Abstract
Convective motions in the deep layers of the solar convection zone are affected by rotation, making the convective heat transport latitude-dependent, but this is not the case in the top layers near the surface. We use the thermal wind balance condition in the deeper layers to estimate the pole–equator temperature difference. Surface observations of this temperature difference can be used for estimating the depth of the near-surface layer within which convection is not affected by rotation. If we require that the thermal wind balance holds in this layer also, then we have to conclude that this must be a layer of strong differential rotation and its characteristics which we derive are in broad agreement with the observational data of the near-surface shear layer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahcall, J.N., Ulrich, R.K.: 1988, Solar models, neutrino experiments, and helioseismology. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 297. DOI. ADS.
Balbus, S.A., Bonart, J., Latter, H.N., Weiss, N.O.: 2009, Differential rotation and convection in the Sun. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 400, 176. DOI. ADS.
Basu, S.: 2016, Global seismology of the Sun. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 13, 2. DOI. ADS.
Belvedere, G., Paterno, L.: 1976, Large scale circulation in the convection zone and solar differential rotation. Solar Phys. 47, 525. DOI. ADS.
Brown, B.P., Browning, M.K., Brun, A.S., Miesch, M.S., Toomre, J.: 2010, Persistent magnetic wreaths in a rapidly rotating Sun. Astrophys. J. 711, 424. DOI. ADS.
Chakraborty, S., Choudhuri, A.R., Chatterjee, P.: 2009, Why does the Sun’s torsional oscillation begin before the sunspot cycle? Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 041102. DOI. ADS.
Choudhuri, A.R.: 2011, The origin of the solar magnetic cycle. Pramana 77, 77. DOI. ADS.
Choudhuri, A.R.: 2020, The meridional circulation of the Sun: Observations, theory and connections with the solar dynamo. DOI. arXiv. ADS.
D’Silva, S., Choudhuri, A.R.: 1993, A theoretical model for tilts of bipolar magnetic regions. Astron. Astrophys. 272, 621. ADS.
Durney, B.R., Roxburgh, I.W.: 1971, Inhomogeneous convection and the equatorial acceleration of the Sun. Solar Phys. 16, 3. DOI. ADS.
Foukal, P., Jokipii, J.R.: 1975, On the rotation of gas and magnetic fields at the solar photosphere. Astrophys. J. Lett. 199, L71. DOI. ADS.
Gastine, T., Yadav, R.K., Morin, J., Reiners, A., Wicht, J.: 2014, From solar-like to antisolar differential rotation in cool stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 438, L76. DOI. ADS.
Gilman, P.A., Foukal, P.V.: 1979, Angular velocity gradients in the solar convection zone. Astrophys. J. 229, 1179. DOI. ADS.
Greer, B.J., Hindman, B.W., Featherstone, N.A., Toomre, J.: 2015, Helioseismic imaging of fast convective flows throughout the near-surface shear layer. Astrophys. J. Lett. 803, L17. DOI. ADS.
Guerrero, G., Smolarkiewicz, P.K., Kosovichev, A.G., Mansour, N.N.: 2013, Differential rotation in solar-like stars from global simulations. Astrophys. J. 779, 176. DOI. ADS.
Hanasoge, S.M., Duvall, T.L., Sreenivasan, K.R.: 2012, Anomalously weak solar convection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 11928. DOI. ADS.
Hazra, G., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2017, A theoretical model of the variation of the meridional circulation with the solar cycle. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 472, 2728. DOI. ADS.
Hotta, H., Rempel, M., Yokoyama, T.: 2015, High-resolution calculation of the solar global convection with the reduced speed of sound technique. II. Near surface shear layer with the rotation. Astrophys. J. 798, 51. DOI. ADS.
Howe, R.: 2009, Solar interior rotation and its variation. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 6, 1. DOI. ADS.
Karak, B.B., Jiang, J., Miesch, M.S., Charbonneau, P., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2014, Flux transport dynamos: from kinematics to dynamics. Space Sci. Rev. 186, 561. DOI. ADS.
Kippenhahn, R., Weigert, A.: 1990, Stellar Structure and Evolution. ADS.
Kitchatinov, L.L.: 2013, Theory of differential rotation and meridional circulation. In: Kosovichev, A.G., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E., Yan, Y. (eds.) Solar and Astrophysical Dynamos and Magnetic Activity, IAU Symposium 294, 399. DOI. ADS.
Kitchatinov, L.L., Ruediger, G.: 1995, Differential rotation in solar-type stars: revisiting the Taylor-number puzzle. Astron. Astrophys. 299, 446. ADS.
Kuhn, J.R., Libbrecht, K.G., Dicke, R.H.: 1988, The surface temperature of the Sun and changes in the solar constant. Science 242, 908. DOI. ADS.
Matilsky, L.I., Hindman, B.W., Toomre, J.: 2019, The role of downflows in establishing solar near-surface shear. Astrophys. J. 871, 217. DOI. ADS.
Matilsky, L.I., Hindman, B.W., Toomre, J.: 2020, Revisiting the Sun’s strong differential rotation along radial lines. Astrophys. J. 898, 111. DOI. ADS.
Moreno-Insertis, F.: 1983, Rise times of horizontal magnetic flux tubes in the convection zone of the Sun. Astron. Astrophys. 122, 241. ADS.
Rast, M.P., Ortiz, A., Meisner, R.W.: 2008, Latitudinal variation of the solar photospheric intensity. Astrophys. J. 673, 1209. DOI. ADS.
Ruediger, G.: 1989, Differential Rotation and Stellar Convection. Sun and the Solar Stars. ADS.
Spruit, H.C.: 1974, A model of the solar convection zone. Solar Phys. 34, 277. DOI. ADS.
Acknowledgements
I thank Dipankar Banerjee, Gopal Hazra, Bibhuti Kumar Jha, Leonid Kitchatinov and Bidya Karak for valuable discussions. My research was supported in part by a J.C. Bose Fellowship awarded by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. I thank an anonymous referee for very valuable comments, which helped greatly in improving the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A: On Differentiating Entropy Along an Ioschore
Appendix A: On Differentiating Entropy Along an Ioschore
The difference of specific entropy \(\Delta S\) given by Equation 5 refers to an isochore over which \(\rho \) does not vary. If \(l\) is the length measured along an isochore, then the entropy difference between two points on an isochore should be given be
From the chain rule of partial differentiation, it follows that
It is easy to argue that the first term in this equation is going to be negligible. Efficient convection tends to homogenize \(S\) in the radial direction so that \((\partial S/ \partial r)_{\theta } \approx 0\). Since the rotational flattening of the Sun is very small, we expect the isochoric surfaces to be very nearly spherical so that \(d r/dl\) is also expected to be very small. Since the first term is a product of two small terms, we can write
Substituting this in Equation A.1, we get
If we take \(\Delta \theta = \pi /2\) for the pole–equator difference, then Equation A.2 leads to Equation 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choudhuri, A.R. A Theoretical Estimate of the Pole-Equator Temperature Difference and a Possible Origin of the Near-Surface Shear Layer. Sol Phys 296, 37 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01784-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01784-7