Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flight Simulation Training Devices: Application, Classification, and Research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Safe and efficient training using flight simulation training devices (FSTD) is one of the fundamental components of training in the commercial, military, and general aviation. When compared with the live training, the most significant benefits of ground trainers include improved safety and the reduced cost of a pilot training process. Flight simulation is a multidisciplinary subject that relies on several research disciplines which have a tendency to be investigated separately and in parallel with each other. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the research within the FSTD domain with a motivation to highlight contributions from separate research topics from a general aspect, which is necessary as FSTD is a complex man–machine system. Application areas of FSTD usage are addressed, and the terminology used in the literature is discussed. Identification, classification, and overview of major research fields in the FSTD domain are presented. Specific characteristics of FSTD for fighter aircraft are discussed separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Baarspul M (1990) A review of flight simulation techniques. Prog Aerosp Sci 27(1):1–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allerton DJ (2010) The impact of flight simulation in aerospace. Aeronaut J 114(1162):747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung W (2000) A review of approaches to determine the effectiveness of ground-based flight simulation. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 4928

  4. Bles W (2008) Spatial disorientation training demonstration and avoidance. Technical Report No. RTO-TR-HFM-118. Nato Research and technology organization, Neuilly-sur-Seine

  5. Smode AF, Hall ER, Meyer DE (1966) An assessment of research relevant to pilot training, vol II. Technical Report No. AMRL-TR-66-196, Biotechnology Inc, Arlington

  6. Schreiber B, Bennett W, Colegrove C et al (2009) Evaluating pilot performance. In: Anders EK (ed) Development of professional expertise: toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 247–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Allerton D (2009) Principles of flight simulation. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Page RL (2000) Brief history of flight simulation. In: Proceedings of SimTecT, pp 11–17

  9. Johnston PJ, Catano VM (2013) Investigating the validity of previous flying experience, both actual and simulated, in predicting initial and advanced military pilot training performance. Int J Aviat Psychol 23(3):227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Macchiarella ND, Arban PK, Doherty SM (2006) Transfer of training from flight training devices to flight for ab-initio pilots. Int J Appl Aviat Stud 6(2):299–314

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boril J, Jirgl M, Jalovecky R (2016) Use of flight simulators in analyzing pilot behavior. In: Proceedings of IFIP AIAI 2016, pp 255–263

  12. Stroosma O, Van Paassen MM, Mulder M (2003) Using the SIMONA research simulator for human–machine interaction research. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit, p 5525

  13. Wise JA, Hopkin VD, Garland DJ (2016) Handbook of aviation human factors. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Air Accidents Investigation Branch (2016) Flight simulators and air accident investigation. Annu Saf Rev

  15. Fletcher JD, Chatelier PR (2000) An overview of military training. Technical Report, Institute for defense analyses, Alexandria Va

  16. Fucke L, Biryukov V, Grigoriev M et al (2010) Developing scenarios for research into upset recovery simulation. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 7794

  17. Zaichik LE, Yashin YP, Desyatnik PA (2012) Some aspects of moving-base simulation of upset recovering maneuver. In: Proceedings of 28th congress of ICAS

  18. Nooij SAE, Wentink M, Smaili H, Zaichik L, Groen EL (2017) Motion simulation of transport aircraft in extended envelopes: test pilot assessment. J Guid Control Dyn 40(4):776–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Field J, Shikany D (2013) Simulator fidelity requirements for upset prevention and recovery training. Technical Report NLR-TP-2013-410, National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR).

  20. Zaal P (2019) Motion cueing for stall recovery training in commercial transport simulators. In: Proceedings of AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum

  21. Childs JM, Spears W (1986) Flight-skill decay and recurrent training. Percept Mot Skills 62:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wikander R, Dahlstrom N (2016) The multi crew pilot licence: revolution, evolution or not even a solution? A review and analysis of the emergence, current situation and future of the multi-crew pilot licence (MPL). Lund University

  23. Ulbig P, Müller D, Torens C et al (2019) Flight simulator-based verification for model-based avionics applications on multi-core targets. In: Proceedings of AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, p 1976

  24. Schreiter K, Müller S, Luckner R, Manzey D (2019) A flight simulator study of an energy control system for manual flight. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 49(6):672–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lone M, Cooke A (2014) Review of pilot models used in aircraft flight dynamics. Aerosp Sci Technol 34:55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peterson T, Grant P (2011) Handling qualities of a blended wing body aircraft. In: Proceedings of AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, p 6542

  27. Daniels TS, Schaffner PR, Evans ET et al (2012) Creating a realistic weather environment for motion-based piloted flight simulation. In: Proceedings of IEEE/AIAA 31st digital avionics systems conference, p. 2E5–1 IEEE.

  28. Paces P, Jalovecky R, Blasch E, Stanek J (2015) Pilot controller design using the CTU flight simulator for shared situation awareness. In: Proceedings of 34th AIAA DASC, p 3E3-1

  29. Allen JG, MacNaughton P, Cedeno-Laurent JG et al (2019) Airplane pilot flight performance on 21 maneuvers in a flight simulator under varying carbon dioxide concentrations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29(4):457–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McClernon CK, McCauley ME, O’Connor PE, Warm JS (2011) Stress training improves performance during a stressful flight. Hum Factors 53(3):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rhind DJA, Head T (2004) The benefits of implicit learning when training ab-initio pilots. Int J Appl Aviat Stud 4(2):153–170

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oberhauser M, Dreyer D (2017) A virtual reality flight simulator for human factors engineering. Cognit Technol Work 19(2–3):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dourado AO, Martin CA (2013) New concept of dynamic flight simulator, part I. Aerosp Sci Technol 30(1):79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Myers PL, Starr AW, Mullins K (2018) Flight simulator fidelity, training transfer, and the role of instructors in optimizing learning. Int J Aviat Aeronaut Aerosp 5(1):6

    Google Scholar 

  35. De Winter JCF, Dodou D, Mulder M (2012) Training effectiveness of whole body flight simulator motion: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Int J Aviat Psychol 22(2):164–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pool DM, Harder GA, Van Paassen MM (2016) Effects of simulator motion feedback on training of skill-based control behavior. J Guid Control Dyn 39(4):889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Burki-Cohen J, Sparko A, Go T (2007) Training value of a fixed-base flight simulator with a dynamic seat. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit, p 6564

  38. Koonce JM, Bramble WJ (1998) Personal computer-based flight training devices. Int J Aviat Psychol 8(3):277–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reweti S, Gilbey A, Jeffrey L (2017) Efficacy of low-cost PC-based aviation training devices. J Inf Technol Educ-Res 16:127–142

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rehmann AJ, Mitman RD, Reynolds MC (1995) A handbook of flight simulation fidelity requirements for human factors research. Technical Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN95/46, Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center Wright-Patterson AFB OH

  41. 14 CFR FAR Part 60, Requirements for the evaluation, qualification and maintenance of flight simulation training devices. https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/nsp/media/14cfr60_searchable_version.pdf. Accessed 05 Mar 2020

  42. Koblen I, Kovácová J (2012) Selected information on flight simulators-main requirements, categories and their development, production and using for flight crew training in the both Slovak Republic and Czech Republic conditions. Incas Bull 4(3):73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. European Aviation Safety Agency (2018) Certification specifications for aeroplane flight simulation training devices, Issue 2. https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/CS-FSTD%28A%29%20%E2%80%94%20Issue%202.pdf. Accessed 05 Mar 2020

  44. Stewart D (1965) A platform with six degrees of freedom. Proc Inst Mech Eng 180(1):371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McLean GMT, Lambeth S, Mavin T (2016) The use of simulation in ab initio pilot training. Int J Aviat Psychol 26(1–2):36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zaal PMT, Schroeder JA, Chung WW (2015) Transfer of training on the vertical motion simulator. J Aircr 52(6):1971–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dahlström N (2008) Pilot training in our time-use of flight training devices and simulators. Aviat 12(1):22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Noble C (2002) The relationship between fidelity and learning in aviation training and assessment. J Air Transp 7(3):33–54

    Google Scholar 

  49. Walker DR (2015) The impact of training context on performance in simulator-based aviation training. Proc MODSIM World 2015(11):2

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roscoe SN (1971) Incremental transfer effectiveness. Hum Factors 13(6):561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jacobs RS, Roscoe SN (1975) Simulator cockpit motion and the transfer of initial flight training. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 19(2):218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rantanen EM, Talleur DA (2005) Incremental transfer and cost effectiveness of ground based flight trainers in university aviation programs. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 49(7):764–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gray TH, Fuller RR (1977) Effects of simulator training and platform motion on air-to-surface weapons delivery training. Air Force Human Resources Lab Brooks Afb Tx

  54. Johnson A, Proctor RW (2016) Skill acquisition and training: achieving expertise in simple and complex tasks. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  55. Martin EA (1985) The influence of tactual seat-motion cues on training and performance in a roll-axis compensatory tracking task setting. Dissertation, Ohio State University.

  56. Grundy JG, Nazar S, O’Malley S, Mohrenshildt MV, Shedden JM (2016) The effectiveness of simulator motion in the transfer of performance on a tracking task is influenced by vision and motion disturbance cues. Hum Factors 58(4):546–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bürki-Cohen J, Sparko AL, Bellman M (2011) Flight simulator motion literature pertinent to airline-pilot recurrent training and evaluation. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 6320

  58. Showalter TW, Parris BL (1980) The effects of motion and g-seat cues on pilot simulator performance of three piloting tasks. Technical Paper 1601, NASA

  59. Casas S, Coma I, Portalés C, Fernández M (2016) Towards a simulation-based tuning of motion cueing algorithms. Simul Model Pract Theory 67:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Jones ER, Hennessy RT, Deutsch S (1985) Human factors aspects of simulation: Report of the Working Group on Simulation. Technical Report AD-A159 956, National research council Washington

  61. Meyer GF, Wong LT, Timson E, Perfect P, White MD (2012) Objective fidelity evaluation in multisensory virtual environments: auditory cue fidelity in flight simulation. PLoS ONE 7(9):e44381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mulder M, Pool DM, Abbink DA et al (2017) Manual control cybernetics: State-of-the-art and current trends. IEEE T Hum-Mach Syst 48(5):468–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Hodge SJ, Perfect P, Padfield GD, White MD (2015) Optimising the yaw motion cues available from a short stroke hexapod motion platform. Aeronaut J 119(1211):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Reid LD, Nahon MA (1988) Response of airline pilots to variations in flight simulator motion algorithms. J Aircr 25(7):639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Väljamäe A, Larsson P, Västfjäll D, Kleiner M (2008) Sound representing self-motion in virtual environments enhances linear vection. Presence Teleop Virt 17(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Berger DR, Schulte-Pelkum J, Bülthoff HH (2010) Simulating believable forward accelerations on a Stewart motion platform. ACM Trans Appl Percept 7(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Groen EL, Clari MSV, Hosman R (2001) Evaluation of perceived motion during a simulated takeoff run. J Aircr 38(4):600–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hosman R, Stassen H (1998) Pilot’s perception and control of aircraft motions. IFAC ProcVol 31(26):311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wentink M, Bos J, Groen EL, Hosman R (2006) Development of the motion perception toolbox. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling & simulation conference, p 6631

  70. Asadi H, Mohamed S, Lim CP, Nahavandi S (2016) A review on otolith models in human perception. Behav Brain Res 309:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Pais ARV, van Paassen MM, Mulder M, Wentick M (2010) Perception coherence zones in flight simulation. J Aircr 47(6):2039–2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Groen E, Wentink M, Valente Pais A et al (2006) Motion perception thresholds in flight simulation. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit, p 6254

  73. Berger D, Bülthoff HH (2009) The role of attention on the integration of visual and inertial cues. Exp Brain Res 198:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Chelette TL, Spenny CH (2003) G & alpha: centrifuge occupant tolerance to simultaneous high g and high angular acceleration. In: Proceedings of RTO meeting 86, pp 36.1–36.5

  75. Henstenburg RB, Yilmaz C, Richter BH (2004) Design and analysis of a modern human centrifuge. Sound Vib 4:3

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kvrgic VM, Vidakovic JZ, Lutovac MM, Ferenc GZ, Cvijanovic VB (2014) A control algorithm for a centrifuge motion simulator. Robot Cim Int Manuf 30(4):399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Aponso BL, Beard SD, Schroeder JA (2009) The NASA Ames vertical motion simulator—a facility engineered for realism. In: Proceedings of royal aeronautical society flight simulation conference

  78. Wentink M, Bles W, Hosman R, Mayrhofer M (2005) Design and evaluation of spherical washout algorithm for Desdemona simulator. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference and exhibit, p 6501

  79. Glaser S, Comtois P (2011) G-pointing: Articulated centrifuge for real-time G flight simulation. In: Proc. of AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, p. 6496

  80. Casas S, Olanda R, Dey N (2017) Motion cueing algorithms: a review: algorithms, evaluation and tuning. Int J Virtual Augment Real 1(1):90–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Valinski R (2020) Examining transient motion cueing and sustained g motion. http://www.etcaircrewtraining.com/wp-content/media/product/pdf/Transient-Motion-Cueing-versus-Sustained-G-Motion.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2020

  82. Groen E, Ledegang W, Field J et al (2012) SUPRA-enhanced upset recovery simulation. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 4630

  83. Gingras DR, Ralston JN, Oltman R et al (2014) Flight simulator augmentation for stall and upset training. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 1003

  84. Abramov NB, Goman MG, Khrabrov AN, Soemarwoto BI (2019) Aerodynamic modeling for poststall flight simulation of a transport airplane. J Aircr 56(4):1427–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Popovici A, Zaal P, Pieters MA (2018) Time-varying manual control identification in a stall recovery task under different simulator motion conditions. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 2936

  86. Nahon M, Reid LD (1990) Simulator motion drive algorithms—a designer’s perspective. J Guid Control Dyn 13(2):702–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Telban RJ, Cardullo FM (2005) Motion cueing algorithm development: human-centered linear and nonlinear approaches. Technical Report. CR-2005-213747, NASA

  88. Pool DM (2012) Objective evaluation of flight simulator motion cueing fidelity through a cybernetic approach. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology

  89. Reid LD, Nahon MA (1985) Flight simulation motion-base drive algorithms: part 1—developing and testing the equations. Technical Report 296, Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto

  90. Reid LD, Nahon MA (1986) Flight simulation motion-base drive algorithms: part 2—selecting the system parameters. 1986, Technical Report 307, Institute for Aerospace Studies, University of Toronto

  91. Hosman RJAW, Advani S (2016) Design and evaluation of the objective motion cueing test and criterion. Aeronaut J 120(1227):873–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. International Civil Aviation Organization (2015) Manual of criteria for the qualification of flight simulation training devices, vol 1—airplanes. Doc 9625, ICAO

  93. van Duivenbode E, van Oene E, van Hoof J, Jacobs L, Belleter D (2019) Objective motion cueing test. Development, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities. In: Proceedings of AIAA Scitech Forum, p 0177

  94. Vlačić SI, Knežević AZ, Cmiljanović BM (2017) Model of military pilot education and training from the aspect of new aircraft acquisition. Vojno delo 69(4):36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Toubman A (2020) Calculated Moves: Generating Air Combat Behaviour. Dissertation, University of Leiden

  96. Borgvall J, Castor M, Nählinder S, Oskarsson PA, Svensson E (2007) Transfer of training in military aviation. Swedish defence research agency, Command and control systems, (FOI)

  97. Bell HH, Waag WL (1998) Evaluating the effectiveness of flight simulators for training combat skills: a review. Int J Aviat Psychol 8(3):223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Schreiber BT, Schroeder M, Bennett JW (2011) Distributed mission operations within-simulator training effectiveness. Int J Aviat Psychol 21(3):254–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. NPA_20_08_Sentenced_Comments on Regulatory Article (RA) 2375: qualification, approval and use of flight simulator training devices. http://www.thegovernmentsays.com/comments/1679115. Accessed 5th Jan 2021

  100. Spenny C, Liebst B, Chelette T, Folescu C, Sigda J (2000). Development of a sustainable-g dynamic flight simulator. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 4075

  101. Gawron VJ (2004) The effects of high G environment on humans. Int J Appl Aviat Stud 4(1):73–90

    Google Scholar 

  102. Vidaković J, Kvrgić V, Lazarević M, Dimić Z (2019) Development of the algorithms for smoothing of trajectories of a roll and a pitch axis of a centrifuge motion simulator. In: Proceedings of 7th international SSM congress, pp 1–10

  103. Vidakovic J, Lazarevic M, Kvrgic V, Dancuo Z, Lutovac M (2013) Comparison of numerical simulation models for open loop flight simulations in the human centrifuge. PAMM 13(1):485–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Crosbie RJ, Kiefer DA (1985) Controlling the human centrifuge as a force and motion platform for the dynamic flight simulator. In: Proceedings of flight simulation technologies conference, p 1742

  105. Ashworth BR, McKissick BT, Parrish RV (1984). Effects of motion base and g-seat cueing of simulator pilot performance. Technical Paper 2247, NASA

  106. Ng C, Sondermeyer V, Lewis M (2001) G-cueing system tuning optimization. In: Proceedings of AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference, p 4306

  107. Mkhoyan T, Wentink M, van Paassen MM, Mulder M, de Graaf B (2019) Mitigating the coriolis effect in human centrifuges by coherent G-misalignment. In: Proceedings of AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, p 0714

  108. Environmental Tectonics Corporation. Tactical flight solutions. http://www.etcaircrewtraining.com/tactical-flight-solutions/. Accessed 10 Mar 2020

  109. Newman DG (2007) An overview of spatial disorientation as a factor in aviation accidents and incidents. Report B2007/0063. Australian Transport Safety Bureau

  110. Pennings HJ, Oprins EA, Wittenberg H, Houben MM, Groen EL (2020) Spatial disorientation survey among military pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perf 91(1):4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Vidaković J, Kvrgić V, Lazarević M, Stepanić P (2020) Computed torque control for a spatial disorientation trainer. FUSME. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME190919003V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Crosbie RJ (1995) The history of the dynamic flight simulator. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e296/8a969689018be36b403b503e31f8bb118604.pdf. Accessed 11th Mar 2020

  113. Gillingham KK (1992) The spatial disorientation problem in the United States Air Force. J Vestibul Res 2(4):297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Pohlmann LD, Reed JC (1978) Air-to-air combat skills: contribution of platform motion to initial training. Technical Report TR-78-53, AFB, Human Resources Lab

  115. Martin EL, Waag WL (1978) Contributions of platform motion to simulator training effectiveness: study 1—basic contact. Technical Report TR-78-15, AFB, Human Resources Lab

  116. Woodruff RR, Smith JF, Fuller JR, Weyer DC (1976) Full mission simulation in undergraduate pilot training: an exploratory study. Technical Report No. AFHRL-TR-76-84, Air Force Human Resources Lab, Williams AFB

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the research Grants of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development.

Funding

This research has been supported by the research grants of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lola Institute, Kneza Viseslava 70a, Belgrade, Serbia

    Jelena Vidakovic, Ivana Vasovic Maksimovic & Aleksandar Rakic

  2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, Belgrade, Serbia

    Mihailo Lazarevic

  3. Institute Mihajlo Pupin (IMP), University of Belgrade, Volgina 15, Belgrade, Serbia

    Vladimir Kvrgic

Authors
  1. Jelena Vidakovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mihailo Lazarevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vladimir Kvrgic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ivana Vasovic Maksimovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aleksandar Rakic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelena Vidakovic.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidakovic, J., Lazarevic, M., Kvrgic, V. et al. Flight Simulation Training Devices: Application, Classification, and Research. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 22, 874–885 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00358-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-021-00358-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation