Abstract
Mercury is a very toxic metal that persists and accumulates in the living organisms present in the aquatic systems and its elimination is an urgent need. Two green (Ulva intestinalis and Ulva lactuca), brown (Fucus spiralis and Fucus vesiculosus), and red (Gracilaria sp. and Osmundea pinnatifida) marine macroalgae were tested for mercury removal from saline waters. The ability of each species was evaluated to the initial mercury concentrations of 50, 200, and 500 μg dm-3 along 72 h. In general, all species exhibited good performances, removing 80.9–99.9% from solutions with 50 μg dm-3, 79.3–98.6% from solutions with 200 μg dm-3, and 69.8–97.7% from solutions containing 500 μg dm-3 of mercury. Among the macroalgae, Ulva intestinalis showed the highest affinity to mercury and it presented an uptake ability up to 1888 μg g-1 of Hg(II) and bioconcentration factors up to 3823, which proved its promising potential on Hg removal.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu MH, Pereira R, Sousa-Pinto I, Yarish C (2011) Ecophysiological studies of the non-indigenous species gracilaria vermiculophylla (rhodophyta) and its abundance patterns in ria de aveiro lagoon, portugal. Eur J Phycol 46:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2011.633174
Aksu Z, Dönmez G (2005) Combined effects of molasses sucrose and reactive dye on the growth and dye bioaccumulation properties of Candida tropicalis. Process Biochem 40:2443–2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.09.013
Andrade S, Contreras L, Moffett JW, Correa JA (2006) Kinetics of copper accumulation in Lessonia nigrescens (Phaeophyceae) under conditions of environmental oxidative stress. Aquat Toxicol 78:398–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.04.006
Aryal M, Liakopoulou-Kyriakides M (2015) Bioremoval of heavy metals by bacterial biomass. Environ Monit Assess 187:4173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4173-z
Atkinson MJ, Bingman C (2010) Elemental composition of commercial seasalts. J Aquaric Aquat Sci 8:39–43
ATSDR (2015) Priority List of Hazardous Substances. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/index.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2017
Bold HC, Wynne MJ (1978) Introduction to the algae: structure and reproduction. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Bulgariu D, Bulgariu L (2012) Equilibrium and kinetics studies of heavy metal ions biosorption on green algae waste biomass. Bioresour Technol 103:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.016
Bulgariu L, Bulgariu D (2014) Enhancing biosorption characteristics of marine green algae (Ulva lactuca) for heavy metals removal by alkaline treatment. Bioprocess Biotech 4. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9821.1000146
Chojnacka K (2010) Biosorption and bioaccumulation – the prospects for practical applications. Environ Int 36:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2009.12.001
Chung MK, Tsui MTK, Cheung KC et al (2007) Removal of aqueous phenanthrene by brown seaweed Sargassum hemiphyllum: Sorption-kinetic and equilibrium studies. Sep Purif Technol 54:355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.10.008
Coelho JP, Pereira ME, Duarte A, Pardal MA (2005) Macroalgae response to a mercury contamination gradient in a temperate coastal lagoon (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:492–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.06.020
Costley CT, Mossop KF, Dean JR et al (2000) Determination of mercury in environmental and biological samples using pyrolysis atomic absorption spectrometry with gold amalgamation. Anal Chim Acta 405:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00742-4
Directive 2008/105/EC (2008) Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 2008 on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy, amending and subsequently repealing Council Directives 82/176/EEC, 83/513/EEC, 84/156/EEC, 84/491/EEC, 86. 348:84–97
European Commission (2013) Directive 2013/39/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 August 2013 amending Directives 2000/60/EC and 2008/105/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. In: Off. J. Eur. Union
Fabre E, Vale C, Pereira E, Silva CM (2019) Experimental measurement and modeling of Hg(II) removal from aqueous solutions using Eucalyptus globulus bark: Effect of pH, salinity and biosorbent dosage. Int J Mol Sci 20:5973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20235973
Fabre E, Lopes CB, Vale C et al (2020) Valuation of banana peels as an effective biosorbent for mercury removal under low environmental concentrations. Sci Total Environ 709:135883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135883
Farooq U, Kozinski JA, Khan MA, Athar M (2010) Biosorption of heavy metal ions using wheat based biosorbents - a review of the recent literature. Bioresour Technol 101:5043–5053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.030
Fomina M, Gadd GM (2014) Biosorption: current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresour Technol 160:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.102
Gonçalves MFM, Vicente TFL, Esteves AC, Alves A (2019) Neptunomyces aureus gen. et sp. nov. (Didymosphaeriaceae, Pleosporales) isolated from algae in Ria de Aveiro, Portugal. MycoKeys 60:31–44. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.60.37931
Gordillo FJL, Aguilera J, Wiencke C, Jiménez C (2015) Ocean acidification modulates the response of two Arctic kelps to ultraviolet radiation. J Plant Physiol 173:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.09.008
Gupta RK, Singh RA, Dubey SS (2004) Removal of mercury ions from aqueous solutions by composite of polyaniline with polystyrene. Sep Purif Technol 38:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2003.11.009
Gworek B, Bemowska-Kałabun O, Kijeńska M, Wrzosek-Jakubowska J (2016) Mercury in marine and oceanic waters—a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3060-3
He J, Chen JP (2014) A comprehensive review on biosorption of heavy metals by algal biomass: Materials, performances, chemistry, and modeling simulation tools. Bioresour Technol 160:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.068
Henriques B, Rocha LS, Lopes CB et al (2015) Study on bioaccumulation and biosorption of mercury by living marine macroalgae: prospecting for a new remediation biotechnology applied to saline waters. Chem Eng J 281:759–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.013
Henriques B, Gonçalves G, Emami N et al (2016) Optimized graphene oxide foam with enhanced performance and high selectivity for mercury removal from water. J Hazard Mater 301:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.028
Herrero R, Lodeiro P, Rey-Castro C et al (2005) Removal of inorganic mercury from aqueous solutions by biomass of the marine macroalga Cystoseira baccata. Water Res 39:3199–3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.041
Ho YS, McKay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
Holan ZR, Volesky B (1994) Biosorption of lead and nickel by biomass of marine algae. Biotechnol Bioeng 43:1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260431102
Holan ZR, Volesky B, Prasetyo I (1993) Biosorption of cadmium by biomass of marine algae. Biotechnol Bioeng 41:819–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260410808
Huang Y, Du JR, Zhang Y et al (2015) Removal of mercury (II) from wastewater by polyvinylamine-enhanced ultrafiltration. Sep Purif Technol 154:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.003
Kadukova J, Vircikova E (2005) Comparison of differences between copper bioaccumulation and biosorption. Environ Int 31:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.020
Knutsen SH, Myslabodski DE, Larsen B, Usov AI (1994) A modified system of nomenclature for red algal galactans. Bot Mar 37:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1515/botm.1994.37.2.163
Kumar YP, King P, Prasad VSRK (2006) Removal of copper from aqueous solution using Ulva fasciata sp.—a marine green algae. J Hazard Mater 137:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2006.02.010
Lagergren S (1898) Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gel Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelster stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens, Handlingar
Leverett D, Thain J (2013) ICES techniques in marine environmental sciences: oyster embryo-larval bioassay (revised)
Lopes CB, Otero M, Lin Z et al (2009) Removal of Hg2+ ions from aqueous solution by ETS-4 microporous titanosilicate--Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Chem Eng J 151:247–254
Lopes CB, Oliveira JR, Rocha LS et al (2014) Cork stoppers as an effective sorbent for water treatment: the removal of mercury at environmentally relevant concentrations and conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:2108–2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2104-0
Monteiro RJR, Lopes CB, Rocha LS et al (2016) Sustainable approach for recycling seafood wastes for the removal of priority hazardous substances (Hg and Cd) from water. J Environ Chem Eng 4:1199–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2016.01.021
Murphy V, Hughes H, McLoughlin P (2008) Comparative study of chromium biosorption by red, green and brown seaweed biomass. Chemosphere 70:1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.015
Murphy V, Hughes H, McLoughlin P (2009) Enhancement strategies for Cu(II), Cr(III) and Cr(VI) remediation by a variety of seaweed species. J Hazard Mater 166:318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.041
Nasfi FH (1995) Total mercury content of sea water on the Tunisian shore. Fresenius Environ Bull 4:161–168
Plazinski W, Rudzinski W, Plazinska A (2009) Theoretical models of sorption kinetics including a surface reaction mechanism: a review. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 152:2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIS.2009.07.009
Rangabhashiyam S, Suganya E, Lity AV, Selvaraju N (2016) Equilibrium and kinetics studies of hexavalent chromium biosorption on a novel green macroalgae Enteromorpha sp. Res Chem Intermed 42:1275–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-015-2085-3
Rocha L, Lopes C, Borges JA et al (2013) Valuation of unmodified rice husk waste as an eco-friendly sorbent to remove mercury: a study using environmental realistic concentrations. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1599-9
Rodrigues D, Freitas AC, Pereira L et al (2015) Chemical composition of red, brown and green macroalgae from Buarcos bay in Central West Coast of Portugal. Food Chem 183:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.057
Roginsky S, Zeldovich Y (1934) The catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide on manganese dioxide. Acta Phys Chem USSR 1:554
Shams Khoramabadi G, Jafari A, Hasanvand Jamshidi J (2008) Biosorption of mercury (II) from aqueous solutions by Zygnema fanicum Algae. J Appl Sci 8:2168–2172
Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry: chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. Wiley, Hoboken
Suganya T, Renganathan S (2012) Optimization and kinetic studies on algal oil extraction from marine macroalgae Ulva lactuca. Bioresour Technol 107:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.045
Sunderland EM, Krabbenhoft DP, Moreau JW et al (2009) Mercury sources, distribution, and bioavailability in the North Pacific Ocean: insights from data and models. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003425
Tavares DS, Lopes CB, Daniel-da-Silva AL et al (2016) Mercury in river, estuarine and seawaters – Is it possible to decrease realist environmental concentrations in order to achieve environmental quality standards? Water Res 106:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.031
Yavuz H, Denizli A, Gungunes H et al (2006) Biosorption of mercury on magnetically modified yeast cells. Sep Purif Technol 52:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.05.001
Zaib M, Athar MM, Saeed A et al (2016) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic biosorption studies of Hg(II) on red algal biomass of Porphyridium cruentum. Green Chem Lett Rev 9:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2016.1185166
Data and materials availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files) or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Funding
This work has been supported by the project Nº46998_N9ve-REE co-funded by Portugal 2020 program (PT2020), PO Centro, and European Structural and Investment Funds. E. Fabre acknowledges the financial support of CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico), Brazil. Bruno Henriques benefited from a Research contract (CEECIND/03511/2018) under the CEEC Individual 2018, funded by national funds (OE), through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. Thanks are also due to the financial support to CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials (UID/CTM/50011/2019) and to CESAM (UID/AMB/50017), by FCT/MEC through national funds, and the co-funding by the FEDER, within the PT2020 Partnership Agreement and Compete 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors’ contribution to the development of this work is described below:
Elaine Fabre: writing, experimental performing, and data analysis
Mariana Dias: experimental performing and data analysis
Bruno Henriques: scientific orientation, data analysis, and writing
Thainara Viana: experimental performing
Nicole Ferreira: experimental performing
José Soares: experimental performing
João Pinto: experimental performing
Carlos Vale: scientific orientation, data analysis, and writing
José M. P. Torres: data analysis and funding acquisition
Carlos M. Silva: scientific orientation, data analysis, funding acquisition, and writing
Eduarda Pereira: scientific orientation, data analysis, funding acquisition, and writing
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors acknowledge that the submitted manuscript was prepared as described in the Guide for Authors, it follows the Ethics in Publishing Policy, and it is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to the publication of the manuscript in Environmental and Science Pollution Research.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Vitor Manuel Oliveira Vasconcelos
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fabre, E., Dias, M., Henriques, B. et al. Bioaccumulation processes for mercury removal from saline waters by green, brown and red living marine macroalgae. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 30255–30266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12687-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12687-2