Abstract
The article discusses the significance of the figure of Adam in the artistic philosophy of Acmeism (or Adamism). Particular attention is paid to the functioning of the image of biblical Adam in the works of Nikolay Gumilyov and Osip Mandelstam. Their texts present the first man not only as the epitome of the poet and bearer of an unclouded view of the world but also as a symbol of the balance between the earthly and the heavenly principles. For Gumilyov, Adam is also an example of manhood and fortitude. The poet creates an original Adamic myth re-evaluating the Fall as a test given to man by God. According to the plot of the myth, the purpose of human life is to seek and attain Paradise. Mandelstam turns to the image of Adam much less often encoding the ideas of Adamism by various means. The poet openly distances himself from the version of Adamism created by Sergey Gorodetsky sharing implicitly the ideas presented in the works of Gumilyov.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhmatova, A. (2001). Sobranie sochinenii, tom 5 [Collected works, v. 5]. In Sobranie sochinenii v 6 tomah, 1998–2005 [Collected works in 6 vols., 1998–2005]. Moskva: Ellis Lak.
Basker, M. (1985). Gumilyov’s “Akteon”: A forgotten manifesto of Acmeism. The Slavonic and East European Review, 63(4), 498–517.
Bely, A. (1909). Emblematika smysla. Predposylki k teorii simvolizma [The symbolism of meaning. Background to the theory of Symbolism]. In A. Bely, Simvolizm [Symbolism] (pp. 49–143, 483–506). Sankt-Peterburg: Musaget.
Berdyaev, N. A. (1989). Filosofia svobody. Smysl tvorchestva [The philosophy of freedom. The meaning of creativity]. Moskva: Pravda.
Brown, C. (1973). Mandelstam. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Chukovsky, K. (2014). Litsa i maski [Faces and masks]. In O. A. Lekmanov & A. A. Chaban (Eds.), Akmeizm v kritike, 1913–1917 [Acmeism in criticism, 1913–1917] (p. 363). Sankt-Peterburg: Izd. Timofeya Markova.
Desiatov, V. V. (2018). Akmeisticheskii khram. Fragmenty dialoga Nikolaia Gumileva i Osipa Mandel’shtama [The Acmeist temple. Fragments of the dialogue between Nikolai Gumilev and Osip Mandelstam]. Voprosy literatury, 3, 123–169.
Filatov, A. V. (2017). Aksiologicheskii podkhod k izucheniyu mifopoetiki: adamicheskii mif v lirike N. S. Gumileva [Axiological approach to the study of mythopoetics: the Adamic myth in N. S. Gumilev’s lyrics]. Novyi filologicheskii vestnik, 4, 141–149.
Filatov, A. V. (2019). Aksiologia prostranstva i vremeni v adamicheskom mife N.S. Gumileva [Axiology of space and time in the Adamic myth of N. S. Gumilev]. Solov’evskie issledovania, 3, 162–171.
Gasparov, M. L. (1995). Orpheus Faber: Trud i postoianstvo v poezii O. Mandel’shtama [Orpheus Faber: Work and constancy in O. Mandelstam’s poetry]. In M. L. Gasparov (Ed.), Izbrannye stat’i [Selected articles] (pp. 221–236). Moskva: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Gorodetsky, S. M. (1913). Nekotorye techenia v sovremennoi russkoi poezii [Some trends in modern Russian poetry]. Apollon, 1, 46–50.
Gorodetsky, S. (1915). Chetyrnadtsatyi god [The year 1914]. Petrograd: Lukomor’e.
Griakalova, N. Y. (1994). N. S. Gumilev i problemy esteticheskogo samoopredelenia akmeizma [N. S. Gumilev and problems of aesthetic self-determination of Acmeism]. In N. A. Groznova & M. D. El’zon (Eds.), Nikolay Gumilev Issledovania Materialy Bibliografia [Nikolay Gumilev Research Materials Bibliography] (pp. 103–123). Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.
Gumilyov, N. S. (1917). Ezbekiye [Ezbekieh] (Trans. Harrison, G. J.). Accessed February 29, 2020, from https://www.academia.edu/33660150/Nikolay_Gumilev_Ezbekieh_1917_Translated_by_Graham_Harrison.
Gumilyov, N. S. (1998–2007). Polnoe sobranie sochinenii v 10 tomah [Complete works in 10 vols]. Moskva: Voskresen’e. (Cited by volume and page number).
Jovanovich, M. (1992). Nikolay Gumilev i masonskoe uchenie [Nikolai Gumilev and Masonic teaching]. In I. G. Kravtsova, & M. D. El’zon (Eds.), N. Gumilev i Russkii Parnas. Materialy nauchnoj konferencii 17–19 sentyabrya 1991g. [N. Gumilev and the Russian Parnassus. Proceedings of the scientific conference September 17–19, 1991] (pp. 32–46). Sankt-Peterburg: Muzei Anny Akhmatovoi.
Kikhney, L. G., & Merkel’, E. V. (2013). Osip Mandel’shtam: filosofia slova i poeticheskaia semantika [Osip Mandelshtam: The philosophy of words and poetic semantics]. Moskva: FLINTA; Nauka.
Lekmanov, O. A. (2000). Kniga ob akmeizme i drugie raboty [The book about Acmeism and other works]. Tomsk: Vodolei.
Levinton, G. A. (1998). Gorod kak podtekst: Iz “real’nogo” kommentaria k Mandel’shtamu [The city as a subtext: From the “real” commentary on Mandelstam]. In T. M. Nikolaeva (Ed.), ΠΟΛΥΤΡΟΠΟΝ. K 70-letiyu Vladimira Nikolaevicha Toporova [ΠΟΛΥΤΡΟΠΟΝ. To the 70th anniversary of Vladimir Nikolaevich Toporov] (pp. 730–755). Moskva: Indrik.
Luknitskaia, V. (1990). Nikolay Gumilev: Zhizn’ poeta po materialam domashnego arkhiva sem’i Luknitskikh [Nikolay Gumilev: The life of a poet based on the materials of the Luknitsky family’s home archive]. Leningrad: Lenizdat.
Mandelstam, O. E. (1993–99). Sobranie sochinenii v 4 tomah [Collected works in 4 vols.]. Moskva: Art-Biznes Centr (Cited by volume and page number).
Piotrovsky, M. B. (1987). Adam [Adam]. In S. A. Tokarev (Ed.), Mify narodov mira v 2 tomah [Myths of the peoples of the world in 2 vols.] (Vol. 1, pp. 39–42). Moskva: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya.
Ronen, O. (2002). Poetika Osipa Mandel’shtama [The poetics of Osip Mandelshtam]. Sankt-Peterburg: Giperion.
Rusinko, E. (1988). Adamism and Acmeist primitivism. Slavic and East European Journal, 32(1), 84–97.
Takho-Godi, E. A. (Ed.). (2018a). Russkaia literatura i filosofia: Puti vzaimodeistvia, vypusk 1 [Series “Russian literature and philosophy: Ways of interaction”, issue 1]. Moskva: Vodolei.
Takho-Godi, E. A. (Ed.). (2018b). Literatura i religiozno-filosofskaia mysl’ kontsa XIX—pervoi treti XX veka. K 165-letiyu Vl. Solov’eva. Serya “Russkaia literatura i filosofia: Puti vzaimodeistvia”, vypusk 2 [Literature and religious-philosophical thought of the late 19th—first third of the 20th century. To the 165th anniversary of Vl. Solovyov. Series “Russian literature and philosophy: Ways of interaction”, issue 2]. Moskva: Vodolei.
Acknowledgements
The research was carried out at the A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IWL RAS) funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (RSF, Project No. 17-18-01432).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filatov, A.V. Philosophical foundations of Acmeism: Nikolay Gumilyov, Osip Mandelstam, and the figure of Adam. Stud East Eur Thought 72, 291–301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09362-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09362-6