Abstract
Peirce’s category of Firstness is first and fundamental. Without Firstness, we can say, nothing can (later) be – no time, no space, no things, no processes, no growth, no regularities, and no thoughts – hence, nothing of which we can ever conceive. However, despite the fundamentality of Peirce’s category of Firstness, we still do not believe that it has received the attention that it rightly deserves; not by Peirce himself, nor by his commentators. In the following we will, therefore, look at the category of Firstness and try to give a modest glimpse of its fundamentality in relation to four other of Peirce’s central concepts: namely, evolution, consciousness, icon, and, finally, abduction.
References
Anderson, Douglas R. 1987. Creativity and the philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Press.10.1007/978-94-015-7760-1Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Douglas R. 1995. Strands of system: The philosophy of Charles Peirce. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Boler, John F. 1963. Charles Peirce and scholastic realism. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar
Esposito, Joseph L. 1980. Evolutionary metaphysics. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hausman, Carl R. 1996. Charles S. Peirce’s evolutionary philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Johansen, Dines. 1993. Dialogic semiosis. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Martin. 2007. Peirce’s esthetics: A taste for signs in art. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43(2). 319–344.10.2979/TRA.2007.43.2.319Search in Google Scholar
Merrell, Floyd. 1997. Peirce, signs, and meanings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442678330Search in Google Scholar
Nubiola, Jaime. 2005. Abduction or the logic of surprise. Semiotica 153(1/4). 117–130.10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.117Search in Google Scholar
Orange, Donna. 2014. Is Peirce’s fallibilism an ethical attitude?. In Torkild Thellefsen & Bent Sørensen (eds.), Charles Sanders Peirce in his own words: 100 years of semiotics, communication, and cognition, 105–109. Boston/Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.10.1515/9781614516415.105Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 8. In Charles S. Peirce, Paul Weiss & Arthur W. Burks (eds.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1967. Manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as identified by Richard Robin, Annotated catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Reference to Peirce’s manuscripts will be designated MS or L.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1992. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), In Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1.].Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1997. In Patricia Turrisi (ed.), Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking: The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2(1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.].Search in Google Scholar
Paavola, Sami. 2005. Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference? Semiotica 153(1/4). 131–154.10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.131Search in Google Scholar
Paavola, Sami. 2011. Diagrams, iconicity, and abductive discovery. Semiotica 186(1/4). 297–314.10.1515/semi.2011.057Search in Google Scholar
Parker, Kelly A. 1998. The continuity of Peirce’s thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1959. Logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic.10.1063/1.3060577Search in Google Scholar
Potter, Vincent G. 1997. On norms and ideals. New York: Fordham University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2002. Peirce’s scientific metaphysics. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.10.2307/j.ctv17vf6dhSearch in Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Sandra B. 1972. Charles Peirce and the Firstness of process. In Andrew J. Reck (ed.), Knowledge and value, 39–50. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-2824-0_4Search in Google Scholar
Santaella-Braga, Lucia. 1996. From pure icon to metaphor: Six degrees of iconicity. In Vincent Colapietro & Thomas M. Olshewsky (eds.), Peirce’s doctrine of signs: Theory, applications, and connections, 205–214. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110873450.205Search in Google Scholar
Sheriff, John K. 1994. Charles S. Peirce’s guess at the riddle. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stearns, Isabel. 1952. Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness. In Philip P. Wiener & Frederic H. Young (eds.), Studies in the philosophy of Charles S. Peirce, 195–208. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674862906.c19Search in Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 1999. How to learn more: An apology for a strong concept of iconicity. In Troels D. Johansson, Martin Skov & Berit Brogaard (eds.), Iconicity: A fundamental problem in semiotics, 21–59. Århus: NSU Press.Search in Google Scholar
Turley, Peter. 1977. Peirce’s cosmology. New York: Philosophical Library.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
