Skip to main content
Log in

Machine learning in empirical asset pricing

  • Published:
Financial Markets and Portfolio Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tremendous speedup in computing in recent years, the low data storage costs of today, the availability of “big data” as well as the broad range of free open-source software, have created a renaissance in the application of machine learning techniques in science. However, this new wave of research is not limited to computer science or software engineering anymore. Among others, machine learning tools are now used in financial problem settings as well. Therefore, this paper mentions a specific definition of machine learning in an asset pricing context and elaborates on the usefulness of machine learning in this context. Most importantly, the literature review gives the reader a theoretical overview of the most recent academic studies in empirical asset pricing that employ machine learning techniques. Overall, the paper concludes that machine learning can offer benefits for future research. However, researchers should be critical about these methodologies as machine learning has its pitfalls and is relatively new to asset pricing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The author refers the interested reader to Gu et al. (2018) who provide a detailed description of machine learning tools for empirical asset pricing. These explanations start from scratch and cover the statistical model specification as well as programming guidelines of different methods. Furthermore, Dey (2016) reviews and explains different machine learning algorithms in detail.

References

  • Amilon, H.: A neural network versus Black–Scholes: a comparison of pricing and heding performance. J. Forcast. 22, 317–335 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R., Harvey, C., Markowitz, H.: A backtesting protocol in the era of machine learning. Working paper, Duke University (2018)

  • Barr, J., Ellis, E., Kassab, A., Redfearn, C.: Home price index: a machine learning methodology. Int. J. Semant. Comput. 11, 111–133 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, D., Büchner, M., Tamoni, A.: Bond risk premia with machine learning. Working paper, Warwick Business School (2018)

  • Brogaard, J., Zareei, A.: Machine learning and the stock market. Working Paper, University of Utah (2018)

  • Butaru, F., Chen, Q., Clark, B., Das, S., Lo, A., Siddique, A.: Risk and risk management in the credit card industry. J. Bank. Finance 72, 218–239 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley, G., Talbot, N.: On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 2079–2107 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarazzo, V., Caggiani, L., Marinelli, M., Ottomanelli, M.: A neural network based model for real estate price estimation considering environmental quality of property location. Transp. Res. Procedia 3, 810–817 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culkin, R., Das, S.: Machine learning in finance: the case of deep learning for option pricing. Working Paper, Santa Clara University (2017)

  • Das, K., Behera, R.: A survey on machine learning: concept, algorithms and applications. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 5, 1301–1309 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dey, A.: Machine learning algorithms: a review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 7, 1174–1179 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., French, K.: Dissecting anomalies. J. Finance 63, 1653–1678 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, G., Giglio, S., Xiu, D.: Taming the factor zoo. Working Paper, City University of Hong Kong (2017)

  • Feng, G., He, J., Polson, N.: Deep learning for predicting asset returns. Working Paper, City University of Hong Kong (2018)

  • Freyberger, J., Neuhierl, A., Weber, M.: dissecting characteristics nonparametrically. Working paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2018)

  • Giglio, S., Xiu, D.: Inference on risk premia in the presence of omitted factors. Working Paper, Universtity of Chicago (2017)

  • Green, J., Hand, J., Zhang, X.: The supraview of return predictive signals. Rev. Account. Stud. 18, 692–730 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, S., Kelly, B., Xiu, D.: Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Working Paper, University of Chicago (2018)

  • Harvey, C., Liu, Y.: Lucky factors. Working Paper, Duke University (2016)

  • Harvey, C., Liu, Y., Zhu, H.:.and the cross-section of expected returns. Rev. Financ. Stud. 29, 5–68 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., Lo, A., Poggio, T.: A nonparametric approach to pricing and hedging derivative securities via learning networks. J. Finance 49, 851–889 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, T.: Computational power and the social impact of artificial intelligence. Working Paper, Cornell University (2018)

  • Keim, D., Stambaugh, F.: Predicting returns in the stock and bond market. J. Financ. Econ. 17, 357–90 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, B., Pruitt, S.: The three-pass regression filter: a new approach to forecasting using many predictors. J. Econom. 186, 294–316 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, B., Pruitt, S., Su, Y.: Some characteristics are risk exposures, and the rest are irrelevant. Working Paper, University of Chicago (2017)

  • Khandani, A., Kim, A., Lo, A.: Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms. J. Bank. Finance 34, 2767–2787 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koijen, R., Nieuwerburgh, S.V.: Predictability of returns and cash flows. Ann. Rev. Financ. Econ. 3, 467–491 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak, S., Nagel, S., Santosh, S.: Shrinking the cross section. Working Paper, University of Michigan (2018)

  • Kumar, M., and M. Thenmozhi. 2006. Forecasting Stock Index Movement: A Comparison of Support Machines and Random Forest. Working paper, Indian Institute of Technology

  • Lewellen, J.: The cross-section of expected stock returns. Crit. Finance Rev. 4, 1–44 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmer, M.: Deep learning and the cross-section of expected returns. Working Paper, Universtiy of St. Gallen (2017)

  • Moritz, B., Zimmermann, T.: Tree-based conditional portfolio sorts: the relation between past and future stock returns. Working Paper, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich (2016)

  • Mullainathan, S., Spiess, J.: Machine learning: an applied econometric approach. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 87–106 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, H., Timmermann, A.: Predictability of stock returns: robustness and economic significance. J. Finance 50, 1201–1228 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapack, D., Zhou, G.: Forecasting financial variables. Handb. Econ. Forecast. 2A, 327–383 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, A.: Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J. Res. Dev. 3, 535–554 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirignano, J., Sadhwani, A., Giesecke, K.: Deep learning for mortgage risk. Working Paper, University of Illinois (2018)

  • Torous, W., Valkanov, R.: Boundaries of predictability: noisy predictive regressions. Working Paper, University of California (2000)

  • Turing, A.: Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 49, 433–460 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, I., Goyal, A.: A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction. Rev. Financ. Stud. 21, 1455–1508 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, J., Li, Y., Tan, C.: Option price forecasting using neural networks. Omega 28, 455–466 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Prof. Dr. Manuel Ammann as well as Prof. Dr. Markus Schmid for their constructive and insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alois Weigand.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weigand, A. Machine learning in empirical asset pricing. Financ Mark Portf Manag 33, 93–104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-019-00326-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-019-00326-3

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation