An inverted U-shaped relationship between cortisol awakening response and same-day error monitoring function in healthy males
Introduction
Given the established link between cortisol and cognition (de Kloet, Oitzl, & Joëls, 1999; Domes, Rothfischer, Reichwald, & Hautzinger, 2005; Joels, 2006; Lupien et al., 2005; Lupien, Juster, Raymond, & Marin, 2018; Lupien, McEwen, Gunnar, & Heim, 2009), efforts have focused on the cortisol awakening response (CAR), a rapid rise in cortisol levels that peaks between 30- and 45-min following morning awakening (Pruessner et al., 1997). Historically, studies treated the CAR as a trait measure for HPA-axis status (Wust et al., 2000). Its associations with both cognition and affective disorder such as depression have been reported (Almela, van der Meij, Hidalgo, Villada, & Salvador, 2012; Kofman et al., 2019; Kuehner, Holzhauer, & Huffziger, 2007; Quevedo, Doty, Roos, & Anker, 2017), though there is some inconsistency in the direction of relationship. For example, some research show greater CAR is associated with poorer cognition (Butler, Klaus, Edwards, & Pennington, 2017; Franz et al., 2011), but more recent research with accurate monitoring of sampling in the CAR period show greater CAR is associated with better cognitive functioning (Baumler et al., 2014; Evans, Hucklebridge, Loveday, & Clow, 2012).
At the same time, further studies argued that the CAR was prone to significant state variation which is greater than trait variation (Stalder, Evans, Hucklebridge, & Clow, 2010; Stalder, Hucklebridge, Evans, & Clow, 2009). For example, Hellhammer et al. (2007) reported that the CAR of a single day was determined to a great extent by state factors (61 %–82 %). It is proposed that state-related increases in the magnitude of the CAR may play a homeostatic role in ‘boosting’ cognitive performance upon awakening (Adam, Hawkley, Kudielka, & Cacioppo, 2006; Clow, Hucklebridge, Stalder, Evans, & Thorn, 2010). Recent studies found that CAR could predict same-day brain function, especially the prefrontal cortex (PFC) mediated executive function (Law, Hucklebridge, Thorn, Evans, & Clow, 2013). Law, Evans, Thorn, Hucklebridge, and Clow (2015) measured CAR and cognitive function over 50 days in one healthy male and found that on days in which CAR was higher executive function (measured by attention-switching task) in the morning of the same day was better. In an intensive 4-day protocol of 9 males, CAR and brain plasticity later on in the day was measured one week apart, on days in which CAR was greater this was associated with better same-day neuroplasticity measured in motor cortex (Clow et al., 2014). In addition, research from our laboratory also supported a similar positive relationship between the CAR and same-day brain function in prefrontal cortex; higher CAR was predictive of better function of response inhibition (Shi et al., 2018) and stronger positive medial prefrontal cortex connectivity (Wu et al., 2015). However, in another study, Moriarty et al. (2014) showed a more complex U-shaped relationship between CAR magnitude and same-day spatial working memory performance.
Error processing, another critical prefrontal cortex-related high-level ability, plays an important role in adapting to the environment (Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004; Notebaert et al., 2009). Electrophysiological studies indicate that error processing includes different stages and two electrophysiological indices are of interest: the Error-related Negativity (ERN) and the Error Positivity (Pe) (Bediou, Koban, Rosset, Pourtois, & Sander, 2012; Luijten et al., 2014). The ERN is a negativity elicited approximately 50 ms after erroneous responses and it is thought to reflect the automatic error monitoring mechanism of the individual’s responses to his/her own errors (Gehring, Goss, Coles, Meyer, & Donchin, 2018; Gehring, Goss, Coles, Meyer, & Donchin, 1993). The Pe, a positivity following ERN, possibly reflects the conscious awareness of errors or the motivational significance attributed to the error (Helenius, Laasonen, Hokkanen, Paetau, & Niemivirta, 2010; Lievaart et al., 2016).
Prior studies have addressed the relationship between cortisol and error processing. For example, less cortisol change was correlated with the larger ERN amplitude, indicating that participants with larger ERNs were associated with successful stress regulation (Compton, Hofheimer, & Kazinka, 2013). On the contrary, Tops, Boksem, Wester, Lorist, and Meijman (2006) reported that ERN amplitudes were positively related with cortisol mobilization during a task session. With regards to the relationship between CAR and error processing, to our knowledge, there is only one study that showed a higher CAR was associated with slowed latency of the ERN (Zhang et al., 2015). However, one limitation of this work is that CAR was collected on two consecutive days after the ERP measurement. Since the CAR is characterized by substantial state variation, it is unclear whether CAR is associated with error processing of the upcoming day (i.e. measurement of CAR prior to the measurement of error processing on the same day).
In the present study, we set out to further elucidate whether the CAR was associated with same-day error processing using event-related potentials. To avoid possible confound eff ;ects of sex we examined an all-male, healthy young population (Almeida, Piazza, & Stawski, 2009). We hypothesized that the greater CAR was associated with better error processing (indicated by ERN/Pe). However, we did not exclude quadratic relationship because results from early studies investigating the relationship of the CAR and PFC function have been mixed.
Section snippets
Participants
The sample and the experimental procedure in this study are the same as in the paper of Shi et al. (2018) which addressed the relationship between CAR and response inhibition. We demonstrated that the CAR was predictive of the function of response inhibition in both the earlier cognitive step (i.e. conflict monitoring) and the behavioural performance of response inhibition on the same day (Shi et al., 2018). A total of 49 right-handed, healthy male university students were recruited from the
The preliminary analysis
Raw values for cortisol concentration on the testing day (i.e. day 2) ranged from 6.18 to 38.30 nmol/L. As expected, on average the peak in cortisol was found at 30-min post-awakening, followed by a decline until 45-min post awakening. Of the total 46 samples, 69.57 % of the participants showed a positive CAR (i.e. CAR > 0) (n = 32) and 30.43 % of the participants showed a negative CAR (n = 14). A two-tailed independent-samples t-test shows no significant differences in age, educational level,
Discussion
The current study examined the relationship between CAR and same-day error processing. Results showed that the CAR was not associated with the post-error behavioral adjustment. Although the hypothesis was not fully supported, we found an inverted U-shape relationship between CAR on the testing day and ERN amplitude in No/NoGo task, whereas no significant association was observed between the CAR on another day/trait CAR and the ERN amplitude. The quadratic effect explained 26.1 % of the variance
Contributors
Author S.X. collected, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. Author W.J.H. designed the study and revised the manuscript. Author S. N. participated in the interpretation of the data and the revision of the manuscript. All the authors approved the final manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31900787, 31771246, 31530031) and Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program.
References (71)
- et al.
The cortisol awakening response and memory performance in older men and women
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(2012) - et al.
Sleep disturbances are correlated with decreased morning awakening salivary cortisol
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(2004) - et al.
The relation of the cortisol awakening response and prospective memory functioning in young children
Biological Psychology
(2014) - et al.
Delayed monitoring of accuracy errors compared to commission errors in ACC
Neuroimage
(2012) - et al.
Caudate nucleus-dependent response strategies in a virtual navigation task are associated with lower basal cortisol and impaired episodic memory
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
(2011) - et al.
Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
(2004) - et al.
Elevated cortisol awakening response associated with early life stress and impaired executive function in healthy adult males
Hormones and Behavior
(2017) - et al.
The cortisol awakening response: More than a measure of HPA axis function
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
(2010) - et al.
Stress and cognition: are corticosteroids good or bad guys?
Trends in Neurosciences
(1999) - et al.
Glucocorticoids and the regulation of memory in health and disease
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
(2009)