Correction to: Hydraulic traits of co-existing conifers do not correlate with local hydroclimate condition: a case study in the northern Rocky Mountains, U.S.A

Correction to: Oecologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04772-z

The authors would like to correct errors in the original publication of their article.

The original article has been corrected.

In the Materials and methods section under the first paragraph of the “Study site and experimental design.” The second sentence has the word ‘Folk’ which should be changed to ‘Fork’. “To capture a hydroclimatic gradient associated with elevation, we selected two south-facing sub-catchments from low (1280 m.a.s.l., lat/long: 46.88210, − 113.34449) and high elevation (1800 m.a.s.l., lat/long: 46.89099, − 113.29714) sites within the North Fork of the Elk Creek watershed.”

In Table 1, everything should have a superscript. Currently, there is a subscript associated with the estimated P₅₀ value of low P. menziesii. This should be a superscript.

Table 1 Estimates for 50% loss of conductivity (P₅₀) and safety margins for P. ponderosa, P. menziesii, and P. engelmannii at the low- and high-elevation sites

Revised version of Acknowledgements section updated here.