy uncertainty in the hospitality sector
2023, International Journal of Hospitality Management
- 1
Research interests: innovation management, knowledge management and business models in several sectors such as tourism and hospitality among others.
- 2
Research interests: retail marketing; shopping behaviour; retail innovation; channel management; corporate social responsibility.
- 3
Research interests: innovation management, knowledge management and business models.
- 4
Research interests: the international transfer of HRM practices, the international innovation process within MNCs, and the management in the Middle East, North African & Asian countries.
- 5
Research interests: pricing, consumer decision making, sharing economy.