Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Earthquake Resistance Assessment of Buried Pipelines of Complex Configuration Based on Records of Real Earthquakes

  • EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION
  • Published:
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Aims and scope

The stress-strain state of buried pipelines with Π-shaped expansion bends under elastic and viscoelastic interaction with the soil is considered on the basis of real earthquakes records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. R. Rashidov, Dynamical Theory of the Earthquake Resistance of Complex Systems of Buried Structures, Fan, Tashkent (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. R. Rashidov and D. A. Bekmirzaev, “Seismodynamics of pipelines interacting with the soil,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 52, No. 3, 149-154 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. R. Rashidov, T. Yuldashev, and D. A. Bekmirzaev, “Seismodynamics of underground pipelines with arbitrary direction of seismic loading,” Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 55, No. 4, 243-247 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. A. Bekmirzaev and I. Mirzaev, “Dynamic processes in underground pipelines of complex orthogonal configuration at different incidence angles of seismic effect,” Int. J. Sci. Techn. Res., 9, No. 4, 2449-2453 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. A. Bekmirzaev, N. Sh. Mansurova, N. A. Nishonov, E. A. Kosimov, and A. T. Numonov, “Underground pipelines dynamics problem solution under longitudinal seismic loading,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, No. 883, 012045 (2020).

  6. N. A. Nishonov, D. A. Bekmirzaev, E. V. An, Z. Urazmukhamedova, and K. Turajonov, “Behaviour and calculation of polymer pipelines under real earthquake records,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, No. 869, 052076 (2020).

  7. D. Ha, T. H. Abdoun, M. J. O'Rourke, and M. D. Symans, “Centrifuge modeling of earthquake effects on buried high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines crossing fault zones,” Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 134, No.10, 1501-1515 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Sarioletlagh, M. Nekooei , A. V. Oskouei, and A. Aziminejad, “Experimental and numerical modeling of horizontally-bent buried pipelines crossing fault slip,” Latin American J. Solids .Struct., 16, No. 3, 1-16 (2019).

  9. K. Ishihara, Soil Behavior During Earthquakes, Georekonstruktsiya-fundamentproekt NPO, St. Petersburg (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. E. Khachiyan, Applied Seismology, Gitutyun, Erevan (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. R. Valeev and D. V. Yalalov, “Analysis of methods of earthquake protection of main pipelines,” Transport i khranenie nefteproduktov i uglevodorodnogo syr'ya, No. 3, 38-42 (2017).

  12. D. A. Bekmirzaev, R. U. Kishanov, and N. Sh. Mansurova, “Mathematical simulation and solution of the problem of seismo-dynamics of underground pipelines,” Int. J. Emerging Trends Eng. Res., 8, No. 9, 5028-5033 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. R. Rashidov and D. A. Bekmirzaev, “Seismodynamic problems of buried pipelines of complex configuration,” Seismostokoe stroitelstvo. Bezopastnost' sooruzhenii, No. 3, 33-37 (2015).

  14. D. A. Bekmirzaev, I. Mirzaev, N. Sh. Mansurova, E. A. Kosimov, and D. P. Juraev, “Numerical methods in the study of seismic dynamics of underground pipelines,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, No. 869, 052035 (2020).

  15. M. Saberi, F. Behnamfar, and M. Vafaeian, “A continuum shell-beam finite element modeling of buried pipes with 90-degree elbow subjected to earthquake excitations,” Int. J. Eng. (IJE), Transactions C: Aspects., 28, No. 3, 338-349 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Saberi, H. Arabzadeh, and A. Keshavarz, “Numerical analysis of buried pipelines with right angle elbow under wave propagation,” Procedia Eng., 14, 3260-3267 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V. I. Myachenkov et al., Handbook of Calculations of Machinebuilding Structures by the Method of Finite Elements, Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. A. Dudaev, “Stiffness matrix of a Timoshenko beam in finite-element analysis of the dynamic behavior of rotary turbomachines,” Vest. IrGTU, No. 6(89), 59-65 (2014).

  19. O. Zenkevich and K. Morgan, Finite Elements and Approximation [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mechanics and Earthquake Resistant Construction, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

    D. A. Bekmirzaev & I. Mirzaev

Authors
  1. D. A. Bekmirzaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Mirzaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Bekmirzaev.

Additional information

Translated from Osnovaniya, Fundamenty i Mekhanika Gruntov, No. 6, pp. 26-31, November-December, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bekmirzaev, D.A., Mirzaev, I. Earthquake Resistance Assessment of Buried Pipelines of Complex Configuration Based on Records of Real Earthquakes. Soil Mech Found Eng 57, 491–496 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-021-09697-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-021-09697-0

Search

Navigation